THE SENTIENT WORLD BRAIN SIMULATION OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS ("The Facts", Page 2, Fact 6)

This...this is what your Governments, on all levels, want with AI and 5G folks.  This is a particularly creepy video, one I DON'T recommend without a barf bucket.  I watched this all the way through with my mouth open 90% of the time, and my wife just basically said "Oh HELL no" pretty much all the way through it.

The Marriage "License" ("The Facts", Page 1, Fact #2-3)

I have always suspected this...but I never saw it in black and white, and thought...well, maybe I'm wrong.  Twould seem that, once again...I am not.

I would like to copy off something that was sent to me by someone that I have come to greatly respect, more than most I have had come across of late.  Thank you, my friend, for setting me "STRAIGHT."  Thank you for proving what I've always suspected, the true reason that CPS and the State always seem to come out the winner, and can do whatever they like, to whomever they like, whenever they want to..

I give you the reprint of this submission of Anonymous, from Arizona.  The truth, indeed, shall set you free.  I've always said, that there is something wrong about the State involving themselves in our business when it comes to marriage.  Now, I have reason to believe it, and live by that statement, and, of course disseminate it, so that America can see, truly, that the United States is indeed a business, and that all you are, and all you produce as a mini-business, belongs to none other.  It most certainly does not belong to you, INCLUDING your children...and neither do you.

**********************************************************************************************************

Enlightening Conversation with a

Marriage License Bureau

[Author Unknown]

About 20 years ago, my former wife, filed for divorce. We had seven (7) children: five (5) daughters and two (2) sons. Our youngest at the time, our second son, was five years old.

At the time, I prepared a counterclaim to the Petition for Dissolution her attorney filed in Domestic Relations (DR) court. I met one afternoon with the head of the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage License Bureau, in downtown Phoenix.

The marriage license bureau was headed by a young woman of about age 25. I asked her to explain to me the general and statutory implications of the marriage license. She was very cooperative, and called in an Assistant, a tall Black man who at the time was working on an Operations Manual for
internal departmental use.

She deferred for most technical explanations to her Assistant. He walked through the technicalities of the marriage license as it operates in Arizona. He mentioned that marriage licensing is pretty much the same in the other states -- but there are differences.

One significant difference he mentioned was that Arizona is one of eight western states that are Community Property states. The other states are Common Law States, including Utah, with the exception of Louisiana which is a Napoleonic Code State.

He then explained some of the technicalities of the marriage license. He said, first of all, the marriage license is Secular Contract between the parties and the State. The State is the principal party in that Secular Contract. The husband and wife are secondary or inferior parties. The Secular Contract is a three-way contract between the State, as Principal, and the husband and wife as the other two legs of the Contract.

He said, in the traditional sense a marriage is a covenant between the husband and wife and God. But in the Secular Contract with the state, reference to God is a dotted line, and NOT officially considered included in the Secular Contract at all.

He said, if the husband and wife wish to include God as a party in their marriage, that is a "dotted line" they will have to add in their own minds.  The state's marriage license is "strictly secular," he said. He said further, that what he meant by the relationship to God being a "dotted line" meant that the State regards any mention of God as irrelevant, even meaningless. In his description of the marriage license contract, the related one other "dotted line."

He said in the traditional religious context, marriage was a covenant between the husband and wife and God with husband and wife joined as one. (This is accomplished with a recording in a family bible, with three witnesses.)

This is not the case in the secular realm of the state's marriage license contract. The State is the Principal or dominant party. The husband and wife are merely contractually "joined" as business partners, not in any religious union. They may even be considered, he said, connected to each
other by another "dotted line."

The picture he was trying to "paint" was that of a triangle with the State at the top and a solid line extending from the apex, the State, down the left side to the husband, and a separate solid line extending down the right side to the wife, a "dotted line" merely showing that they consider themselves to have entered into a religious union of some sort that is irrelevant to the State.

Marriage License Secular Contract Diagram STATE (primary party)
HUSBAND WIFE . (secondary party)
(secondary party) . GOD

He further mentioned that this "religious overtone" is recognized by the State by requiring that the marriage must be solemnized either by a state official or by a minister of religion that has been "deputized" by the State to perform the marriage ceremony and make a return of the signed and
executed marriage license to the State.

Again, he emphasized that marriage is a strictly secular relationship so far as the State is concerned and because it is looked upon as a "privileged business enterprise" various tax advantages and other political privileges have become attached to the marriage license contract that have nothing at
all to do with marriage as a religious covenant or bond between God and a man and a woman.

By way of reference, if you would like to read a legal treatise on marriage, one of the best is "Principles of Community Property," by William Defuniak  At the outset, he explains that Community Property law descends from Roman Civil Law through the Spanish Codes, 600 A.D., written by the Spanish juris consults.

In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a for-profit venture or profit-making venture (even though it may never actually produce a profit in operation) and as the wife goes out to the local market to purchase food stuffs and other supplies for the marriage household, she is replenishing
the stocks of the business.

To restate: In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a business venture, that is, a for-profit business venture. Moreover, as children come into the marriage household, the business venture is considered to have "borne fruit."

Now, back to the explanation by the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage Bureau's administrative Assistant. He went on to explain that every contract must have consideration. The State offers consideration in the form of the actual license itself - the piece of paper, the Certificate of
Marriage. The other part of consideration by the State is "the privilege to be regulated by statute."

He added that this privilege to be regulated by statute includes all related statutes, and all court cases as they are ruled on by the courts, and all statutes and regulations into the future in the years following the commencement of the marriage. He said in a way the marriage license contract is a dynamic or flexible, ever-changing contract as time goes along - even though the husband and wife didn't realize that.

My thought on this is can it really be considered a true contract as one becomes aware of the failure by the State to make full disclosure of the terms and conditions. (But remember in court, [presumption and assumptions], so must be repudiated in all aspects or you give over jurisdiction.)

A contract must be entered into knowingly, intelligently, intentionally, and with fully informed consent. Otherwise, technically there is no contract.  Another way to look as the marriage license contract with the State is as a contract of adhesion, a contract between two disparate, unequal parties.
Again, a flawed "contract." Such a contract with the State is said to be a "specific performance" contract as to the privileges, duties and responsibilities that attach.

Consideration on the part of the husband and wife is the actual fee paid and the implied agreement to be subject to the state's statutes, rules, and regulations and all court cases ruled on related to marriage law, family law, children, and property.

He emphasized that this contractual consideration by the bride and groom places them in a definite and defined-by-law position inferior and subject to the State. He commented that very few people realize this.

He also said that it is very important to understand that children born to the marriage are considered by law as "the contract bearing fruit" - meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the law never comes out and says so in so many words.

In this regard, children born to the contract regarded as "the contract bearing fruit," he said it is vitally important for parents to understand two doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s.  The first is the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. The second is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.

Parens Patriae means literally "the parent of the country" or to state it more bluntly - the State is the undisclosed true parent. Along this line, a 1930's Arizona Supreme Court case states that parents have no property right in their children, and have custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State.

This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their children as long as they don't offend the State, but if they in some manner displease the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take custody and control of its children - the parents are only conditional caretakers. [Thus the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.]  He also added a few more technical details. The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the State. Technically, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife, in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract mortgages and debts. They can get car loans, home mortgages, and installment debts in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for- profit business enterprise. The marriage contract acquires property through out its existence and over time, it is hoped, increases in value. (This goes to legal term limited conditional title or lease. The right to make a profit or to in-cure a loss)  Also, the marriage contract "bears fruit" by adding children. If sometime later, the marriage fails, and a "divorce" results the contract continues in existence.

The "divorce" is merely a contractual dissolution or amendment of the terms and conditions of the contract. Jurisdiction of the State over the marriage, over the husband and wife, now separated, continues and continues over all aspects of the marriage, over marital property and over children brought into the marriage. (Spousal support, child support, visitation, education, health care, etc...State has a say forever!)

That is why family law and the Domestic Relations court calls "divorce" a dissolution of the marriage because the contract continues in operation but in amended or modified form. He also pointed out that the marriage license contract is one of the strongest, most binding contractual relationships the State has on people.

At the end of our hour-long meeting, I somewhat humorously asked if other people had come in and asked the questions I was asking?

The Assistant replied that in the several years he had worked there, he was not aware of anyone else asking these questions. He added that he was very glad to see someone interested in the legal implications of the marriage license and the contractual relationship it creates with the State. His boss, the young woman Marriage Bureau department head stated. "You have to understand that people who come in here to get a marriage license are in heat. The last thing they want to know is technical, legal, and statutory implications of the marriage license."

I hope this is helpful information to anyone interested in getting more familiar with the contractual implications of the marriage license. The marriage license, as we know it, didn't come into existence until after the Civil War and didn't become standard practice in all the States until after 1900, becoming firmly established by 1920. In effect, the States or governments appropriated or usurped control of marriages in secular form and in the process declared Common Law applicable to marriages "abrogated."

How To Spot A Sovereign Citizen ("The Facts, Page 2, Fact #5)

This, my friends, is a very....very important video.

See, we SOVEREIGNS (everyone in the United States that isn't a U.S. Citizen, as defined by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, every indigenous person that has not accepted government benefits, and every person that lived in our country before 1864;) are a serious threat to the current order....

Now, the point of THIS video, is that the police do, in fact, believe themselves to be above the law that they enforce.  What it does NOT say (but what I do), is that, NOT ONLY THE POLICE; but every....single....judge, elected official, Mayor, Senator, Representative...every single elected official on every level of government in alleged "Authority" over us believes THEMSELVES to be sovereign...because every one of them believes they are above the law, and that the law that applies to US does NOT apply to them; which if you look up the definition of sovereign, that's exactly what they are saying.  Judges, for instance, enjoy sovereign immunity; but even though they don't call it that, every OTHER official ALSO enjoys sovereign immunity.  Don't believe me?  Try and sue any one.  You won't believe the immunity ALL of these people enjoy.

What you're also going to see in this video is a cut and continued segment that demonizes any of US that believe that WE are sovereign...which we ALL ARE.  Most of us have had this trained out of us.  We aren't aware of our sovereignty anymore.  That's because Government claimed this sovereignty for itself, and doesn't want us having it.  Believe this folks...and if you still don't believe this, just listen to this guy, the police chief...who I guarantee believes HIMSELF to be part of this sovereignty scam, and has enough immunity to protect him for life.

Sometimes you just have to watch what people say and how they say it to realize the real truth, right?  :D

"Foggy" Declares War, Part II ("The Facts," All Pages, All Facts)

One I have absolutely NO intent to participate in, sans this final post.

NOTE TO THE GENERAL POPULACE:  This article, nor the one directly below it, has a lick o' slander or libel included....unlike the Fogbow community, which literally eats and shits out the stuff.

Just so you can see how sinfully old, ugly and deluded this freak of liberal nature is, please go here.  This video was edited moments after its issue, because it actively threatened me with violence....he then edited it quickly after threatening to call the police, to make it look more like a joke:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZJdC0PReI4&t=29s

*****************************************************************************************************

You know, sometimes, when you wish to start a war properly?  You have to know what buttons to push.

Let's start with this monster button riiiiiiiiiiight over here....

I'M AN ARMY VETERAN, "FOGGY"  I was an MP...'magine that.

There....that oughta pretty much do the trick.

If not, I certainly have more.

First off, the initial article was recently amended.  I think it'll do nicely m'self.  In case you're lost easily, Froggy....which I'm sure you are, daily, here's the link to the first article I wrote about you, so you can find your way.

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2019/09/foggy-fogbow-dilapidated-moron.html

The content has changed to protect the innocent....and point wildly at the real terrorists.

And yet, if THAT'S not enough...there is SURELY more...

See, unbeknownst to Senor Fogbreath, we recently made contact with the writer of the article linked to in the first post, just below (that's UNDER THIS ONE for those morons in the Fogbow community who understand nary a lick of English.)  He came back with some rather interesting stuff for me.  I want to take a moment to personally THANK Commander WILLIAM FITZPATRICK for reporting this group and it's bag o' bones traitor leader to THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY...which I regret to inform his Fogness, is NOT run by the criminal BARACK OBAMA and his Nazi Generals anymore....so things may not fare too well for the Fog and his band of terrorists, in the long run.  We'll begin with this little ditty:

https://thejaghunter.wordpress.com/2019/09/18/navy-veteran-files-complaint-against-seditionist-fogbow-group-with-sheriff-gets-moved-to-homeland-security/

Then, as we moseyed around the ol' Fitzgerald bunkhouse, we came across this little number:

For you conservatives that are probably feeling pretty damned sick to your stomachs about now, please, note that this letter not only mentions his real name and his state of origin, but his ACTUAL ADDRESS!  BONUS!!!
I'll give ANYONE $100 cash with pictures to prove that you physically tortured any or all of this man!

Now, to properly put into perspective how insane, demented and delusional this moronic mumbler really is (as if you weren't convinced enough ALREADY;) we need a couple of screen shots.  Remember, that before the posting of my last article?  I had no idea this POS was even still stuck on me.  I say...it must be love.  From what I hear, I am hardly his first TI....this guy is a REAL PRO!!

I'm bettin' he was real upset to see Obama the criminal put out, and doubly upset his criminal replacement, Hilary, didn't make it into the oval office...or we'd ALL be dead already.

Annnnnyhoo....I promised you screen shots....so bring on the Shotz....lol

Now this first screen shot is to show you the length this man will go to destroy a single person in 323M people....but please remember, this is hardly the EXTENT of how far he'll go.  There are 64 pages of post results in what...4 YEARS?  I cannot believe this man has nothing better to do with his 12 remaining days of life....seriously.

Now this is just what he's written since my arrest, on 6/6/19.  This is 4....yes, that's 4 pages worth of....what, we don't really know.  At 25% view, I couldn't even get half a page in the window of a 17" screen.

You know what?  This is a big waste of my valuable space; and my incredibly limited time.  You wanna see more?  Just drop "Fogbow Forum Christopher Bruce" into a search box, and click on any of the first few links.  Save me some trouble, thanks.

One thing you'll notice almost immediately is that no one word of mine is sacred, no minute of my life left untouched.  Me?  A Stalker?  I think we've found the REAL stalkers, right here.  They're called GANGSTALKERS, CYBER BULLIES...Psychopaths...Mental cases....you name it.

Whatever it is they're called?  I'm hardly eskeered.  One fact the Foggy-doggy doesn't know is that I strutted right into the FBI Headquarters in D.C. and caused quite a fuss with hardly a single click o' the manacles. Mueller (Mueller?  Mueller?) the criminal head of the FBI and his gang of jack-booted thugaroos put on their pants just like every other human on the planet; and what's more?  Couldn't pin a crime on a ginormous donkey, un-blindfolded.  You know what also occurred to me?  All of those FBI years of going through my computer and my email from 2015 til just a couple months ago (yes Fuggy, they FINALLY STOPPED!  Time to call in sommore favors, eh?), from RI all the way to Hawaii?  Was probably at the behest of this criminal.  Sad to say, however....NARY A SINGLE AGENT HAS EVER....EVER...been to my door.  They KNOW betta.  Poor wittle Fogdog.  Just can't catch a break, canya?

Another thing you'll probably notice is that he has better access to my state and federal court cases than I do.  More so, it's pretty obvious that there is a list duck-taped down right next to his computer with a number of names that he must search for on a daily basis to make sure he doesn't miss a single thing.  For Christ's sake, every day something came up in my life, there was a post on it on snoop Foggy's blog; and 2 days ago was the first notice I took of that.  What a pile of absolute LOSERS.  I'm betting not a single one of these people has a mother, a girlfriend or a wife, because they would be spanking these sad excuses for humans daily to whip them into find something better to do with their days, surely.  64 pages of results.  1585 posts...just about li'l ol' me.  It's really good to know that I actually DO affect people's lives.  I think I should almost THANK the guy for helping me get more views on my blog.  Oh, and remember....every time one of your misfits clicks on one of my stories about you?  It goes up on the Top 10 most read post's list...and the higher it goes on that list, the more it gets read  ;).  Of course, it being the FEATURE article will help keep it there....forever...and ever...and ever.

Now, let's just move on over here for a minute.  I got a couple more real pretty buttons that just popped up, and they are just BEGGING to be pushed, and I don't wanna be sparing of nary a one.

First of all, Foggy is a guy who needs what little of his brain he might have left removed for the safety of all living things, and have the space between his ears filled with scalding hot pudding.  His mother?  Really should have swallowed him instead.

For one, Fog-turd community...there is no way on God's earth that a sensible jury would EVER find me guilty in this case.  I could beat this one, hands tied behind my back, from 100 yards outside the courtroom, with my eyes crossed and a huge band-aid across my lips.  Hate to tell you Foghorn, but I'm going to see you go to prison (or at the end of a hangman's noose) long before you see the end of me.  Get that across your liberal-assed thingy you call a brain, something you wouldn't recognize if it jumped out and said WOBGOF.  See ya asshole....oh, and one more thing:

Are my wittle feelings hurt by what you've said about me for 4....long....years without me noticing?  How very pretentious of you to even believe you have any kind of affect on my life....whatsoever.  Buh-Buy Froglegs.  Nice to see you again.  Oravoire.  Don't let the noose get caught in yer butt-crack on the way down on the rope.  I'll be the very first to dance on your grave...probably in around a week or so.   I wanna know about the drugs you've been takin', because they do well in preserving wrinkled up 200 yr. olds, obviously.   Too bad you won't be around in 4 more years to report on what I'm doing.  There's no way you'll make it another 4 years.  Bernie Sanders has a better chance of living out a year in the White House than you do for another month.  It amazes me what a little embalming fluid behind the ears does for a guy.  And should you believe that's my best list of insults?  Think again.  Those insults are the ones I just reserve for the slugs in my life; or for moldy, crusty pieces of toast....of which categories you fit in nicely, on both counts.

God that was liberating...and Hell, a whole lotta fun too!  Til' we meet again, y'all.  :D