The Punisher Part II

http://images2.layoutsparks.com/1/84922/the-punisher-1-skull.jpg

Well kids...The days of DHS are just about done and gone.  The last straw has been thrown, the camel's back, broken.  For those members of DHS still reading, as soon as the appeal to this assessment is over and we win in it (and we WILL WIN), well, let's just say that a lot will be changing, and a lot more people will be paying attention.  And since the case will be closed, (our records at DHS of course, will be gotten PRIOR to that) and all that you have done will finally be out in the open for all to view.  The confidentiality will be gone (and every document of the court during this case, every recording of  EVERYONE will be posted and shared continuously online) your immunity irrelevant.  I know you folks forget this often, but Federal trumps State every time.  You'll be using that has your department's motto soon enough.


Now that nothing matters anymore, I will remember to ask for the safety and risk documents; from what I understand, those will be useful in subsequent actions.  You folks might all be immune to prosecution for taking our daughter, but there are further actions concerning related issues I most certainly CAN sue for, and some of those could be quite damaging, and may just go on...and on...and on....eventually, you'll all pay...one way or another.

I will spend each and every spare moment for the rest of my time in this crummy state picketing your pet drug facility in order to have it closed, as well as begin starting my bid for the position as Iowa's new Governor.  All involved with this, of course, are advised to retire early, when I win.  I will drag this and all future appeals out to the largest stretch, and all witnesses will be served in accordance this time:  No more quashing subpoenas this time Mr. Daily Maize, you and the judge's misdeeds are most certainly going to be there for the record this time.

Judge Price, please, if you will your Honor, be ready.  Appeals for those motions to suppress, as well as a minimum of one motion a day will be filed with the court til the day you can no longer postpone the final gavel on the permanancy of our daughter...and then that one will also be appealed as far as it can go, as well...that's if the recusal or the writ doesn't get you first.

And count on me taking that blog supression on a wild ride all the way to the United States  Supreme Court.

Also on the menu wil be the promised side motion to reveal, at last, your "just cause" reasons for signing the removal order, as well as the bias writ of H.C. that will all be done PRIOR to permanancy, as well as a few other aces I have up my sleeve that you don't know of.  Never let it be said that I am an unfair headhunter...I'm giving my prey the option to run àhead before I cross the starting line.  The war has indeed only just begun.

OMG....what's wrong with me?  I very nearly forgot to tell you what this was all about...see, I opted to finally quit butting my head against the wall and start playing along...you know, for my wife's sake.  It didn't last long.  About 24 hours or so.

First, they started right in with the same old song, and offered us just one visit a week...and with Ashley Andrews again, no less, after she lied on her reports as well as on the stand...But I bit my tongue...and whaddya know, insult to injury, they wanted me to do a drug test, while I'm at the courthouse, no less...but hey, it was a urine test...so I gritted my teeth and agreed.

Yet, on a hunch, and just for the fun of it, I told the goon taking the test about the first one, and as I  described the place, he heard it out to his own personal boiling point, then stated that he went there all the time...and that it was and had never been like I described it.

I then had what I suspected...that, because of what I had said in my blog after the hair test, they had changed it to be more presentable, I was sure. When I went there again, I whistled.  Different indeed.  The changes implemented in just that short 4 month period of time, was nothing short of miraculous...mostly because the only people I'd ever seen pull rabbits out of their asses like that, were none other than those of DHS.  Needless to say, I also, then, proceeded to  peg this guy as being no more legitimate than the first batch of testers.

I gotta say, my people skills have really paid of at times, and this time was no exception.

So I tried something else for fun, I told the guy I was gonna come up dirty.  He didnt relay the results...and because of that, I fished the cup out of the garbage after he left.  It was, of course, clean.

After that, I went and got my wife so that she could take hers too, and before I got there, I called to tell Katie I had tested clean.

Imagine that, we had to go to...THE SAME DRUG TESTING PLACE, where we had our hair test done.  I told Liz to not do the test without a witness, and to record what happened.

As she went in, I got an expected call from none other than Ms. Gosch, telling me
I had, once again tested dirty for meth...I couldn't believe they tried to do it again!  Then Liz came out to inform me that they had refused her a witness, like I thought they would...and I had just about had enough.  I told her to grab her stuff, we were leaving.  Why I had ever expected anything from this (let alone this late in the game) after all they had already pulled is far above my understanding.  I KNEW better, and I did it anyway.  And what, you might ask would benefit them from doing this a 2nd time??  It's fairly obvious, my friends....to INSURE, FINALLY, that this author (not Liz, she was a good candidate for hoop jumping in and of herself) would be made an example of.  Permanacy would be found elsewhere, more than likely with her current foster family, or, as I predicted, she'll be the poster child for next year's DHS adoption drive.

Oh, and there's one more thing I should mention as well, see, Liz had been handed another cup identical to the one I had fished out of the garbage...and had walked out with it.  Now, you need to believe me when I say that there was NO doubt in Liz's mind that I was clean...but for the further move of "beyond reproach", I used that 2nd cup to prove these people bogus beyond all unreasonable doubts.  Would that I had done this (or had thought to do this) in front of a variety of people that the court might have been deemed CREDIBLE witnesses...but this instead served as a much deserved dual purpose.  First to prove to my wife once and for all that the purpose of this test was always meant to keep us and our baby in the system for the whole enchilada...and they managed it.  2nd, to prove to myself once and for all that I WASN'T CRAZY AFTER ALL...the World and everone in it really WAS out to get me.

I used the 2nd cup, and peed in it again...and Liz and I watched it for the required 3 minutes together, while NOTHING happened.  No result...at all...clean or dirty.  And then it hit me.  They didn't falsify this result...the cup did nothing at all, and the results from this inactive cup could, thereby, be whatever they wished it to be.  'Magine that.

The most fun we deserve to experience in the upcoming weeks, after all of this, is on its way.  May your experience in your role as " The Audience" be as memorable and enjoyable as ours.  Remember too what a damn sore loser I can be.  Too bad I wont be losing  :D

The Punisher, Part I

http://images2.layoutsparks.com/1/84922/the-punisher-1-skull.jpg

Ohhhh...so the judge is a game player.  And here I thlought he was just an asshole!  It's O.K., I like games!!  I say, let the games BEGIN!!!

Bravo!! (Idiots....)

https://donewithaa.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/dunce21.jpg

I love the way these guys poke me, then stand back 20 ft. to see what I'll do next...

I just gotta say it America....how this idiot ever became Judge is beyond me.  Oh, and Bill?  You're losing sucker.  Every little smirk you smile, every bit of condescendence you spit down your chin at us, just brings your job closer to its end.  Enjoy your little walks on the West side of the courthouse, looking over your shoulder the whole way....it won't be long now, and you'll be a memory in the court system, a washout...a HAS BEEN....that's the kinda life for me...scared to walk down the street...lol.  I saw your little ass walking up 6th Street 'round 11...it's a wonder you make it to the end of the block, for real.  Dirt like you isn't even worth shakin' off my shoes.

As I said, America, this circus ends soon...as do the careers of all involved.  This still stands.  Kevin?  You're cool.  Paul?  Super Cool.  You're still idiots, but you're cool.  You're on the wrong side there, Kevin.  Get with the program son...the only thing prosecuters can brag about to their friends is what psychopath is threatenin' you THIS week.

Oh, and to my special new friend Stephanie Rhinehart....you and the folks at DHS are worthy of my very special attention....your whole DEPARTMENT will soon be a memory, the way it stands now anyway.

So...

I've just a thing or two left to say
Go ahead William A. Price.  Give it your stupidest moves....you're history, and you know it, it's just a matter of time now.  Once this case is over, you will lose on so many levels you won't know what elevator to take to avoid it.

This moron thinks he pulled the first goody on me by (childishly) scheduling our hearing...at 11:30.  He asks me a question, knowing full well this is the sort of thing I'm waiting to answer...and at 12:01 like a 7 yr. old who leans over to check out your card hand, he says LUNCH....right in the middle of my sentence, like that's gonna hurt my wittle feewings....what a DICK!  Better yet, he continues this hearing...for another week!  I don't think I've played that way since I was somewhere around 8 yrs. old...lol.  Just goes to show you the moral fibre and lack of intelligence and originality at which our current elected officials, these conveyers (supposedly) of law and order are made of....DOESN'T IT?  TIME FOR A REVAMP!!

The part I loved the most today tho?  Anybody who might be afraid of this idiot?  He thinks he played a good one on me by dismissing the Snake Daily Maize FIRST, THEN denying my motion to change his motion for the permanent record to show my reasons as the right reasons the snake wanted out.....ONLY ONE PROBLEM, IDIOT....it's on the record that you asked me what the reason was that I wanted him gone, and THAT YOU DENIED THE CHANGE TO CORRECT IT....Because now that you've relieved that attorney you don't feel it's an issue any longer...BUT YOU ASKED ME WHY I WANTED IT CHANGED, THEREBY PUTTING IT ON THE RECORD AS NOT CORRECT...THEREBY PROVING MY POINT, THAT YOU'RE THE ONE WHO ORDERED HIM TO FILE THE AFFIDAVIT!!  Bravo!  You lose....lol.

Look guys...I'm just not really into the games anymore, and I definately am not fond of playing with children, or those of lesser intelligence....so I'll tellya what.  It's on file, and it's in the record right where I wanted it.  So here's how the game is played now, ya snobby yups.  My house, my blog, my rules....k?  Aww, don't cry...get over it.

We won't be attending your little kangaroo court hearings any more either.  DHS, you lost ages ago.  See, both of you are about to figure out just how dumb and ignorant and small I really am.  Oh, we're going to the assessment appeal, and we're gonna win.  But Judge William Price?  Call yer little buddy attorneys and tell 'em to take the day off...cause we ain't gonna be attending your little circusses any more.  Terminate, PLEASE....I DARE you....then put your peabrains between your knees and tremble, because your  rule?  Is just about over.  So sayeth the Mighty Sword.

P.S. - You like playin' dirty?  I can play dirty....hehe...

The Whole Enchilada

http://foodimentary.com/tag/national-enchilada-day/

Hey kids!  Thought I up and died din'tcha?  Sorry to disappoint.

It's time now to say goodbye to all things DHS.  This month, whether I win or not, whether I accomplish anything at this time or not, signals the end of this horror...one way or t'other.  If I don't win this war...well, you can best bet I'll win some other ones once the case is closed.  See, the courts pretty much have it made where this sorta thing is concerned...nobody has the ability to look into anything that matters at all, and no one can really do anything either; until your case is closed, your rights terminated, your child gone...leastways not in the conventional sense.  Good thing I'm pretty unconventional.

I'm going to forego the standard invitation-style method and just handle it this-a-way.  The tried and true method.

December 11th, a mere 3 days from now, signals a primary battle; one that wasn't on the original schedule.  If there was any doubt at all to my innocence, where anyone in this court is concerned, there shouldn't be any left.  I have, quite easily, told my side of this story to its nth degree in quite a few statements to this court, all myths have been laid bare, all facts found, exposed for their obvious flaws.  I have been careful to take note of all things done and said wrong...everything is in its place or filed with the court in this case, ready to roll; and will be used a-plenty once the case is closed and our child gone...if it goes that route...which I don't plan to let it.  For those of you interested, this battle takes place at 11:30.  As usual, anyone interested in attending is invited to meet up with me a half hour before on the courthouse steps at 11.  I'll be the guy in the shirt and tie and this crazy looking face:

This will be one for the history books, of this you can be sure.  Maybe this judge cowed me once, but there shall be no repeat of that, count on it.  I'm more than ready for this room now.  Let 'em bring in whatever D.A. Hammer they like, but there will be no backing down, no fear in this defendant's eyes.  This baby is overdue to be returned, and the travesty that had her removed exposed for the wrong it was.  If she isn't, I of course will NOT be giving up there.  This matter will, without question, be appealed, along with a few surprises I plan to implement, should things go other directions.

Soon to follow will be the appeal to our original assessment.  For those of you who haven't been fortunate enough to view this little fairy tale, full of lies and untruths, please see "Going for the B***S, Part II, found here:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/09/going-for-bs-part-ii.html

This one will easily be one for the books as well, and will include a list of hostile witnesses the likes of which have yet to be seen in such a case, and will be the end of Ms. Emily Nieman's career...when I get finished with her, she'll be flippin' burgers and rememberin' the good ol' days, when she could do whatever she wanted to and get away with it.  My favorite part though, will be the 18 minutes of taped conversation that I plan to make this court listen to, between her and my wife, where it's quite clear of her intention to deceive...both my wife and the courts.  I always thought I'd love to see her face while I played this for a court somewhere, and this one is most assuredly no exception.  I'm betting this is going to be one f***-up DHS isn't gonna stand for, allowing herself to be recorded while she callously put this mother under duress to sign the baby away.  Til then, Ms. Nieman...I can't wait, for sure, for sure.  You're about to be shredded meat when I get done with you, count on it.  This will more than make up for your lies on the stand at our removal hearing...and I plan to push for a perjury charge on that, once we get our daughter back and I can focus on you and all the Hell you've put our family through.  Our revenge on you will most certainly be the sweetest.

So....here's the deal my friends.  All of this 5 months, and the hell we've been through is about to be over..one way or the other.  One thing I have noticed about this UPCOMING hearing, on the 11th, is that the prosecution has been very quiet....and not filed a single thing.  I will also, I'm sure, since he'll be required to be there (being that he has yet to be relieved as my wife's attorney) enjoy looking the snake Daily Maize right in the eyes as I tell him about the letter I've just sent to the attorney disciplinary board, asking for his disbarment.  I'll be sending an additional copy of that letter to his hiring firm, and we'll see how they like it.  I'm not finished with Mr. Mays by a long shot.  I strongly suggest that he find another state to practice in, because I plan to deprive him of the rest of his days in the sun, where his career as an attorney is concerned.

After I get a recorded DVD copy of every hearing that's taken place up to this point, the fight to gather the heads of all involved will continue, even if our daughter is lost.  Every recorded copy of these proceedings, along with every recording of ALL interactions with ALL the parties involved, as well as every court document will be packaged up and shipped to every available person in charge of all of these parties, and the people in charge of those people...and to quote a commercial popular in the 80's concerning the AIDS virus...and so on, and so on, and so on"...and every available avenue to bring charges against all involved will be taken.  No one will be safe from my persistance.  And if the Governor, who I hear is quite on the side of DHS and does nothing to stop them won't bend, well then I guess my campaign to relieve him of duty will be implemented, immediately.  These portions of Iowa Code, as well as the immunity they provide will be changed, or I guess I'll just have to run for Governor (and win) FIRST, BEFORE I run for the prize position in 2020, so I can change them myself.  To anyone who would doubt my resolve to right the wrongs done to Iowa citizens daily?  Try me baby.  I'm sure I can find more than enough people that wouldn't mind getting a better option than "The Moustache".

So you see, America, the fight for your rights to be returned to you, as well as the Government that has totally lost it and run amuck, has begun.  To quote a line given by the more recent news addition who calls themselves "Infowars", "The answer to 1984 is 1776."  The Revolution has begun.

Going for the B***S, Part VIII - Suppression of Court Evidence

Here, we will show two suppression motions, to be efiled immediately.  Please, if you will, take note of it, all the while taking further note to observe the smug look of an over-confident and giddy defendant...:D

MOTION TO SUPPRESS:

1.  COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce:  In his motion to suppress, as evidence presented throughout this case, proceeding and open; in first, the removal hearing, held July 29th, 2014, second, the adjudication hearing, held September 12th, 2014, and, in the order and petition; causing the legal removal of the designated child in these proceedings, Trilynn Brueggeman, as legal reasons that have been presented as evidence in this case, also given to have this child removed, legally; I now state, in defiance of the use of this blog as evidence and reported evidence; against these defendants; as unconstitutional; for the court’s records, I now give these reasons:

2.  Because this blog; an editorial piece, presented by this author, Christopher Bruce, as such, and also as his given opinion; concerning any subject, up to and including this case, its facts, as well as his wont to declare his decided opinion concerning all entities involved; is intended to be only a way for this author in which to candidly present, to his audience, feelings and fleeting thoughts concerning whichever subject he should be considering on any given day at any particular time.  These time frames may only take up as many seconds as it takes for a thought to be processed; and should not be framed otherwise by anyone else, who is not the author; who might choose to peruse this blog; as a set time frame for factual statements or to be used in an evidentiary manner.  Hereby, it is the finding of this defendant and author:  that any idea, opinion or thought; expressed in the body of any of these stated editorials, as they are presented; should never be able to be legally brought against any person, who might also be involved in this case; in a legal manner, up to and including the author; or be used as evidence against this or any defendant.

3.  Regardless of this court’s argument, as well may be refuted against this motion, that Iowa Law provides this court, as well as this proceeding, confidentiality for all involved in this case, as well as its content,  the author and defendant in this case, Christopher Bruce, has a God-given Constitutional right, per the first Amendment to its Constitution of the United States; to be able to; per this Federally-mandated right; be able to publish this author’s continued opinion of the facts presented here in this case, the entities who prosecute and rule over this case, as well as the instigators of this case, presented as themselves, and hereby named, as belonging to The Department of Human Services/Child Protective Unit; regardless of its confidentiality; as long as the author refrains from stating these facts as stated, word for word, by its participants; without fear of it being used in an evidentiary or a reported evidentiary manner against the aforementioned author and defendant in this case.

3.  That ALL evidence, presented as fact; as used as evidence or reported evidentiary; in the Order for Removal, the CINA petition, the Removal Hearing, The Adjudication Hearing, as well as any subsequent documents or hearings in which this editorial blog is or will be used as evidence or reported to be such, should be hereby suppressed and no longer used as such evidence, and should also be stricken from all court records as such evidence.  Using editorial opinion as evidence of fact should not be allowed in any court-related legal proceeding, as this action, on the part of the prosecution, presents itself in such a manner as to indirectly or directly, inhibit, prevent or, through threat of intimidation or deprivation of freedom, would serve to deprive this author, as well as any given defendant; of their wont to express said opinion, thereby becoming direct in its attempt to suppress this author’s wont to express the afore-mentioned ideal, thought, or opinion; defining these actions; as taken by any court in any such legal action; to mean they desire, through whatever indirect means, to cease any effort made by the author and/or defendant, to express his opinion, a right given freely by the afore-mentioned Amendment.

I now hereby move that all evidence, presented in the form of evidence, or reported as such, and used by the prosecution against this author, the defendant, and his wife, be hereby stricken from all court documents or reports; and in the hearings, stated as fact, also involved in this case, as well as from all court records which might describe the proceedings of this case.  Any further use or mention of this blog in an evidentiary manner in this case will subsequently involve a United States Supreme Court action and ruling to be brought against the prosecuting and trier-of-fact entities involved in this case.

/S/ Christopher Bruce and Elizabeth Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE AND ELIZABETH BRUCE
1169 9th Street #5
Des Moines, Iowa 50314

MOTION TO SUPPRESS:

COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, in his motion to suppress, as evidence entered, exhibits 2 and 3 from the Adjudication Hearing, held September 12, 2014, at the Polk County Courthouse.

1.  These exhibits, presented and named as Hair test Elizabeth Bruce, and Hair test Christopher Bruce, are false, as well as beyond the scope of Iowa Code, section 232.73 as required in a CINA action, where drug allegations are involved.  I hereby request this court to suppress this evidence, until proof is provided by this facility, that the samples were not or able to be tampered with, as well as witnessed by another employee working for Family Services of Iowa, a DHS choice (as well as an obvious benefactor from this entity) for its drug testing of defendants in their actions against them.  This is proved as such, because assessments, done by EFR, another such DHS choice (as well as another obvious benefactor from this entity), following drug testing, is obviously ordered, by DHS and by the trier-of-fact involved in this action (as found as fact in a statement made by the trier-of-fact, Judge William A. Price, stated as a certainty as to the results of an assessment against ANY defendant involved in such an action, that drug abuse training will be found to be required of the defendants, AFTER such an assessment, proving to be fact, as well as leaving no possibility that any other assessment result will be considered, i.e., these defendants do NOT use drugs, and need no drug abuse training).

2.  I also bring, in an effort to back up the reason for this suppression, that we already know there were no witnesses available at the time of our testing that will willingly attest to the safety of these samples, or that would be able to guarantee them tamper-proof, since the responsible participating party who administered the test was operating the facility by themselves, this fact being personally and obviously witnessed by the defendants being tested in this interaction.

3.  That the mother, during her birth at Methodist, came up clean in her cord stat test, done at the hospital following the child’s birth.  Had the mother been using at any time, during or before the birth, the results of the hair stat test would have proven their existence to include that time as well.  It did NOT.

4.  There is clear and convincing evidence that will be provided to this court at a later date, that will show this mother as having severe asthma, severe enough that a single hit of Marijuana, used by this defendant 5 years ago, produced an emergency situation in the mother that could very well have included her death.  To allege this mother as using meth internally is ludicrous at best, per this evidence.

5.  There is clear and convincing evidence that shows the amount that the defendants showed in these results could only be determined as environmentally acquired, if the results were indeed factual at all.  Users of this drug have come to show results closer to 2000-3000 pg/mg.  The father, who claimed in his blog, which will be suppressed as evidence soon enough, claimed to POSSIBLY be dirty for this drug, only in environmental conditions, and only produced a showing of 558, barely over the cutoff result, showing his as the ONLY possibly factual result in this instance, but only because of his blog and the statements made therein.  The mother’s results, as aforementioned, are physically impossible, as this mother has neither used, nor been around other users of this drug in her entire life; as she is aware of, yet showed a result almost twice as large as the father’s result, at 852 pg/mg, also not a number of an average user’s much larger proportions, so, should also be ruled as environmentally acquired, again, even if the evidence is indeed factual.

6.  I hereby move to suppress this evidence, used as fact in the adjudication hearing, held and ruled September 12, 2014.

/S/Christopher Bruce
Christopher Bruce 1196 9th Street, Apt. 5
Des Moines, Iowa 50314

GOING FOR THE B***S, PART VII (The Upcoming Disbarment of Daily Maize)

http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/485783/

OMG KIDS!!!  the UNMITIGATED GALL OF THESE PEOPLE!!  DIDNT YOU PEOPLE IN THE COURT HEAR WHAT I SAID IN THE COURT STATEMENTS?  SENATOR GRASSLEY IS NOW INVOLVED, and, against your immunity and confidentially, is more than allowed to view ALL of these court documents....without being able to be stopped, WHILE YOUR RIDICULOUS CASE IS WIDE OPEN....You like apples?  How you like THOSE apples?

Here, I will state, that Dale Mays, the snakey lawyer, who works for Benzoni Law Firm (SNAKE PIT, EVIDENTLY), has asked to resign as my wife's attorney...but get this...remember that little move he pulled, in an attempt to cut off my ability to get court documents needed by these parents to defend themselves, and making Elizabeth pay for 2 state appointed attorneys on minimum wage + at $8.25, all while living at the homeless shelter...you would not BELIEVE WHAT THIS SNAKE just tried to pull over our eyes...  Well, believe it, because I'm pulling the wool off.  The sheep shall know it ALL, BELIEVE THAT, as will Senator Grassley's office.

Here, I will state (as a restated quote, so as not to IDENTICALLY reveal anything from a confidential juvenile case document) that Attorney Dale Mays, just tried to file a motion to withdraw as the wife's council, and stated in his third reason that after I threatened his Bar status for doing this to her against her better interests, that I gave, as a reason, that I was mad at him for making her file another affidavit, allowing the court to claim her as indigent and be able to help her with her attorney fees...like nobody would notice that he was COVERING HIS ASS FOR HIS STUPID MISTAKE, as well as "His Honor"'s ass for signing such an order.  Here then, was my soon to be efiled rebuttal to CORRECT the FACT STATED IN that motion...ENJOY!!

Comes now Christopher Bruce in his motion to modify reasons given to withdraw:

1.  It is stated, as reason to withdraw #3, in Attorney Dale Mays’ Motion to Withdraw that:



(this is the confidential part that I cannot repeat, for fear of imprisonment...good thing I paraphrased it above...because I couldn't copy it into this document)



The actual fact is, that this attorney received an email from the father, this date stated, what is claimed, but that my reason was NOT that council had requested (I would imagine this to also be at this Judge’s request that he do so) his client, Ms. Bruce, fill out a financial affidavit which would enable the court to make a finding of indigency and appoint her counsel...that had been done AT FIRST, back in July.

On September 5th, this counsel, against his client’s best interests, after this client had just started back to work at her part time job at $8.25, had his client, with her full trust, sign yet another financial affidavit, just five weeks after being claimed indigent and able to receive a state court appointed attorney, in order to have her state her income, with no expenses (because she WAS INDIGENT AT THIS TIME, staying at a homeless shelter, as ALL, including the trier-of-fact, and the county attorney, as well as DHS were duly aware, and in search of permanent housing with obvious expenses in order for us to effectively reunify with our child, since the courts have, throughout all of our hearings, claimed this as their primary reason for not doing so), in order for the Judge, William A Price to sign this affidavit to claim her NOT INDIGENT, to, effectively, force the mother to pay for all of this attorney’s services, as well as her baby’s attorney’s services...all on $700 gross a month.  This served the dual purpose of effectively eliminating any possibility that the father, whose rights to view confidential documents already had been cut off, could not, without fees, access the same documents, rendering the family as unable to defend itself.

It should also be brought before this court, that no more affidavits have been requested, even at another 6 weeks of passage.  This is because then, the court would have to find her indigent yet again, due to her now having apartment, bills and food expenses, and no better income.  This will be filed and corrected immediately for the courts records.  Nice try Dale and Judge.  This one’s going to be on the books as it happened, not stated incorrectly to disprove your bias.  If this statement of fact is not corrected immediately, I will file these emails, from and to the mother, as proof of your attempted deceit.  I’ll leave that decision in the Judges hands.

And Mr. Mays?  This obviously giant paragraph long typographical error goes on your record as well, as trying to cover up your grevous and disbarable error...to further prove your need for disbarment."

SEE?  I TOLD YOU NOVEMBER WAS GONNA BE FUN FOR ME!!  WAS I LYIN'?

The Dating Game - Day 3

The Eagle Rises Again - Part II, Court Statements (Going for the B***S, Part the Last)

Now kids?  If this doesn't prove the possibility of my leadership qualities?

Nothing will.

You are about to witness a court statement that will be immediately, following this post (we wouldn't want to publish confidential court documents again, now would we??  The time stamp on this blog post will more than prove that it wasn't even a confidential court document YET...hehe.) efiled with the court, filed with all attorneys in the case (that matter), and in a nice little package that will be delivered unto the offices of Mr. Chuck Grassley, with the address to this blog, and a release of information signed by me and Liz, along with all recordings of every....single...interaction...with EVERYBODY in our little party.  This blog post, and this Statement to the Court, listed below, that I will be efiling just a few minutes from now; I believe, will signal, very nearly the END of this case...

Please, if you will, read it....at your liesure  :D

For I am...and will always be...The MIGHTY SWORD.

...and they shall know my name.

STATEMENT TO THE COURT CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION HEARING

COMES NOW, Elizabeth Bruce and Christopher Bruce, in their statement to the court:

Concerning the disposition hearing, held and ruled October 21, 2014:

1.  I would first like to state that the father, out of fear for his freedom, after posting confidential court documents online, did not attend for this reason.

2.  In reference to the 4th statement, made by this court, stating reasons that the child should remain in out of home placement:  I have given his Honor more than enough reason to ascertain that the reasons in this fact are either unneeded (the mental evaluations), service ordered to the parents due to falsified results (the drug assessment/drug abuse TRAINING), INCORRECT ALTOGETHER (homelessness, change of address was efiled and signed on October 17th, 2014), and lastly, also falsified in reports by CFI (the ability to adequately care for an infant).  If his Honor would order, this mother will, on demand, change a diaper for his honor (Basic Cares 101, #1), feed the baby on demand (Basic Cares 101, #2), and strap into a carseat to the best of her training per Ashley Andrews (Basic Cares 101 #3), which will probably not be very well, considering Ms. Andrews’ elimination of that training several visits ago, as well as the fact that we have yet to get a car for ourselves, a carseat to put into that vehicle, as well as a substitute baby with which to practice on.  Until his Honor should see for himself the completion of these “Basic Cares”, this should not be found as fact, but remains, as such, “hearsay” from a fallible human being, Ms. Andrews, as to whether these cares are learned or not.  Let’s not forget, your honor, that this same visit supervisor recently tried to file charges against me for harassment using UNFOUNDED EVIDENCE, and probably isn’t happy about that plan being foiled by me, using recordings of her interactions with my wife and myself.  Also, lest we forget, that everyone associated with this case, especially those of DHS and CFI, are constantly reading the blog in order to glean even more evidence against this family to use in these hearings...and I’m certain that Ms. Andrews has noticed the blog post that I directed exactly at her as well.  Naturally, if I were in her shoes, I would probably be a bit miffed, prone to a bit of vindictiveness, and since I was not able to hurt this father directly, might be prone to make sure this mother didn’t get any training, in order for her to fail, as well.  This was the case with the reporter of this action; when she couldn’t get at me directly, she went for the easier target, the mother, utilizing DHS to get back at me, through her, so this attitude with us in general doesn’t surprise me at all.

Oh, and by the way, as long as we’re on the subject, I’m sure his Honor, D.A. Stephanie Brown, Katie Gosch, Caseworker for DHS and Stephanie Rhinehart, her Supervisor, have all noticed by now, I’m celebrating my win in the upcoming Permanency Hearing.  Actually, I’m celebrating my victory PRIOR to that hearing (you all remember that word, don’t you?  PRIOR?  Meaning:  BEFORE?)  There’s very good reason for this.  You see, this blog?  The one you folks are so fond of quoting, where the removal of this child is concerned, where DHS’s actions against me, the father, lately, are concerned, as well as the DHS Advocate; Ms. Brown and her office are concerned, Attorney Dale Mays’s dis-bar-able actions along with his honor’s ordering of the 2nd financial affidavit, a mere 5 weeks after appointing us council at the state’s expense, and while we were still INDIGENT; so that the father’s ability to defend himself, are concerned?  I can prove this court completely biased, and will do so immediately in a separate action.  When I’m finished with each and everyone, in this court, you will all be removed from office and publicly shamed.  That blog, the one that was used for reasons of the removal, as well as continuously as evidence against me, (oh, and isn’t funny that we don’t do drugs, but immediately following my statement that I MAY come up dirty for methamphetamines through environmental exposure?  Suddenly, not only am I dirty for this drug, but my wife, who almost died because she took a hit of marijuana, is TWICE as dirty as I am for it, after her and the baby BOTH came up clean for anything just nine days prior to that, upon our child’s birth); in this action is about to be your total undoing.  It is, and always will be, my first Amendment right to publish my opinion in this editorial blog, and to use it as evidence against me and my family is beyond all legal and civil reproach.  What’s most important here, is that DHS has used this blog as a means to punish this father, indirectly; yet, put in its proper light, this directly interferes with this father’s right to free speech; through intimidation, threats of imprisonment and fear.  You may all be immune to state prosecution, but you will be brought up on Federal charges in this matter, each one of you, IMMEDIATELY.  Because you peruse this blog so carefully, and because I’ve been known to threaten all of you (non-physically, only with your respective jobs) in it, and the fact that I have personally ridiculed all of you many times, your actions in response have damned all of you; you have biased yourself thoroughly, and anyone that sees anything about this case, the facts found, as well as the way it’s been ruled on, will believe this beyond a shadow of a doubt.

And, for the record, this statement to the court is going to be filed, along with a release of information, to Senator Grassley’s office, with proof of it’s receipt to me.  With this statement will also be ALL recordings of ALL interactions we’ve had with EVERYONE in this court, INCLUDING recordings of ALL court hearings and their rulings, as well as any BILLED TO US court documents, thanks to the efforts of Mr. Dale Mays, Attorney at law, that he should request to see.  Sans the court documents, all I have promised to Senator Grassley’s office, will also be posted...Well, I don’t think I have to say where, now do I?

Oh, and in case you’re concerned that I might be breaking the law by doing so?  I will be making sure that each thing I post here has an earlier timestamp than when I efile it.  It’s not confidential, until I do so.  Besides, my efilings seem to be immune (as well as are things that make no difference to anyone, or that don’t help my defense at all, i.e., appearances, appointments, etc.), I can access THOSE confidential court documents...imagine that.  Just the ones that the prosecution files, and his honor’s facts (laid down in orders from these hearings)...imagine that too.

Your honor will be asked to recuse this case upon its proceeding.  If his Honor should AGAIN refuse to recuse, a writ of habeas corpus will be implemented, and your bias brought forth with little effort at all.  If you refuse to recuse the case, and rule against me in this hearing upcoming, your bias will be full and irrefutable, and will drag you down off of your bench, again with little effort.

You know, I was going to go further and refute the rest of these facts, but I think we all know how this is going to go, don’t we?  Let’s just stop here, and call it a day.

/S/Christopher Bruce

The Dating Game - Day 2 (Q.1)

How To Beat the DHS Railroad Job, Part III (C) - The Court Hearings (The Reasonable Person Theory, and Reasonable Efforts

http://www.angelfire.com/games2/warpspawn/Matrix.html

Hey, we're back....already????  Oh yeah, you know it...

So here, I would have to say that this is not only one of my favorite arguments; that I had with the director of the so-called "Paralegal Courses" I took at our local community college; this also ranks as probably my favorite thing in my case with DHS.  I am being facetious, no doubt...you know me SO well!!  But, as sarcastic as I may be currently...it will most certainly BE my favorite thing about this case...because it is with this subject, not alone, but in a slight majority of a few reasons I will be using TO WIN THIS CASE.

Let's begin with the "Reasonable Person Theory".  Now, according to my teacher, again, the director of my classes, whose teaching style drove me BONKERS...but whom I loved to intelligently "debate" against...mostly because her reasonings, as well as her answers to my questions; usually included some form of the ol' American idiom:  "That's just the way it is!"  I firmly despise anything that even looks like it means this, simply because NOTHING is "Just the way it is"....in no way, shape or form.  "That's just the way it is", and "It is what it is", as you well know, is SHEEP talk.

In our law, the "Reasonable Person" is a time-honored ditty that was founded oh....around 1837.  In our law, America's REAL law in my opinion...COMMON law, we call it; the "Reasonable Person" theory isn't a theory, but a standard...meaning, the phrase itself always means the same thing, and doesn't change, even though the circumstances of 10 similar cases might vary, for...various reasons.  It doesn't really refer to anyone in particular, it is a fictional person that is supposed to represent "Joe Average", if you will...but at the same time doesn't either (??)  "What would Joe do, if he were in this pickle?"  Get it?  Good, because you know how I really feel about our system of law anyway, and I really and TRULY despise this.

So, I'm talkin' to my law "teacher"...and she starts talking about the "reasonable person" standard again, and how it applies (a little differently too) in contract law.  Now I've heard her babble about this before, when she taught the ridiculously ludicrous subject of "Introduction to Law"...and I say ludicrous, because her style of teaching, mixed with the AWFUL text book she chose to use for the class, were both about as helpful as an umbrella is on a sunny day.  NOT helpful at all.  Just another pain in the arse, where carrying it around is concerned.  So, remembering the thoughts that had entered my mind and stuck there like glue the last time she talked about it, I brought up this:

Who exactly is it, that, during the course of any case, decides who the reasonable person is?  Her answer to that was "Nobody, because the reasonable person, as far as actual people are concerned, doesn't really exist."....and I said "Oh..."  Then, after a bit of uncomfortable silence, I just had to ask this:  "OK, so if the reasonable person doesn't really exist, than why are we having a debate about him/her then?"  She didn't really care for that one.

Needless to say, this stupid portion of the argument (legal debate, she would have said), went on for quite a while.  I don't know if you're familiar with analytical people, but we're the people you hated in school with a passion every time their hand went up...or, you may have been in love with this person too, because this is the kind of person who has to understand every logical nuance of something before he can move on...because, if you DO move on, then he'll never get that...as well as won't get anytihng else he learns subsequently, because his mind has to be able to get past that first thing he learned or he won't learn anything else until he understands it...so, if you're a studious learner, you hated this guy, because he'd hold you up at all times, sometimes even detrimentally to the expense of the whole class, depending on what sort of person your teacher is.  If they were really tolerant, you'd never get more than half-way through your books.  You'd be stuck at half-way, and the teacher would almost HAVE to pass you, because it wasn't in his power to shut this guy up.  Now, you might have loved him too, mainly because this same guy, when his hand went up, would go round and round with the instructor, trying to figure it all out, and, because it was loads of fun watching this person keep the professor hopping with question after question about the same damn thing, before you knew it, the class was OVER, and it was time to go home!!...or to break, or whatever.  And yeah, as to one of those analytical people?  I was one of 'em.  Hence, the hatred of "That's just the way it is!!"  "Them's SHEEP words, Clem!"; BOOM, POW, RIGHT IN THE KISSER!!"

So anyway, back to this....this....TEACHER...or whatever the Hell she was claiming to be that day...she goes and freaks out on me (after a while of this) when I come at her with this:

OK, so what you're trying to tell me is this, then...Let's say we get an immigrant from Turkey over here...we'll just call him Abdul, for intermediary identification purposes. Now, in Abdul's country, if you steal something, you get your hand cut off...unless you were determined to absolutely need that something...you know, like a loaf of bread to feed his family, whatever.  Now, here in the states, what happens here when you steal something (which is probably why theft is so big here in our country), we usually, depending on the amount of the item stolen, call it a "5th Degree Theft", or to call it by its common law name, "shoplifting"....usually with a standard value range of around 0-200 dollars in value, and only requires, upon your first offense, an overnight stay in the local county jail, and a fine that will probably equal around 4x the value of what you stole.  The reasonable person, then, as defined by our "common law", wouldn't steal at all...so you deserve to have the book thrown at you.  Nine times out of ten, however, this is pretty much kiss my ass behavior, and a lot of shop owners will, against all reasonableness, let that theft go without calling the police, especially if the item was $5 or less.  Now, get up around $100, and this is something we need to look at a 2nd time.  Now you're not NEARLY as reasonable...Anyway, to Abdul, this is TOTALLY unreasonable, and, where he comes from, the reasonable person, after Abdul stole his $4 loaf of bread to feed his family, would have said "Fly, be Free!!", and that would have been the end of it.  "My NEW reasonable person...who is actually not reasonable to me anymore, says I have to pay $16 for my loaf of bread, spend a night in jail for my first offense, and go ten years without a job that comes anywhere near a job that you'll be able to steal on....Turkey, HERE I COME...BACK!!"

So now, we get back to Abdul.  He steals something he REALLY DESPERATELY needs for his family...let's just say it's a lawn-mower, priced at $150.  Oh come on already, he did pick the cheapest one, didn't he??  Isn't that reasonable, at the very least?...anyway, so Abdul, kinda sorta new to this country, gets off with a fine and time served...I mean, it is his first offense, and he is from Turkey...

Here's where I had my problem with this theory though...let's just say Abdul, in his home country, is allowed to murder someone, if the argument gets to a screaming volume level, and screaming, at least by the person opposite your argument, is offensive.  So the non-screamer is now allowed to kill the offending screamer, and he can therefore get away with it, because screamers are generally idiots, and the law of Turkey smiles every time you knock off one of those guys.

Then let's say he's killed himself 2 or 3 screamers over in Turkey...he then goes to America on vacation.  He hears a scream coming from the woods..(Prey!!).  He runs after his screamer, and then kills him.  The police, of course, are close up behind.

Now, let's say we go with a judge's chief saying...."Ignorance of the law is NO EXCUSE!!"...."Yeah, but isn't it different when Abdul kills off someone, regardless of why?"  Damn Straight.  Because, you see, Abdul is now an American, and is about to meet someone for the first time.  The fictional "reasonable person".  The only problem now, is this:  See, Abdul's reasonable person, the person he knew in Turkey, the one that used to hate screamers, has changed nationalities.  Now, Abdul's reasonable person's name is Archie.  Archie says Abdul must DIE!!

Here's the other problem I have with that theory.  Abdul DOESN'T kill anyone here, but kills himself a screamer in his own land...only now, the reasonable person isn't named Abdul anymore, his name is Achmed, and Achmed only kills mockingbirds...and to kill anything else, means Abdul must DIE!

Even more reason to hate it is the thing that drives me the craziest, and that I just can 't wrap my mind around.  Who IS the reasonable person, who decides what that reasonable person does, says, hears, thinks, etc.  I mean, the CONCEPT of the person never changes...only the circumstances as they apply to each thing...but if the reasonable person doesn't think spinach and liver is legal, and Frank absolutely loves the stuff, well....whaddya do then?? The whole basis of that theory is, quite simply, this..."what would the reasonable person do under the same circumstances?", right?  But if the reasonable person would jump off a bridge in those circumstances, do we have to do the same thing in order to not end up in jail???  I just don't understand it.

What I'm saying, I suppose, is that the reasonable person, protected from all harm from us simply by being fictional (however, NOT so fictional, if you're the one that's guilty/going to jail...not so fictional now, EH CHRISTOPHER???)...is not ever going to be you.  You know who the reasonable person is, though no one will say it.  The fact-trier...the guy who is currently in charge of your destiny...and if he's on the take?  Or biased?  You're SCREWED...yes, the new "reasonable person" in YOUR life...is the JUDGE!!....oh, happy day.  THIS is the person who truly decides who that reasonable person is, and then decides if you measure up to that figment, and what'll happen to you if you come up short.  You can almost look at it this way...what would the reasonable crowd do to this newly-found reasonable criminal??  (somehow, I can hear the queen saying OFF WITH HIS HEAD!!!)

Now, let's get back to the very thing that's driving YOU the craziest...what the Hell does all this have to do with DHS???

There's where we're at.  I KNEW I'd find myself...

Sooo...we're gonna jump right over that bridge, and plant ourselves on the other side, over on the "Reasonable Efforts" side of things. (arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh!!....you see now why I think the law needs a serious revamp?  Should have been pretty obvious by NOW!), and the reason that we're bypassing the reasonable person (for now) and the reason I hate the theory ULTIMATELY will be very obvious in a few minutes after that.  REALLY, I PROMISE!!

So, you've been through the Removal Hearing...Part one of our court hearings, remember?  The one you probably don't remember because they had it 7-10 business days after your child was stolen, and you hadn't even processed that fact as yet?  Well, if you WEREN'T still reeling from the punches, would have felt a "PING", and you would have slowly started to realize a feeling... that your life....the way it used to be, anyway...was now no longer your own, and things started to get dark, and gnarly....you don't know why really, but everything is just so....CRAPPY!!  You...you feel just like you felt, right after you got married, and your husband's mother needed to come and stay with you for a few weeks while her house was being painted....AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!

And it hits you.  Your life, as it was, is now no longer your own, for REAL.  Now?  You belong to DHS, and there's nothing you can do about it.  Now, you live, breath, s***, eat, have sex with....you get the picture.  These people have now moved into your home, and aren't planning to leave for 6 whole months...until the permanency hearing.  And the first thing they want from you, is PAPERWORK....and tons of it.  "Sign here, initial there, fill this out completely, turn this in before your next hearing, file this, here's a copy of that...and this one is that..."...and you wonder how you ever lived without all this before...

As I mentioned back in part (A) of this part, this is to keep you trippin' until the hearing for removal, and when it comes, that hard hitting D.A., whose sole purpose it is to make you look horrible?  She's on it like flies on **** already, and has already accused you of not seeing some paper you supposedly didn't remember, didn't remember reading, signing...ANYTHING...but supposedly? "It was the most IMPORTANT PAPER IN YOUR LIFE....AND YOU DON'T REMEMBER SEEING IT OR SIGNING IT???  HUH?  what's WRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONG WITH YOUUUUUUUUU?????"

And now you know....such is the game at its inception, and at its most cunning.  You really MUST remember, these folks have been doing this FOREVER...and you're a removal virgin.  And, from here, to expert is...well, it's Hell, back, beyond and sideways, because you are now dealing with the "take your children specialists!!..."  And that's why you're headed for TPA...and for no other reason...unless you're either a really good hoop-jumper or a breed of sheep they like.  Then there MIGHT be hope, a chance you might see your babies' little smiles again...hold them to you like they're actually yours again...someday...maybe...

Next, and the star of our show, is the in between stuff...family team meetings, visitations with F.S.R.P...or whoever your state's version of the outfit that handles your children's visitations, is.  Ours, as you know, is Children and Families of Iowa, and your Visit Slinger is an F.S.R.P. worker...and another snake in the grass that you CANNOT and SHOULD NOT EVER TRUST!!  Now where was I...oh yeah, FTM's, Visits, Confirmation of those visits, free transportation assistance for 3 months (or 3 months worth of bus passes), your drug assessment (if drugs were alleged), your mental evaluation (if they think you're mental...which, from what I understand, they always do, whether you believe you are...or whether you ACTUALLY are or not), oh, and what did I just get in the mail honey?......SCREECH!!!!!!  "oh...the removal social worker's assessment my lawyer finally got in the mail, that I haven't seen anything of yet...wonderful...oh, and something else too?  What's that?  Did you say the Asian Petition?  What?  The China Petition?...OH....the CINA PETITION...oh yeah.."

And here it is, the Adjudication Hearing is now upon you...and you get through that, and you hear this strange foreign-sounding phrase...You've heard the words before, just not the two together...in that way, they sound very familiar too..."Reasonable efforts..."...."reasonable efforts, reasonable efforts...REASONABLE PERSON....ARRRRRGGGGGGHHH!!!...Yes, it is has been found, whether you were aware of it or not, that reasonable efforts (remember, I said you'd come to hate this one?) were offered to you in order to help you "reunify your family".....what?  Really?  I'm sorry...could you repeat/explain that, because all I've seen is chaos and confusion...thanks!!

Now, here's the fun stuff you are gonna strangle someone over...all those hoops you've been hoppin' through?  The mental Eval, the drug assessments (which, by now, have turned into drug TREATMENT, more than likely...ok, DEFINITELY THEN...), the family team meetings?  These are now called "reasonable efforts, made, to you, and for you...from us, the loving folks of court central and DHS, to help you in your quest to reunify your family...just like OUR quest for you!!"......BULLS***!!!  Do NOT fall for this crap y'all!!

This is the beginning of a very sick and twisted friendship between you and the courts, as well as DHS, because now, you have become the victim of the system...just like your baby...except your baby is probably having a good time and an awful lot of fun with his/her new parents...something you won't be having again until this is over...if it's EVER over...and hopefully will once again include your child...whose life, that you're SUPPOSED to be enjoying life with, is enjoying that life with people he/she doesn't know very well...YET...If she's a newborn?  Plan on missing all of those experiences every mother looks forward to...her first steps, her first smile, her first laugh...THEY'RE NOW SOMEONE ELSES WONDERFUL FIRSTS...and you just missed EVERYTHING.  Oh...oh thank you, DHS, for saving my life, by showing me the evil of my ways, and giving me oh so many "reasonable efforts" in which to make us whole again..."

You see, America, if you've been a bad girl or boy, these probably are reasonable to you...they should be things you should be doing...if you really and truly love your children...but to those of you who have done NOTHING wrong?  Who just...are?  Are, yet accused of things you would never even consider, but because they are DHS, and you aren't?  Well, you're guilty of all they accuse you of, and you're just WRONG.  How REASONABLE is that??

Worse yet?  If you're right (WRONG), and you're mad about them telling you you're wrong?  You just...can't...do that.  You can't fight city hall.  You have to do what they say, and just get them out of your life..you MUST jump through THE HOOPS!!!...IF YOU LOVE YOUR CHILDREN, DO WHAT YOU GOTTA DO AND GET IT OVER!!

This is the lie they feed you...and I don't just mean DHS...I mean EVERYBODY...your friends...your relatives...your attorneys...EVERYBODY...because all those people that aren't DHS/court related, they're on your side...but they're sheep, more than likely...trained...brain-washed.  I suppose, if you wanna go along with all of that, that's you.  I will tell you this though, one...more...time.  You MAY/MIGHT get your kids back if you play ball, guilty...or innocent.

Here's the thing though...this madness?  Reasonable people and reasonable efforts made?  THIS HAS GOT TO STOP!!  This isn't the way to fix you and your child's problems...this most CERTAINLY isn't the way we used to fix our OWN problems...No, this is, quite simply, a governmental intervention, meant to eventually brainwash you into sheep-typical behavior, to slap you in the face in order to remind you that you WILL OBEY, or...you won't get your kids...or our reasonable efforts...you'll....just...be...terminated.  And yet, what you really DON'T realize as yet, is that they WANT you to terminate...because, they have other sheep...other good sheep that obey...and THEY'LL get your children, if you don't act right...they can afford them...YOU CAN'T...they can take care of them...YOU CAN'T...understand??  IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT FOR ETERNITY AMERICA????

I guess what I'm saying is this...I have dubbed myself your champion.  I plan to take the dragon down...just about any way I have to.  Once again, I do this...not just for me, but for you as well, and for YOUR children.  Remember, it never hits home how bad things truly are with this sort of thing...unless it happens to you...and there is nothing more destructive to your psyche, or your soul...then when you cry wolf..and all of a sudden, if you don't conform, like your side is telling you to?  It's funny how short the conversations about your problem get...how, as you start talking about how they're doing you TODAY all of a sudden?  Your mother has to run to the store for sommore prune juice...your dad has to sweep the garage...your best friend has to go pick up HER children from the playground.

If you're a fighter in this, it's a damn lonely fight at times...but please, if you will?  Stick with me.  'Cause what I'm doing RIGHT NOW is fighting for us ALL.  Whether you think so or not, depends on how you feel AFTER you're released from your Matrix bed, and you are, once again, part of America.  The America I intend to get back for you.  See you for part IV, the endgame, coming soon...:D