Showing posts with label Benzoni Law Firm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benzoni Law Firm. Show all posts

Saturday, August 5, 2017

The Corrupt Courts/Corrupt Officials List, Part II



To kick things off, I began this with the intention of getting information from folks about their corrupt courts, judges and officials sent to my email...not commented below the last article, as most decided to do.  That email AGAIN is:


Please, if you will, MAKE A NOTE OF IT!!

After this portion, I highly suggest you make your way down to the asterisk line, where you will find information that will change your life, bet on it.  For those of you that are already victims of judicial fraud, well, you've already experienced your fair share, and will validate it with this.  This is primarily aimed at those who are still walking around asleep.  You there!  Yes YOU!!  Yeah, I'm talking to YOU!!!  Wake up, before you're the next contestant on "The Price Is Your Rights!"

I believe that I will kick things off, where this is concerned, by submitting the folks that I know need submitting...along with all I know of them.  I suggest, highly, that you use this as a template to do your own lists; of which, after checking my email, I have...none!!!  Not one list!  I imagine this is due to your not knowing exactly what I want from you, and how to do it...well, that roadblock no longer exists, thanks to what I'm doing RIGHT NOW!  SO GO CRAZY!!

Let's do this then, eh?

THE JUDGES

For Polk County, Iowa, home of Des Moines, Iowa, the State capitol, and my former home of 42 years, District 5C, The Judges List:

Judge William A. Price


Judge William A. Price (The A, of course, stands for MAJOR ASSHOLE!)  This man has an enemies list Omar Khadafi would envy.  I once....ONCE, saw this man walking to get some coffee during a break of his...SHIFT? as a judge, and, I kid you not, the man looked over his shoulder at LEAST ten times, in just a block of walking.  That's the life for me!  I wanna be a corrupt evil judge!

Neither here nor there, this is, actually, a man I should be thanking...well, had he not upheld the legal kidnapping of my wife's only daughter; told an associate magistrate "Get him!  He's a piece of cake" before I was tried by her for harassing a poor editor of a local rag to do my story after he sent me a SIGNED email stating he would; placed a cash only bond of $1500 on me for 3 simple misdemeanors once, and not only refused to recuse (dismiss, in legalese) himself from all of my cases when I ordered him to, but also refused me my right to have a recusal haring to determine his bias against me.  Yes, you heard that right...the judge that I needed to dismiss himself from ruling over me was able to deny me the right to have a hearing to determine whether he was able to rule on a case involving me due to possible bias.  No, no, our system isn't broken!  The reason I should be thanking him, is for kicking me in the shins as to the condition of our judiciary; and the fleecing through the court system of the American people by these foreign officials; through the use of the law of the sea (commerce) and martial law courts.  Had he not been the most corrupt judge I've come across to date, I would not know what I know now, that our judiciary is in bad need of a total dismemberment.

I'm just going to put it like this, people, this guy has no listed properties in Iowa, I have NEVER seen this guy in public, aside from his one trip to get some coffee, and it took me almost two years to find a single picture of him anywhere.  I would hope that would be enough for you, to convince you not to vote him BACK in for yet another of a hundred terms; but in case it isn't, and you need more, well, here you go:

(Takes a deeeeeeep breath)...I was going to list links for every single article that has this judge's name in it; but that would be wayyyy too much work.  For anyone wanting actual proof and paperwork concerning these allegations, go to the brownish looking sidebar of this blog.  There, under the archives portion of that sidebar, click on any week of the first year, 2014, anytime after 6/22, and just about every single article has his name in it somewhere; and usually includes some accompanying paperwork.  This carries on into 2015, until around May, then he resurfaces again in January, February and March of 2016, and briefly again in August and September of 2016.  Will you have to go that far?  Probably not.  Believe me, once you've gone through just a couple of my 2014 articles, it should be more than enough to convince the majority of you folks that the only good places for this judge are jail or the grave.


Judge Robert Blink

Now, this guy has his job as a judge down.  Unlike Judge William Price, who is so corrupt that he doesn't even try to hide that fact anymore; to the public, and to those who don't know him yet, or haven't appeared in front of him, this guy initially projects like a fair, decent guy...but a fair and decent guy wouldn't dismiss 200+ pieces of evidence relevant to my defense in a felony trial, and, not only let all of his buddies, the 29 elected officials he dismissed as having to testify for my side of the case, get out of testifying, but went through my witness list a couple more times to ensure that even more could get out of testifying, even though they nor their lawyers were present at the hearing to quash those subpoenas.  More than that, even after setting a hearing to have my probation revoked (I opted for this, and asked him to set a hearing for it...and he did), then issued a warrant for my arrest for...probation violation, even though I hadn't even signed up for probation, nor met with an officer of the court.  This is also the guy who put me in jail for a year for a justified crime, refused, after promising he would, to issue a protective order involving a key witness who was half responsible for having me arrested and jailed, and threatened harassment charges against me for wanting to discuss possible ways to pay my debt to society, without jail, with the prosecuting attorney, Linda Lane.

For more about this Judge and what he did to me in my felony case, see these links:


and then stay tuned, very soon, for the transcripts from this case that were submitted as evidence in my post-conviction relief case concerning this case, where I am trying to get these wrongs righted...not that they will be.  See also all of my post-conviction relief case submissions here in my most recent blog posts, around the last two links listed above. 


Carol S. Egly

There's a rather special place in the "Bruce Bitch List" for this alleged "Judge".  She ignored an initial challenge of her jurisdiction, issued the very first time I appeared in front of her, didn't address that challenge for 3 WEEKS (challenges to jurisdiction are supposed to be addressed IMMEDIATELY, before another proceeding or judicial action can take place); then claimed an unlawful jurisdiction to try me under, without any proof.  Then, because I had asked for a jury trial in this simple misdemeanor case, but had just submitted it a couple of days before they had combined cases for it and my felony trial (that ran parallel with this case) and had misplaced that motion to ask for it, she would then OK a submission of a court produced motion that was not designed by me, that didn't show that I wanted one; then, to cover up their screw-up, changed the record of the court to state that I had specifically asked for a NON-jury trial in that motion, and denied me that.  From what I gather, this Judge spends an awful lot of her free time drinking (I would too, if I were involved in the shite these Polk County Judges get away with daily...anything to alleviate the pangs of guilt, eh?), and shouldn't really be on the bench, after just THESE shenanigans. 

The picture above?  The product of a well-planned photo shoot, I'm thinking.  The times I appeared in front of her, I was ready to change the E in her last name to a well-deserved U, due to both her looks, and her rather ugly soul.



Judge William Kelly


Judge William Kelly is young yet...his only saving grace.  He seems OK, not quite as corrupt as the ones that have been around FOREVER...but this Judge already has a black smudge on his record.  This man, on the record of the court even, denied me the right to defend myself in my own person, unless I took on, at the very least, a state provided attorney.  Yes, you heard that, he denied me the right to get case files, hear evidence, etc...and defend myself, while I was incarcerated.  For those of you still lost, that means that I was not able to do all those things the Constitution guarantees me, as long as I was locked up.  I'd say that's a pretty hefty smudge.



Magistrate Anastasia Hurn



Now Magistrate Anastasia Hurn was mentored by, and, evidently, reports to, none other than Judge William Price.  This in and of itself is more than enough for me, personally.  Add to that, she ruled that I had harassed those poor members of the Des Moines media, in particular CityView managing editor Daryl Tromblay and kid reporter Jeffrey Pitts; by asking them to keep their word and report on Des Moines corrupt officials and courts, where I was concerned.  Of course, when 2 months after that promise had gone by, and I had yet to here from these folks, I got a wee bit upset.  We had been in constant ambiguous contact, via email, for nearly 2 years prior to this, and had never had an issue...until I asked for them to complete the promise I had hoped they would make, after witnessing this apparent series of judicial horrors.  C'mon...I had a head editor's signature on an email, promising that he would do the story...how could a judge fault me for emailing them twice to ask WTF, why they hadn't even made a move after 2 whole months?  Funnier still, the managing editor, on the record, testified that stealing my child unlawfully using no provable allegations didn't constitute a story.  The fact that they found me innocent of those allegations, but still didn't restore my rights or my child wasn't news either, evidently.  I suppose that the written email, (which, in any court of law, be essentially a signed contract) wasn't sufficient cause to email them asking why they hadn't done anything.  Let's not forget that Judge Price had come into the court room prior to the start of the trial by judge, to tell his prize magistrate pupil to "Get Him...he's a piece of cake" before he left her chambers.

This magistrate deserves a place on Polk County's "Evil Judges to Watch" list.  She's going to do great things for Iowa, I guarantee it.

Anastasia, unfortunately, was the only magistrate or judge I could find, in Polk County, with a facebook profile.  I'd like to thank her for posting this great candid picture of her having some beach fun, like us regular folks, after corruptly ruling against me in my harassment case.  Funny I can't see her profile anymore...I wonder what happened?  We were getting along so well too!


Judge Jeanie Vaudt


Judge Jeanie Vaudt refused me my right to videotape the proceedings in my post-conviction relief case, and quashed the only official's subpoena I was able to get served for my post-conviction case...her buddy John P. Sarcone (See evil official's list, later to be added to this article), Polk County Iowa's head racist and most criminal County Attorney.  She would not compel the state to tell me where Linda Lane, the recently upgraded attorney in John Sarcone's office had disappeared to (at just the right time), so that I could call her as a witness in her case; and ordered that I be refused justice in every way in her case.  It seems funny to me that hardly anyone ever wins out against the State...any state, for that matter.  Gee...I wonder why?  They sure don't have much problem appealing and appealing and appealing when and if they should lose, using your hard-earned tax dollars to try you over and over again...until they win...or at the very least, get a stalemate.  The numbers, showing how many times the state wins out against John Q. Criminal are, of course, more important to show us.  We can't have those numbers, showing how many of those "criminals" were cleared, expunged or admonished of the county attorneys allegations, getting too high.   Then the jig, the court cash cow, would be "up", as it were, and Iowa would lose out on some of its fed funding to keep a certain so amount of people in jail, at any one time.  Can't have that...right??


ELECTED OFFICIALS

OK, so that's it for the judge's list.  Let's move on to Polk County's Elected Officials.


Attorney General Tom Miller


Tom Miller is supposedly still Polk County's Attorney General.  This ancient piece of crap needs to be ousted, if this is the real truth.  I've heard a lot of crazy things concerning this man.  Among them is that he once arose from his seat in Des Moines and made his way to Clinton Iowa, where he excused a social worker from her charges of perjury that had been brought against her in a civil case, because, he stated, "She was immune to prosecution."  I've also heard that his son is in jail for all kinds of crazy things as well.  Either way, this man has been in office entirely too long...if indeed he really is still in office.  

Anyway, this man's office is responsible for fighting you in any case that brings charges against ANY State official, or when you appeal the same official's actions.  For example, should you fight the Department of Human Services in their Child Protective Assessment of whether you are actually abusing your children or not, it's the Attorney General's office who defends their side of things.

The only case I ever beat in Iowa was such a case.  They even appealed it up to the Director of DHS, who agreed with my side of it.  Of course, there wasn't much that he could say.  It was way too obvious that they most certainly did mess things up.

This office also was responsible for defending the courts when my termination case went to the appellate courts.  I did not fare so well in that one...even though I had just won in the case that showed that I did not abuse my child.  So how is it that it was shown that they did wrong in taking the child, yet, didn't do wrong in terminating my rights because of that?  Here are documents (and of course, my opinion of all that occurred in those documents) to show that maybe these people aren't quite on the up and up in Iowa.

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-appeal-to-termination-part-i-this.html

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-ol-double-cross-appeal.html

** Honorable corruption-related mentions in this office are as follows:

Katherine Miller-Todd, Asst. Attorney General
Grant Dugdale, Asst. Attorney General 





John P. Sarcone, The official head of the Polk County Attorney's offices, is one of the most corrupt individuals STILL in office in Des Moines Iowa to date.  Where do I start here?  I think I've done enough on this man and all he has done to me and my family.  For links on this guy, well, I'm just going to say that I could almost dedicate my entire blog to getting this man put out of office.  I guarantee, that if you were to go just about anywhere in this blog, you would find his name tagged in just about any article I've written.  This man even went as far as to call the Secret Service on me, to get me arrested, because he wasn't able to find me.  He wanted me arrested so that I would not be able to attend my Termination of Parental rights hearing.  He has called the FBI offices, all over the country, in an effort to shut me up and get me off of his case.  He wants me gone...or dead...which is fine, since I want the same for him.  At the very least, this man deserves serious jail time...not just for what he's done to me, but what he has done to an awful lot of people in Polk County.

Try and call him sometime, at 515-286-3737.  Ask to speak to him personally.  I dare you to try.  His secretary screens his calls for why you're calling.  I've seen this man once, I think...in 42 years.  His office is lined with bullet-proof glass.  These are the actions of a serious criminal, my friends.  Stop re-electing this criminal into office, Iowa, PLEASE!

On the right side of this blog, in the brownish side-bar, is a search box.  Put in "John P. Sarcone", and stand back.  All you would ever want to know about this criminal is right here.  Make a note of it.

**Honorable mention of those criminals who work under this criminal attorney:

Linda Lane
Stephanie Brown
Kevin Bell
Kevin Brownell
Jesse Ramirez

                - Assistant Polk County Attorneys

For more information about these assistants, just search for them in this blog.  I also dedicate a paragraph to each of them further down, when I attack attorneys.


Charles Palmer, Former director of DHS, Iowa


Charles Palmer, Director of the Iowa Department of Human Services, is a criminal of a higher order, and the head of the department that has stolen more children in Iowa than all but 5 other states in the union.  Yes, Iowa is #6 in the country for taking children from parents...and never giving them back.

Thank God, that, just about the time that Iowa finally decided to look into what exactly was going on in this state department, this 100 yr. old asshole finally decided to retire.  But pay attention, Iowa, because I'm sure that whoever is going to replace this criminal (Jerry Foxhoven) will be no better.  More importantly, this department, once it comes out what they have done to Iowa, needs to be stripped down to its bare bones, and all that caused Iowa grief, INCLUDING Charles Palmer, should be brought to justice.

Honorable mention for Iowa DHS employees:

Jeannie Munson, Agitator and Collaberator
Mark Worthington, Agitator and Collaberator
Emily Nieman, S4, Child Protective Services
Stephanie Rhinehart, Supervisor, CPS
Katie Gosch, Caseworker, CPS

For more information on any of these, please search for them in this blog.

Here, Iowa, is your new director.  Be on the lookout for more crimes, involving him:


Jerry Foxhoven, Current Director, Iowa DHS

Naturally, I'll be paying close attention...:D


*******************************************************************************************************



Well, it would seem that we need to get going on more corrupt Iowa Officials, the attorneys that I know well.  Let's begin with the more recent, and work our way backwards.  Now, keep in mind, a lot of these "officials" of the court stay very well hidden, and pictures/info on them is all but impossible to find...but that doesn't or won't exclude their coverage.  Some, I found pretty ancient pictures of...and that will do.  A few, some of the more corrupt, I've opted to include links to their Linked-In profiles, so that we can blast what they're up to these days as well as what they've done in their oh-so-sordid pasts.

So what do you say we get this pahty stahted?

We'll start with the County Attorney's office, and John P. Sarcone's assistants in his crimes.  We'll begin with the one that's attacking me right....this...minute, Mr. Jesse Ramirez.  Here's his mug:

NOTE:  I picked this one, because he's wearing glasses, like he is now.  I'd say he's about 20 in this picture, approximately 8 years before I met him.




Now, I shouldn't have to tell you everything this slime ball has done to me, mostly because there are about 15 articles here in this blog, all just recently written (See all articles just above and below this one, entitled "The State Post-Conviction Relief Case").  This one is on our "Evil Attorneys to Watch" list, for sure.



Another infamous FORMER county attorney under the thumb of John Sarcone once upon a time is none other than Linda Lane, pictured below:



who, according to her Linked In profile, found here:


is now a (probably more so) corrupt Asst. U.S. Attorney...though no longer in Iowa (you Iowa "lawbreakers" can thank your lucky stars).  I will, of course, be finding out exactly where SHE is, mostly because we have unfinished business in Federal Court.  For more on all that she did, all you need do is peruse just about any article from 2016 in my archives, or, you can just jump up a few articles to my "transcripts" articles under my "State Post-Conviction Relief Case" Series.

Lucas Taylor, of the law offices of Mark R. Hinshaw, is the "Stand-by attorney" who witnessed AGAINST me in my post-conviction relief case.  Now I don't know about the rest of the world out there, but how can an attorney, who is supposed to be representing you and your best interests, allowed to witness against you?  Got me.  Let's not even talk about the fact that this is an experienced felony lawyer who didn't ask for a bond-reduction hearing or depositions (probably the two most important things you should do for your client, especially in a felony case), didn't appeal my case (when I asked him to), didn't poll the jury to find out if a mistrial was warranted (it was, without question), wasn't able to attend a very important hearing to determine whether 29 witnesses should be allowed to testify on my behalf (they were), or whether 200 pieces of filed evidence should be relevant (it all was).  I think that's enough said here...don't you?


The entire cast of Mark R. Hinshaw Law Firm.
That's Lucas, 3rd from the right.



Now attorney Dale Mays, of Benzoni Law Firm fame in Des Moines, Iowa, pictured at a much younger age here:  (sorry, this was all I could find, America)



is a snake of a lawyer of a higher order.  This man screwed my wife over by staying silent in each and every juvenile hearing we had, and weaseled out of getting slapped on the wrist for not doing his job...and doing it UNLAWFULLY as well.  For more on what this man does when he "does his job", see about any article I wrote here from 6/22/2014 until May of 2015.  Here, let me get you started with one of the better ones:


and for a more complete list of his incompetent infractions, you can go here as well:


And yes, that was BENZONI LAW FIRM in Des Moines, Iowa...don't forget that.


Now we move on to assistant county attorneys and a state of Iowa GAL that are so corrupt that NO information can be found on these people WHATSOEVER, save a case law quote here and there.  No pictures of these criminals could be located either, though, when you search the names, the only things that come up in their image counterparts are from my blog.  They, of course, deserve extra special mention.

Kevin Brownell, who was the Asst. Polk County Attorney in our later juvenile cases, had me thrown out of my own case that I had been in for 6 months, because I was the legal father of our child, not the biological one, when the evidence against him, the judge and the State was so damning that there was no other way out, but to get me out of it.

Stephanie Brown, another assistant, was the one that brought a whole list of false allegations against us (that we were later cleared of, by the very agency that removed her), and who purported to be an advocate for the department of Human Services.

Kevin Bell was the assistant County Attorney who brought false charges against me in my first harassment of social workers back in 2015.  He later dropped the more serious charge, when the damage had already been done, and when it was discovered that he had no proof of his allegation.  He would state in the dismissal that he did it because I plead to the lesser simple misdemeanors...and that the charge against me for threatening these social workers lives (something I didn't do) could just be ignored because of it.

Finally, the last and final corrupt official worth mention is Paul White, a cobra State of Iowa GAL (Guardian Ad Litem), who did absolutely nothing but sit in court in his $1000 suit and look pretty, and point his finger at us, the "criminal" parents.


EPILOGUE

Well, America, here is your blueprint.  Should you want to join into the fun, please contact me on FB, or email me using the email at the top of this article.

Until you do...this is the mighty sword, signing out, until the decision in my state post-conviction case.

************************************************************************************************


ATTENTION!!

A good friend of mine could really use some more votes to get a judge out of office, by the way...and with that, he posted some very enlightening information, for those of you who still doubt that our system of law and those who purport to uphold it is a sham.  For those of you who still believe what we've been duped into believing, that "The system works", I suggest you read it well!!  Thank you Michael C. School! (again...lol)  I highly recommend his website for relevant LAWFUL information concerning this very thing and other similar subjects.  Please note too, Michael C. School, that your name, along with others, now graces the list of websites I support.  :D  Now for his contribution:

There are no "Judges" just BAR Attorneys.... Gloria Navarro is an executive trust administrator FRC vs. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller vs. PE 261 U.S. 428, 1 Stat. 138 -178) “Judges do not enforce statutes and codes. Executive Administrators enforce statutes and codes.


Gloria Navarro has a Certificate of Standing on file to practice law on file with the federal courts same as any other BAR Attorney.

MILITARY FLAG WITH THE GOLD FRINGE

Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.The Law of the Flag regulates the laws under which contracts entered into will be governed. (See Ruhstrat v. People.)

Any courtroom that displays such a flag behind the Judge is a military courtroom which Is operating under military law and not constitutional law, or common law, or civil law, or statute law, Restrictions. (Note added: This court is thereby receiving public funds under false and fraudulent pretense and is committing Treason against the Constitution under the 16th American Jurist Prudence Section 177).

Whereas : 1,2 American Flag such as a gold fringe MUTILATES the flag and carries a one year prison term. This is confirmed by the authority of Title 36, Section § 176 (g). The gold fringe is a fourth color and, purportedly, represents “color of military law” jurisdiction and when placed on the Title 4 U.S.C. Section §§ 1,2 Flag, mutilates the flag and suspends the Constitution. Refer to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242, see BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY.

Uniform Bonding Code- 5.4 - Bonding of Judges

A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable:




1. if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of any citizen appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen appearing in any court of the county in which he works whose case may come to his attention 12y a means.


An attorney shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable,:

if he fails to protect the remedies of due process and the equal protection of the law of either his client or of the adverse party in an action. In an adversary system of law, each lawyer or attorney shall protect the representation of fact not only for their own party, but shall protect the legal process for both parties without, exception.


OATH OF OFFICE MAKES PUBLIC OFFICIALS “FOREIGN”
Those holding Federal or State public office, county or municipal office, under the Legislative, Executive or Judicial branch, including Court Officials, Judges, Prosecutors, Law Enforcement Department employees, Officers of the Court, and etc., before entering into these public offices, are required by the U.S. Constitution and statutory law to comply with Title 5 USC, Sec. §3331, “Oath of office.” State Officials are also required to meet this same obligation, according to State Constitutions and State statutory law.
All oaths of office come under 22 CFR, Foreign Relations, Sections §§92.12 - 92.30, and all who hold public office come under Title 8 USC, Section §1481 “Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions.”
Under Title 22 USC, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, Section §611, a Public Official is considered a foreign agent. In order to hold public office, the candidate must file a true and complete registration statement with the State Attorney General as a foreign principle.
The Oath of Office requires the public official in his / her foreign state capacity to uphold the constitutional form of government or face consequences.
Title 10 USC, Sec. §333, “Interference with State and Federal law”
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Such willful action, while serving in official capacity, violates Title 18 USC, Section §1918:
Title 18 USC, Section §1918 “Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the government”
Whoever violates the provision of 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—
(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(2) Is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both. And also deprives claimants of “honest services:

Title 18, Section §1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”
“For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.
and the treaties that placed your public offices in that foreign state under international law and under the United Nation jurisdiction:
49 Stat. 3097; Treaty Series 881 CONVENTION ON RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF STATES

1945 IOIA –That the International Organizations Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; Title 22, Sections 288 to 2886 U.S.C.) the US relinquished every office
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1101
The term “foreign state” includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be regarded as separate foreign states


The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

Is Gloria Navarro registered as a Foreign Agent? FARA.GOV

http://www.citizensactionnetworks.com/…/Ethics%20for%20Fede…

http://www.citizensactionnetworks.com/…/Prosecutorial%20Mis


For more proof of our U.S. Judicial corruption and the mockery of our Constitution and all it's supposed to provide us free citizens, as well as provide us FREE justice, visit Michael's page at:

www.citizensactionnetworks.com

Tell'em Christopher (Bruce) the living man sentcha...:D

Friday, January 9, 2015

The Final Battle Part IV - The Last Reach For the B***S (B)


 DAMN I'M HAVING FUN!!!


Wheeeeelllllp....today I got to invite some great folks from Methodist to our upcoming permenancy hearing....it's gonna be a whoppin' good time!  Oh...oh, and that's not all....but, I'm afraid I just have to keep secrets, we don't want any preparations for my surprises...I just can't wait for Methodist's explanation for their part, and, thanks to the motion to NUNC PRO TUNC the removal hearing (to be filed...PRETTY DAMN QUICK, we're gonna rehash the whoooooole thing, starting with that bitch...you know the one.  I can't WAIT!!


Here are just some of today's motions, including another one I can't wait for, the drug facility, and their shining faces...not just to show the judge that ALL of their testing was FALSE, but to bring DHS's drug goon on the stand, you know, TONY REED, to testify about his 2nd drug test of the father after our last hearing, just 3 days after I served the facility to appear...well, they did, but not to produce records, like they most certainly WILL at this hearing; but to, IN THEIR REVENGE OF THAT ACTION, TO TAKE AND PRODUCE ANOTHER TEST THAT THEY COULD FALSIFY in order to try and teach the father a valuable lesson in f***ing with DHS...only one problem...they provided me with MORE evidence of DHS's snake-like actions (I'm thinking those folks and Daily Mays, of former attorney fame, might just be related somehow).  So now, we can have at his happy lying ass too.  We'll see if he tries any football tackles on this defendant, as I waltz out of the courtroom to go and get our daughter...tee hee. I do declare that all of these bastards will soon be a fryin' in the winter sun...legally, of course, and, just so the administrative branch of the Polk County Sheriff's office isn't confused about my borderline threat here, thsi one means:

I....PLAN...TO .....FILE...A....LOT....OF...CHARGES...AND...BRING...SEPARATE...ACTIONS...SOOOOON...NO....PHYSICAL...HARM...IS...INTENDED...HERE....BY...THIS...DEFE...NDANT ...OR...HIS....WIFE...EITHER....

**********************************************************************************************

Now comes Christopher Bruce in his motion to supress evidence, as presented by the prosecution for drug testing,  in the adjudication hearing, as well as it will be brought against us in our upcoming permanency hearing, with clear and convincing evidence for exhibit.

1.  The father has acquired two urine cups that will used as exhibits.  These two cups are used to do official drug testing at a facility that serves DHS in their efforts.

2.  Two days after this defendant did file a motion to suppress this evidence, DHS did file a report to this court, with an included version of this 2nd test, complete with an explanation for the cup that was thrown in the trash, as being a cup the tester found to be inactive, and that was thrown in the trash by the tester as well, after doing one test on the defendant.  Then, that a 2nd cup was used, and found this defendant dirty for methamphetimines.  Proof of this deceit on the part of the tester, as well as DHS, is as stated below:

a. That the defendant, who was asked by DHS to take a urine test (not ordered by this court, or its trier-of-fact, to this defendant’s best knowledge), agreed to do so without argument, even after DHS had made
it clear that all was the same as before, 1 visit a week, supervised, with the same worker, Liz still a drug user, and in need of abuse training, the father the same, as well as having mental issues.  The father, in an attempt to go along with what this court has asked, was willing to do what it took in order to accomplish this.

b. That this defendant, who had relieved himself just prior to the hearing, and this hearing only had taken 15 minutes at most, had yet to have to go again.  This defendant then drank water in order to comply with this test.

c. Once, while the defendant wandered and spoke, the tester, thinking this defendant was leaving the courthouse in order to avoid this test (even though he had willingly agreed to do it), moved to block his path so that he could not leave, as if he had the power and the right to accomplish this. This, to this defendant, proves his desire to do the test this time, as false, because if this defendant were to leave, he would have to produce another inactive cup or something else might go wrong as opposed to doing it this time.

d. That this defendant, while waiting to produce enough to take the test, did inform this tester (without his knowledge of his being the owner of the contract with DHS for drug testing until the report showed in efile this fact 2 days later) the story of the first drug test, at the facility on Merle Hay Road, to the letter, in order to deem whether this tester was more honest than the facility he had tested at for hair.  After describing the condition of the facility, this tester then claimed that he had many dealings with this facility, and knew the staff well, and that this facility looked nothing like I had described it to him.  This brought to the defendant that this was no person that the defendant could expect or trust to issue accurate and honest drug results to this court.

e. That upon this realization, the defendant declared that maybe he should inform DHS now that he would be coming up dirty in this urine test, then proceeded, after a time to provide the drug test sample.  After watching how the test was done, this defendant then inquired as to how the test worked.  The tester told the defendant of the process, and claimed that there were several tabs, each containing the name of a drug, and that they would not only move up as the drug in question was recognized, but that bars would appear in color to signify a clean or dirty for result; and finally that one or two of the tabs had already begun moving. When this defendant tried to change his view as to witness the test, the tester then turned the cup away from the defendant.

f. After the test had completed, after the related time period to this defendant of three minutes for the test to complete, the tester was asked for results, to which the tester pulled out his cell phone and took pictures, and told the defendant that DHS would hear the results first, then inform the defendant of those results. Afterwards, the tester asked the defendant to pour the sample into another container, sealed this, then asked the defendant to dispose of this test cup into the court’s bathroom trash.  The tester left, and the defendant remained at the court house, with the intention of retrieving this cup.

g. The defendant asked a member of the Polk County Sheriff’s staff to get the key to the garbage, because the defendant claimed that he had dropped something into the garbage and could not reach it to retrieve it.  The staff then procured the key from the janitor and watched as the defendant retrieved the ONLY cup in the garbage.

h. This defendant brings that DHS and this tester’s story that the tester  taken two complete samples from this defendant one right after the other, and then threw the discovered inactive cup away after a first test, then did another after discovering the first cup to be inactive is false, and that DHS and this tester have an agreement and contract to cover each other’s story, in case such a falsehood is discovered to be so in such a case. There was no 2nd sample taken from this defendant, and the testee, not the tester, threw away the cup; not because the cup was inactive as discovered by the tester, but because the inactive cup was found out by
the testee, and was, in fact, required to be trashed by the defendant.

i. After discovering that nothing showed on the cup whatsoever (no marks, and no rising tabs), this defendant did, in an effort to procure more proof needed to convince this court of this deceit, decided to go and pick the mother up from work, just to see how her drug test would come out.  The father then drove the mother to 2911 Merle Hay Rd., the very place this defendant was hoping that he would have to go to.  On the way, this defendant called Katie Gosch to leave a message on her voicemail that the results had shown clean for the father’s test, in order to flush her part in this deceit out.

j. Upon arriving at Central Iowa Family Services, this defendant told the mother to do her test, ask for a witness to this test, and to record the interaction.  The mother went inside to do her test.  Then the phone rang, and it was Katie Gosch, who informed that my test results had not come back clean, as I had told her, but that they had, once again, come up dirty for meth.  I then hung up on her, realizing that they had done this to these defendants once again, utilizing the same facility’s testing results as proof.  The father then called DHS again to inform Ms. Gosch only these words,“We’re done, no more of this BS”, we’re done here.”...and that’s it.  There was no mention of no more contact to be had between DHS and I, as claimed by Ms. Gosch.

k.  Just a moment later, the mother exited the facility with her test cup still in her hand (not on purpose), and informed me that they had denied her the right to a witness, as she had asked. I was upset, of course, thanks to the phone call from Ms. Gosch and said “Come on, we’re leaving.”  The mother had to then go back in, because she had left her purse inside.  She came out and, upon noticing that she had a cup, we decided, as we drove home, that we would attempt the test again in this unused cup, with the mother as witness to see if we had the same problem with this new cup as we did with the test cup taken from the courthouse. Upon arriving at home, the father took the new unused cup into the bathroom and filled it to the top with fresh urine, and put the cap on it.  We waited the 3 minutes the tester had waited...and discovered this 2nd cup as inactive, just like the first one.  My wife took pictures of the cup after the test had completed.  The inactive result of this test is submitted as evidence with this court, as of this date.  Later, not unlike the removal recording, we realized again that we had forgotten we had recorded this, and listened to it today, in order to see if there was anything we could use as evidence. The only voice you can clearly hear is the mother’s unfortunately, but if you listen closely, you can hear the female tester as she denies this mother her witness to the test she wants to willingly take; by stating there is only a single collector who works there, and no witness can be or will be provided to her.

l. I find it very interesting that the female tester involved with the test of the mother is surprised when she says that she wants a witness to the test, then remarks on her surprise by saying that NO ONE has ever asked for a witness to the test.

m. That with the blog post dated back on 8/14/14, named “The B&S Railroad Job, Part II - The Drug Thingymabob” posted on this defendants website, even now, describing this facility in full detail, as having, upon your entrance to it, a very large reception area with a single large desk in it, with only one person working in the entire place, with nasty shag carpet, that looks nothing like your average drug testing facility; and a side room with an ugly smaller desk in it, where this man (or woman) who works there, cuts your hair with a pair of school scissors and sends it in.  Nowhere in this facility is there another piece of furniture, or anywhere for anyone who might be waiting to take their test to sit and wait.  This defendant finds it quite interesting, then, that 5 months later, it’s been completely remodeled, again, as witnessed by both defendants, with all that this defendant witnessed and posted about back in August, gone.  Now, there’s a small waiting room with differently colored low carpet, clean, with a giant wall now separating the main area from the front, with security cameras in place and a lot of nice furniture at which you can sit and wait for your appointment in it; as well as a nice and  new professional look to it.  When this defendant had described this place to his tester, remembering he had said “over a year” as a time frame that he’d been working with the place, thought to serve a subpoena on this facility in order to gain a client list, and upon his entry to this place found it completely remodeled because of his post alone, this defendant is absolutely certain of this fact, beyond all reasonable doubt.  This, of course, gives this tester, just three days after serving them a subpoena to appear at our hearing with all of their records to present in this court, who is not only the owner of this testing facility, as well as the owner of this contract for drug testing with DHS, more than enough motive, JUST 3 DAYS AFTER THIS DEFENDANT SERVED THEM WITH A SUBPOENA TO APPEAR, appears,, NOT with their records, but to only give this defendant a drug test and find him guilty, once again, and to find this defendant and his wife dirty for the same drug with an alternate falsified test.

n. That the mother’s drug test was as the results produced, falsely positive, due to her just receiving an inhaler with Albuterol, around the time of the hair stadt test, by Primary Healthcare.  and is shown in this website, the answer provided by a professional working for the company shown in Exhibit #40-42, efiled this date, 1/9/2015.  This answer given by a website, Drugs.com (Drugs, Inc.) proves this inhaler to produce false positive for meth, as well as for amphetimines.

3.  Here, then, is the relief these defendants hereby seek with this motion:

4.  That each and every test done at this facility should be either retested at a true and legitimate testing facility, far out of the reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, or  suppressed for all who have attended this facility.  I am advertising everywhere for others who have had their testing done here, and I have already gotten 3 recent clients in response.  More will be continuously added to the list.

5.  That the Department of Human Services owes an apology to Elizabeth Bruce, and that her need for drug testing, drug assessment, as well as drug abuse training be rescinded by this court.  Slander and Libel charges shall be filed against this Department, post haste.

6.  That all accusations of the alleged drug use, as well as her recommendations be stricken from all court records.

7.  That drug testing, in the form of Urine testing, be ordered to be done on this father again, by another facility far out of reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, post haste, and, pending these results, that the relief sought in paragraph 5 and 6 of this motion be repeated for this father.

S/ Christopher Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE

We also took a minute to file the recording for all to hear, and the drug result pictures and the other drug cup fished from the trash, then, tomorrow, we are going to file the motions, NUNC PRO TUNC, for ALL of our hearings to be reheard, and put appropriately in place for the Writ of Mondamus soon to follow the appeal to the permanency...matter of fact, just as soon as I walk out the door of the courtroom.  All of this will delay things JUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUST LONG ENOUGH to make room for all of this defendants little aces, that he's been a savin'....and a savin.....and a savin' up for this upcoming Writ.

DAMN I'm having fun!!  What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall, however, when our beloved DA, Stephanie Brown, and Judgy William A Price Esquire see THIS ONE, to be filed...wellll....NOW!!

******************************************************************************************

From what I've heard?  Judgy Price doesn't like losing Either....lol.  I really and truly, wish I could see his face, when he sees this, and pending his decision to WILLINGLY and GLADLY recuse this case..well, shoot, I wish I could say the words...but I just can't do it.  Here then, is the motion that will turn these people on their respective behinds.  Enjoy Judgy!  All my love Stephanie Brown....you little mynx you  ;)

Toodles!

(SORRY....this motion is still in the process of being edited, and will be posted for your viewing pleasure A.S.A.P.)