The Ol' Double-Cross (Appeal)

OMG kids...I realize these people have to do their jobs, in order to collect a much needed paycheck (in addition to what other bonuses they make in the adoption and foster market trade), but really?  What DRIVEL!!!  Talk about grasping at straws!  These idiots couldn't find a law if it passed right in front of 'em...(you like that?  I thought it was good!!!).

Now, on the front, there was, as I expected, a demand to keep this confidential.  Hmmmmm...well, the Supreme Court, as well as the Attorney General's office, DID start the war before I even got to the battleground...so no.  I don't theeenk so.  Deny MY motion to stay Termination will ya?

Naturally, there WILL be comment.  Can't have a farce like this go without that kind o' fun, now can we??  Let's get it on.

Now, the first thing I suppose I should mention, here, is the use of the phrase "Material Facts"...something these people wouldn't recognize if it hit 'em smack across the side of the head...please, continue on...

Issue 1, they state, is that CB...that's me, of course; does not have standing to raise any issues from the CINA proceedings, because I was dismissed as a necessary party and all of the CINA orders are "Res Judicata."  For those of you ignorant of Latin (the dead language we still use...so how is this a dead language then, and why the hell is it still used in our law??), Res Judicata means these issues are moot issues; they've been discussed and ruled on in previous hearings, with no dispute, nor appeal taken by the defendant.  They are, therefore, according to the law, not able to be brought up again; and set in stone.

BULLSH**

One more sentence that's important here, is that error was NOT perserved at all.  Hate to tell you folks out there in dream land; I don't know about the error you're showing or preserved in YOUR files, after you altered or destroyed them, BUT ERROR IS MOST CERTAINLY PRESERVED RIGHT HERE, ON AMERICA'S DEADLY SINS, IN THE ENTIRE "AND AWAY WE GO" SERIES, in the blog you were so fond of using over and over again against me, as well as in the four binders containing every single document received from the Juvenile records department, as well as downloaded to my computer via efile; complete with date and time stamps showing when YOUR FOLKS FILED THEM!!!!  Also "preserved", are the 5 full recordings of each and every court hearing I'm in possession of (and their copies in at least 5 different locations in this state), and the recordings of each and every interaction I've ever had with the *ahem* WOMEN of DHS and CFI.  Ain't that special?  And remember, that last one...#9 on that sheet I signed?  Remember?  Was very clearly never agreed to, where NOT recording you and your illegal actions were concerned.  So sorry.  Screw around with the transcripts and burn and alter documents all ya like; and I wish you all the luck in the world getting away with THAT lie.

Sorry, lost my mind for a minute...back to the rest of it.

For one, you all know that this father's rights were terminated in one case; which didn't occur for a month and a half after he had been thrown out of the CINA case, and deemed not a party to THAT case...yet I was left in the termination hearing, so that my rights...COULD BE TERMINATED.  And, since I WAS left in the termination hearing, and, obviously STILL in possession of my rights, (else, why would they need to terminate them?) AND A PARTY TO THAT CASE so that they could do so...then how did they manage to terminate my rights, IF I WAS NO LONGER A PARTY TO THE CASE?  I know, I know...confusing, eh?  So much for that nonsense.  On to part 2 of that, since everything that happens in the CINA case provides need for termination, and helps a Judge decide that termination is necessary, then how is it that everything in the CINA case is RES JUDICATA, and not relevant to the appeal of termination?  Are you starting to get that RAILROAAAAD feeling again???

On to the "discussion" portion of this crap, they bring up...ONCE AGAIN (almost as bad as the permenancy hearing with this one, right?) that the father has been dismissed as a necessary party to the case (after 6 months of fighting in it), because they have established RONALD SHAVER to be the actual father; utilizing an Iowa Supreme Court decision, In the matter of J.C., which states that this father was found to be an unnecessary party...BECAUSE his rights had been, by this time, terminated, and that the child in question was having troubles identifying her true father.  The baby in THIS case hower was not even, as yet COGNIZANT even, and didn't even know how to distinguish light from dark yet, let alone a fake or true father.  She was already having trouble with this anyway, I'm sure, considering the FOSTER father, surely, if at all.  Regardless, THIS LEGAL father's rights had yet to be terminated, yet the Judge JUMPED on his chance to rid the court of the headache of having to address the 500+ motions we had filed NUNC PRO TUNC, as well as all of the evidence that this father had piled up against Emily Nieman and the crooked Judge, William A. Price, in order to bring out the truth of the TOTAL illegality of this entire case.

Later, AGAIN, it's stated that I didn't challenge any of the orders in appeal...and they're right.  I didn't.  I didn't do this because I agreed with the findings found (I most CERTAINLY did NOT), and duly expressed the reasons why not in the petition of appeal.

NOTE THE "NOTE", later, where it covers the Attorney General's butt (he thinks), where she states that just because the Supreme Court denies my stay of termination, that this by no means defines me as a parent or a possible appellant in this appeal...EXCEPT THIS APPEAL IS ABOUT THE TERMINATION, AND I WAS A PARTY TO THE CASE!...my RIGHTS WERE TERMINATED IN IT.  I WAS A @#$%! father/appellant!!!  Why was I later mentioned to NOT attend the termination?  Why would it matter, if I was NOT identified as a PARTY TO THE COCK-A-DOODY CASE??????????

*takes a deep breath*......RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAILROAAAAAAAD!!!

Add now, that the Attorney General now adds that niether myself (because I wasn't a party now in EITHER case, by definition) NOR the mother (who is, and is listed as pro se in these cases now) has a right to refer to issues in the CINA proceedings, even though it's BECAUSE OF THE CINA PROCEEDINGS THAT WE ARE NOW IN TERMINATION, AND THE APPEAL THEREOF....RIGHT???  You people REALLY need to go back to law school for a much needed refresher course in LAW!!

Now we move on to what is, perhaps the biggest lie of them all.  They state, that we abandoned all 18 of our motions, as well as the motions to address 5 pieces of evidence, which we had worked extremely hard on, for weeks, and had piled up to show this whole batch of proceedings as false, illegal, and in bad need of redress (re-addressing, for you law newbies).  Now, you wanna 'splain to me why I would have, within 10 minutes, ABANDONED THESE BY WALKING OUT OF THE HEARING???  The truth, as most of you already know, is that they had filed a motion to establish paternity like 5 times in both cases, so that the judge, practically before he hit the door, could address this motion first, which also had the added bonus of giving these people a lawful (yet irrelevant) way to throw both the father off of the case, right along with every single motion and piece of evidence he had filed.  ABANDONED HIS MOTIONS MY ASS...

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLROOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAD!!

Here's one I love:  That we...or the mother, rather, did not pursue an application for the ICWA, but the county attorney...DID!!!!...at or around this particular time, WHEN THE CASE IS ALMOST OVER!!...WELL YA...after I filed a motion to INTERVENE HE DID!!

Please, if you will, remember that we didn't find out about ICWA, or the fact that the worker had deprived the mother of even knowing there WAS AN ICWA, until this whole thing was about over.  This was one of the motions these parents had filed just before the permanency hearing, and had the distinction of being the ONLY motion this crooked judge had the desire to hear out; after throwing away 17 other motions and all the evidence we had piled up against him, along with the father.  This is because, if this motion had NOT been addressed, it may have very well cost the man his job as a judge.  They make this look like THEIR effort to find out if maybe the Cherokees might want to be involved, when in fact this had been denied the mother FROM DAY ONE!  It was only because I had discovered that they had denied her this through fraud that it was even brought to light.  LYING LITTLE BASTARDS!!!  So, after the judge threw me, all of my evidence and all of my motions off of the case; and after the mother stood up and asked this biased judge to recuse the case and left also right behind me, he then called his goons, the Polk County Sheriff's office to bring the mother back so that he could find out what he needed to get out of this little mess.  Unfreekin'believable.  Then said we left and abandoned the rest.  Little @#$%!.

To polish off this pile of garbage (on this page, anyway), the broken record concerning the father continues on, stating ONCE AGAIN that I am not a party to this case, and that the father is attempting to represent the mother in this appeal...WHAT???  First of all, the mother is ALREADY PRO SE, and the father is representing HIMSELF, AND IS VERY MUCH A PART OF THIS APPEAL!!!!  Let me see if I can possibly make this more clear for this IDIOT!!  MY.....................RIGHTS...........WERE.........TERMINATED......SO ............OBVIOUSLY.........I.......AM..........A.........PARTY.........TO...........THE............CASE!!!!!!

And, to put the cherry on the top of this melted sundae, he then tries to accuse me of practicing law...ARE YOU SERIOUS?????  Give me a f***ing break. NEEEEEEXT!!!

As much as I'd love to dispute each and every legal site used in this cross-BS, there really isn't any sense in trying to dispute cites used to prove that this BS is correct, or lawful.  I've already wasted more than enough of your time in doing the former, so doing this would just be boring and redundant. But, if it will make you happy, I will take just a moment to point out that the VERY FIRST REFERENCE?  Shows you don't know your P's, Q's, R's OR your S's.  It states...and I quote, "[a]nd therefore he was not a party to the termination hearing."....endquote.  I believe I am, well after the Permanency hearing, mentioned in each and every document FOLLOWING that hearing, where it was determined I was no longer a party.  Sounds to me like I was still a party to the termination hearing folks.  And as that party, my rights were then duly TERMINATED.  You can't terminate the rights of a non-party to the case.  Nice try, too bad, so sad.  Either I wasn't a party to the case, and still have my rights, or I WAS a party to the case, and had them terminated.  I'm afraid you're going to have to make up your minds here.  Either way, this shows what IDIOTS you are, and on that merit alone, have zero defense to my being a party in THIS APPEAL. Phhhhhhhhhht.  I think I've said quite enough, concerning your so called legal cites in defense of your arguments.

FINALLY!!!!  Pompous windy bastards.  On to Issue II.

Now we have these idiots trying to prove to the Supreme Court, that because we didn't show up for the Termination Hearing, that we have NO RIGHT TO BRING AN APPEAL!!!!!

For those of you ignorant in this story, they scared us away from this hearing by FILING HARASSMENT CHARGES, ONE FIRST DEGREE AND 2-3RD DEGREES.  THEY DIDN'T WANT US TO SHOW UP, SO THEY COULD PULL THIS BS!!!  And, just to be certain we didn't show up, they called in the Secret Service!!!!  The unmitigated gall!!  Now, if you continue on to the next page, it states that we seek to justify our absense with information that is not a part of the record.

THIS RECORD?  well DUHHHH...it was a whole different case!!!!!  Of COURSE it isn't a part of the record.  WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE???  ARE THEY MENTAL?

To conclude this little travesty of justice, kids, let's just say that I was GOING to post the answer that I intend to present to the Supreme Court, but I think I'm going to take some time on it, do it right, then dedicate a new post to it.  I think it deserves that.  Also, it would seem that we have yet ANOTHER name for the Bruce Bitch List.  Welcome, Katherine S. Miller Todd.  You are just another poor unlucky soul in a very long list of people who will ALSO be losing your job over this.  :D

The Pre-Appeal Summary to the Assessment Summary Appeal Summary

https://spiritualmusclehead.wordpress.com/2014/11/17/jubilee-justice/

NOTE:  As of today, comment moderation is now OFF THE TABLE...this means that each and every citizen of America is now able to comment freely on these matters...on any post, without moderation.  Natrually, moderation will still be implemented, just not officially, and will happen without your knowledge.  This means you do NOT have to wait for me to OK IT...Now that I have more than enough to prove my case available here, online in my blog, I worry less about what people have to say.  What can you say?  We now have CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE OF THIS STATE'S CORRUPTION...What more could a blog author want???

UPDATE:  As of this time, the sargeant in charge of Des Moines Metro's Most Wanted page, found here:

http://mmw.dmgov.org/

one Sargeant Halifax; has been called by this father FOUR TIMES in the last two days.  No charges have been brought against this father, and yet his picture is still EMBLAZENED as being Des Moines MOST WANTED man, utilizing the same 1st Degree Harassment charge I was arrested (and bailed) for just 2 weeks ago...ahead of long-time resident Mr. Trombone, considered a very ruthless criminal.  Dangerous indeed.  I even took the time to remind him where I lived, in case he wanted to gather a posse to come and arrest me for NO CRIME.  Gotta love this s***, huh??

***************************************************************************************************

Well kids, the Pre-hearing for the Assessment Appeal was, in this FATHER'S opinion, a success.  Granted, Mr. Grant Dugdale, the assistant Attorney General in charge of railroading these parents in this hearing was a pain in the Kiester, as he Dug into us, over hill and Dale...as was Connie Dickema...I'm sorry, Diekema, the non-party representing the party of Methodist witnesses.  The real winner here though, suprisingly enough, was ALJ (Administrative Law Judge) Margaret LeMarche.  I gotta tellya kids, this woman, to me, was the epitome of everything I ever expected or thought a judge to be.  She was kind, fair and helpful...and by God, I think she might just dispense some real, honest, truthful judgement.

Not that it matters, or so I've been told.  No, from what I understand, if DHS isn't crazy about her ruling, well, they do one of two things.  a.) they bypass the judgement, and keep plugging along, doin' their own thing; and totally blow it off, or  b.)  They appeal the ruling...hoping for a judge that'll be more crooked and on their side.  I can understand this strategy.  When 75 percent of the judges are corrupt in Iowa, appealing just brings it around to someone a bit more on the side of evil, on the average.  Pretty good odds, if you're the spawn of the Deveel, I say.

Anyway, the attorney for those criminal doctors of Methodist brought up a valid point.  The Parent's rights as of this moment anyway, have been officially terminated...by the head crook in our juvenile case, Mr. William Price, the Dishonorable.  Then the idiot woman GAVE ME THE MEANS WITH WHICH I COULD RESOLVE THE ISSUE...Thank you Ms. Dickema...(oh hell with it, I like this spelling better anyway.)

And, of course, who should be involved in the hearing as well (I enjoyed just HAVING THE BITCH WITHIN EARSHOT...knowing she was listening to how I was gonna dig her career closer to being over), but the Bitch herself, Ms. Nieman.  Just hearing that voice again grated on my spine like no one's business.  By the way, it's important to mention that a new pair of videos has made it's way onto my youtube channel.  For those of you entirely too comfy on your couches to search or copy and paste YOUAREELS, I have, naturally, brought in the link for you, for ease of access purposes:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9pubNeFBc2YxGzL8S-HG5w

Go to the "Videos" tab, and you'll find two new videos.

The first, and finally, is the ENTIRE REMOVAL RECORDING, converted into video, set to the pictures from this blog.  Naturally, you'll wanna hold it up to this document:

Now remember kids, this is NOT for the faint of heart.  You might not be able to listen to more than a couple of minutes of this recording without wanting to seriously injure the social worker responsible, as, once again, she breaks several laws in this removal, as well as deprives the parents of EVERY SINGLE right available to them, or will, on the flipside, want to find and coddle the mother in order to comfort her through her ordeal.

Then, America, I insist that you IMMEDIATELY direct your attention to this website:

http://medicalkidnap.com

Here, all you need do is peruse the title of the articles on the first page in order to get a feel for what's going on with Child Protective Services/DHS EVERYWHERE IN OUR COUNTRY.  Any of it sound familiar?  It should.  A lot of it looks very similar to what these parents have endured, at the hands of this state and governmental agency, and at the hands of none other than METHODIST/UNITY POINT HOSPITAL.  Get me?  Feel me?  You should.

Anyway, the hearing is now officially set for May.  I'll keep you posted.  In the meantime, maybe I wasn't so crazy or guilty of anything...afterall.  Love ya.  Don't go changin'.  Let's continue to get it on.  :D

The Affidavit of Truth

NOTE:  Our assessment appeal?  POSTPONED...(THANK GOD).  Her Honor, Ms. LaMarche, has informed me that we need to regroup.  Fine with this father.  Hopefully we'll get some more things accomplished.  By the first, I planned to get a car, with which to attend this hearing.  Seems that we weren't getting the job of serving done correctly anyway.  So, quash away Unity Point.  I'll be seeing you soon enough...in person.  You won't be quashing then, I guarantee it.  In the meantime, this will give me more completion time on my U.S. complaint.  So Doug, if you are reading this (and I know you are, remember), call Her Honor, will you?  We need to talk about that new hearing date.

****************************************************************************************************

OK America, I am about to file charges against Polk County, Carroll County and the State of Iowa, including Terry Brandstad, the Governor of Iowa with the U.S. Courts.

It is, of course, now important that I publish, for America to take note, this Affidavit.

****************************************************************************************************

Comes now, CHRISTOPHER BRUCE, STILL THE LEGAL FATHER, in his Affidavit of Truth:

To whom it may concern: if anything happens to me, then Wrongdoing May Have Been Done.

i, Christopher William Bruce, am of very sound mind and very sound body.  My cars and home are well maintained, i am in very good spirits and looking forward to a very long and rewarding life.  i and others are involved in lawful actions of holding county and state officials to the proverbial fire of upholding their Lawful Constitutional Oaths by means of Lawful Affidavits and Criminal Complaints containing abundant evidence charging them with Felonious Acts against the People of the Country and in placing Lawful Commercial Liens potentially worth billions of dollars on both their Surety Bonds and their personal assets, and further, seriously impacting the defendant’s ability to hold any future office.  Therefore, if “anything” happens to myself, I have an “accident” or go missing and end up dead; be it known here that i, Christopher William Bruce, did NOT commit suicide or have an “accident” and further, i am not careless with poisons, old food, toxins, flammables, firearms, nor have any known enemies.  i am asking that if anything happens in the form of a negative or deadly event, even if it seems to fit well within the scope of what’s “Normal”, i seriously request that very capable and responsible persons with excellent skills and expertise, take a really good look into the Who's, What's, When's Where's Why's and How's of my demise; as it may in all likelihood be, in fact, a purposeful Act, There but for the Grace of God go i.  i certify the foregoing is true, correct, complete and not misleading to the best of my knowledge so help me God.

/S/Christopher Bruce

Christopher Bruce

914 E US 30, Lot 4

Carroll, IA  51401-2600

Unfreakin'believable, Part III (The Assessment Appeal Railroad Job, Part I)

NOTE:  Contact DHS....Where I sent my combined certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court to appeal the Termination Hearing order? (By the way, THIS is why that order hasn't come out yet...they're going to use the results from the assessment railroad job to fuel that order, and make our appeal to the Supreme Court afterwards look frivolous and ridiculous...make sense?)  They have opened that certificate...get this...128 TIMES...AND SEVEN TIMES, JUST TODAY.  This is the Attorney General, looking to make sure he's covered all of his bases, and has come up with just enough to make us look as stupid as possible.  He don't know me vewy well, DO HE?

*************************************************************************************************

Well kids, we're now 9 days out from our long awaited assessment appeal, where we will be tearing up the careers of MANY.  This father?  Can't wait, personally.

I've just discovered that this appeal is gonna be even more fun than I imagined.

Why you ask??  Welllllll.....

Get this.  I couldn't believe it when I opened it.  Here's what I'm a talkin' bout...

Now, first of all, this appeal applies to the Child Protective Assessment SUMMARY, DATED:  July 17th Through August 12th.  This document is the social worker's report, that dates 21 days from it's beginning to be a case, and is a summary of what, who, why, where, and how....from the worker's point of view.  This worker's point of view, as you all well know, is that her fairy tale is true, all of the 55 lies plus she told in it are true, founded, and backed up by more facts that she drummed up, using....whatever, out of thin air, and that the removal of the child was cool, the D.A. was cool in backing that up, and the judge was cool for ruling the way he did during the course of it, using HIS fabricated facts...and the ones she and the D.A. fabricated, and that we deserve to sign a child abuse registry for ten years.

You'll notice, that on this document (sent to me after I sent in MY witness list of over 25 witnesses plus a ton of evidence, of which only two are really needed for sure...the recording of the removal and the removal order), that this is their return list of evidence THEY will be presenting, and their own witness list.

Note too, that what they are using, in order, is this:

1.  The Child Abuse assessment notice.  Hmm....don't remember that, out of the 700 other documents I had, but that's ok.

2.  The child abuse assessment notice..one for me, one for Liz.  Check.

3.  The Child Abuse Assessment summary...well, that's coo.  I submitted that as well.  Check.

4.  the CINA Petition.  Check.  Me Too.

5.  The CINA Removal order...ah, but here's the deal.  We're not talking about the order itself.  No, we're talking about JUDGE PRICE'S removal order, dated on our first court date.  Yes, we've passed up the temporary removal order...they don't want that one.  That one is all BS.  Well...so is Judge Price's, but we won't talk about THAT.  We all KNOW about that one.

6.  Now here we have The adjudication order....ah, but wait...that took place on September 12...why are we looking at that?

7.  The Disposition order, October 21....WHAT??

8.  The Permanancy Order, 1/15

9.  The DHS report....whoa, now COME ON!!  dated 12/30/14.

10.  The Termination report, dated 2/16/15....

Need I go on?  What the f*** do #6 through...whatever have to do with the assessment summary, the only thing we're talking about here??????  And we're going to use, as exhibits, all of Judge Price's fabricated facts, based on the D.A.'s hearsay facts, gathered from Emily Nieman's fairy tale facts, gathered from Jacque Karlson's made up reported call to DHS, also hearsay.  And let's not even talk about the reports from noted liar KATIE GOSCH...Are you starting to get that railroad feeling again yet????

Now, here's what I love too...Their reserve on the right to call any exhibit necessary to refute or respond to unanticipated evidence offered by another party....

Now, I don't know how many lawyers we have in our audience, or lawmakers, but this sounds a bit shady to me.  First of all, what other party are we talking about?  There's us...and them.  Are there more parties to this I don't know about?  And if I don't know about them, shouldn't I be aware of these to present a proper defense???  And what about that evidence?  Shouldn't I be aware of that too?  I mean, why did I send in an exhibit list, and have to do it before 14 days of the hearing, when they can submit their evidence anytime?  Here's another thing I love, I had to submit my witness list 14 days prior...and they sent me theirs 10 days before the hearing.  Evidently, they don't have to follow their own rules.

...and, any exhibit listed by another party...

RAILROAD, RAILROAD!!!!

What does that mean?  I'll tell you what it means, Iowa/America.  This means they can call in whatever and whoever they want for just about any reason...and don't have to tell me a damn thing about it.

Let's move on to section II, the witnesses.  OK....

Well, this is cut and dried.  We have us, and Emily.  Perfect.  Oh, but wait...there's that reserve the right thingy again...We the DHS have the right to call witnesses listed by the appellant.

OHHHH....so WE have to do all the hoofwork, and serve all the subpoenas, whilst they sit in their cushy offices and let me do all the work.  Then, THEY can call OUR witnesses to the stand, in order to ask direct questions to the witnesses...MY witness, that they had no intention of calling themselves, and ask them whatever they want too.

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAILROAD....

You gotta love this.  Aren't you getting any of this yet peeps??

Here's the deal tho.  I could give a flying rat's kiester.  Let 'em have their day in the sun.  Everyone I called is straight up GOING DOWN.  And all this does is continue to fuel that conspiracy fire I've been yelling about for 8 straight months.  I hope, after all I do, that they rule in favor of keeping that assessment, and making us sign that registry...no, I TRIPLE DOG DARE 'em.  I'll make sure and ask for the transcripts from this one folks.

Oh yeah...one more thing.  Here's the info to contact the Iowa Attorney General's office, and it's head, Tom Miller.  Make sure and ask him whose laws and court procedures HE follows, as opposed to the rest of us.  Or, if you really want answers, ask for Mr. Grant Dugdale, who's in charge of the Prosecution:

Website:  https://www.iowaattorneygeneral.gov

Email:  webteam@iowa.gov

Phone Number:  515-281-5164