The Termination Appeal/Cross Appeal, Part I - The Duck and Cover

Well, thanks to an order that come through the Supreme Court today....after months of what was certainly a very awkward silence (not unlike a child with it's hand caught knee-deep in a cookie jar; mainly because they see that there's no way to win here; and knowing that I won't, by any stretch of the imagination, keep the case quiet i.e., confidential), they've found a way to weasel out of addressing the issues brought against them in our appeal, in just about the only way that remains to them.  Tricky little devils they are, they are.

So, a little history here, there was an appeal, of course, filed back in March 27th of 2015...and because the crimes brought against Polk County in our child removal case were so numerous and heinous, and involved so many of the elected officials in our state and county, they've been stuck in neutral, and haven't wanted to proceed, trying to invent some way to get out without looking illegal and unjust.  The petition, filed by the appellants, can be found here, if you need a refresher:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-petition-of-appeal.html

After 6 months of waiting (most appeals are dealt with in around 4-6 months), and telling me, for 5 months straight that it was "under consideration", they then told me that it wasn't moving forward, and that it wasn't even a case as yet, because I have failed to do 3 things.  Now, not only are these things that the average citizen would even consider to be something they would have to do, but they were, because of these things, about to dismiss the whole thing...because I hadn't done them.

1.  They were waiting on the filing fee to be paid.  Wouldn't this be in need of mentioning almost immediately, if this were an issue?  Of course it would.  2.  I hadn't asked the lower court to shuffle the records of the proceedings to the Supreme Court...are you serious??  Wouldn't your average logical person think they would have to do that?  They didn't...and they don't.  This was made quite clear.  3.  I was required to not only pay for the transcripts of the proceedings and make pay arrangements (at $3.50 a page, somewhere around $1000 for all of the proceedings) to get them, I was required to ask the lower courts to produce them and get them to the Supreme Court as well.

This appeal, of course, did not only cover the Termination of our Parental rights, it covered the entire case, start to fini.  We of course, were indigent, and couldn't afford to pay $150 for the appeal, we certainly couldn't afford $1000 for transcripts...so we filed AGAIN for indigency, had the filing fee waived, and an order was issued by the criminal Judge Price, 6 months after being asked to issue another order claiming we weren't able to pay for things, ordering the transcripts be produced.  I saw the order, but evidently didn't read it too well.  How did I discover this?  I got this in our case, just the other day:

Now, in case you can't see what they've done here, see, we didn't show up for the termination hearing.  Why?  Because they made me miss it, by putting out a warrant for my arrest for something they claimed I had done almost 2 months prior to the hearing date...because they wanted me to miss the termination hearing.  Why did they want me to miss the termination hearing?  Because then, as far as appealing this case went, I would, according to Iowa Law, have NO STANDING to appeal it.  Fortunately for us, we covered this in our appeal, and provided proof of it for days, in our petition....with only one problem, now, in case you really missed how they intend to get away with it.

See, because of this order, stating that the transcripts of the court hearing we missed, the termination hearing' were to be produced at state expense, issued by Judge Price around 6 months ago (we smiled with satisfaction upon seeing it, but little did I notice that it only ordered that the transcripts FOR THE TERMINATION were to be produced at state expense), this order states that we have 14 days...to pay for the other hearings.  I knew they'd find a way, didn't you?  They know damn well we can't afford this.

So here's the deal America.  I've been exposing this state and its criminals for nigh on almost 2 years now...and they're about to win this war....because I can't cough up the necessary $800 or so needed to produce the transcripts for this entire case...the only transcripts that the state will pay for are the ones for the hearing that we didn't show for...'magine that.

I have never in my life ever asked you for anything, my friends.  I have battled hard for all of you, nearly every day of this entire 1 year and 8 months, and never have I expected anything from you in return.  NOW, I'm begging for your help.  I need $800 to get these transcripts produced, a.s.a.p...before the 14 days is up...or I may very well lose this case.

See that little DONATE button up there to your top right, at the top of the blog, in orange?  I need $800, and I have about a 1000X more likely chance of beating this case in court and getting my daughter back...please, help, with that, if naught else...and I swear, I will never ask for another thing as long as I live.  I am about to add 3 more "levels" of giving...all geared towards getting these transcripts made before the end of April...$5, $2, and $1.  I have over 2000 friends....surely a couple of bucks wouldn't kill you??  Thank you, in advance...may the Lord bless your fight, either way, regardless.  :D

Unfreakin'believable Part VI - The Supreme Court Appeal

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthpicturegalleries/6996925/
Animal-pictures-of-the-week-15-January-2010.html?image=19

I'm sure there's a few folks out there that have been wondering..."What the hell ever happened to that appeal to the Supreme Court of Iowa that you made in...March was it?"  Yeah, you got it.  March. "And, oh, what the hell is going on with that case, and your daughter?  I mean, isn't that what you've written about all this time, primarily?"  Hell yeah it is.  So WTH has been going on with that case?

Well America, it's like this...

You're absolutely right...this case was in the Supreme Court of Iowa, where it's been sitting there, like a dead duck, for 7 months now.  It was, and has been my understanding, that the case was, "Under Consideration", like they've been telling me for the entire period...until about a week ago.

I called several times during that period of 7 months...and each time, I was told by the Clerk of Court for the Supreme Court that it was, indeed, "Under Consideration"...it isn't...and it never has been.  Why?  Because the Supreme Court of Iowa has no desire to hear this appeal.  And now, it looks as though it might never be heard.

See, all that time, while it's been "Under Consideration?'  There were, supposedly, and told to me just a week ago, 3 things that are keeping this appeal from moving on:

1.  I haven't paid the filing fee.

2.  They haven't got the records from the cases yet.

3.  They haven't received the transcripts from the cases yet.

All three of these things...unbeknownst to me, were my responsibity to take care of, evidently....and I'm finding this out..just as they're about to close the case and bury it.

Oh, we'll go over these three things, one by one...but first, let's go over what I've done to get this case heard already.

First, I had to file a notice of Appeal.  Easy Peasy.  no biggie.  Type up a one page document, and electronically file it from my chair.

Second, I had to draw up something called a "Combined Certificate".  This was not so easy.  3-4 pages of some kinda nonsense, that should have flagged the Supreme court that they needed the records to this case, and the transcripts thereof.

Third, and most importantly, I had to draw up the "Petition of Appeal".  Now, for those of you who have been following me all this time, this was part of a very large bunch of bullshit that I had to do for the supreme court, when really, all this bunch of yahoos had to do was wave their magic legal wands, and they could have had all of this with the punch of a couple of mouse buttons.  You see, contrary to what they told me at the beginning of this mess, they DO have E-file for the Supreme Court.  They told me, back then, that they didnt.  They do...but you have to have a case in the Supreme Court running...in order to be on E-file...and I didnt.  They didn't tell me about this until last week.  Included in this pack of BS that I had to issue to the Supreme Court, in a timely manner (unlike THEIR definition of "Timely Manner", evidently) were 17 copies of the 20 page Petition of Appeal, bound and with a blue cover sheet on it, 17 copies of the 11 page Petition of Termination, and 17 copies of the 11 page AMENDED Petition of Termination.  This cost me a pretty penny, and, if I had a running case, and had an efile to file it in at the time, would have been as easy and copying it and filing in the court case running...except that I didn't have one running (they say now), so I had to print all of this off...then mail it at exhorbitant rates to their clerk of court.  In the meantime, motions have been filed, and resistance has happened, and ANSWERS and motions opposing that resistance have been filed in this case, docket number 15-0559 (yes, they even give this non-existant case a case number)...that, according to them, doesn't exist yet, because of the 3 things I listed above...so let's go over those, shall we?

1.  Paying the filing fee.

According to our Constitution, (but remember, we are mini-me's of the U.S. Corp., and are, as such, mini corporations, so the Constitution doesn't apply to us corporate property...which we are, technically) "We The People" do not have to pay a filing fee for any court case, or an appeal to any injustice, whether on a state or federal level.  Moreover, I asked the clerk of court exactly who it was that was demanding my payment, or that I was paying this filing fee TO...and she wouldn't tell me that.  'Magine that.  So, what I have to do, is ONCE AGAIN (even though I showed a judges order stating that we were ALREADY indigent, using, at that time, a CURRENT financial affidavit from BOTH of us showing this...oh, and after 7 months?  They can't find that document that I attached to the combined certificate back then, now) file a CURRENT financial affidavit showing, ONCE AGAIN, that we are STILL indigent, then have to file a motion to have the Supreme Court waive the need for a filing fee.  Unbelievable.

2.  They haven't got the records for the case yet.

I have to tell the Juvenile court that the Supreme Court needs those records...ARE YOU SERIOUS?  Why should I, the appellant, have to tell the District court (who already knows that we are appealing the case) that the Supreme Court needs their records?  Oh, and I asked the clerk why the Supreme Court didn't ask for those records from the District court?  She says they NEVER do that...that it's our responsibility to do it.  Now I have to "motion" the district court, FOR the Supreme Court, to give the District court records to the Supreme Court.  WHAT THE HELL ARE WE PAYING THESE IDIOTS FOR, OUT OF OUR TAXES?  DO THEY DO ANYTHING BUT "CONSIDER" CASES FOR APPEAL for the enormous salaries I'm sure we pay these people??  For an ADDITIONAL FILING FEE (mentioned above) as well??

3.  They haven't got the transcripts from the transcribers yet.

They haven't gotten these transcripts from the Juvenile court yet...because I have to pay them nearly $1000 for them...because the transcribers charge $3.50 a page, for court hearings I should have never had to attend in the first place.  I could go as far as to mention the fact that they should have never had the right to take our daughter in the first place (as DHS's own adminstration and ADMINISTRATOR has ruled); let's not even talk about the fact that they should have never had jurisdiction over this case anyway, because of her Indian heritage...I mean, I wouldn't even BE appealing if they had a moral compass, or a sense of justice...I think they can fork out the money that they STEAL FROM THE TAXPAYERS ANYWAY TO STEAL CHILDREN to pay for our injustices, hmmm?   CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS SHIT?

Now, they do give you the option of asking to have he state pick up the tab.  How do I get the state to pay for them?  I have to file another set of financial affidavits to THE DISTRICT COURT...when all along, they have deemed me...INDIGENT.  Do they really think that things have gotten better for us today, as opposed to a year ago, when they stole our daughter and made us homeless?  They haven't, at least not much.  And, at the time, there were, once again, CURRENT financial affidavits ALREADY FILED...but I have to motion the court to produce them at state expence, NOW, after 7 months...because now I just might be able to afford them, as opposed to 7 months ago, when this Supreme Court case (that never was a Supreme Court case) was supposedly already "under consideration".

So what I'm trying to say here is, I am currently under yet ANOTHER time gun, to hurry up and do all of this...or they're going to (if they haven't already) close the appeal.

Now, if this doesn't convince you that Family Court and the Supreme Court are all in bed together to hide the corruption?  Nothing will.  Nuff said.

Till next time, Christopher Bruce, the Mighty Sword.  Onward with EXPOSING THE CORRUPTION....DAILY...HERE, AND ON MY PODCAST!  :D

The Appeal to Termination, Part I - This is WAR!!!

http://zimaq.deviantart.com/art/THIS-IS-WAR-190778988

WARNING!!!  CONTAINS THE KIND OF LANGUAGE YO' MAMA WARNED YOU ABOUT!!!

Well, in case you don't remember, the Supreme Court of Iowa has already denied me 3 motions, one to stay our termination (even though it's GLARINGLY OBVIOUS THAT THESE PARENTS HAVE BEEN DONE WRONG HERE), the Motion to un-confidentialize (Oh NO!!  CAN'T HAVE AMERICA SEE WHAT WE PLAN TO DO, AS WE RE-RAILROAD THESE PARENTS), and the motion to re-consider the stay of Termination, which we're pretty GD sure will be right behind this little travesty.

First, remember, that after almost 11 months..well, I think I've had it...mentally, financially, and physically.  I think it's time to bring this around, EH?  I think a bit of Kharma action might just be in order.

So, here first, is yet ANOTHER letter received from the Asst. Attorney General, Katherine Miller-Todd-Jingleheimer-Schmidt; resisting ONCE AGAIN, our motion to have the Supreme Court of Iowa reconsider our stay of termination...along with my winning commentary, per usual.

Quite simply?  I, Christopher William Bruce say FUCK YOUR CONFIDENTIALITY.  NEEEEEEXT!!!

This legal moron first states that our rights have been terminated....WELL YEAH, IDIOT, THAT'S WHY WE'RE APPEALING IT!  Man oh man, the waste of paper this woman promotes is unreal!!

2nd, she goes on to REPEAT that we filed a motion to stay our parental rights termination...like they had the RIGHT TO DO SUCH A THING ANYWAY...yeah yea...tell me me something I didn't fucking know, WILLYA??  I'm sure a whole lot of trees are getting chopped down yearly to fuel this woman's inkjet...

You know, they are right, the FINAL decision hasn't been made by the old decrepid idiot that runs DHS...but he will, and he'll do it just about the time this gets denied AGAIN...then I'll just refile it anyway.

Now the part that pissed me off to no end...*grits his teeth*...she states AGAIN that I have NO FUCKING STANDING IN THE CASE, BECAUSE THE CORRUPT JUDGE IN MY CASE THREW ME OUT OF IT WHEN I HAD SO MUCH GD EVIDENCE PILED UP IN THE COURT TO BRING THEM ALL TO THEIR FUCKING KNEES...I've had it with these assholes.

And now, my response.

OK kids, you're gonna think I've flipped my lid...but I had to do it...

Katherine Miller Todd, the Asst. Attorney General and newsest member of my "Bruce Bitch List", and the prosecutor in my Supreme Court Appeal just heaped yet another straw on my back, and this Appellant has decided that he's had quite enough of the bullshit.

So...for your reading enjoyment (I suggest all of you with weak wills and sensitive ears please, look the other way NOW), here is a letter that I just sent this woman, after she "Resisted" my motion to reconsider the decision to stay our termination....AGAIN.

"Dear Ms. Miller Todd;

First of all, you idiot, you can't tell me I don't have standing in an appeal to Termination, when I was in a case where my rights were FUCKING TERMINATED...and, just because the judge in my case is a corrupt sonafabitch who couldn't find a moral compass to save his ass; doesn't mean you have to try and beat him out.  What's more, just because, for now, you have the taxpayer's money forever at your disposal...MY MONEY...to keep this shit going for all eternity, doesn't mean you should open your mouth and speak. Say I don't have standing in this case one more time, I will come down there and personally rip your balls off.

Now, here's another li'l tidbit for you, moron.  I'm bringing the ___ into this...know who they are? If you don't, there's a link to their website, along with a radio show you should listen to long before you take one more step towards me or my family. THEY'RE THE ONES, WITH ME, AND A MILLION OTHER AMERICANS THAT ARE GOING TO BRING ALL YOU CORRUPT ASSHOLES TO JUSTICE, ONCE AND FOR ALL.  So I'm only going to say this once...back the fuck off, or you're all going to prison. Period. Or, as it states in the video? Maybe even worse than that...matter of fact, isn't it about time you stop trying me with my own tax dollars?

I suggest all you stupid people give it up NOW...before it's too late for you to run and hide. The days of Statutory law are all but over, and the days of Common Law have re-begun.

By the way, I'm shipping this off to all the other players in our bunch, as well as all of my news buddies and politicians. I wouldn't try the harassment angle again, it's getting old. Add to that, I have at minimum of 6000 people who are gonna bail me out anyway. Oh, and in case you hadn't noticed, NOTHING YOU DO IS CONFIDENTIAL ANYMORE. Every step you make, and everything you're doing is posted on my blog, on Facebook and on Twitter...so I wouldn't waste the effort.

Christopher "Always Standing" Bruce
THE MIGHTY SWORD.

The Ol' Double-Cross (Appeal)

OMG kids...I realize these people have to do their jobs, in order to collect a much needed paycheck (in addition to what other bonuses they make in the adoption and foster market trade), but really?  What DRIVEL!!!  Talk about grasping at straws!  These idiots couldn't find a law if it passed right in front of 'em...(you like that?  I thought it was good!!!).

Now, on the front, there was, as I expected, a demand to keep this confidential.  Hmmmmm...well, the Supreme Court, as well as the Attorney General's office, DID start the war before I even got to the battleground...so no.  I don't theeenk so.  Deny MY motion to stay Termination will ya?

Naturally, there WILL be comment.  Can't have a farce like this go without that kind o' fun, now can we??  Let's get it on.

Now, the first thing I suppose I should mention, here, is the use of the phrase "Material Facts"...something these people wouldn't recognize if it hit 'em smack across the side of the head...please, continue on...

Issue 1, they state, is that CB...that's me, of course; does not have standing to raise any issues from the CINA proceedings, because I was dismissed as a necessary party and all of the CINA orders are "Res Judicata."  For those of you ignorant of Latin (the dead language we still use...so how is this a dead language then, and why the hell is it still used in our law??), Res Judicata means these issues are moot issues; they've been discussed and ruled on in previous hearings, with no dispute, nor appeal taken by the defendant.  They are, therefore, according to the law, not able to be brought up again; and set in stone.

BULLSH**

One more sentence that's important here, is that error was NOT perserved at all.  Hate to tell you folks out there in dream land; I don't know about the error you're showing or preserved in YOUR files, after you altered or destroyed them, BUT ERROR IS MOST CERTAINLY PRESERVED RIGHT HERE, ON AMERICA'S DEADLY SINS, IN THE ENTIRE "AND AWAY WE GO" SERIES, in the blog you were so fond of using over and over again against me, as well as in the four binders containing every single document received from the Juvenile records department, as well as downloaded to my computer via efile; complete with date and time stamps showing when YOUR FOLKS FILED THEM!!!!  Also "preserved", are the 5 full recordings of each and every court hearing I'm in possession of (and their copies in at least 5 different locations in this state), and the recordings of each and every interaction I've ever had with the *ahem* WOMEN of DHS and CFI.  Ain't that special?  And remember, that last one...#9 on that sheet I signed?  Remember?  Was very clearly never agreed to, where NOT recording you and your illegal actions were concerned.  So sorry.  Screw around with the transcripts and burn and alter documents all ya like; and I wish you all the luck in the world getting away with THAT lie.

Sorry, lost my mind for a minute...back to the rest of it.

For one, you all know that this father's rights were terminated in one case; which didn't occur for a month and a half after he had been thrown out of the CINA case, and deemed not a party to THAT case...yet I was left in the termination hearing, so that my rights...COULD BE TERMINATED.  And, since I WAS left in the termination hearing, and, obviously STILL in possession of my rights, (else, why would they need to terminate them?) AND A PARTY TO THAT CASE so that they could do so...then how did they manage to terminate my rights, IF I WAS NO LONGER A PARTY TO THE CASE?  I know, I know...confusing, eh?  So much for that nonsense.  On to part 2 of that, since everything that happens in the CINA case provides need for termination, and helps a Judge decide that termination is necessary, then how is it that everything in the CINA case is RES JUDICATA, and not relevant to the appeal of termination?  Are you starting to get that RAILROAAAAD feeling again???

On to the "discussion" portion of this crap, they bring up...ONCE AGAIN (almost as bad as the permenancy hearing with this one, right?) that the father has been dismissed as a necessary party to the case (after 6 months of fighting in it), because they have established RONALD SHAVER to be the actual father; utilizing an Iowa Supreme Court decision, In the matter of J.C., which states that this father was found to be an unnecessary party...BECAUSE his rights had been, by this time, terminated, and that the child in question was having troubles identifying her true father.  The baby in THIS case hower was not even, as yet COGNIZANT even, and didn't even know how to distinguish light from dark yet, let alone a fake or true father.  She was already having trouble with this anyway, I'm sure, considering the FOSTER father, surely, if at all.  Regardless, THIS LEGAL father's rights had yet to be terminated, yet the Judge JUMPED on his chance to rid the court of the headache of having to address the 500+ motions we had filed NUNC PRO TUNC, as well as all of the evidence that this father had piled up against Emily Nieman and the crooked Judge, William A. Price, in order to bring out the truth of the TOTAL illegality of this entire case.

Later, AGAIN, it's stated that I didn't challenge any of the orders in appeal...and they're right.  I didn't.  I didn't do this because I agreed with the findings found (I most CERTAINLY did NOT), and duly expressed the reasons why not in the petition of appeal.

NOTE THE "NOTE", later, where it covers the Attorney General's butt (he thinks), where she states that just because the Supreme Court denies my stay of termination, that this by no means defines me as a parent or a possible appellant in this appeal...EXCEPT THIS APPEAL IS ABOUT THE TERMINATION, AND I WAS A PARTY TO THE CASE!...my RIGHTS WERE TERMINATED IN IT.  I WAS A @#$%! father/appellant!!!  Why was I later mentioned to NOT attend the termination?  Why would it matter, if I was NOT identified as a PARTY TO THE COCK-A-DOODY CASE??????????

*takes a deep breath*......RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAILROAAAAAAAD!!!

Add now, that the Attorney General now adds that niether myself (because I wasn't a party now in EITHER case, by definition) NOR the mother (who is, and is listed as pro se in these cases now) has a right to refer to issues in the CINA proceedings, even though it's BECAUSE OF THE CINA PROCEEDINGS THAT WE ARE NOW IN TERMINATION, AND THE APPEAL THEREOF....RIGHT???  You people REALLY need to go back to law school for a much needed refresher course in LAW!!

Now we move on to what is, perhaps the biggest lie of them all.  They state, that we abandoned all 18 of our motions, as well as the motions to address 5 pieces of evidence, which we had worked extremely hard on, for weeks, and had piled up to show this whole batch of proceedings as false, illegal, and in bad need of redress (re-addressing, for you law newbies).  Now, you wanna 'splain to me why I would have, within 10 minutes, ABANDONED THESE BY WALKING OUT OF THE HEARING???  The truth, as most of you already know, is that they had filed a motion to establish paternity like 5 times in both cases, so that the judge, practically before he hit the door, could address this motion first, which also had the added bonus of giving these people a lawful (yet irrelevant) way to throw both the father off of the case, right along with every single motion and piece of evidence he had filed.  ABANDONED HIS MOTIONS MY ASS...

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLROOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAD!!

Here's one I love:  That we...or the mother, rather, did not pursue an application for the ICWA, but the county attorney...DID!!!!...at or around this particular time, WHEN THE CASE IS ALMOST OVER!!...WELL YA...after I filed a motion to INTERVENE HE DID!!

Please, if you will, remember that we didn't find out about ICWA, or the fact that the worker had deprived the mother of even knowing there WAS AN ICWA, until this whole thing was about over.  This was one of the motions these parents had filed just before the permanency hearing, and had the distinction of being the ONLY motion this crooked judge had the desire to hear out; after throwing away 17 other motions and all the evidence we had piled up against him, along with the father.  This is because, if this motion had NOT been addressed, it may have very well cost the man his job as a judge.  They make this look like THEIR effort to find out if maybe the Cherokees might want to be involved, when in fact this had been denied the mother FROM DAY ONE!  It was only because I had discovered that they had denied her this through fraud that it was even brought to light.  LYING LITTLE BASTARDS!!!  So, after the judge threw me, all of my evidence and all of my motions off of the case; and after the mother stood up and asked this biased judge to recuse the case and left also right behind me, he then called his goons, the Polk County Sheriff's office to bring the mother back so that he could find out what he needed to get out of this little mess.  Unfreekin'believable.  Then said we left and abandoned the rest.  Little @#$%!.

To polish off this pile of garbage (on this page, anyway), the broken record concerning the father continues on, stating ONCE AGAIN that I am not a party to this case, and that the father is attempting to represent the mother in this appeal...WHAT???  First of all, the mother is ALREADY PRO SE, and the father is representing HIMSELF, AND IS VERY MUCH A PART OF THIS APPEAL!!!!  Let me see if I can possibly make this more clear for this IDIOT!!  MY.....................RIGHTS...........WERE.........TERMINATED......SO ............OBVIOUSLY.........I.......AM..........A.........PARTY.........TO...........THE............CASE!!!!!!

And, to put the cherry on the top of this melted sundae, he then tries to accuse me of practicing law...ARE YOU SERIOUS?????  Give me a f***ing break. NEEEEEEXT!!!

As much as I'd love to dispute each and every legal site used in this cross-BS, there really isn't any sense in trying to dispute cites used to prove that this BS is correct, or lawful.  I've already wasted more than enough of your time in doing the former, so doing this would just be boring and redundant. But, if it will make you happy, I will take just a moment to point out that the VERY FIRST REFERENCE?  Shows you don't know your P's, Q's, R's OR your S's.  It states...and I quote, "[a]nd therefore he was not a party to the termination hearing."....endquote.  I believe I am, well after the Permanency hearing, mentioned in each and every document FOLLOWING that hearing, where it was determined I was no longer a party.  Sounds to me like I was still a party to the termination hearing folks.  And as that party, my rights were then duly TERMINATED.  You can't terminate the rights of a non-party to the case.  Nice try, too bad, so sad.  Either I wasn't a party to the case, and still have my rights, or I WAS a party to the case, and had them terminated.  I'm afraid you're going to have to make up your minds here.  Either way, this shows what IDIOTS you are, and on that merit alone, have zero defense to my being a party in THIS APPEAL. Phhhhhhhhhht.  I think I've said quite enough, concerning your so called legal cites in defense of your arguments.

FINALLY!!!!  Pompous windy bastards.  On to Issue II.

Now we have these idiots trying to prove to the Supreme Court, that because we didn't show up for the Termination Hearing, that we have NO RIGHT TO BRING AN APPEAL!!!!!

For those of you ignorant in this story, they scared us away from this hearing by FILING HARASSMENT CHARGES, ONE FIRST DEGREE AND 2-3RD DEGREES.  THEY DIDN'T WANT US TO SHOW UP, SO THEY COULD PULL THIS BS!!!  And, just to be certain we didn't show up, they called in the Secret Service!!!!  The unmitigated gall!!  Now, if you continue on to the next page, it states that we seek to justify our absense with information that is not a part of the record.

THIS RECORD?  well DUHHHH...it was a whole different case!!!!!  Of COURSE it isn't a part of the record.  WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE???  ARE THEY MENTAL?

To conclude this little travesty of justice, kids, let's just say that I was GOING to post the answer that I intend to present to the Supreme Court, but I think I'm going to take some time on it, do it right, then dedicate a new post to it.  I think it deserves that.  Also, it would seem that we have yet ANOTHER name for the Bruce Bitch List.  Welcome, Katherine S. Miller Todd.  You are just another poor unlucky soul in a very long list of people who will ALSO be losing your job over this.  :D

The Turning o' the Tables, Part I

I dunno kids...I think I feel a different breeze blowing...a much warmer and more relaxed one.

Oh sure...there's been a setback or two.

Methodist's cache of lawyerly dirision has found a way to allow of their "unduly-burdoned" doctors and nurses, who are probably really busy relieving other parents of THEIR children at the behest of DHS, to be able to "call in" for our assessment appeal hearing.  That sucks a**.  Will it hamper my ability to prove their dishonesty, you ask?  Hell no.  They're still going right where I want them to.  Down the tubes.  They'll pay...just like the rest of the gang.  And will they be able to "Phone in" for the Supreme Court?  Not a friggin' chance of that happening.

We haven't heard a thing from the Supreme Court as yet, concerning the appeal...mostly because it's not our turn yet.  No, first, the "defendees" have to file their cross-appeal.  Then it's our turn again.  But really?  I don't see this as being a problem, as yet; or ever really.  I don't think we'll be denied this time, oh no.  See, there's that U.S. Court thing looming over their heads.  No, I think they're gonna wanna settle with the parents, and fast.  What they don't seem to get is, it doesn't...really...matter.  The accused are GOING to U.S. Court, no matter WHAT the Supreme Court decides.  Corruption in the state of Iowa is going to be a thing of memory, before I get any rest.  I'm not done with the li'l bastaches by a long shot.  Remember?  I promised they would lose their jobs.  And they WILL LOSE THEIR JOBS...come Hell.  High water isn't gonna be an optional condition.  There will be NO option.  Not only that, but I'd like to see some real jail time...for the Judge, for the County Attorney and his lackeys, and for those of CPS...there will be a special place reserved in the worst hell on Earth for these morons.  And I will be the distributor of that Hell.  Satan will be envious; by the time I get done with THESE losers.

No, I really and truly believe that things are finally going my way...and even if they aren't really, and I just think they are, it's O.K., because now I have enough momentum going that there's no real chance of stopping me now.  Like a fellow employee that's become a real issue in your working life, if I can't get the point across to the manager to do something about you, it's OK, because next I go over his head, and go to the Supervisor.  I can't get anywhere with him, FINE!!  There's the District Manager.  Then his supervisor...and his, and his, until I get to the CEO and company headquarters.  Heads will roll, whether you like it or not, and if you can't do it, well, there's always the guy over him, and the guy over him...SOMEONE along the way will take care of the issue, trust me.  :D

By the way, for those of you wanting proof that this father WASN'T guilty of those charges the State brought....not that you do or anything.  The thing I think I like the most is that there were SO MANY comments of friends of mine under that shot, on the DMPD's website, singing my praises (and THANK YOU FOR BELIEVING IN ME GUYS!!) I just got all warm and googly inside.  Oh, and did I forget to flip off the state?  IN YOUR FACE COUNTY ATTY.  Consider it a done deal.  :D.  Here's that order, for those of you doubting Tami's and Terrences.

The Motion of Non-Confidentiality

http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photos-time-transparency-clarity-honest-forthright-clock-words-white-face-to-illustrate-honesty-sincerity-forthrightness-image35971723

OMG America...I just had to do it, didn't I?  I love psychological warfare, it's my FAVORITE.

Here is a motion to be mailed off to the Supreme Court, concerning our appeal.  They wanted me to sign a document of Confidentiality...and I believe you all know how I feel about that...

So here it is, another masterpiece from the legally twisted mind of the Mighty Sword..and Ms. Sword, too..  :D

FINALLY!! (Success!!) The TERMINATION ORDER & THE INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

SPECIAL NOTE:  I was gonna answer this order America, but I don't believe I wish to waste any more time on the likes of Judge William A. Poobah Price.  He doesn't look at or answer any of my motions anymore anyway; and not only that, but I couldn't see anything he DOES decide to answer anyway, thanks to my being kicked out of this case as well, thanks to his supposed termination of my rights.  Little does he know...It was either answer and wait for a response that I wouldn't be able to see anyway, or appeal it.  I'm done with this asshole.  I think I'll choose B, Appeal, Alex.

The audacity of these people is simply amazing America.  Why don't they get it?  They filed the order...and now we appeal, and the nightmare they've been dreading is now upon them.  The Interlocutory Appeal process has begun.  You'd think these people would have a lick of sense, or might be worried about their careers...but no, they just plug along, ignoring the harbinger of their doom.  I just have to shake my head....again.

Of course, as you know, the Federal complaint form, which will, of course, drag them into U.S. Federal Court is more than half filled out.  Upon filing my appeal, this one gets put into U.S. court.  They just don't think I'm serious....or something.  Or maybe, that all along, I would, eventually, just roll on over.  Or, maybe, just maybe, they thought I MIGHT be bluffing.  They couldn't possibly be more wrong. SOOOOOOOO......

Here it is Kids, finally, the long-awaited Termination order, terminating these parent's rights.  It's good to finally have the last packet of lies, issued by the Grand Poobah himself, William A. Price.  He, of course, had us immediately unindexed for this case...but of course, it didn't stop this FATHER from filing his appeal...immediately following.  The Interlocutory appeal is BACK ON.  The Supreme Court's version will, of course, be immediately filed Monday, when I get my new car.  :D

Here then, is the last and final BS tale told by William Price and the gang.  We will, of course, be answering to this set of fabrications rather quickly.

I think we'll include some commentary with this one...or maybe, I'll just answer it and post that instead.

Yeah, I like that better.  :D

Isn't Life Interesting?

http://www.army.mil/article/82619/Fort_Benning_s_Independence_Day_Celebration/

Well kids...maybe I was wrong.  Maybe justice will be done after all...

I just peeked at the papers filed of late in our case(s)...and something really interesting just cropped up.  It's not much...but it's a damn good start, should you ask me.

See, a couple of days ago, I ran across what I thought might be a glitch.  See, my views, at least on a daily basis, have never in life exceeded 700.  And that's when I worked really hard at it.

The other day they went to over 1700 views...and I said...NOOOOOOOOO....that CAN'T be right...and I blew it off.

The same day, this document came out on e-file.  I looked at...and stifled a small yell of joy...could it be????

The supreme court just asked...not just for an order or two.  Not for a transcript or two...but for EVERYTHING...EVERYTHING IN OUR CASE!!!!!!

Stay tuned America.  A little more investigation might just be in order...