DAMN I'M HAVING FUN!!!
Wheeeeelllllp....today I got to invite some great folks from Methodist to our upcoming permenancy hearing....it's gonna be a whoppin' good time! Oh...oh, and that's not all....but, I'm afraid I just have to keep secrets, we don't want any preparations for my surprises...I just can't wait for Methodist's explanation for their part, and, thanks to the motion to NUNC PRO TUNC the removal hearing (to be filed...PRETTY DAMN QUICK, we're gonna rehash the whoooooole thing, starting with that bitch...you know the one. I can't WAIT!!
Here are just some of today's motions, including another one I can't wait for, the drug facility, and their shining faces...not just to show the judge that ALL of their testing was FALSE, but to bring DHS's drug goon on the stand, you know, TONY REED, to testify about his 2nd drug test of the father after our last hearing, just 3 days after I served the facility to appear...well, they did, but not to produce records, like they most certainly WILL at this hearing; but to, IN THEIR REVENGE OF THAT ACTION, TO TAKE AND PRODUCE ANOTHER TEST THAT THEY COULD FALSIFY in order to try and teach the father a valuable lesson in f***ing with DHS...only one problem...they provided me with MORE evidence of DHS's snake-like actions (I'm thinking those folks and Daily Mays, of former attorney fame, might just be related somehow). So now, we can have at his happy lying ass too. We'll see if he tries any football tackles on this defendant, as I waltz out of the courtroom to go and get our daughter...tee hee. I do declare that all of these bastards will soon be a fryin' in the winter sun...legally, of course, and, just so the administrative branch of the Polk County Sheriff's office isn't confused about my borderline threat here, thsi one means:
I....PLAN...TO .....FILE...A....LOT....OF...CHARGES...AND...BRING...SEPARATE...ACTIONS...SOOOOON...NO....PHYSICAL...HARM...IS...INTENDED...HERE....BY...THIS...DEFE...NDANT ...OR...HIS....WIFE...EITHER....
**********************************************************************************************
Now comes Christopher Bruce in his motion to supress evidence, as presented by the prosecution for drug testing, in the adjudication hearing, as well as it will be brought against us in our upcoming permanency hearing, with clear and convincing evidence for exhibit.
1. The father has acquired two urine cups that will used as exhibits. These two cups are used to do official drug testing at a facility that serves DHS in their efforts.
2. Two days after this defendant did file a motion to suppress this evidence, DHS did file a report to this court, with an included version of this 2nd test, complete with an explanation for the cup that was thrown in the trash, as being a cup the tester found to be inactive, and that was thrown in the trash by the tester as well, after doing one test on the defendant. Then, that a 2nd cup was used, and found this defendant dirty for methamphetimines. Proof of this deceit on the part of the tester, as well as DHS, is as stated below:
a. That the defendant, who was asked by DHS to take a urine test (not ordered by this court, or its trier-of-fact, to this defendant’s best knowledge), agreed to do so without argument, even after DHS had made
it clear that all was the same as before, 1 visit a week, supervised, with the same worker, Liz still a drug user, and in need of abuse training, the father the same, as well as having mental issues. The father, in an attempt to go along with what this court has asked, was willing to do what it took in order to accomplish this.
b. That this defendant, who had relieved himself just prior to the hearing, and this hearing only had taken 15 minutes at most, had yet to have to go again. This defendant then drank water in order to comply with this test.
c. Once, while the defendant wandered and spoke, the tester, thinking this defendant was leaving the courthouse in order to avoid this test (even though he had willingly agreed to do it), moved to block his path so that he could not leave, as if he had the power and the right to accomplish this. This, to this defendant, proves his desire to do the test this time, as false, because if this defendant were to leave, he would have to produce another inactive cup or something else might go wrong as opposed to doing it this time.
d. That this defendant, while waiting to produce enough to take the test, did inform this tester (without his knowledge of his being the owner of the contract with DHS for drug testing until the report showed in efile this fact 2 days later) the story of the first drug test, at the facility on Merle Hay Road, to the letter, in order to deem whether this tester was more honest than the facility he had tested at for hair. After describing the condition of the facility, this tester then claimed that he had many dealings with this facility, and knew the staff well, and that this facility looked nothing like I had described it to him. This brought to the defendant that this was no person that the defendant could expect or trust to issue accurate and honest drug results to this court.
e. That upon this realization, the defendant declared that maybe he should inform DHS now that he would be coming up dirty in this urine test, then proceeded, after a time to provide the drug test sample. After watching how the test was done, this defendant then inquired as to how the test worked. The tester told the defendant of the process, and claimed that there were several tabs, each containing the name of a drug, and that they would not only move up as the drug in question was recognized, but that bars would appear in color to signify a clean or dirty for result; and finally that one or two of the tabs had already begun moving. When this defendant tried to change his view as to witness the test, the tester then turned the cup away from the defendant.
f. After the test had completed, after the related time period to this defendant of three minutes for the test to complete, the tester was asked for results, to which the tester pulled out his cell phone and took pictures, and told the defendant that DHS would hear the results first, then inform the defendant of those results. Afterwards, the tester asked the defendant to pour the sample into another container, sealed this, then asked the defendant to dispose of this test cup into the court’s bathroom trash. The tester left, and the defendant remained at the court house, with the intention of retrieving this cup.
g. The defendant asked a member of the Polk County Sheriff’s staff to get the key to the garbage, because the defendant claimed that he had dropped something into the garbage and could not reach it to retrieve it. The staff then procured the key from the janitor and watched as the defendant retrieved the ONLY cup in the garbage.
h. This defendant brings that DHS and this tester’s story that the tester taken two complete samples from this defendant one right after the other, and then threw the discovered inactive cup away after a first test, then did another after discovering the first cup to be inactive is false, and that DHS and this tester have an agreement and contract to cover each other’s story, in case such a falsehood is discovered to be so in such a case. There was no 2nd sample taken from this defendant, and the testee, not the tester, threw away the cup; not because the cup was inactive as discovered by the tester, but because the inactive cup was found out by
the testee, and was, in fact, required to be trashed by the defendant.
i. After discovering that nothing showed on the cup whatsoever (no marks, and no rising tabs), this defendant did, in an effort to procure more proof needed to convince this court of this deceit, decided to go and pick the mother up from work, just to see how her drug test would come out. The father then drove the mother to 2911 Merle Hay Rd., the very place this defendant was hoping that he would have to go to. On the way, this defendant called Katie Gosch to leave a message on her voicemail that the results had shown clean for the father’s test, in order to flush her part in this deceit out.
j. Upon arriving at Central Iowa Family Services, this defendant told the mother to do her test, ask for a witness to this test, and to record the interaction. The mother went inside to do her test. Then the phone rang, and it was Katie Gosch, who informed that my test results had not come back clean, as I had told her, but that they had, once again, come up dirty for meth. I then hung up on her, realizing that they had done this to these defendants once again, utilizing the same facility’s testing results as proof. The father then called DHS again to inform Ms. Gosch only these words,“We’re done, no more of this BS”, we’re done here.”...and that’s it. There was no mention of no more contact to be had between DHS and I, as claimed by Ms. Gosch.
k. Just a moment later, the mother exited the facility with her test cup still in her hand (not on purpose), and informed me that they had denied her the right to a witness, as she had asked. I was upset, of course, thanks to the phone call from Ms. Gosch and said “Come on, we’re leaving.” The mother had to then go back in, because she had left her purse inside. She came out and, upon noticing that she had a cup, we decided, as we drove home, that we would attempt the test again in this unused cup, with the mother as witness to see if we had the same problem with this new cup as we did with the test cup taken from the courthouse. Upon arriving at home, the father took the new unused cup into the bathroom and filled it to the top with fresh urine, and put the cap on it. We waited the 3 minutes the tester had waited...and discovered this 2nd cup as inactive, just like the first one. My wife took pictures of the cup after the test had completed. The inactive result of this test is submitted as evidence with this court, as of this date. Later, not unlike the removal recording, we realized again that we had forgotten we had recorded this, and listened to it today, in order to see if there was anything we could use as evidence. The only voice you can clearly hear is the mother’s unfortunately, but if you listen closely, you can hear the female tester as she denies this mother her witness to the test she wants to willingly take; by stating there is only a single collector who works there, and no witness can be or will be provided to her.
l. I find it very interesting that the female tester involved with the test of the mother is surprised when she says that she wants a witness to the test, then remarks on her surprise by saying that NO ONE has ever asked for a witness to the test.
m. That with the blog post dated back on 8/14/14, named “The B&S Railroad Job, Part II - The Drug Thingymabob” posted on this defendants website, even now, describing this facility in full detail, as having, upon your entrance to it, a very large reception area with a single large desk in it, with only one person working in the entire place, with nasty shag carpet, that looks nothing like your average drug testing facility; and a side room with an ugly smaller desk in it, where this man (or woman) who works there, cuts your hair with a pair of school scissors and sends it in. Nowhere in this facility is there another piece of furniture, or anywhere for anyone who might be waiting to take their test to sit and wait. This defendant finds it quite interesting, then, that 5 months later, it’s been completely remodeled, again, as witnessed by both defendants, with all that this defendant witnessed and posted about back in August, gone. Now, there’s a small waiting room with differently colored low carpet, clean, with a giant wall now separating the main area from the front, with security cameras in place and a lot of nice furniture at which you can sit and wait for your appointment in it; as well as a nice and new professional look to it. When this defendant had described this place to his tester, remembering he had said “over a year” as a time frame that he’d been working with the place, thought to serve a subpoena on this facility in order to gain a client list, and upon his entry to this place found it completely remodeled because of his post alone, this defendant is absolutely certain of this fact, beyond all reasonable doubt. This, of course, gives this tester, just three days after serving them a subpoena to appear at our hearing with all of their records to present in this court, who is not only the owner of this testing facility, as well as the owner of this contract for drug testing with DHS, more than enough motive, JUST 3 DAYS AFTER THIS DEFENDANT SERVED THEM WITH A SUBPOENA TO APPEAR, appears,, NOT with their records, but to only give this defendant a drug test and find him guilty, once again, and to find this defendant and his wife dirty for the same drug with an alternate falsified test.
n. That the mother’s drug test was as the results produced, falsely positive, due to her just receiving an inhaler with Albuterol, around the time of the hair stadt test, by Primary Healthcare. and is shown in this website, the answer provided by a professional working for the company shown in Exhibit #40-42, efiled this date, 1/9/2015. This answer given by a website, Drugs.com (Drugs, Inc.) proves this inhaler to produce false positive for meth, as well as for amphetimines.
3. Here, then, is the relief these defendants hereby seek with this motion:
4. That each and every test done at this facility should be either retested at a true and legitimate testing facility, far out of the reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, or suppressed for all who have attended this facility. I am advertising everywhere for others who have had their testing done here, and I have already gotten 3 recent clients in response. More will be continuously added to the list.
5. That the Department of Human Services owes an apology to Elizabeth Bruce, and that her need for drug testing, drug assessment, as well as drug abuse training be rescinded by this court. Slander and Libel charges shall be filed against this Department, post haste.
6. That all accusations of the alleged drug use, as well as her recommendations be stricken from all court records.
7. That drug testing, in the form of Urine testing, be ordered to be done on this father again, by another facility far out of reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, post haste, and, pending these results, that the relief sought in paragraph 5 and 6 of this motion be repeated for this father.
S/ Christopher Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE
We also took a minute to file the recording for all to hear, and the drug result pictures and the other drug cup fished from the trash, then, tomorrow, we are going to file the motions, NUNC PRO TUNC, for ALL of our hearings to be reheard, and put appropriately in place for the Writ of Mondamus soon to follow the appeal to the permanency...matter of fact, just as soon as I walk out the door of the courtroom. All of this will delay things JUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUST LONG ENOUGH to make room for all of this defendants little aces, that he's been a savin'....and a savin.....and a savin' up for this upcoming Writ.
DAMN I'm having fun!! What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall, however, when our beloved DA, Stephanie Brown, and Judgy William A Price Esquire see THIS ONE, to be filed...wellll....NOW!!
******************************************************************************************
From what I've heard? Judgy Price doesn't like losing Either....lol. I really and truly, wish I could see his face, when he sees this, and pending his decision to WILLINGLY and GLADLY recuse this case..well, shoot, I wish I could say the words...but I just can't do it. Here then, is the motion that will turn these people on their respective behinds. Enjoy Judgy! All my love Stephanie Brown....you little mynx you ;)
Toodles!
(SORRY....this motion is still in the process of being edited, and will be posted for your viewing pleasure A.S.A.P.)
