The Power of: Part IV - Community/Individuality

http://blog.backupify.com/2013/06/05/refer-great-talent-contribute-to-your-community/

Every facet, every department of your mind needs to be programmed by you,
And unless you assume the rightful responsibility, and begin to program your own mind,
The world will program it for you.

 - Jack Kornfield

I am the one and only, nobody I'd rather be;
I am the one and only, you can't take that away from me.

- Chesney Hawkes

Ain't nobody knows me like I know me, and that's final!

- Christopher Bruce

The Mighty Sword

From his upcoming book, "Brucisms"

(hey...I don't see this as an impossibility!) 

Hey, whaddya know, I'm back!!

It's a wonder I made it at all, I gotta tell ya...but here we are again, America, with the Mighty Sword back in the driver's seat, in opposition to the district court's opinion of how things are going with me, as well as to their contrary evidence; which isn't hard, considering what they think or imagine that they have is all untruths, twisted truths or fabricated BS.  What they don't realize is that nothing will stop me from my ultimate goal, to first, fix the state I live in; as well as keep my undivided attention on the higher prize of higher office, in order to undergo the arduous task of making it so this country's citizens might be able to boast a much better position; in which to, first, reclaim our nation, then when that's a done deal, get to work on our largest issue; currently unbeknownst to most; where our relationships, with ourselves, with each other, with other nations, and with our long-lost Deity is concerned.  I don't know about you, but I think it's time we take the clock back a few decades; in order to get back the morals and values we had back when America actually WAS a great nation, and we had actual evidence to back up that claim.

...and that, my friends, is what this post concerns.

I'm sure you've had the opportunity to read up on the post from ....called Selfishness - The "Mine" virus.  If you haven't, I suggest it as a good prelude to this post.  It can be found right here:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/08/selfishness-mine-virus.html 

So this, then, is the road that leads to, then gives you this power.

You must, of course, fix your relationships with yourselves...meaning, you must open your eyes, ears and minds to what's really going on with you because of the kind of person you've developed into, over the years, and compare it to either the person you were that you used to like, or to the person you've always strived to be.  I've always had a deep respect for "The Matrix" series and its version of things, in that it seems as though this is our lives, as programmed into our brains by a smart evildoer race of machines (that we created, and that used to serve us instead) who we fight against, but have to free, then re-program our programmed buddies in order to get an army big enough to turn things around; as well as stop the extinction of the human race.  In our story, almost identical to that one, the Government (or, rather, the corrupt people we supposedly "elect" to it) has programmed us to be sheep, and if some of us don't wake up and fight what's going on, we Americans and our freedoms and rights might just be what's going for extinction.  We believe we control the government we put in place approximately 235 years ago, but they instead manage us now.  We listen to them lie to us, then we watch as they pass laws that make it worse for us and better for them.  The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, and the folks in-between, in the middle, are here to make it look sensible as well as to facilitate the existence of both classes, often without realizing that they do so.  When the time comes that they outlive their usefulness to those of the upper class; who thrive off of their efforts to maintain an even keel in their existence; they're systematically thrown out of their moving vehicles on the highway doing 80 miles per hour, and are then forced to either move up or down in socio-economic definition; then either learn new dog eat dog behaviors and throw all of their kind-hearted and generous or giving behaviors away, in order to better mimic the callous behaviors of their richer brethren at the top; and succeed; or to stick by their morals and values, and because they chose to do the right thing, were forced to sink down into the mire we of the lower class trudge through daily.

Next, you have to fix the relationships you have with others.  Now, we all know that there are a hundred ways to go with this one, but I'm going to make it easy for you, and only cover the giant categories, in an attempt to keep this from being a really extensive and boring post; the length of which could be equal or greater in value to my longest post ever.

First our relationship with other strangers, or people we'll never ever know, is actually the more serious of these.  For example, if the word "Mexican" passed a citizen's lips, back in the 50's, they were more than likely only referring to those people somewhere south of our borders.  Every once in a great while, we might actually have even met a true citizen of that country...on very rare occasion.  Now, when the word Mexican leaves a person's lips you know this person is either referring to any one of the hundreds of authentic Mexican restaurants who serve real Mexican food, you might also be referring instead to that elephant in the room, the giant country below us, where we have a real serious immigration issue.  We'd also be referring to a dialect that has all but equalled, and in some places even, surpassed our own, almost like Spanish may someday be a REQUIRED course...wouldn't that be a day we wouldn't soon forget?  Most of all, the word Mexican has come to mean; to some of us here at the bottom of the ladder anyway; "He's one of a million citizens who works for companies for pennies on the dollar, and because they'd rather hire them for less, this costs us jobs; as if there wasn't enough preventing us from getting them already!"

It's this skewed view of our accountability that has brought us to the pickle we're in now, and we don't even realize it.  We very obviously, in most cases anyway, facilitate our own problems and create our own outcomes.  I had this problem for a great many years...and still kind of do.  It's easy for us, the way we were raised  back in most of our days; added to the lack of accountability; in our governmental figureheads, in our work-places, in our schools...we learn early on to point our fingers at others to blame them for our problems.  Back then you were a tattle-tale.  Now you're a hero.  Whistle-blowers are as common as Q-tips.  I can hear a disciplinary father now, as he first explains it to his first born son (who he has high hopes of, where taking over the family business is concerned), then pulls of the ol' leather belt to make sure his point has sunk in, and the information has duly retained itself in the brain of his future vice-president of operations..."Sure, it may be a fact that Johnny ruined your tree house...but you ARE the one who ignored your best friend when he said that he was over at his house last week, and Johnny stomped all over his collector comics.  So even though it might have been Johnny who ruined the house, it was because you yourself chose to ignore a legitimate warning...made even more legitimate by the fact that it was your best friend that said it, someone who's never lied to you...ever."

We have, as free citizens, the right to speak up or to do something about it, something I've had to learn rather quickly over the last 6 months.  The judge who presides over your case might be a lying, cheating bastard; who makes up his own version of the facts, then rules against you with those facts; but if you don't rebut those facts, or, if that doesn't work, don't appeal his rulings, then you're to blame for his finding fault in you; ultimately, as well as on the whole.  Own up to it, and suck it up America.  The problems this country has now?  Are all here because you didn't speak up, didn't write your congressman, and didn't contest that law they passed.  What's more, you took the local news' word for it, even after you claimed they get paid to say what they do, when telling stories about our government; when they said that Al Gore lost and GW Bush won in FL in 2000, without doing an independent investigation of those facts, or checking those numbers out for yourself.  You, who, just last week, said we couldn't trust electronic voting machines if our lives depended on it, took those results as gospel anyway; and GW, the biggest idiot to ever breathe on the President's office, and all that makes it oval, took command.  What's worse is, you accepted it AGAIN, 4 YEARS LATER, when they claimed that America, even after everything we now knew of GW, just said screw it and somehow managed to vote him in again!!!  And if you believe that, cows pigs and doggies have all left the earth and are now circling around Saturn in order to figure out which lane works the best in rush hour.

Where were we?  Oh yeah....community.  Remember another post of mine, called "The Right to Privacy (Sorry...or the Expectation Thereof)"?  I know, I know, who can keep track, right?  And who, in their right minds wants to dig through the archives to find the damn thing?  Nobody...so, because I'm a nice guy, then, here ya go:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-right-to-privacy-sorrythe.html

Here, in the 2nd paragraph or so, I talk about your "communities" and how they've changed DRASTICALLY over the years.  It used to be you'd be a good neighbor right out of the gate, usually as soon as the new people moved in.  First it was the traditional homemade apple pie you sent the wife over with, usually right after they took back the U-Haul, then there was inviting them over for dinner, etc., etc.  Now-a-days, you're lucky if you talk to your new neighbor more than once a given year.  Distrust of strangers is now as common as breathing.  If they're moving right in next to you, it's almost disastrous.  Getting to know the neighbors isn't just something we never seem to get moved up on our list of things we have to do "one of these days", but is also something we're not really sure we wanna do anymore, at all.

Then let's take a minute to consider our very anti-social behavior of late.  Just about everyone, from your administrative banker all the way down to the janitor comes complete with earphones in their ears, or who plays Candy Crush Soda Saga on their lunch breaks.  Communication with others is becoming extinct behavior, and something that almost seems unkosher to do, anymore.  Talking with your kids, something that used to go hand in hand with good parenting skills, is just about impossible to accomplish.  Considering that evolution hasn't provided us with any better ways to read others' minds (beings that we still only use the small percentile of our brain functions, something that hasn't changed hardly at all over the course of our history), we may just lose the best option we've ever been in possession of, where understanding others is concerned.  At this point, we'd have to mandate the use of our phones as entertainment only in the confines of your home's four walls, and then only sparingly, like TV used to be; as a reward for doing all of your homework or getting all of your chores done.

So, community is mui importante.  Developing a bond with people, whether it's with the neighbors, with your friends, with your co-workers, or with your mates is key to our survival, as humans.  Well, oddly enough, so is your individuality.  There has to be a healthy balance of the two, or you're never gonna make it in your life, and you'll never know a damn thing about people.

Remember when you learned about sex?  It was very awkward having to admit you didn't know things you should have, or that others knew already (however they found out, most of us don't really wanna know).  So it is with your interpersonal skills.  Most important about those skills, however, is in being different, being you, being unique; or finally, representing that percentage of humans that think outside the box; whether it's on demand, or done independently.  If you are just another person, whether at work, at the office Christmas Party, or on the dating scene, this works against you in the worst ways.  Considering the examples of places or situation that I've provided you with, I don't have to tell you what those worst ways are; most of us are already well-aware.

So, what's the point here?  The point, my interesting Judeo-Christian friends, is only this:  If you don't start talking to each other and learning about each other, and continue to shut the rest of America out in order to avoid hurt, pain and loss, you also miss out on the value of good friends, good working relationships and love...things we humans can't live without, especially now.  Take the earphones out of your ears and talk with your children.  Talk to your parents.  Most of all, communicate with yourselves, or you may just miss out on life itself.

The Final Battle Part V - In the Middle of the End (C - DESPARATION SETS IN)

http://pixgood.com/smug.html

WELCOME AMERICA, TO THE GREATEST THREE RING CIRCUS ON EARTH!!  PRICEY'S MAGIC SHOW!!

Oh, this is classic....and noticed....and expected.

ABRAAAAACADABRAAAAA!  aaaaaaand....WHALA!!  A new trick!!

They’re losing...so this is a desperate time...as well as a desperate measure.

They want to claim that this defendant, as only a married and legal father, is now extra baggage.  And has no merit to be here..and should no longer be a party to this action.  If it’s found by Pricy boy to be a motion worth granting, and he does so, then every motion I’ve filed, as well as all evidencence for this hearing; is now moot, and removed from this case...imagine that.  Wanna bet, that before the god even gets sat down, that this is the first motion that Pricey boy picks up?

Then, Liz is all there is left.  She is neglectful, as found by the court, and has done nothing to change it in the time allowed, therefore, the rights are now moved to be terminated.  A very very smart move on the part of the Prosecution...just not smart enough.  You know what, it’s not a smart move at all.  It’s actually an extremely stupid move, a  very strange move, a very ironic move...and lastly, a very funny move, all at the same time.

So, let’s go over the facts, shall we?

1.  See, first, is the fact that this father has been very much a part of this case for the entire 6 months, and now, alla sudden, he ISN'T???  As a matter of absolute fact, half of the "reasons" they use to originally remove the child concern this father.  So if this motion is granted (as we all know full well it will be), it most certainly appears, legally, that this was something that this Judge should have done ages ago, and didn't; mostly because it was an ace he was saving, just when it looks like this defendant might just win his case; and can be easily found to be exactly what it looks like....a move of desperation.  Not only that, but should this come down as a ruling of the court, then it has to also be ORDERED.  Liz had presented herself as pro se, but there’s also a motion to appoint council to the mother for termination...but then Liz, via me, of course, can ask that lawyer to withdraw, almost immediately as well, and a special hearing for that, must be set.  You can’t make someone use an attorney.  Hate to tell you folks of the court....(as if you didn't know this); this mother didn't file the financial affidavit so that you could find her indigent and claim her to be in need of another snake...LAWYER, I mean to say lawyer...no, this defendant did so, in order to show any appealing entities that you ASSHOLES and LIARS AND CHEATING BASTARDS did the 2nd one as a way to cut off any chance these defendants had to defend themselves, back in the day.  Yet another neat thing about ORDERED?  ORDERED means APPEALABLE....So here comes appeal, as well as MANDAMUS...and then trying to get the defendant, the LEGAL FATHER, thrown out of the case?  ALSO MOOT.

2. Now, this fact needs a bit of an explanation. I'm sure you’ve seen (and if you haven’t noticed) the report I just filed; where I dispute all this department of state claims as fact over this entire 6 months.  In the report, you’ve noticed, I’m sure, that the true father of the child has been found, via a paternity test, to be irrefutibly, the bio father.  Even more funny, is that they are claiming, even at this late date, that the father is to be considered for possible placement.  Most funny is that Ron Shaver, the bio father, is NOT going to be considered...at all.  For one, Ron is too late.  For two, Ron has a significant record.  For three, Ron Shaver of Newton has been called by these parents with the intention of informing him of DHS’s deceit.  Ron, however, has been bull-sh***ed by DHS, and actually believes he has a chance at getting the baby (as a single dad), even though these defendants have told him otherwise, and he has not verified it with us...meaning he has been told, by DHS, not to respond to these parents.  For 4, what they have NOT informed Ron Shaver of, is that there’s a new case, filed with a new petition (which by the way, has not, or has of yet, ever been served on these parents; with the sole intention of termination....of not only THESE parent's rights, but of Ron's rights as well.

Why is obvious.  There has NEVER....EVER been an intention of reunification....to these defendants, to Felicia Pace (formerly of choice #2 fame, Elizabeth's sister), OR to RON SHAVER....at all.  Why?  Because this was, as suspected by these parenjts with good reason since day 1, that it wasn’t ever their intention to reunify any part of the family.  Their intent was always to milk the money given this state for having this child in the system, then to terminate our rights in order to also make money off of her adoption.

3.  Here’s what I’m betting has happened.

The Pritchards were, quite simply, a couple who wanted to adopt a baby...for no reason that we folks will never know...and that’s ok.  But, their preference was to have a newborn, instead of the hundreds of children they probably have up for adoption that are 5 or older, as it is for most who want to adopt.  Who wants to know that the children they’re adopting used to be very close to their actual parents?  And the possibility of almost all older children, as we all know, are almost always damaged or emotionally scarred, and usually have a difficults time adjusting.  No, the first choice is usually, for those who want to adopt children; they seem to always PREFER a newborn.  Less guilt inolved with that.  Makes sense even.  The problem is, there’s not too many newborns on the market these days.

So DHS then says...hey, that’s OK...because we can get around this for you.  Tell you what, Leslie and Nathan Pritchard of Ankeny.. let’s do this...become foster parents!  See, there are new mothers, ones that have just had their children, that often get reported on, and their kids get removed.  These kids generally go into the foster care system (or, if we’re really fortunate, we can beat the mothers into giving them up to Safe Haven, our adoption agency first, without consequence), and the parents then jump through our hoops in order to try and get them back...and here’s the best part, most of them fail.  What’s more, if they don’t, we could, if properly motivated, SHOW them to fail.  Then, because you’ve had her all this time, we can now prove to this court that it’s in the child's best interest (I'm beginning to really hate this phrase) to find permenancy...where she;’s already been all this time; with the fosters.  Then, whala, when we terminate their rights, she’s ready for adoption, then ALACAZAM, you’ve received what you wanted....YOUR VERY OWN NEWBORN!  I’m betting the Pritchards have no children of their own.  Any Takers??  I’ve seen ‘em in court enough..land they never have any other kids with ‘em.

4.  I find it ironic that Kevin Brown-L, the D.A. representing, "prays" that the judge will honor and grant this as his relief.  I find this to be ironic, because I truly think that this DOG thinks he IS a GOD in our case.  This will be shown to be the biggest joke of this decade, all in time.

This marks the 3RD post that I'm continuing.  That means that I'm a busy boy, yannow.  I mean the hearing's tomorrow...and I have A LOT to do!!  I gotta say, the prosecution's keeping me hopping, for sure, for sure.  Never fear, we have many surprises.  To BE CONTINUED, LIKE PARTS B OF THIS SERIES, AND THE GOING FOR THE B***S POST WITH THE REPORT!!  CHECK ON BACK, YA HEAR???

The Final Battle, Part V - The Part Immediately Following the Beginning of the End (B, The Big Goodbye)

http://www.thepublicprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/images-33.jpg

Ain't life grand??

To start with, I need to inform all that read my blog of my intention, as of this very moment.

I have temporarily vacated my apartment, with the intention of remaining lost until this hearing has passed.  Why you may wonder?

Well, I did it.  I called the sonsabitches out.

I've mailed copies of this recording; you remember, the one where the Bitch, Ms. Nieman, had our child removed.  Then, I delivered a copy of it (as well as all on the website) to these entities (with the exclusion of obious entities I shant mention....you know, for security reasons), just so they'd have a clue that they are now, very obviously, being watched...and I don't mean on a state level either.

1.  Terry Brandstad.  I never ever liked this beady-eyed little bastard, especially since he had the gall to get his son off on a drunk driving charge that killed 2 perfectly innocent Iowa citizens, then netted him the cost of EIGHTEEN DOLLARS WORTH OF RETRIBUTION IN COURT COSTS...gotta love that.  I believe, his being the most obvious in passing all of our current version of the Iowa Code, that he's at the helm of our little disaster, and should pay with all he is.  Shouldn't be too hard to finger him, he's been rather alight with many a scandal of late.

2.  Charles Palmer & Company (Charles, Stephanie Rhinehart, Katy Gosch, Emily the BITCH Nieman....as well as any of these idiots who might have access to all of our court documents).  Oh, and let's not forget the FEMA agencies in charge, in both KC and Washington.  Wouldn't want them ignorant, no sir.

3.  Mr. Obama himself.  Might as well keep going with the line, right?  I mean, what better way to find out how deep the rabbit hole goes?  I say, that if the man is truly ignorant of what the states are up to, that, at the least, he might just help me out...wouldn't THAT be novel?

4.  All in charge of the Indian Bureau, where Ms. Nieman's little stunt is concerned, as well as the appropriate tribes involved in Liz's lineage.

5.  Every TV and radio station in the Des Moines area.

6.  Every well known news team in the country.

...as well as other unmentionable agencies too.  We wouldn't want ANYONE missing out on the fun this week, do we?  What better way to keep follks honest, then to finally have those who can actually do something about it, unlike other worthless people I know (*coucharlesgh cougrassleygh*), right?

Now, I feel that some folks may just not like my little tattle-tale nature.  That's fine, I have no truck with that.  For one, I'm very well protected, in case of any accidental damage, to my person as well as all I have.  For two, they gotta find me first...LOL.

Now, on to more pleasant matters...

Bet you guys didn't see this one comin' did ya?...lol

I think it's only fair, that, since we won't be seeing this wunnerful group of people for some time...at least, until it's time they leave where they are, that is...that we really should stop...smell the roses, and say a fond farewell to all who would have separated us from our daughter.  Don't you?  He he...

To Des Moines, Iowa

I think it's only fair to say that Des Moines, Iowa...at least, the Des Moines, Iowa I USED to live in, was a really sweet place to live.  I LIKED it here.  Then.

This was, of course, back in Robert D. Ray's days...back when Iowa was a nice place to be.  And then, something....evil...that's all I can say about it...pure, unadulturated evil...took his place.  Back in a day most recently, Mr. Beady Eyes Branstad, one of my favorite governors of all time (NOT) decided to reinstate himself as our current governor, through what miracle of Satan, one can only guess.  Since the day this idiot made it back in, it's been nothing but nightmare after nightmare...and all accountability  for any of his actions have still to be confirmed as possible.  Well, Terry?  It's on baby, just like it is for the rest in charge of this crummy state.

To be continued, on an "as we go" basis (keep checking back, I wanna get this one out there now, so that all can see that this is not a good spot for them to occupy...)

The Final Battle Part V - The Beginning of the End (A, the recap)

This particular series of posts, more than likely including 3 parts, signifies the end....of this battle, more than likely, since this case, which will have to start pretty much ALL OVER AGAIN, will never make it past the removal hearing.  Once I press "Play" on that 18 minute recording of the extremely ILLEGAL and CRIME-FILLED removal interaction with the Bitch, Nieman, formerly (I'm sure, by now) of DHS/CPS fame; who I imagine that, once she loses her job will have to change her name (again, more than likely for the 50th time) in order to make it out o' there without a scratch (if the FBI doesn't get her before that, that is).  I have now, of course, determined that there is an awful lot more that I can get her for.

KIDNAPPING/FALSE IMPRISONMENT - Will be brought, due, quite simply, to this removal being done 100% illegally.  By process of elimination, then, if it wasn't done legally, it was DONE ILLEGALLY...Surely one, if not BOTH of these charges will apply, both for the mother as well as our daughter.

FORGERY - Done, not just once, but TWICE, where the mother is concerned....with Emily falsifying her initials on this document, and, we believe, where this judge's signature is concerned, as well.

FRAUD (numerous counts) - Don't think I have to delve into this one much to prove it, do I?

FALSIFYING RECORDS/LEGAL DOCUMENTS - Not sure which, if not both, but we got her on this one for a definate.

CONSPIRACY/COLLUSION - Oh yeah Methodist/Unity Point Healthcare...you are, without question, on my list, and as close to the top as you can be without being there.  Here's our little list of baddies from that place (in order of importance, of course):

Now, I believe I'm just gonna let ol' Joyce DeGroot, SW, off the hook...for two reasons.  First, she's Dutch...and some of my favorite people in this state, including my last set of wonderful foster parents (whom I still keep in touch with) are Dutch.  Besides, I'm sure you didn't provide the mother with brochures in order to give Bitch Nieman a reason to remove our daughter.  You were just doin' what you do, and these defendants are sure of that.  Not only that, but this author is pretty damn good at recognizing bad eggs, even before words are spoken (about the only good thing my mother gave me), and those rotten folks don't include you, your manner wasn't right.  Thank your stars that your furrowed look of uncertainly was on your face as I looked at you, after serving you your subpoena.

The people who WILL get the short end of the conspiracy stick, are of course, Dr. Jill Jasper...Dr. Amanda Harris...my bestest buddy Dr. Michael Line...and let's not forget good ol' Doc Haugen.  Before we get to the RN's, I have to jam two people ahead of them:  First we have Amanda Barton, who evidently goes by her real name sometimes still, since in our CC's, concerning our appeal to the Bitch's assessment, it never mentions an Amanda Barton...it states that the SW's name (SW0 more than likely means she's "in training") is Beth Avery.  Doesn't matter, by the way, the FBI knows your real names, so hide all ya like...you will be found.

NOTE TO THE BITCH...whatever your name might be.  Don't forget Ms. "Nieman"...Federal trumps state EVERY time.  You can be immune to state prosecution all day long...so thank God you broke the law so well on the fed level, or I might have NEVER got to see you in chains.  I'll be sure and ask where I can come visit...Oh come on, don't be like that...I'll bring you flowers, I promise!
Now where was I...oh yeah...

The Nurses:  Amanda Dirkx, RN; Anne Owens, RN; Chandra Brown, RN; Mary L. Davis; Cynthia Franklin, RN; Taylor Brommel, RN; Susan Adam, RN.  If anyone might have a problem with my hatred of nurses, please see "Going for the B***S, Part III."

Ashley Andrews of Children and Families of Iowa, Jamie, her bitch of a super, VNS, Those of our District Attorney's Office, Stephanie Brown, of course...and now, we add Mr. Kevin Brownell, for his move of trying to sneak past this defendant and file his little petition of Termination, before this defendant would notice.  Sorry sonny....I kinda liked you.  You were alright, as enemies go....but I'm afraid you stepped on my toes with that one, and these Homeys don' play dat.  Look America, he's a good kid, I know it...but I tried to tell him he was on the wrong side, and he just...didn't LISTEN.

Tony Reed and all employed by Central Iowa "Family Services" (coughs).  Got special plans for you pally...:D...legal stuff, of course...:D

Dale Mays, Benzoni Law Firm (should they remain behind the snaky attorney); sorry Paul...you were kinda cool too, but I figure, if you're still gonna stand in this court against us, that you're gonna have to sink like the rest of 'em too.  I figure, with the code of ethics sitting over your desk and you breaking about every one of 'em just by being silent, well, I'm afraid you'll just have to be on the FBI's docket of people to investigate as well.

And, finally, the man himself, won't you please give a good round of applause to JUDGE WILLIAM A.MF PRICE...It becomes quite clear daily, my little friend, that you have a past as well as an always growing list of many many enemies, explaining, of course, your little walk up the sidewalks of Des Moines for fresh air, all the while looking forever over your shoulder in fear of whom might be trying to run you over today; should you decide to try and cross the street.  Ousting this judge from the presence of our capital's citizens in order for him to contemplate with dismay all he has done before he's brought down for it; will be almost as great a pleasure as doing all I plan to the Bitch herself.  All, for both, quite legally OF COURSE....(meant for the Polk County folks, in order to clarify possible "borderline" threats they might imagine).

And, finally, I just bet, if I follow my gut, I'm sure I'll find, right behind all of these pleasant people, the shadowy figures of Charles Palmer, of DHS Administrative fame, and the host of our little show, Governor "Beady Eyes" Brandstad, the "Moustache".  In case you've forgotten about what this man has been responsible for, then turn your eyes back, oh....20 years or so, when this man got his son off for driving drunk and murdering two innocent Iowa Citizens...for around $18 in court costs; and who, just recently, turned his back on someone who wanted to ask about the Governor's possible accountability, where his and Iowa's actions, of allowing a very disturbed foster child, 17, to return to his drudgery life of foster care, in order to allow him a mental break in order to then murder his 5 year old foster brother with a rather large stone, used to bash him over the head, all because some mental deviant decided to remand this kid from the institute where he was housed, to foster care, because they, more than likely, had to figure out which kid to turn loose because of budget cuts, and chose him., than put him with a few families in order to figure out who would best serve the :"best interests of a child"...for a real family, NO PROBLEM.  This man is duly responsible for the laws passed, which protect all players in this little charade, meant to drum up federal monies through the pathways of adoption and foster care in Iowa.  Yes, moustache, you'll be found out soon enough as well, I'll bet it.  Bet you never thought that one of your intended targets, someone of the lower class you choose to pick on, a supposed "Easy Target"; would have the cahones to speak up against you, and will be the avenue that leads to your ultimate undoing...also legally.

PURJURY UNDER OATH - At our removal hearing.

RELIEF IN THE FORM OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS - Should be as easy as pressing play too, huh, where getting this asked for will be concerned...

And I'll take whatever else they wanna throw at her too.  Oh, and SURELY this won't be the only instance of this in her career, of this I have absolutely NO doubt.  Nobody gets to be THAT much of a bitch with only one poor black mother's notch on her belt.  But that's OK, I don't believe the world will be hearing from Emily "The Bitch" Nieman for quite...a ....long....time.  if we would happen to see her on the street by some miracle, I'm pretty sure I won't be able (or desire) to hold this mother back, should it ever occur..

Let's just plan to go here, as long as we're at it, shall we?  I will be running for the position of Governor for this state, as soon as this nightmare is past, whether we win this or not...which of course, we WILL.  We of the state of Iowa, as well as of these United States, are tired of you crooked people, who, although clean of grime and dirt to begin with, lie in wait til you get into office, in order to first wield the power with which to abuse your position.  I will bring, with me, the age of the UNpolitician, and with it, the end of the dishonest one.  I will not be perfect....but I'll be tried, as well as true.  I will represent ALL of Iowa's citizens in their bid to reclaim their country, as well as the government that rules it with the heavy hand of something close to socialism, where only the rich have the ability to get away with their crimes.  No more will spoon-fed, money-grubbing liars, kidnappers and thieves be allowed to abuse the citizens of this state, once I gain my title, and all shall be treated and helped once again as equals.  Our doors will be and will remain opened to Iowa's plight, and all will be made right.

Good.  As long as we understand each other.  No bull coming out of one side of this candidate's mouth, of that you will be sure.  Nor, let it be said, shall I be the recipient of one thin dime of this state's money, where its constituents are concerned, nor do I need it for my campaign.  It will run as my office does...non-partisan, non-profit, and non-political.  We all are equal in God's eyes...well, we WILL all be equal in God's eyes, once we decide he belongs here in the United States again - and only He will rule this land and its citizens, after I'm through with it.  We will bring back our days of no fear, of helping one another, and of religeous and spiritual motives.  The law itself shall bend in my office, and be made plain for all of its citizens.

One more question I'm sure you'll have for me...will I be a vengeful Governor, at the onset?  Damn straight I will be.  DHS, and all it is now will be torn down and rebuilt in its original, helpful guise. That's not to say there will never be another child protected, that just means that the way it happens now is ...well, let's just say they're not playing nice...or fairly...or legally...or..ok, I'm sure you get the idea.  All laws protecting their a**es will be stripped....toot suite, just to keep them honest, BET on it.

The Final Battle IV - The Last Reach for trhe B***S (C)

It simply amazes me the things these people will try while I float blithely along...While I was diddling around congratulating myself and slapping myself on the back, saying victory is assured...the other side, true to their nature has been speeding along, and still trying their little tricks to terminate before these defendants know what hit 'em.

They will of course, fail miserably, though it seems they know it not...which they very well DO know...but, think I may have not, as yet, caught on to what I have to do....I have.  And did.  And have done.  For the information of my followers and readers, all I have wanted to do has been, as of this date, done.  HOWEVER....

They did, but only a little, spoil my fun.  I had such big plans to make this a circus they wouldn't soon forget.  In all of this, I only got to serve 1....count'em, 1 subpoena...and that sucks.  Worse yet, you might have thought it would be the one I wanted to serve the most, at the very least...and there is a good excuse fot my actions.  I forgot today was Saturday.

I didn't realize that the day I knew to be my last to serve was on a Saturday.  DAMN.

However, there is a shiny little lining that they will, STILL...BE UPSET WITH.  And it is now located, right where it should have been last night...as well as right here, in this post.  Well, you know, I really do have to get it out, ya know, because this one is the one that matters, the one they've been trying to beat me filing, and didn't.  WORSE YET, they've already drawn up the petition for termination, and started the action.  I like that the first motions in it were MINE...and the end to all of their actions henceforth...

Here is the expected motion from last night, to be immediately followed by the one that will lay Judge Price and the gang to their final resting place.  The first is too late now, it won't affect anything...not that it would have anyway.  For those of you that are lost, NOTHING I would have done or said would have stopped, slowed down or eliminated the termination train that was moving ahead at 190 MPH...except the one following this one.  The one thing that would have gotten me out of the way was termination.  I have, with one motion, terminated their termination.  Bye Bye guys!!!!  For you readers, you're gonna wanna see the 2nd motion.  These guys don't even have to look....'cause they knew it was coming, as soon as I posted Mr. DHS Directtor's letter.  Now, I shouldn't hear a peep from the other side...albeit I've been wrong before...

***********************************************************************************************************

Here is the first of two, filed on our CURRENT case...

COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, in his MOTION FOR VISITATION

My wife and I would like to get visitation, as ordered by the court, with our daughter, Trilynn Brueggeman, and with permission from FSRP and DHS, 7 days a week, unsupervised in our home; from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. every evening.

/S/ Christopher Bruce and Elizabeth Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE AND ELIZABETH BRUCE

Now, you and I both know that the judge, even at his weakest, would never grant such a motion...but we should have filed this document oh.....5 days up to 2 days ago...this would have prevented this from showing up....today.

NEW CASE:  INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS.

Now they're trying to say, because I (allegedly, but did NOT) said that I wanted no more contact with DHS...to wit, in their report, they're saying I said I wanted NO MORE CONTACT, so they haven't.  What I said was, WE'RE DONE.  In their usual fashion, they interpreted it for me again.

However, nothing they've ever said or done to these defendants is now going to matter any more.  What am I talking about?  Well, remember the recorded interaction of the removal?  We didn't realize itl...again, because I could barely stand to listen to ALL of it, that Ms. Bitch Nieman asked the mother if she was Indian.  She said yes, and Ms. Nieman said "What tribe are you?'  Then after her pause (because she wasn't quite suire) Ms. Bitch said "Nevermind"....then marked, both on the legal order, AND on the separate paperwork that she said NO...Nice huh?

Here's why she said NO.

Now, because of THIS motion, all they've said and done?  GONE!

Judge Price?  GONE.  All the other bitches, who are all gonna lose thier jobs?  GONE.  I wouldn't be surprised if Ms. Nieman wasn't already GONE.  I'm already looking for her to tell her how I feel about the crimes she commited, before those charges are brought on her, and I can watch the FEDS lock her up for...Oh, LIFEMAYBE??  That'll be a real tootin' PLEASURE BABY.

bye bye!!

Here's that motion I've been sayin' gonna put this case right on out of this Honor's hands....for GOOD.  I'll be sure and show up for court in order to express my condolences for their loss....LOL.

**************************************************************************************************

By the by, here's another motion I just can't help but share with you BEFORE the winner.

COMES NOW Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce in their motion to receive email addresses for Ron Shaver and Trilynn Brueggeman:

1.  That this court, in its efforts to thwart these defendants, did, with malice, start a new case on Saturday, January 10th, 2015.  This was an effort to terminate their rights while they waited for the permanency hearing, or quite possibly directly following it, or before these defendants could file an appeal, as well as the promised writ of Mondamus.

2.  That this court did, in its efforts to thwart these defendants, changed the service list to include the father, Ron Shaver, who these defendants do not know, let alone know the email address of.

3.  That this court did, in its efforts to thwart these defendants, changed the service list to include our child, Trilynn Brueggeman, who, in the best knowledge of these defendants, is 5 1/2 months old, and isn’t even cognizant enough to have an email address, let alone should these defendants be required to email court documents to this child’s account, should she even have one.

4.  This is another attempt by this court to trip up these defendants, in order to distract them from doing what they were, AND HAVE already done.  We have, in accordance with the law, unlike all in this court, filed for the intervention of the ICWA act, a right that was dismissed and bypassed by Emily Nieman, SW4, who will be answering for her crimes soon enough.  We further bring that we have, indeed, not only done it in THIS case, but in the other as well.

5.  That Judge Price is only adding to his list, where his acts of deceit and bias are concerned, and will answer to these charges soon enough.

6.  These defendants, in order to comply with this court, hereby request these “email addresses”, or these new service’s physical addresses immediately, in order to forward our motions in this case; and comply with procedure.  If this court is not willing to do so, we will appeal all cases to the supreme court, post-haste, to see how they feel about it, as soon as we walk out the door to this hearing, upcoming, as well as to stall further proceedings, in order to give ALL appropriate government officials and agencies (on the FEDERAL level and the intervention of the Cherokee tribe more than enough time to act).  We have also informed the FBI of your actions, numerous times.  Expect ACTION on ALL CRIMES on ALL PARTIES on the opposing side of this court, and their affiliates, A.S.A.P.  Also included in these actions will be the Director of DHS, and the Governor, Terry J. Branstad.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand....

COMES NOW ......the winner!!

***********************************************************************************************************

COMES NOW Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce in their motion to expedite the request for an order setting hearing for the applicability of ICWA:

1. Tyilynn Brueggeman, the child in interest, is part Indian. A hearing must be scheduled to protect her rights with proper notice to the parties. 

2. The Court must set an expedited hearing to determine the applicability of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. Sections 1901-1963, concerning the child in interest.

3. The court must assign a new Guardian Ad Litem to meet the needs of the child, who is part Indian.

4. The court must assign a new court appointed attorney to represent the mother at states expense. The court has previously determined that the mother, Elizabeth Bruce, cannot pay any part of the expenses of counsel. 

5. Judge Price must recuse himself from this matter because he has shown bias and prejudice.

6. Courts have repeatedly held … the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a). 

7. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated

"Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted."

8. "Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so

that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication." Kenner v. C.I.R., 387F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated "a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final."

9. Reasonable efforts have not been made by the DHS. 

10. Under Iowa Code § 232.96(8), the court may dismiss the petition.

11. Clerk to provide a copy of the order to child, parents, counsel of record, foster parents, Iowa Department of Human Services, Indian Tribe, Secretary of the Interior, and case scheduler. 

WHEREFORE Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce requests an expedited hearing date and time to determine the applicability of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. Sections 1901-1963, concerning the child in interest. 

OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE the court shall order the release of the child, Tyilynn Brueggeman, if the court finds that there is not probable cause to believe that the child is a child within the jurisdiction of the court.

********************************************************************************************
Isn't this the SH**??  DAMN I'd just LOVE to see their faces tomorrow morning...(whisltes a little tune and promptly skips off to enjoy his day)

The Final Battle Part IV - The Last Reach For the B***S (B)

 DAMN I'M HAVING FUN!!!

Wheeeeelllllp....today I got to invite some great folks from Methodist to our upcoming permenancy hearing....it's gonna be a whoppin' good time!  Oh...oh, and that's not all....but, I'm afraid I just have to keep secrets, we don't want any preparations for my surprises...I just can't wait for Methodist's explanation for their part, and, thanks to the motion to NUNC PRO TUNC the removal hearing (to be filed...PRETTY DAMN QUICK, we're gonna rehash the whoooooole thing, starting with that bitch...you know the one.  I can't WAIT!!


Here are just some of today's motions, including another one I can't wait for, the drug facility, and their shining faces...not just to show the judge that ALL of their testing was FALSE, but to bring DHS's drug goon on the stand, you know, TONY REED, to testify about his 2nd drug test of the father after our last hearing, just 3 days after I served the facility to appear...well, they did, but not to produce records, like they most certainly WILL at this hearing; but to, IN THEIR REVENGE OF THAT ACTION, TO TAKE AND PRODUCE ANOTHER TEST THAT THEY COULD FALSIFY in order to try and teach the father a valuable lesson in f***ing with DHS...only one problem...they provided me with MORE evidence of DHS's snake-like actions (I'm thinking those folks and Daily Mays, of former attorney fame, might just be related somehow).  So now, we can have at his happy lying ass too.  We'll see if he tries any football tackles on this defendant, as I waltz out of the courtroom to go and get our daughter...tee hee. I do declare that all of these bastards will soon be a fryin' in the winter sun...legally, of course, and, just so the administrative branch of the Polk County Sheriff's office isn't confused about my borderline threat here, thsi one means:

I....PLAN...TO .....FILE...A....LOT....OF...CHARGES...AND...BRING...SEPARATE...ACTIONS...SOOOOON...NO....PHYSICAL...HARM...IS...INTENDED...HERE....BY...THIS...DEFE...NDANT ...OR...HIS....WIFE...EITHER....

**********************************************************************************************

Now comes Christopher Bruce in his motion to supress evidence, as presented by the prosecution for drug testing,  in the adjudication hearing, as well as it will be brought against us in our upcoming permanency hearing, with clear and convincing evidence for exhibit.

1.  The father has acquired two urine cups that will used as exhibits.  These two cups are used to do official drug testing at a facility that serves DHS in their efforts.

2.  Two days after this defendant did file a motion to suppress this evidence, DHS did file a report to this court, with an included version of this 2nd test, complete with an explanation for the cup that was thrown in the trash, as being a cup the tester found to be inactive, and that was thrown in the trash by the tester as well, after doing one test on the defendant.  Then, that a 2nd cup was used, and found this defendant dirty for methamphetimines.  Proof of this deceit on the part of the tester, as well as DHS, is as stated below:

a. That the defendant, who was asked by DHS to take a urine test (not ordered by this court, or its trier-of-fact, to this defendant’s best knowledge), agreed to do so without argument, even after DHS had made
it clear that all was the same as before, 1 visit a week, supervised, with the same worker, Liz still a drug user, and in need of abuse training, the father the same, as well as having mental issues.  The father, in an attempt to go along with what this court has asked, was willing to do what it took in order to accomplish this.

b. That this defendant, who had relieved himself just prior to the hearing, and this hearing only had taken 15 minutes at most, had yet to have to go again.  This defendant then drank water in order to comply with this test.

c. Once, while the defendant wandered and spoke, the tester, thinking this defendant was leaving the courthouse in order to avoid this test (even though he had willingly agreed to do it), moved to block his path so that he could not leave, as if he had the power and the right to accomplish this. This, to this defendant, proves his desire to do the test this time, as false, because if this defendant were to leave, he would have to produce another inactive cup or something else might go wrong as opposed to doing it this time.

d. That this defendant, while waiting to produce enough to take the test, did inform this tester (without his knowledge of his being the owner of the contract with DHS for drug testing until the report showed in efile this fact 2 days later) the story of the first drug test, at the facility on Merle Hay Road, to the letter, in order to deem whether this tester was more honest than the facility he had tested at for hair.  After describing the condition of the facility, this tester then claimed that he had many dealings with this facility, and knew the staff well, and that this facility looked nothing like I had described it to him.  This brought to the defendant that this was no person that the defendant could expect or trust to issue accurate and honest drug results to this court.

e. That upon this realization, the defendant declared that maybe he should inform DHS now that he would be coming up dirty in this urine test, then proceeded, after a time to provide the drug test sample.  After watching how the test was done, this defendant then inquired as to how the test worked.  The tester told the defendant of the process, and claimed that there were several tabs, each containing the name of a drug, and that they would not only move up as the drug in question was recognized, but that bars would appear in color to signify a clean or dirty for result; and finally that one or two of the tabs had already begun moving. When this defendant tried to change his view as to witness the test, the tester then turned the cup away from the defendant.

f. After the test had completed, after the related time period to this defendant of three minutes for the test to complete, the tester was asked for results, to which the tester pulled out his cell phone and took pictures, and told the defendant that DHS would hear the results first, then inform the defendant of those results. Afterwards, the tester asked the defendant to pour the sample into another container, sealed this, then asked the defendant to dispose of this test cup into the court’s bathroom trash.  The tester left, and the defendant remained at the court house, with the intention of retrieving this cup.

g. The defendant asked a member of the Polk County Sheriff’s staff to get the key to the garbage, because the defendant claimed that he had dropped something into the garbage and could not reach it to retrieve it.  The staff then procured the key from the janitor and watched as the defendant retrieved the ONLY cup in the garbage.

h. This defendant brings that DHS and this tester’s story that the tester  taken two complete samples from this defendant one right after the other, and then threw the discovered inactive cup away after a first test, then did another after discovering the first cup to be inactive is false, and that DHS and this tester have an agreement and contract to cover each other’s story, in case such a falsehood is discovered to be so in such a case. There was no 2nd sample taken from this defendant, and the testee, not the tester, threw away the cup; not because the cup was inactive as discovered by the tester, but because the inactive cup was found out by
the testee, and was, in fact, required to be trashed by the defendant.

i. After discovering that nothing showed on the cup whatsoever (no marks, and no rising tabs), this defendant did, in an effort to procure more proof needed to convince this court of this deceit, decided to go and pick the mother up from work, just to see how her drug test would come out.  The father then drove the mother to 2911 Merle Hay Rd., the very place this defendant was hoping that he would have to go to.  On the way, this defendant called Katie Gosch to leave a message on her voicemail that the results had shown clean for the father’s test, in order to flush her part in this deceit out.

j. Upon arriving at Central Iowa Family Services, this defendant told the mother to do her test, ask for a witness to this test, and to record the interaction.  The mother went inside to do her test.  Then the phone rang, and it was Katie Gosch, who informed that my test results had not come back clean, as I had told her, but that they had, once again, come up dirty for meth.  I then hung up on her, realizing that they had done this to these defendants once again, utilizing the same facility’s testing results as proof.  The father then called DHS again to inform Ms. Gosch only these words,“We’re done, no more of this BS”, we’re done here.”...and that’s it.  There was no mention of no more contact to be had between DHS and I, as claimed by Ms. Gosch.

k.  Just a moment later, the mother exited the facility with her test cup still in her hand (not on purpose), and informed me that they had denied her the right to a witness, as she had asked. I was upset, of course, thanks to the phone call from Ms. Gosch and said “Come on, we’re leaving.”  The mother had to then go back in, because she had left her purse inside.  She came out and, upon noticing that she had a cup, we decided, as we drove home, that we would attempt the test again in this unused cup, with the mother as witness to see if we had the same problem with this new cup as we did with the test cup taken from the courthouse. Upon arriving at home, the father took the new unused cup into the bathroom and filled it to the top with fresh urine, and put the cap on it.  We waited the 3 minutes the tester had waited...and discovered this 2nd cup as inactive, just like the first one.  My wife took pictures of the cup after the test had completed.  The inactive result of this test is submitted as evidence with this court, as of this date.  Later, not unlike the removal recording, we realized again that we had forgotten we had recorded this, and listened to it today, in order to see if there was anything we could use as evidence. The only voice you can clearly hear is the mother’s unfortunately, but if you listen closely, you can hear the female tester as she denies this mother her witness to the test she wants to willingly take; by stating there is only a single collector who works there, and no witness can be or will be provided to her.

l. I find it very interesting that the female tester involved with the test of the mother is surprised when she says that she wants a witness to the test, then remarks on her surprise by saying that NO ONE has ever asked for a witness to the test.

m. That with the blog post dated back on 8/14/14, named “The B&S Railroad Job, Part II - The Drug Thingymabob” posted on this defendants website, even now, describing this facility in full detail, as having, upon your entrance to it, a very large reception area with a single large desk in it, with only one person working in the entire place, with nasty shag carpet, that looks nothing like your average drug testing facility; and a side room with an ugly smaller desk in it, where this man (or woman) who works there, cuts your hair with a pair of school scissors and sends it in.  Nowhere in this facility is there another piece of furniture, or anywhere for anyone who might be waiting to take their test to sit and wait.  This defendant finds it quite interesting, then, that 5 months later, it’s been completely remodeled, again, as witnessed by both defendants, with all that this defendant witnessed and posted about back in August, gone.  Now, there’s a small waiting room with differently colored low carpet, clean, with a giant wall now separating the main area from the front, with security cameras in place and a lot of nice furniture at which you can sit and wait for your appointment in it; as well as a nice and  new professional look to it.  When this defendant had described this place to his tester, remembering he had said “over a year” as a time frame that he’d been working with the place, thought to serve a subpoena on this facility in order to gain a client list, and upon his entry to this place found it completely remodeled because of his post alone, this defendant is absolutely certain of this fact, beyond all reasonable doubt.  This, of course, gives this tester, just three days after serving them a subpoena to appear at our hearing with all of their records to present in this court, who is not only the owner of this testing facility, as well as the owner of this contract for drug testing with DHS, more than enough motive, JUST 3 DAYS AFTER THIS DEFENDANT SERVED THEM WITH A SUBPOENA TO APPEAR, appears,, NOT with their records, but to only give this defendant a drug test and find him guilty, once again, and to find this defendant and his wife dirty for the same drug with an alternate falsified test.

n. That the mother’s drug test was as the results produced, falsely positive, due to her just receiving an inhaler with Albuterol, around the time of the hair stadt test, by Primary Healthcare.  and is shown in this website, the answer provided by a professional working for the company shown in Exhibit #40-42, efiled this date, 1/9/2015.  This answer given by a website, Drugs.com (Drugs, Inc.) proves this inhaler to produce false positive for meth, as well as for amphetimines.

3.  Here, then, is the relief these defendants hereby seek with this motion:

4.  That each and every test done at this facility should be either retested at a true and legitimate testing facility, far out of the reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, or  suppressed for all who have attended this facility.  I am advertising everywhere for others who have had their testing done here, and I have already gotten 3 recent clients in response.  More will be continuously added to the list.

5.  That the Department of Human Services owes an apology to Elizabeth Bruce, and that her need for drug testing, drug assessment, as well as drug abuse training be rescinded by this court.  Slander and Libel charges shall be filed against this Department, post haste.

6.  That all accusations of the alleged drug use, as well as her recommendations be stricken from all court records.

7.  That drug testing, in the form of Urine testing, be ordered to be done on this father again, by another facility far out of reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, post haste, and, pending these results, that the relief sought in paragraph 5 and 6 of this motion be repeated for this father.

S/ Christopher Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE

We also took a minute to file the recording for all to hear, and the drug result pictures and the other drug cup fished from the trash, then, tomorrow, we are going to file the motions, NUNC PRO TUNC, for ALL of our hearings to be reheard, and put appropriately in place for the Writ of Mondamus soon to follow the appeal to the permanency...matter of fact, just as soon as I walk out the door of the courtroom.  All of this will delay things JUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUST LONG ENOUGH to make room for all of this defendants little aces, that he's been a savin'....and a savin.....and a savin' up for this upcoming Writ.

DAMN I'm having fun!!  What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall, however, when our beloved DA, Stephanie Brown, and Judgy William A Price Esquire see THIS ONE, to be filed...wellll....NOW!!

******************************************************************************************

From what I've heard?  Judgy Price doesn't like losing Either....lol.  I really and truly, wish I could see his face, when he sees this, and pending his decision to WILLINGLY and GLADLY recuse this case..well, shoot, I wish I could say the words...but I just can't do it.  Here then, is the motion that will turn these people on their respective behinds.  Enjoy Judgy!  All my love Stephanie Brown....you little mynx you  ;)

Toodles!

(SORRY....this motion is still in the process of being edited, and will be posted for your viewing pleasure A.S.A.P.)

The Final Battle, Part IV - The Last Reach for the B***S (Part A)

Hey America!!  Sorry to keep you waiting...

Well...I was going to be pretty nice to these people...you know, since they were about to lose and all, I thought it to be only fair..

HOWEVER...it would seem that DHS, in their usual fashion, of course, has once again decided to play dirty with these defendants.  They are, of course, pushing that the drunk they want to receive the child now, all because he all of a sudden wants to play ball and jump through any possible DHS hoops he might encounter, but they have filed all the voicemails I left in anger on my caseworker's machine, the father's machine, and Dale Mays' machine, like this is gonna make a difference in whether they win or not....IT WON'T.  They filed their permanency report with the sole intent of pissing on this author and infuriating him.  It worked, of course, and after throwing my favorite waffle Iron at the wall and breaking it, I thought about it and caught it.  To be filed, also today, will be a very interesting report of my very own...for the record, of course. This has not, of course, gone unnoticed by these defendants.  Now they've gone too far...now my wife wants to be involved, 100 percent.  Now we're BOTH goin' for the B***S, with no mercy, no less.

And so it begins...today.

This defendant, from sun up to sun down, is planning to file nearly 59 motions to this court.  We'll start with these two winners, one of which, the Rescindment of Signatures motion, (withdrawal of consent), which of course didn't matter where the judge can deny or accept this motion is concerned...if it's filed with the court of record, it's effective, and nothing this trier of fact can say can change it.

We shall also be submitting the motion to correct motion" motion again today, but not the one concerning the snake Dale Mays, who, I repeat, will NOT be weaseling out of this subpoena this time....nononononono Daily the Snake Mays, you WILL be in attendance, I guarantee it.  No, this one will be to declare moot all the motions I purposely filed with EFILE in order to make his Honor chuckle and think I had no idea what I was doing, and that, once again, on January 15th, he'd be able to cow these defendants.  Nothing, ever, could be further from the truth.  These people are so screwed on so many levels, they won't know what elevator to take to get there to stop it.

Oh, and Your Honor?  In case you should be reading this, I would like to submit that you might just have a Solomon-grade dilemma on your hands.  See, I'm pushing that blog thing all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, as I feel there's more than enough merit there to warrant Constitutional investigation.  I guarantee it will be heard too, I've discussed this over and over again with a Constitutional expert who bets on it.  That means that all actions in this case will be put on FOREVER hold, until the matter is heard...that's what....a year or two, maybe more, down the road?  Sorry DHS, no poster child for Adoption Saturday this year.  The Dilemma for the judge?  If, when I resubmit the document asking that the blog isn't considered to affect this case as evidence, if he honors that motion, half of the reasons used in the removal order are GONE BABY...and I believe that would be more than enough, considering the RECORDING OF THE ENTIRE INTERACTION, TO BE FILED AS EVIDENCE TODAY, will be more than enough to quash the rest of the order.  If he denies the motion, this will drag on....and on....and on....for 1-3 more years...and no one will receive their piece of the action where this child belonging to DHS is concerned.  I will be sure to write all who have been paying special attention to make sure they receive no monies for this child during that wait either....:D

yeah....there's more, believe it.  I will, NATURALLY, be posting ALL.....DAY....LONG to keep you guys abreast of the happens.

Oh, almost forgot...here are two of the motions to be filed ...well, NOW.

COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, in his MOTION TO CORRECT MOTIONS FILED ON A PREVIOUS DATE:

1. That on the date of the 26th of December, 2014, this defendant,
representing himself pro se, did file, with this court on the aforementioned
date, four motions.
2. That the defendant used a legal term incorrectly in three of these motions,
and would prefer to be forgiven this infraction, and be allowed to correct
them by replacing them with updated versions...
3. This also needs to be done for the record of the court; in order for this
defendant to appeal to this court’s decisions in our permanency hearing to
be held on January 15th, 2014
4. I request, then, as my relief, that any motion, filed on the date of the 26th,
with the exception of the motion to recuse this case, that all other motions
filed on the 26th of December be considered moot, and each motion filed
prior to this on the aforementioned date, that have already been removed
rom efile, be hereby stricken for consideration in this court’s records, and
that these new motions, filed on this date, 1/8/2015, be addressed instead.


/S/ Christopher Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE AND ELIZABETH BRUCE

********************************************************************************************

Here is the first motion the mother wanted badly to get in on.  Take special note of the very last paragraph that's signed by the mother.  In the first hearing addressing the rescindment of signatures, the judge dismissed it like so much balloon air, and asked the mother what she wanted to accomplish with it...the mother, of course, knowing this document to be full of legaleze, and a bit cowed by the judge, of course, stumbled for a legitimate answer...and came up with nothing but a couple of "Uh's...which of course, since she had signed this motion, was exactly what this judge hoped to accomplish with this question.  Well, this one's about to be resubmitted, but not for this judge's approval.  And yet, should he be curious about anything else, I'm sure the last paragraph will settle that....thanks for your contribution honey.  I think it's gonna be a winner, for sure.

COMES NOW, Elizabeth Bruce in her motion to rescind signatures, nunc pro tunc,

1.  Incidents involved with this motion:

a.     Elizabeth Bruce was taken, with Trilynn Bruggeman, the child, from her home to Methodist Hospital, supposedly just for a pediatrician’s appointment.  She was told by Emily Nieman and Amanda; two DHS Social workers; upon arrival at the hospital on Friday, July 18th 2014; that they would be waiting to get a room in which to check the child in.  Social Worker Amanda left the hospital, and was no longer involved in the removal.  After 72 hours at the hospital, when she was mentally and physically exhausted, Elizabeth was approached by Nieman, alone, when no one else was present as witness, hounded the mother to place the baby into adoption.  When Elizabeth wouldn’t agree to that, she then stated that it was out of her hands, the child was in the court system already, and she would HAVE to sign the baby into foster care.  Emily Nieman said she would read the order to her, then have her initial each line.  The worker skipped over almost half of the document, only reading what she knew Elizabeth wouldn’t question, and had each line already filled in with X’s, to represent Elizabeth’s initials.  Emily Nieman then handed Elizabeth a court order, already filled out for her, and was told to sign it.  When Elizabeth again refused, Nieman stated that “If you don’t, the Judge will rule against you in court, and it won’t look good for you.”  Elizabeth, never having had any legal issues, and who had never been in trouble with the law, rather that risk possible  trouble, she chose to sign it, against her better judgement, and believed that she would be in trouble if she didn’t.   This will be proven in Exhibit 1, the recording of this interaction.

b.     Dale Mays, who was appointed by the court on August 22nd 2014, to represent Elizabeth; as well as serve her best interests, because she could not afford to hire her own; asked Elizabeth to sign a financial statement on September 5th, 2014, then e-filed the document onto her case against her best interests and without her knowledge, the same day.  Elizabeth has never received a copy of this, nor has she been mailed one, either.  Her andN the father were both indigent at the time, and, when Mays asked Elizabeth questions about her income, she had no clue why he was asking them, or that he had planned to file this document with the court.  Because of this document, the judge, at the court hearing the parents had on October 21, 2014, concerning our Disposition, ordered Elizabeth as able to pay her attorney fees, because she made $700 a month gross with no expenses.  She is now in possession of an apartment with enough expenses to reclaim her indigent status.  These facts are apparent and will be shown in exhibits 2-5; the new financial affidavit, and Attorney Mays’ emails to his client, as well as the signed affidavit from September 5, 2014.

                  Elizabeth still is, to this day, not able to afford this, and she would have, had she but known what would arise out of it, never signed this document, she would have filed a new or more current financial statement with the court, so that the figures represented would have been more recent, as well as accurate.

2.  Purpose

Elizabeth Bruce, being now of sound mind, hereby rescinds all signatures obtained under duress by Emily Nieman, social worker, for the Iowa Department of Human Services, and Attorney Dale Mays, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because Emily Nieman and Dale Mays were clothed with the authority of the state, when action was taken under "Color of State Law."

3.  Statement of Elizabeth Bruce, concerning issue the first:

a.     I was unaware of the legal effects and ramifications of the signing and giving verbal consent to DHS and other legal documents or consent involving the taking of my child. I was influenced by the misleading and deceptive wording of Emily Nieman and Amanda, DHS Social Workers, acting Under The Color of Law, who fraudulently obtained my signature and their implied verbal consent in all forms.  These individuals willfully and knowingly failed to fully disclose to me their full intentions. These individuals influenced, misled and deceived me into trusting, agreeing and to sign documents. I was influenced by the common and widespread practice of deception by the above named individuals.

b.     My signatures and implied verbal consents were fraudulently obtained by the above named individuals and associates who wrongfully detained my daughter, with the implied promise of reunification. They willfully and knowingly failed to fully disclosure to me the ramifications as well as the full effect of yielding consent. The actions of these individuals, caused extreme stress and lead to the CINA and the possible termination of parental rights, and threaten to place me in more financial difficulty that I already am, causing me to be unable to help myself.
c.     That I am a natural born free sovereign United States citizen, a freeman and I am endowed by my Creator with numerous inalienable rights to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” which rights are specifically identified in the Declaration of Independence and protected by the United States Constitution including my inalienable right to direct and control the upbringing of my daughter.

4.  Statement concerning issue the second:

a.     I was unaware of the legal effects and ramifications of the signing and giving verbal consent to attorney Dale Mays and other legal documents or consent involving the disclosure of my financial situation.  I was influenced by the misleading and deceptive wording of Attorney Dale Mays, acting Under The Color of Law, who fraudulently obtained my signature and their implied verbal consent in all forms.  This individual willfully and knowingly failed to fully disclose to me his full intentions. This individual influenced, misled and deceived me into trusting, agreeing and to sign documents. I was influenced by the common and widespread practice of deception by the above named individuals.

b.     My signatures and implied verbal consents were fraudulently obtained by the above named individual and associates who deceitfully took advantage of my trust in my attorney, as well as my confidentiality, with the implied trust in my attorney that he only had by best interests in mind. He willfully and knowingly failed to fully disclosure to me the ramifications as well as the full effect of yielding consent. The actions of this individual, caused extreme stress and lead to only placing me in a worse situation financially, and threaten to place me in more financial difficulty that I already am, causing me to be unable to help myself, my husband, and my family to reunify properly.

c.     That I am a natural born free sovereign United States citizen, a freeman and I am endowed by my Creator with numerous inalienable rights to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” which rights are specifically identified in the Declaration of Independence and protected by the United States Constitution including my inalienable right to direct and control the upbringing of my daughter.

5.   Supreme Court Decisions covering both issues present:

a.     The Supreme Court has specifically recognized parental rights of custody and control. In the landmark decision of Meyer v. Nebraska, the Court stated that parents have a substantive due process right to direct the upbringing and education of their children shall not be infringed. Parents possess the right to direct their child's "destiny." Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 535 (1925). The Supreme Court stated that natural parents have a "fundamental liberty interest...in the care, custody, and management of their child." Santosky v. Kramer, also protecting children's interest in the privacy and dignity of their homes and in the lawfully exercised authority of their parents.” Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Children have a Constitutional right to live with their parents without government interference. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 7th Cir. (2000)

b.     Social workers cannot deliberately remove children from their parents and place them with foster caregivers when the officials reasonably should have known such an action would cause harm to the child's mental or physical health. K.H. through Murphy v. Morgan (7th Cir. 1990)

c.     The forced separation of parent from child, even for a short time; represents a serious infringement upon the rights of both. J.B. v. Washington County (10th Cir. 1997)

6.  These rulings as they pertain to this motion:

a.     The Court rulings leave no room for doubt as to the importance and protection of the rights of parents.

b.     That by reason of the afore stated facts, I do hereby exercise my rights as a free sovereign U.S. citizen, upheld by various court decisions, to revoke, rescind, cancel and to render null and void, both currently and retroactively to the time of signing or otherwise implying consent, based upon the constructive fraud perpetrated upon me by Emily Nieman of the Iowa Department of Human Services and Dale Mays, of Benzoni Law, an Attorney.

c.     The lack of full disclosure and fraudulent representations by DHS and Dale Mays vitiate those documents and verbal agreements in question with the signature of Elizabeth in which those agreements were breached, is hereby declared NULL and VOID as of this date, November 3rd, 2014.

7.   Legal Definitions

a.    Bouvier's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, 1856:
FRAUD, contracts, torts:  Any trick or artifice employed by one person to induce another to fall into an error, or to detain him in it, so that he may make an agreement contrary to his interest. The fraud may consist either, first, in the misrepresentation, or, secondly, in the concealment of a material fact. Fraud, force and vexation, are odious in law. Booth, Real Actions, 250. Fraud gives no action, however, without damage; 3 T. R. 56; and in matters of contract it is merely a defense; it cannot in any case constitute a new contract. 7 Vez. 211; 2 Miles' Rep. 229. It is essentially ad hominem. 4 T. R. 337-8

Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit -- and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U.S. 372] in the statute, see United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir.1985) -- includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987)

2.    Inalienable rights - Rights which are not capable of being surrendered
or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights.
Morrison v. State, Mo. App., 252 S.W.2d 97, 101.

8.    A Public Declaration and Notice of Immediate Withdraw of Consent

a.     I, Elizabeth Bruce, 1196 9th Street, Apt. 5, Des Moines., IA 50314, hereby declare in affidavit form, my full and complete renunciation and withdraw of all possible forms of consent to the unlawful creation of, operation of, and participation in, the current fraudulent, de facto, State and Federal “corporate bodies politic”.

b.     This complete withdraw of consent includes all known and unknown fraudulent “unconscionable” agreements or contracts, past, present, or future, relating to any vessel, individual, actor, natural or artificial “person,” corporate “fiction,” commercial entity, legal fiction, legal term, trust, status, standing, station, or any other possible creative combination of carefully constructed “words of art,” CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA, or other possible “color of law” misrepresentation of my existence and flesh and blood body, that are designed to replace my God given unalienable Rights, Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, “Without Prejudice”

c.     And that from this day forward, all issues, including all jurisdictional issues, arising from, relating to, or in regards to, the “presumption of consent” to the 14th Amendment corporate “person” of Federal United States “citizen” status, shall be considered ab initio - NULL, void, invalid and With explicit reservation of all of my Rights and waiver of none.

       

I now affix my signature to these affirmations: 

/S/Elizabeth Bruce

Signature of Rescinding Party:

/S/Elizabeth Bruce, “Without Prejudice" U.C.C. 1-207

9,  It’s widely believed (and shown as well at every opportunity by everyone in this court), that this court doesn’t think that I have the mental capacity to know what I’m asking for in presenting and signing this document, or have any idea what relief it is I seek with it. Unlike the impatient people of this court, my husband has taken the time to break down for me the ridiculously hard legal language for me and explained what every sentence means.  I therefore declare that I know full well what I’m signing to, as well as everything I hope to gain from doing so.  Should this court or this judge need any assistance in understanding this document, I suggest that you direct your questions to the Drake Law Library, where you’ll find all the help you need.  I’ll be more than happy to wait for the rest of this court to catch up.

Signed, this date, 1/8/2015

/S/Elizabeth Bruce