******************************************************************************************************************
As of THIS DATE, 1/14/19, we have elevated this formerly landmark case, with upcoming landmark decision pending, up to UBER-LANDMARK CASE, with the same. Folks, I'm just gonna say this..what this court has to say on THIS APPEAL, in the 8th Circuit court of the Federal Government, is not only going to rock the nation in the area of family law, it's going to rock the nation as a WHOLE. How is that? Well, I have just amended the post that was JUST here, to the post it is now. Before, it was moderately brilliant. Now, it is justifiably SHEER GENIUS (Wile E. Coyote....SOOPER GENIUS....I like the sound of that....). This case, and the answer pending will serve to cook the brains of these justices to the boiling point. To rule in favor of the defending parties will defeat all in alleged "Governance" over this great land of ours. To rule in our favor is sure to cause the entire family court system to fall to it's knees and give up. Stay tuned, because after you read the last paragraph, you'll understand it all, if you have any sense. Should you wish to skip all the BS and get right to the meat and potatoes, just read the final 4 paragraphs of the reply, where the CALLOUT is. If you don't quite see the light, never fear, because I have included a summary at very bottom that will help with that (the band....The Band....THE BAND! DO YOU SEE THE LIGHT???)
*****************************************************************************************************************
NOTE: This, my new and interesting Judeo-Christian friends, is where we attempt to elevate the case to LANDMARK status. If you read nothing else, please, jet down to the thrilling CONCLUSION to this answer, where the call-out occurs.
"Christopher,
the Living Man and Elizabeth, the Living Woman do submit their response brief
to the briefs submitted by the defending parties’ attorneys.
Christopher (Bruce),
The Living Man"
Once
again, the attorneys for the defendants in these cases like to focus on insignificant
rabbit trails; hanging on to technicalities that shouldn’t matter to a justice
at all in such a case; and enjoy belittling facts stated, calling them “Vague;”
though they are stated clearly enough.
As this is their job, we the claimants expect nothing less; especially
since the rope these defendants’ attorneys once hung from safely; just above
the floor of the law; has now become more of a string over a chasm; with the
net removed. In addition to this; even
WITHOUT the proof the claimants have brought before these federal courts, let’s
be honest here: who could possibly make
up claims like those brought by the claimants against these defending parties? The District Court is supposed to consider
the facts of these claims to be TRUE; yet those assumptions aren’t made; nor
are the facts related assumed to be fact AT ALL; in ANY portion of the
decisions made. Instead, the District
Court Judge leans heavily on how “threadbare”, “conclusory” and “baseless” the
claims made are; then allows immunities, as well as a few widely unheard-of
“doctrines” as defenses; so the defendants en masse can get out of everything
alleged in both cases; immunities and doctrines invented, we’re sure, for the
sole purpose of allowing those of the corrupt state courts and those officials
of the several states to be able to do whatever they want to, without worry of being
accountable; or be concerned that those of the federal “Government;” may
intervene. And yet, when a federal agency,
agent or law needs to exercise its power, cries of “It’s federal law, there’s
nothing we can do!” from the state are quickly substituted instead. Isn’t it great how this works out for
everyone in Governance over “We The People?”
The only question that remains is, when do “We The People” ever win out
against those in elected offices? A
rhetorical question, that one. The
answer, it seems, is NEVER; and if this is the truth; then officials of
Government in the States are free to commit crimes, be corrupted absolutely,
and violate rights left and right.
Should the victim of this bring the matter to a court on the state
level; whether it be district, criminal, civil, or appellate, it’s fine,
because the state will always rule in their own favor and cover the backsides
of their comrades on the lower levels.
Should the people then turn to the Federal Government’s courts; those
allegedly in oversight of the States as a whole; who claim to uphold the “law”
and the Constitution, and who claim to oversee and overrule all subordinate courts
and their rulings (considering the Supreme court, who turn out decisions that allegedly
carry the heaviest legal weight in ALL matters of the law; and call it “THE LAW
OF THE LAND); now all matters decided by the State are FINAL and “res
adjudicata” instead; and cannot be interfered with or overturned by those of
the federal courts; though conspiracies, conflicts of interest and criminal
behaviors abound in their proceedings.
The
defending attorneys also continuously evade a most important fact: there are two cases here…not one. The reason behind this appeal is not only to
point out to this appellate court that the district judge did NOT address the
FIRST case with any sort of accuracy, completely skipped over anything stated
that pointed out violations of the rights of the claimants by the defending
parties; and chopped and condensed the claims down to a dismissible sentence or
two; then ruled that everyone could go, then decided the 2nd case
using almost the same order as the first, addressed matters of defending
parties that didn’t even know the 2nd claim existed; decided AGAIN for
the same parties listed in the first case, though even THEY had not, as yet,
read or received the 2nd claim (no summons were ever issued to the
claimants for the 2nd case by
the court); and called the 2nd claim “Already litigated”
solely based on the fact that she had hastily decided the 1st claim,
in error; around an hour prior.
The
claimants state; in their answer to these appellee briefs; that they will not
be acknowledging or referring to anything said in them in particular; as they
all say pretty much the same exact things.
These attorneys all defend their positions based on a host of
technicalities, using case law and doctrines that never seem to quite mirror or
apply to anything being addressed or referred to in these cases; cry and moan
about the claimants not following this court rule or that one; let alone the
fact that their briefs; as well as all decisions made by these state “Judicial
Officers” and their conspirators over the last nearly 5 years in every state
District and Supreme Court; added to, more recently, the Federal District Court;
all boil down to the same thing: apparently,
no one of “The People” can bring a remotely successful civil suit and expect to
get anywhere with it; especially if it involves even hurting the feelings of
someone in an alleged official capacity, in ANY capacity; not against only judges
or attorneys, but against anyone occupying anything that even looks like,
smells like, or is related to in any way, any official or “quasi”-elected
office containing any person, male or female, on any level; whether City,
County, State or Federal; from a U.S. Supreme Court Justice all the way down to
the janitor mopping the floor at the request of said Justice; and expect to
receive a fair or speedy trial, that it will be heard by an impartial jury; or
contain a reasonable or logical order, opinion or decision that might possibly
award the plaintiffs anything that might resemble “Justice”, since even just
“The rules” of all of these courts tend to put a stop to these cases long
before those who might bring suit can even get the idea that maybe they may be
entitled to some sort of relief; and then only should they somehow manage to
squeeze past the heavenly host of immunities and all-encompassing excuses and
reasons the defending parties have that can enable 100% plus of them to weasel
away from all accountability for all they do and have done against the people;
regardless of the crimes they committed against them, regardless of which or
how many purposeful violations of the rights of one or more of the citizenry in
question might occur; no matter for what purpose or motive these violations
occurred; or for however long they’ve occurred.
The claimants wonder if Capital Murder of the claimants would also be
allowed these defending parties. We
claimants imagine so, since every other crime is alleged at them, and is
evidently about to be excused.
The
claimants, from now on, wish to only help simplify things for those interacting
with them in these federal courts; those attorneys, judges and other
defendants; and offer them some sage advice.
There is no need to work so hard on these parroted and quizzical briefs
and orders; as the majority of the afore-mentioned are usually devoid of all
logic and reason; are stuffed to the gill with dug-up, unknown and unverifiable
case law; containing opinions of Justices that were probably just having a bad
day; or were overloaded hearing matters concerning people they didn’t like,
simply because they breathed the same air they did and smelled bad too. Instead, you can just send this single
message to all aspiring claimants instead; as it is just as easily understood
and crystal clear as it was when they read the same message between the lines
of every brief and order that has hit the docket: “Are your unalienable, civil,
Constitutional and due process rights being violated? Are felonious and even federal-grade crimes
being committed against you in earnest by those in elected office; in great
numbers, for years on end? Are your
court hearings, judicial officers and even your own attorneys working against
you in concert; as they collectively conspire to fabricate charges against you,
libel and slander you continually and feed false stories to the local papers
that do the same; call the President’s own Secret Service on you to arrest you
for the petty, code-defined alleged and falsely accused “harassment” of some
insignificant Child Protective workers with a God complex; using non-existent
evidence or evidence that no normal person, in their right mind, would consider
to be anything but “speaking freely,” per your unalienable and Constitutional
right to do so; forge your signatures (as well as judges’ signatures) on your
paperwork, impose un-Constitutionally outlandish sky-high bails and bonds
against you to keep you in jail; fabricate entire hearings and transcripts; and
falsify and change the record of the court?
Have your children been wrongfully taken from you by the state and are never
due to be returned; even if you do all they tell you to do and do it right; and
even if they did the wrong thing to begin with, and said so too? Are you not receiving any due justice because
of a blindingly obvious criminal collusion between 10’s of elected officials,
judges, attorneys, police officers, etc. all over your city, your county and
your state? If so, TOUGH. Get over it.
Roll over; take your lumps, open your wallets and get back to work; and
if you tell anyone about this, file suit against us, claim, complain or
anything else suchlike, we’ll make your life a living Hell until you’re pushing
up the daisies; make certain your cases are dismissed easily and quickly by all
courts in a 1000 mile radius; and, as the final coup de gras; charge you to
file each and every case and appeal (after you’ve paid us more than enough to
do our jobs as it is; per your ridiculously high taxes); charge you to view and
print all your case documents (including even your OWN filed documents;) and
charge you again when we decide to dismiss any action against those in office, without
fail. If you don’t pay these fees within 3 weeks of the order, we’ll send it to
collections; ruin what little credit score you may have had; then garnish your
wages and jail you incessantly, until we’re paid. NEXT!”
Concerning
the rule 12(b) defense the entire of list of defending parties is trying to use
to escape these claims of damage; the claimants have no need whatsoever to rely
solely on their “baseless threadbare recital” of these claims; as ample
evidence of the defendants acting far outside of the role of their official duties
and violating every single type of right allegedly provided the claimants is still
able to be found just about everywhere you should choose to look for it;
including all over the internet. One
would believe that recordings of defendants violating someone’s rights, the
“Record of the Court” (not the altered one; the actual record of the court) and
papers actually filed in court cases that blatantly violate someone’s rights
would be more than enough. The claimants,
are learning fast, that enough is never enough, when bringing suit against
those in alleged “Governance” over them.
For
a good example; the claimant Christopher’s face is, even to this day, STILL on
the Facebook page of the Des Moines Police Department; in continuous libel of claimant
Christopher, evidently, for all time; in that this post falsely accuses the
claimant as engaging in the fabricated allegations that were charged against
him by defendants Lancaster, Nieman, Price, Brownell, Rhinehart, White, Gosch,
Sarcone and Bell collectively in the criminal (and corrupt) courts of the
County of Polk; allegedly in representation for and claiming damage of the
ENTIRE STATE OF IOWA; in what was to be the first of many falsely brought criminal
cases to follow; ALL with no proper jurisdiction ever proven when challenged;
all conflict of interest (in that the state ruled over the matter, presented as
an injured party AND prosecuted each matter); with no damaged claimants who
would claim the same; with “pleas” that weren’t stated, but instead entered “on
behalf of” the claimants charged; unlawfully; and using some of the same biased
judges that ruled over our juvenile matters; and the claimants have attached evidence
of this clear libel of the claimant, Christopher, by defendant Lancaster, to
this answer, in exhibit. After a
fashion, the claimants suppose it’s a good thing it’s still there; since it damns
defendant Lancaster easily; and shows that he did exactly what the claimants
accused him of doing: violating plaintiff
Christopher’s rights and ruthlessly destroying his character unnecessarily and
vindictively – serving to add the “Threads” right back onto what was defined by
the District Court Judge as “Thread-Bare.”
Also
worth mentioning, it has been ruled in several court cases over the years; in
cases decided that will probably never be found easily by the common man (or
the claimants); that there is no better evidence backing up the truth of facts
behind a series of events; sans the obvious bodies, blood and fingerprints; than
a time and date stamped account of the events as they happened. The claimant, Christopher, has duly
documented nearly every moment of his life since the claimants’ daughter was
unlawfully removed from the claimants’ care on his personal blog as each event happened;
up to and including the submission of this very answer to the defending briefs;
and it contains more than enough references to all that occurred with the
defending parties named in BOTH claims. The
entire blog was submitted to the Federal District Court as an exhibit, with an
identifier page. Certainly, the relation
of events is sure to be a bit one-sided in favor of the claimants; but more
than enough pictures, court documents and evidence are shown on these posts in reference
to these events; state in detail all that happened in all eight of the named
cases; backing up all of what the claimants have stated against these defendants
as absolute TRUTH; as well as relate facts and events that include the
additional defendants who don’t even know there was a suit. In addition, it also shows, without question,
how it was that these claimants have never quite been able to bring any kind of
successful suit against these defending parties for specific violations of any
single right within any possible time frame needed to do so. Since the violations were so numerous, close
together and continuous; by the time the shock wore off for one violation and the
claimants would recognize it to be a violation of their rights; another
violation followed in quick succession; and the statute of limitations to file
suit on the first violation would expire quickly while they were distracted. Even if it had not expired, every state-paid judge
backed up every decision made by every other state-paid judge on both the
district AND appellate levels; no matter how wrong one court might have been; so
whether a claim brought was within the limits or not obviously doesn’t matter;
and didn’t either. Where can a claimant
turn or go then; if the whole state wrongly finds in their own favor and backs
up the criminal actions of the District’s unlawful rulings?
Later,
as missing pieces of the puzzle came together; showing better which defending
party colluded with who to accomplish what, when and why; and why the time taken
to make decisions; made by the state judges listed as some of the defending
parties in these matters; had taken as long as they had; when what had happened
in total made more sense from the perspective of and due to the malicious intentions
of the defendants; it was easier to see the blatant efforts taken to help push
the defendants well behind all possible actions’ limitational lines; including
those limitations of the Federal courts.
In the decision of the District Court Judge, she mentions “Equitable
tolling” briefly; something that should be provided these claimants in
abundance; only in consideration of the sheer volume of their Federal-District-Court-evaded
rights violations; in each and every category; and the time frame over which
they have occurred.
One
final note concerning these “Threadbare and conclusory “facts””; every fact stated
in claim against these defendants is in very precise detail; and is also related
in the same exact precise detail - in the Claimant, Christopher’s time and date
stamped blog, in nearly exact duplication.
As it concerns traumatic experiences in relation to their often-unwitting
victims; at least for those who do not, instead, elect to subconsciously block the
whole experience out of their minds; it is nearly impossible for those affected
by these traumas to miss even one detail; as it sometimes seems to the victims
of these traumatic experiences that they occurred just yesterday. This court can be most assured that it has
been like this for these claimants for 4 and a half long years. As every violation of these claimants’ rights
was and is often executed to the traumatic level; there is no one fact that is
ever missed, or a single word or sentence that varies one iota, as the
claimants relate these events repeatedly, for nearly every single court they
have had to endure. Concerning the facts
of the claim against these defendants, and all the evidence filed in “Bruce 2”;
(as well as all they decided it best to omit, considering the volume of the
evidence they should have also filed, but didn’t want to oppress the appellate
court) it should be most apparent that the defending parties did act well
outside the scope of their “official duties” in each and every event involving the
claimants; and the time and date stamped blog; probably the most damning piece
of evidence filed in either case; tells the same story in meticulous detail.
Just
so the attorneys don’t try to reach for the excuse that the claimants never
read their briefs, so they should be dismissed; the claimants choose to address
only four points made in two of the briefs submitted by the defending parties’
attorneys. The claimants know it sounds
silly, but there are rules and rulings that cover all their other reasons for
dismissal, so it wouldn’t surprise the claimants to hear of the existence of a
ruling made to cover this one as well.
The
attorney defending the clients “The City of Carroll, Iowa Police Department”
and “The Altoona Police Department” mentions that, because none of their
represented parties have been mentioned in the claimants’ appellant brief
submitted to this court on appeal, the claimants’ have, in effect, waived their
clients’ need to be involved. To date,
this is among one of the more idiotic defenses we have heard voiced in a “court
of law.” Had the pro per litigants had
the attorney’s knowledge of the need to name each and every defending party and
their damage of the claimants AGAIN because we are in a different court; when
they are named a myriad of times in the initial claims being considered,
plenty; we would have done so, and obliged this appellate court. The fact that they are, in fact, named plenty
of times in the claims of the plaintiffs, shows easily that these claimants did
not, and do not, in any way, WAIVE their involvement at all. If this court wishes for the claimants to,
once again, amend their brief to name each and every defendant and show their
damage AGAIN, the claimants will do so; but this court would have to bend its
regulatory rule to allow for an additional brief length of 30 or more pages for
us to do that; since, at its current regulated length, there would be no space
left to properly or sufficiently argue our appellate position.
Another
such defense, reached for desperately by the State of Iowa’s attorney, is that
we waived the appeal to “Bruce I” because we stated in our initial brief that
we weren’t going to refer to that order, because “Bruce II” was our desired
decision to attack. This is, in fact, a
half-true statement, but for us to voluntarily waive it completely would
obviously be ignorant, considering this order was the INITIAL decision, very
relevant to the 2nd decision, and was fraught with error. Not only that, but the District court Judge
used the fact that she decided “Bruce I” to rule “Bruce II” as already
litigated, so how does this statement translate to “we waive the entire
case?” The fact is, it doesn’t, and we
waived NOTHING. This appeal addresses
both cases, and both decisions, period.
More
so, an excuse is used, not only by THIS attorney, but by others as well,
showing well the continuous collaborative conspiracy against the rights of
these claimants, showing also that the attorneys for the defense are cheating
and copying each others’ answers to pass the exam; that they nor their clients
were ever served the claim for “Bruce II”, therefore “Bruce II” doesn’t require
this court’s consideration or ruling.
And just like the cheater who copies his neighbor’s test answers, and
his neighbor has the wrong answers, the claimants have stated CLEARLY that the
District Court NEVER SENT SUMMONS TO BE SERVED FOR “BRUCE II,” a fact stated
not only in this reply brief, but in their initial appellate brief SEVERAL
TIMES; adding that, though no one had seen, been served, or had read anything
stated in THAT claim, the District Court decided that matter anyway (See
Appellant Initial Brief, Section II, Discussion of Error, Introduction; and
subsection 2;), in error, of course. The
fault, once again, lies in the District Court hastily deciding both matters in
error; because this court required them to take action, after the claimants
submitted their Writ of Continuing Mandamus to this court, and just prior to
her decisions.
The
attorneys representing these defendants insist on repeating; falsely no less; that
no rights of the claimants, Constitutional or otherwise have been violated by any
of the defending parties in these claims. In rebuttal, the facts, listed in
great detail in BOTH claims show a host of violations of the claimants’
Constitutional, due process, unalienable and civil rights; yet none of these
violations are even whispered about in any kind of detail (or at all), or with
accuracy of the events; in either claims’ decisions; since to do so would
present matters that need to be urgently addressed, then ruled in favor of the
claimants. Should this court not give
proper notice to the obvious and total avoidance of all the facts showing these
violations by the District Court Judge, it would also be in equal if not
greater error.
CONCLUSION
The
claimants voluntarily dismissed the defendants they chose to in “Bruce 1”; this
fact they have never disputed; but they did it for a very obvious reason, which
was stated clearly in their dismissal motion, in abundance; they did it in
order to correct the errors the defending attorneys had pointed out in the
initial claim; then file a 2nd case, with a properly stated claim. That this motion is now being used as a
single justified reason the appellate court should release the dismissed
defendants from ALL the claims made against them in BOTH cases; is, quite
simply, ludicrous. The claimants never
intended to set the defendants listed free from the initial claims made; that
should be obvious to anyone with any sense.
The sole purpose of the motion to dismiss in “Bruce 1” was to re-file
against a portion of the same defendants in “Bruce 2”; identify them as individuals,
in order to separate them from whatever “official capacity” they were hiding
behind; and add the apparently missing “claims of damage;” since the Federal
District Court Judge had no intent to allow the claimants to correct these
errors OR amend their initial claim. After
reading the rules of court; it was also obvious to the claimants that no
attorney could be expected to be appointed on the claimants’ behalf; and the
claimants certainly cannot afford to pay one; so, the claimants, representing
themselves, should not be held to the same standards as attorneys in the
presentment of their claim. Therefore, a
possibility for amendment of the claim; allowing them to do it properly; should
have been offered the claimants. Also, in
the detailed instructions for filing a civil suit, it says that, should you intend
to make allegations against an official, you should also name the branch of
“Government” for which they work; and the claimants did so, per the court’s
instructions. The original claim in
“Bruce 1” had not listed the defendants’ corporate fictions as separate
defending parties; their names were placed above the names of each group of
defendants as headers; and this was very clearly what they were, since the
names underneath them were indented. When
the summons were finally sent to the claimants in “Bruce I,” included were
separate summons for the defendants’ places of employment; much to the
confusion of the claimants. When the
claimants called the clerk of the District Court to find out why they were
included, they answered that they could not tell the claimants whether they
should serve them or not; since that would constitute the clerk giving the
claimants legal advice. Since they were
included, and the claimants wanted to close off all possibilities for the claim
to be dismissed, they opted to serve the summons for the entities by mail as
well, an error they will not soon repeat.
Also
concerning “Bruce 1;” one attorney; mistakenly, we’re sure: specifically noted;
in his answer to the claim; that the claimants were suing these individuals as employees
of these non-suable entities; and as operating in their “official capacities”; evidently
entitling the named defendants to all manner of immunities and more ridiculous
defenses the claimants would just as soon forget. The claimants, in “Bruce 2” then purposefully
omitted naming these places of employment as defending parties (the claimants
restate here that they NEVER intended these entities to be listed as defendants
in “Bruce I”) and submitted a new claim, corrected to include proper claims of
damage and more. The fact that the
district court judge took the claimants’ first filed claim; didn’t really read
it at all; and deemed it “decided” in favor of each and every defendant in
“Bruce 1; then in absolute error, dismissed the 2nd claim based on
her deciding the first; stating that the new matters were now “already
litigated;” and stated that the entire dismissal of “Bruce 2” was due to this
fact; even though it was stated quite clearly that the claimants dismissed
those several defendants of the first claim that were also named in the 2nd
with the intent to file the 2nd claim properly. Then, to add insult to injury, she even went so
far as to decide “Bruce 2” for the newly listed defendants who didn’t even know
there was a suit. The excuses and
“legal” reasons used to release each and every defendant in both suits not
withstanding; added to the almost non-accomplishable task of serving these documents
on these defendants’ “actual persons;”; (those of defendant Sarcone’s offices,
for example, sit behind 2” thick bullet-proof glass; travel to work and back
home via tunnels below the city; and you can’t even leave a voicemail for
defendant Sarcone without his secretary knowing why exactly you want to do so;
let alone could anyone under these circumstances possibly serve anything on
him;) in addition to the total disregard by the District Court Judge of actual
crimes committed, issues presented, allegations made and rights violated by
judges across the State of Iowa; choosing instead to allow defendants in
official office in Iowa to get off the hook because the claimants weren’t up to
speed on the defending party’s current married name; or the same wasn’t standing
at the desk when the mail came; therefore, wasn’t “served” properly. These are laughable reasons AT BEST to put
aside and disregard the felonious and federal-grade crimes that were committed
against these claimants; in complete violation of their rights.
The
attorneys for these INDIVIDUALS; as they were so identified in “Bruce 2”; who were,
in fact, all acting, utilizing color of State Law in their alleged official
capacities should not be allowed to bypass being held liable for violating the rights
of the claimants; all because the claimants didn’t follow some rule of court to
the letter, or because they didn’t present nearly enough case law to support
their arguments. One would lean heavily
on the assumed use of common sense and logic in decisions made by judges…Ah,
but that’s no good, is it; since to use real common sense might bring you to
the side of the claimants; and be disastrous to the closely-quartered working
relationships currently enjoyed by those on both the federal level and those of
the City and State that they are both located in together.
The
point to this appeal is not so that the attorneys for some of the same
defending parties can re-hash and beat to death all of the same tired old
excuses they used on the District Court level; as most are legally petty; as
well as all that all these defending parties have to hold onto for dear life in
order to show that the District Court Judge did the right thing in deciding in
their favor; as she dismissed both claims on the same day, within an hour of
each other, using almost the exact same order; and granted the defendants in
total their needed excuses and immunities; designed to enable the issuance of
“Get out of suit free” cards under NORMAL circumstances. In order to be able to hold onto and use
those excuses and remove themselves as defendants concerning ONLY the 1983
action, however, they would need to have:
a. shown that they operated
within the scope of their official duties, a fact that is most obvious to the
contrary in nearly every defendant’s case; and b. their actions would somehow have to be disproved
as blatantly violating the rights of the claimants; which of course, they
cannot. More so, no defending party,
listed in either of these claims, can honestly state under oath that they
operated independently in these violations; but obviously HAD TO depend on,
collude and conspire with others of their peers; as well as had to have FULL
knowledge that what they were doing was wrong and unlawful, in the execution of
those violations.
As
to these matters being defended by these attorneys using “The Rooker-Feldman
Doctrine;” or stating that these matters are “already decided and final” or
“Res Adjudicata” because the entire corrupted court system of the State of Iowa
has collaborated, conspired and ruled unjustly against the claimants en masse;
it’s time Your Honors bring an answer to THE question, and relate that answer to
all the citizens across this great land of ours: Who is really in charge here? Are the words uttered by those of the federal
“Government;” and those of the SCOTUS, “The Law of the Land;” or aren’t they? Do decisions of the federal courts and the
SCOTUS carry more legal weight than State decisions? Of course, they do. Therefore, it surely can’t be both ways.
For
the best example, how is it that the term “Legal Father” is nationally defined and
recognized everywhere as the man who is married to a woman that has a baby; regardless
of the biological father, a man with ABSOLUTE standing and rights to the child;
but this is defined differently only in the case of Claimant Christopher in
only the corrupt courts of Iowa as an “extra” father with no rights whatsoever
from the child’s birth, therefore no longer a party of interest in the matter
when they rule it so? The decision to terminate his rights; as executed by
Defendant Price; when the matter came before the appellate Supreme Court of
Iowa; was vacated; indicating that there was little that they could say without
damning the State as a whole as participating in an absolutely ridiculous and
unlawful decision of the District Court, and without blowing the cover of this
illegal ruling by defendant Price. Here,
in THIS case, you must make a final decision on this very important question. Either Federal codes, justices and law are
prevalent, and matters of legal impropriety engaged in by those of the states should,
can and WILL be overturned when federal justices recognize that the actions of
that state are obviously too corrupted and criminal; thereby rendering all qualified
decisions as NULL and VOID; or we don’t need the oversight of the DOJ and the
federal Government, their code or their justices anymore; and everyone on that
level – especially those of the FCC, the NSA, the FDA, the DOJ, the BLM, The DHS,
The FBI, the IRS, the CIA, the U.S. Attorney’s offices and CPS - can now go
home and save the taxpayers TONS of money; and bonus, thousands of wronged
parents everywhere may just have their unalienable and undeniably proper,
SCOTUS and Constitutionally-backed right to parent their own children as they
see fit restored; and have their lawful biological property returned to their
care. Over 60 agencies of Government,
many of them federal, were contacted by the claimants over 4 and a half years;
and all have said, without fail, that ALL could not involve themselves in any
family matter. Even HHS, the agency that
allegedly spawns and trains social workers have stated that they are not
responsible and cannot control the actions of a social worker. So who does?
Who IS ACCOUNTABLE? And remember,
the whole country is watching here; on the Plaintiff Christopher’s blog, on
Facebook; and via emails sent out to the media and the people. No manner of “gags,” “seals,”
“confidentiality” or “restrictions” are going to work here. Affidavits of Truth have been filed
everywhere that’s important, and the claimants have already alerted every news
station in Iowa and in Missouri; as well as everyone in a 500-mile radius of
your court of the existence of this case; and though the afore-mentioned may
not be able to watch what happens on what is SUPPOSED to be the public record
of an Article III Court of LAW; they can watch every moment of it as it happens
on the claimants’ time and date stamped blog; and we the claimants are certain
they’re paying attention. So which is
it? Either the Federal Government and
their Judiciary are in charge, and the last say so concerning ANYTHING at law;
or state decisions are final and legally binding, meaning, essentially, that
they are separate countries instead; thereby independent of Federal Governance,
taxes, codes and law; and can support themselves; and the rule of the State in
legal decisions can be decided to be final and cannot be corrected or
overturned by the federal judiciary in any way, then you of the federal justice
system and the Supreme Court are no longer needed; and neither are your laws,
your statutes; your rulings/case law. If
this is this is the case, then it should be that no decision rendered by the
justices of the Federal Government should be cited or have any bearing over any
legal matter; and none of this Governments’ agents or employees should be tolerated
to interfere or interject themselves into ANY legal; personal; or any other
kind of matter on the state and/or the personal level of any of this country’s
citizens. I do not envy the pickle this dilemma
might put you in; but the claimants are tired of being deprived of their due justice,
especially via dismissal BEFORE their cases are able to be ruled on by an
impartial jury of the claimants’ peers; though that jury is seldom impartial,
since justices are free to violate the claimants’ due process rights any time
they like, as long as they’re doing their job at the same time. We wonder, do these immunity defenses mean,
that as a judge is giving his opinion, he could simply just pull out a pistol
and shoot the claimants in the head as he spoke with no fear of legal
retribution, since he was doing his job at the time? If we follow the logic of Judicial
immunities, it seems that they could.
Think of all the money the taxpayers would save in man hours, since
court hearings would take half the time or less to decide with no opposition. These state judges, DHS workers and attorneys were
all just “doing their jobs;” and while they did, they violated the claimants’
rights in every conceivable manner. It’s
the same thing, isn’t it?
The
claimants have noticed the attempt by some of the defending attorneys, to deem
this case and its appeal as “Frivolous”, so that we might be charged under your
added recent law concerning that designation.
This case is anything but frivolous, and we claimants strongly encourage
the court to remember that all that occurs here is, as we speak, being posted
on the claimant Christopher’s blog, with relevant damning commentary; and
nearly every rights group in the country knows to look for it too. Having a child wrongfully removed from the
claimants care by the System, 9 days after she was handed to them, deemed
innocent of the allegations 2 months after their termination and not having that
decision overturned, being belittled, disrespected, libeled and slandered
incessantly; being arrested over and over again on false charges and jailed
wrongly for it; and when wronged, having every attorney (even yours) and judge work
against you when you attempt to seek justice on appellate levels, is hardly a
frivolous matter. If this court should
believe that all of this is fun for us, it would be quite wrong.
In
summary, the claimants point to any and all argument and facts that were stated
in their opening brief, for their stated cause for appeal.
Oh, one more thing....the facebook page of libel.
Can't forget that, can we Jakey boy?
We'll add just a couple more pictures here on the blog, however. Please, if you will, note the comments made by people I know as they stutter in disbelief at this bullshit.
***********************************************************************************************
So, are you lost? I know, it's a lot to take in. Let me explain. See, if they rule in favor of US, it means that the feds really ARE in charge, and the words of the SCOTUS are IN FACT the last legal weight, more so than all corrupt state-level rulings. This will also mean the death of RES ADJUDICATA and the Rooker-Feldman defense; at which point, we can all file to get these unlawful state rulings OVERTURNED. On the other hand, should they rule in favor of the States and their officials, this means that the words of the SCOTUS are WORTHLESS, and carry NO LEGAL WEIGHT, and means that those unconstitutional acts of CONGRESS, those 445 narcissistic control freaks, don't mean a hill of beans; and the rulings of the State are final....essentially identifying them as separate COUNTRIES...not states. That means Goodbye Federal Taxation, Goodbye federal CODE, Goodbye 5G installation, and goodbye federal code, and, most importantly? BYE BYE D.C., and all federal employees. THANKS Trump, for shutting down the Government....because it may be that you might have to keep it that way for good.
