Saturday, February 21, 2015

And Away We Go!! (Intermission)



Hey kids....just wanted to present yet another motion that will NOT be addressed, I'm sure...yet another masterpiece from the twisted mind of soon-to-be-Governor-of-Iowa Christopher Bruce.  Enjoy!  Also wanted to let you know that more has been added to both the posts concerning court docs so far...both July and August have new stuff, stuff I forgot to add.  GOOD stuff...like I said, keep coming back to the oldies, for they will change mucho!

*************************************************************************************************

Comes now, CHRISTOPHER BRUCE, STILL THE LEGAL FATHER, in his statement to the court:

1.  That on the date of February 16th, 2015, a report of Termination was
    completed by DHS, and efiled with this court on February 18th; 2015.

2.  On this same date, several voicemails were also filed, transcribed as
    recorded of this father at the offices of DHS.

3.  During the course of the report filed, it states, in no uncertain terms, that the
    father made a violent threat to the life of Emily Nieman SW 3 (a demotion?
    that’s a good start, I suppose), of CPS.

4.  This father has made it quite clear several times, that, regardless of his
    current feelings, regardless of how he might have sounded, or how mad, that
    every PROMISE made to any member of this court or DHS has ONLY been
    about the positions each respective person holds, currently, and that his
    promises are to be the cost of continuation in the continued lies told, found
    and determined against this father and mother, and the continued and
    persistent movement towards the termination of the rights of the parents.  At
    the most, jail time has been threatened.  Never once, during the course of
    ANY of these voicemails; can ANYTHING said even be misconstrued of
    anything else, let alone the threat of the crime of MURDER.  This defendant
    also tires greatly of the phrase ‘BORDERLINE THREATS’ being used in
    these court documents. It’s never been unclear what I’m promising to anyone,
    in ANY recording ever transcribed; or in any blog post currently online.  I bring
    a challenge to ANYONE in this court or in law enforcement; to find ANY
    sentence that threatens ANY bodily harm or felony, even in its intent or
    alleged ambiguousness.

5.  That, once again, in their desperation to stop this defendant in his actions, as
    well as terminate his rights, this agency has filed harassment charges against
    the father; concerning these “Borderline threats”; which couldn’t be any less
    borderline than they are, currently.  They’ve done this before, of course, and
    his “Honor” has chosen to skirt the issue, skillfully.  Now they’re trying to go all
    the way back to July.  A true holder to the laws of this state would see this as
    completely ridiculous, and would of course wonder why it is that they have
    chosen to wait for 7 months to do so.  But then we’re hardly dealing with
    reasonable fact finders in our case, so it’s no surprise to these parents or the
    father that this is even being reasonably considered to be a fact.

6.  Iowa Code 708.7 defines harassment (or at least, the type their trying to file
    against me anyway) as:

708.7 - Harassment.

1. a. “A person commits harassment when, with intent to intimidate, annoy
        or alarm another person, the person does any of the following:

(1)  Communicates with another by telephone, writing or via
      electronic communication without legitimate purpose and in a
      manner likely to cause the other person annoyance or
      harm....(the remainder of this does NOT apply)

   b.  A person commits harassment when the person, purposefully and
        without legitimate purpose, has personal contact with another
        person, with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or alarm that other
        person.  As used in this section, unless the context otherwise
        requires, “Personal contact” means an encounter in which two or
        more people are in visual or physical proximity to each other....(the
        remainder to the next section DOES NOT APPLY)

2. a.  A person commits harassment in the first degree when the person
        commits harassment involving a threat to commit a forcible felony, or
        commits harassment and has previously been convicted of
        harassment three or more times under this section...(the remainder
        does NOT apply here)

3. a.  A person commits harassment in the 2nd degree when the person
       commits harassment involving a threat to commit bodily injury,
       or....(does not apply)

4. a.  Any other act of harassment is harassment in the 3rd degree.

   b.  Harassment in the 3rd degree is a SIMPLE MISDEMEANOR.

7.  Concerning portion 1.a.(1), the only portion of this that MAY apply is the
    electronic communication portion.  I have never spoken to these people voice
    to voice with promises like I’ve made, there are only voicemails.

8.  Concerning portion 1.b.(1), NONE of this applies at all, since I have never
    uttered a threat to anyone in person.

9.  Concerning portion 2.a., there are not, in their transcribed words of my
    messages, ANY forcible felonies threatened AT ALL.

10.  Concerning portion 3.a., there are not, in their transcribed words of my
      messages, ANY threats of bodily injury or harm.

11.  All throughout this portion of Iowa Code, is the phrase “without legitimate
     purpose”.  My purpose should be most clear, to warn all employed at DHS
     and this court that, if they should continue in the deceit they employ against
     these defendants; that their jobs will be taken from them; and nothing more.
     This is more than “legitimate purpose”, in this defendant’s opinion anyway;
     and would be considered so easily, in Common Law.  All I’m doing is
     legitimately; and quite possibly; with a bit of brashness and foul language
     included for affect; that you may all go to federal prison if you continue in
     your actions.  I find that to be quite a good enough legitimate purpose for you
     folks, if nothing else.

12.  Concerning portion 4.a., then, the ONLY possible charge that could be
      brought here, is HARASSMENT IN THE 3RD DEGREE; a simple
      misdemeanor.  This defendant asks, then, as his relief, that this report be re
      written or stricken from the court’s records, as the information that is
      contained there is UNTRUE AND INCORRECT; as well as damaging to
      this defendant, and does, in effect, due to the provided transcripts, bring
      against DHS the charge of LIBEL; AND also, asks that any “warrants”
      issued because of this, be rescinded immediately.  If not, this defendant will
      simply add this charge to the growing list of felonious infractions this court
      and DHS have already engaged in against the defendants in this case.

`13.  Finally, in my statement, let it be known that, regardless of the penalty due
       this father, that he is in the process of posting EVERY SINGLE
       CONFIDENTIAL COURT DOCUMENT concerning this case, complete
       with names and personal information of all connected to it; ON HIS BLOG,
       ONLINE, in a logical order and with complete commentary; for this country
       to see for eternity, or until the end of the internet’s existence; whichever
       comes first.  How’s that for “Unresolved Long-standing Mental Issues”?  You
       haven’t even begun to experience my legal revenge, of this you may be
       most certain.  Include THAT in your list of “Borderline threats”.

/S/Christopher Bruce
LEGAL father

Friday, February 20, 2015

And Away We Go!! (Part B - August)



Hey Kids, and welcome back!  In case you haven't noticed, I haven't had scads of time to "enlarge" the story yet, but hang tight...you know, what with dodging "National" warrants that they can extradite me for, on a 3rd degree simple misdemeanor harassment charge, in all 50 states (RIGHT!), getitng all the court docs I can get before they cut me off for being a security risk (AGAIN), and keeping up with all the printing and scanning, well, life is getting pretty crazy again.  And here I was, getting pretty relaxed here in Osceola...Oskaloosa...Fort Dodge...Portland Maine...Seattle Washington...Frankfort, Germany, was it?  I forget...anyway, here we are again, with the month of August, plus a couple hang overs from July I THOUGHT I got scanned but didn't, but since they were pretty damned important, I thought I'd just get 'em posted in this post.

So here ya are then!  Enjoy!  :)

SPECIAL NOTE:  I got a day behind on posting these, so tellya what...I'm going home to print and scan September's docs too, and you should have those by....*checks watch*...5 or 6 today...k?

SPECIAL NOTE TWO:  I am currently printing up the police reports that concern the harassment of these parents (and their alleged harassment by us).  The purpose of these being here is to not only show Ms. Nieman's testimony in the CINA Petition that she didn't know anything about these people, what they were doing here, or what happened to cause them to leave, was a huge pile of smelly bull crap.  She not only had the story as told by us, and countless officer's relations of that same story, but SHINY testimony in this reporter's OWN WORDS, that she was psychotic, and on meds, and was IN THE BLOG, IN THE POST RIGHT BEFORE ALL OF THIS HAPPENED, yet the worker blows past all of that and instead picks one sentence out where I say "it" about our daughter and starts building a whole case against us instead; then says, in the CINA that "friends or relatives came from out of state to care for the child...there was a falling out of some type and they left, its not sure".  This alone should and would have been more than enough to prove that something funny was going on, yet the D.A. and the Judge believe her heresay as gospel...but hey, don't take MY word for it...hold the CINA up against her assessment, as well as the judge's order, mix in some officer DIRECT TESTIMONY AND SOME POLICE REPORTS, and check the whole thing out for yourself, as they lie, twist, then damn themselves using THEIR OWN WORDS!!

Also, you'going to get some documents twice, as well as dated as being filed later in this case.  These will, more than likely be our own rebuttals to these events, or to fill in holes, so as to insure the integrity of our timeline, as to when things happened, and why.  So if you see them again, or notice the words NUNC PRO TUNC on them, then you'll know what's up.  I've also decided that I'm going to include, on occassion, links to blog posts past, so you're able to view events as they happened, during the case.

************************************************************************************************



The First of three drug tests, all falsified, and done by a joint called
"Central Iowa Family Services"; at 2911 Merle Hay Rd. (MHR and Urbandale
and run by a Juvenile Officer; Tony "The Tackle" Reed,
who evidently played tackle position in high school football,
I'm guessing this to be true because of his stance against me, as he thought I might be
leaving the courthouse to avoid taking urine sample drug test the 2nd;
even though I agreed to it willingly, and even though it was NOT court ordered;
and was just pacing while I waited for enough urine to take it.
This spot has exclusive contract with DHS for all of their drug testing...imagine that.
Remember too, this is a magical place, that once was unprofessional
and looked NOTHING like a real business, let alone a real drug testing place,
but because of my blog, has now remodeled themselves to be more to my liking...lol.
That, and to avoid scrutiny too, I'm guessing.


Falsified results #2, drug test for the father:




Ah....Here we go, the first "Family Team Meeting", (where everyone BUT the family could speak.  No, wait, I almost forgot.  Nathan and Lindsay got to speak quite often...oh yeah, so I suppose it WAS a family team meeting!)  A.K.A. Post-Removal Conference" notes; two, two, two reasonable efforts made us...in one, with two different names.




Here WOULD have been Jerry Brueggeman's Death Certificate...but we thought we'd leave it out, out of respect for the fact that he didn't end up being the bio father.  It's important to mention, however, that at the bottom it says "Illegal to make a copy of this copy"...even though the D.A. did so.  Evidently it's OK for them.  I thought I'd best not publish that.  Don't need EXTRA charges on top of the heinous crime of publishing our court docs and 3rd degree harassment...lol.



The Family Interaction Plan
Author:  Those of DHS/CPS, or Kate Gosch, Case Manager







Please note at the bottom, where it starts out NO video or tape recording or interaction will end immediately.
Why for y'all?  Afraid you might do more wrong here?  Why the need for this???

More of this report...and the visit schedule, plus confirming the visit schedule.  More than a full ridiculous requirement of anyone who's homeless, upset, and with only one phone and pass for the bus..





The Court Reporter Cert. for the Removal Hearing




My First Invitation...I'm SO PROUD!!
This was long before I knew it was actually Judge Price overseeing things.
Whoops!  Sorry Susan...well, no, actually, not.




The DHS Assessment of our family
Author:  Emily "the Bitch" Nieman
Lies told:  55++















The FSRP report for the first month, where, OMG...we missed attending A DOCTOR'S APPOINTMENT Even though DHS used this report several times to claim we'd missed appointment(s), more than one...
and several visits...but remember, this was the first week.  Shock, anger, knowing we'd been done wrong
as well as homeless and looking for some place to be so we could get our daughter back were serious priorities.  Plus, we only had one bus pass and one phone for a while, and were trying to adjust to this overwhelming situation and get ready for a court hearing that would happen in just 6 days.









Thursday, February 19, 2015

And Away We Go!! (Part A - July)



Funniest thing....

I looked up Iowa Code 708.7, and it states, under the crime "Harassment", that there are 3 types...1, 2, and 3rd degree.  NONE OF THESE is a felony, and this idiot expects me, the Mighty Sword, who took pre-law, to believe that ANY of these charges is extraditable.  It isn't...it's a misdemeanor.  I was fooled for a brief second, long enough to look it up to be sure...but, sure enough, his threats of this being a "National Warrant" and extraditable from any of the 50 states, is quite bogus.  F*** you too, my little detecting friend...have a nice day, and enjoy what little employed life you have left (reiterates and states that this is NOT, IN ANY WAY, A THREAT OF A PHYSICAL NATURE).

Now, let's get on to committing yet another simple misdemeanor, the crime of publishing CONFIDENTIAL COURT DOCUMENTS...and I'm more than willing to spend the max sentence of 60 days in any jail...30 days for the 3rd degree harassment (which it is NOT, that would involve voice to voice contact, which it has not, considering all I did was leave voicemails) and 30 days max for publishing confidential documents) AFTER I have my day in court on FEBRUARY 25TH (AND THE ANSWER IS YES, THAT IS AN INVITATION TO ATTEND).  Here, then is EVERY ONE OF THEM....with commentary, starting with the month of July.  Enjoy!!

SPECIAL NOTE:  This will MOST CERTAINLY be a CONTINUOUS WORK IN PROGRESS....first, I just realized that my scanner software is set to condense the scan on its own, and some docs got scanned upside down....so once I get the kinks worked out, the next month, posting today, will be SCADS easier...but this one, in addition to needing to be commented on, is the busiest month, as is January of this year, so is going to take the most to get right.  KEEP CHECKING BACK, FO SHO!!

********************************************************************************************************
Keep in mind this order of documents is true, right down to the second it was filed.  This is the first real timeline of our case.  I will be fixing, reposting, turning documents right side up, introducing each and commenting as to what might have happened up to or during or directly between one document and another.  This will show you the way these things are handled from start to finish.

Now of course, you all the know quite well, the story of the removal.  I've gone over it so many times it makes one sick...even myself.  You have no idea how tired I am of telling and re-telling this story, usually as it falls on the deaf or very nearly deaf ears of whoever it is I tell it to.

However, it's important to see it HERE, in its timely glory, mostly because before, these parents had no idea the lengths these people were able to go to a.  Conspire to take the baby; b.  Conspire to KEEP the baby; and c.  Cospire to terminate ALL parental rights, without fail.  Also keep in mind that these parents knew not the law, at least not in the sense of what it took to deal with DHS, or a court that would do whatever it took to hold this child from us; no matter how illegal.

Oh but we know now.  I guess what I'm trying to say is, when I wrote about all of this, I didn't have the whole story.  I remember back when we were getting ready to go into the removal hearing, and saying "Now we've got these bastards" and thought winning would be open and shut.  Little did we expect the magic court of Judge William A. Price;and his made-up rulings, based on thin air...a man who evidently receives a good chunk o' change in ruling against us and siding with DHS; nor did we expect John P. Sarcones influence over those of the Polk County D.A.'s.  Most of all, we most certainly didn't expect this corrupt Judge's influence over our own attorneys, as they switched sides whenever it benefitted the court.

So the point is, sure, you can be referred back to where I've written about this stuff before (if you're new to all of this); or you can say "Oh, I've seen this crap already"....and breeze past it.  But you won't have seen it like you will now.  First, all court docs have NEVER been posted...only some, and definately NOT in this timely order.  Nor have all of these defendant's documents been posted in the same fashion; in rebuttal, or with the knowledge apparent that these defendants now have of the actions of all of these that are involved in this.  Most of all, you've seen my proof, but only in and of itself, not backed up or inserted properly, timewise, against the things they've pulled.  No, America, THIS will be where all will appropriately and totally revealed.  Read it, I insist.

Naturally, there will of course be 7 parts, and all 7 will be filed in 7 days.  It is, of course, just now 7 days until the termination of ALL of these parent's rights...and the child will be forever the property of the people who had the intention of adopting her all along, and with whom DHS and the court had ALWAYS intended for her to be....with Lindsay and Nathan Pritchard, who have already been all this child knows since her 9th day of life, and who have obviously paid dearly to have our newborn.  Also, at the end of each month, I will provide all of America with the KNOWN phone numbers for all of the people involved, so that you can call them (at work) or pop by their home or workplace so as to ask them what the hell they think they're doing.  I would never do such a thing to anyone, given different circumstances, but the folks of our court, of the Governor's office and of DHS have given me no alternative.  So forgive me America.  Just think about this...if it was YOUR child or granchild...wouldn't you do the same, given no other choice?  Of course you would.  'Nuff said.  Let's get it on then.

Police Reports, showing Emily Nieman (considering how many times in her assessment that she claims to have read these, as well as talked to the officers involved) to know FULL WELL who the reporter was; as well as her role in our lives...which, by the way, was NOT caregiver.

Please, if you will, start out with Ms. Karlsen's own admission of her mental issues, given here.  She was only talked to once, when she called DHS, and was never heard from again.  Remember, because of my calls to the police, she was already leaving state, because she didn't want to be arrested for harassment.  This post, found here:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/06/interruption-of-service-reader-response.html

was only one post away from the one where they found all of their "proof" of the father's "Lack of Bond with the baby", and that was posted before the child even got home.  Funny how they didn't look at this post at all, but chose to extract just 10 words out of the entire blog post that I had written about my feelings that day, so that they could get their supposed proof.









Now, open this post up on another tab:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-b-august.html

And scroll down to where you'll find Ms. Nieman's assessment.

On yet another tab, open up this post:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-final-chapter-hell-no-part-iii-b-s.html

Where you'll find the story that happened just after the removal, and what I had to say about it.

Finally, although incomplete (I wasn't able to make a movie that spanned the entire 18 minutes of this recording), open this film, and listen to the first part, six minutes or so, while you listen to the mother go through her ordeal with this worker, while you read this order, following:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/10/dhs-preparation-for-annual-adoption.html

The Removal Order
Filled out by:  SW4 (Oh, I'M sorry, SW3...Evidently Ms. Nieman
suffered some sort of demotion.  I wonder why?) Emily Nieman, CPS
Signed by Judge William A. Price (via Emily Nieman)



Affidavit of NO Indian affiliation.
Signed by Emily Nieman, SW4, CPS


Appearance of Asst. D.A. Stephanie "The DHS Hammer" Brown; Polk County D.A.'s Office


The CINA (Child In Need of Assistance) Petition
Author:  Stephanie Brown, Asst. D.A.
Witness to the Testimony of:  Emily Nieman, SW4 (3), CPS (Hearsay Instance 1)




Order for the appointment of council for Trilynn Brueggeman "A Child"
Paul White GAL (guardian ad litem) Lawyer is appointed.
I like this by the way, I think it's funny that the members of the court are allowed to refer to her as "A Child" the whole seven months we're in court, but I"m not allowed once, for five seconds, to refer to to my daughter as "it", when I haven't even met her yet.




Order for Dale Mays to be council for the mother





Order for Colin McCormick to be council for the Father




The Appearance of Paul White, GAL for Trilynn


Summons to appear at the removal hearing for the mother.



Summons to appear at the removal hearing for the father



The Medical records of Methodist/Unity Point Healthcare, where neglect was "proven" to be the case of both the mother and the father.  This was claimed, at the removal hearing, to be a "reasonable effort" that DHS and this court made to "prevent or eliminate the need for the removal".  The order, made just after this "reasonable effort", didn't list this 3 day period as one, nor were any "reasonable efforts" made in order to prevent or eliminate it...and yet the judge FINDS that THEY were made...































Appearance of Dale Mays for the mother.


The ACTUAL appearance of Dale Mays for the mother...lol.


The Order for the Removal Hearing, put out after the hearing.




Please, for rebuttal to this order, please open, next to this post, another post, here:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-e-november.html

Where you can look down and find our statement to the court "Concerning the removal hearing", where we put to rest...well, at least, for us, the ridiculous findings of this judge.  Make sure you follow along in the assessment you should already have up on another tab.  As you'll find, the judge tends to make up his own facts here.  Some don't even jibe with what the worker says in her assessment, or in the CINA petition, found earlier in this post..

Financial Affidavit for the father.


Order for appointment of Council Kevin McCormick for the father.




A Document stating we had received a copy of the CINA document, somehow signed by both of us on the day we attended the removal hearing.  Niether of us remember seeing this petition, EVER, until the date of September 12, at the adjudication hearing, about the time I got to finally see every other court document in our case.  Niether of us ever remember seeing OR signing this document either.  'Magine that.  We were, in the adjudication hearing, made to feel like criminals when we're forced to say we'd never seen the CINA petition...???




Now, as promised, the contact numbers for all players in our little game thus far.  Most of this is hardly new information, considering I pubished a few of these documents back in the days...and most of our removal experts are listed here.  But just in case you missed them...well, I think it's only fair, don't you?

Now keep in mind, these are WORK numbers.  But I insist you call them anyway...

Emily Nieman, SW4 (damn...3!!) - (515) 423-7824

Dr. Michael Line, D.O. (Blank Hospital, Methodist) - (515) 402-1793

Dr. Jill Jasper (Blank Hospital, Methodist) - (515) 241-6611

Dr. Eric Haugen (Blank Hospital, Methodist) - (515) 241-8923

Dr. Amanda Harris (Blank Hospital, Methodist)
I guess she doesn't work there anymore...sorry!

VNS (Visiting Nurse Services General Number) - 515-515-288-1516

Dale Mays (Benzoni Law Firm) - (515) 271-5730

Katie Gosch (CPS/DHS) - (515) 725-7245

Polk County District Attorney's Office (515) 286-3341
(Ask for John P. Sarcone; D.A., Stephanie Brown A.D.A. or Kevin Brownell A.D.A.)
Email:  john.sarcone@polkcountyiowa.gov

Blank Children's Hospital - 515-241-6212

Methodist Hospital General Information (to ask for the number for the legal department, of course!)
515-241-6212

Polk County Sherrif's Office Administration - 515-286-3814

Polk County Courthouse (I'm sorry, but, as expected, the ever paranoid Judge William A. Price will have to be generally contacted here)
515-286-3722

Make sure you call these people often to ask what the heck they thought they were doing to these parents...for me, willya?