Tuesday, September 5, 2017

The State Post-Conviction Relief Case, Part XII - The Order (A)



Well kids, 'twould appear that the judge, Jeanie Vaudt, is very nearly ready to produce an order, concerning this travesty of justice.  Funny thing is, 'twould also appear that she expects me...or the other side, to do all the work for her.

First, I just got an email on Sunday, saying that she had already asked me to give her a "proposed order" concerning this matter.  Huh?  First, I didn't get get any such email...and, to be fair, neither did the other side, according to his apparently surprised response (he has to send me anything that he replies back to a communication, to avoid impropriety), but now, I supposedly have to write...in 2 days, no less, a proposed order, telling the judge what she SHOULD write up, if she were to rule in my favor.

I don't think so.  When did this become a norm?  Just for fun, I looked this up.  Can I find a damn thing about this in any rule of civil procedure, anywhere?  Nope.  Not even an example, let alone a definition.  You know what I think?   I think this is her way of getting the other side to let her off the hook.  I think she knows I have no intention of doing any such thing, and, since she wants to share responsibility with someone, ANYONE, for screwing me out of justice, she is now begging for some help from someone who has already done his homework...Jesse the snake Ramirez, and the crooked county attorney's office.

I say, fair enough.  Let 'em play their little game some more.  It is, of course, all academic.  We all know what will happen next, anyway.  If I win out, they'll appeal.  If they win out, I'll appeal.  Then we all sit around for what could well be another year and a half waiting for the crooked judges in the Supreme Court of Iowa to uphold what the lower court decided.

Oh, I will, of course, submit SOMETHING...but it won't be a "proposed order."  What it will be is something that wraps up what I think of her, concerning this, and concerning the snake defending the state as well.  My other submission to you, very very soon (probably today, matter o' factly) will be the (lately discovered and received) fraudulent and DOCTORED transcripts from the case this case concerns, the "Underlying matter", which, upon inspection, does not include A.  Any threats made against Brent Swallers, who was threatened with jail time for harassment, if he continued to act as my legal agent, and which also does not include B.  the judge's near denial to make me take down their only confidential document off of my blog, which would have denied me my right to free speech.  This will also force me to ask for the recordings of this case (they told me that they don't make recordings of JUVENILE proceedings, which leads me to believe that they do make recordings of all other ones), so that I can compare the two (transcripts vs. recordings), and bring fraud upon the court in Federal court, along with the newly prepared Federal cases (the others were dismissed, due to the fact that I combined way too much for those idiots to handle in just one) that I intend to file as well.

Let 'em have their fun.  Their time is forever coming.  The war against Iowa continues...and goes on...and on...and on...until the day I expire.  IF I EVER expire, that is.  Not if I can help it.  Not until some people pay for all they have done.  I will NOT quit.  I will NEVER give up.  Count on it.  :D

ADDENDUM:  You know something?  I think I'll have a little fun with this.  I think I WILL write a "Proposed Order"...something to the affect of "I, Jeanie Vaudt, find in favor of the plaintiff.  I can't believe I didn't do that ages ago.  What was I thinking?  Here, I award you $25,000 for pain and suffering, I order your record expunged of all charges, and I order that charges of malicious prosecution be filed against John P. Sarcone, Linda Lane and Judge Blink be filed.  Here...have another $1,000,000 for our violation of every civil, due process and constitutional right you've ever had.  I'm sorry Mr. The Living Man, have a nice day.  Judge Jeanie Vaudt."  In a perfect world, right?

ADDENDUM, PART II:  I did do that order.  Here it is, for those of you that are curious as to what it entails:


No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you very much for your comments! Thank you again!! I value your opinions!