The State Post-Conviction Relief Case, Part III - Hide and Seek

Guess what kids?  I SAID, GUESS WHAT KIDS???

Whaaa?  How did you know?  Who told you?  Yes, just 14 days out from trial, I sent a letter to John P. Sarcone...personally.  Here's what it said:

Now, you may think this was a bit uncalled for...but there was a purpose to this, that you are about to be informed of.

You see, there were a few problems on the defense's side...if you have no idea what I'm talking about, then by all means, read the following articles...then it will be most clear:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-state-level-post-conviction-relief.html

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-state-post-conviction-relief-case.html

You see, there is...and was no way for the defense (the State) to win out here...The complaint filed is QUITE CLEAR about the infractions committed during the case to put me away for a year in the Polk County Jail.  Guess what happened not long after I filed the case?

Linda Lane, the head prosecutor in that case (as well as just about every other misdemeanor case that occurred right alongside of it)...resigned her position with the Iowa Polk County Attorney's office.  'Magine that.  I'm sure you know why.  If you don't, let me bring you folks up to it, and rub your faces in it...just for S's and G's:

SHE CONSPIRED, OR WAS THE PUPPET FOR JOHN P. SARCONE, AND WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING GUILTY VERDICTS FOR ME IN EVERY CRIMINAL CASE FOR 2016...and I prove that...over, and over again.  Rather than risk her career (her being a young and promising lawyer), she did a very smart thing:  She quit.

Good girl Linda Lane.  You did that before you got in too deep, like the rest of the criminals...problem is, you didn't get out fast enough.  Your name is on the Bruce Bitch List, and once you're there, you STAY there...until you get what's comin' to you...legally, of course.

I didn't know she had quit, by the way...not until yesterday, when I contacted John Sarcone's offices, and asked for Ms. Lane...to whit, they mentioned that she was no longer employed there.  I have to wonder whether she quit, or was asked to quit, because she refused to cooperate, or whether she got wise and ducked out before the bomb hit...it's hard to say.  The point being, another Assistant PCA had to assume the case in her stead.  Enter one Jesse Ramirez, another criminal puppet of John P.'s.  Fortunately?  This one's a real idiot.

First of all, he has yet to legally appear in the case.  2nd, you would not believe what they're trying to do, to get the inevitable staved off.  Yes, they want a continuance...but you're just gonna die laughing when you see how.

Anyway, the letter above, the one that might have been uncalled for?  Was most certainly called for.  You see, the PCA's office couldn't tell me the person who had subbed for Linda...mostly, I'm sure, because there HADN'T been anyone else yet so assigned.  Therefore, the letter above was a poke to make sure that John P. was still alive and kicking.  He was.  And his response?  Was to assign THIS criminal half-wit to the case, ASAP, and have him put out this letter, to both me...and the judge.

Now please, before you go any further, take special note of this idiot's attempt to keep this conversation between him, I, and the judge in the case, confidential.  Keep in mind, also, that this is a case on THE PUBLIC RECORD...a civil case.  All communications between this guy and ANYBODY is PUBLIC RECORD.  You can't just magically make these things confidential by simply saying it, you have to have a good reason.

Attached to it, was this motion to recast the complaint (meaning, he wants me to submit it again, revised, so that he can "answer it properly"), and continue the case.  Please, by all means, laugh your heads off.  Keep in mind, this is the move of several desperate men.

Let's begin with the fact that this request for a recast of the complaint is happening at month 5 1/2, 4 1/2 months past the time allowed by the courts to answer it, and a mere two weeks before the actual trial concerning the complaint is to be held, let alone state that it's "unintelligible", or not able to be read or understood.  Let's also state that the witnesses in this case were about to be subpoenaed, at the plaintiff's expense.  Thank God I hadn't done that yet, right?  You would have seen a rather furious plaintiff, had I spent money to do that by this time.

The "claims" are quite simple.  They wrongfully put me jail, utilizing every trick on the books.  For that, I want relief.  The relief is clearly stated, based on that claim.  You would think that just the fact that I applied for post-conviction relief should auto-produce a claim, wouldn't you?  I filed for it, based on wrongdoing, and that wrongdoing is very clearly stated...in the claim itself on the application, in the minutes of testimony, and several other places as well.

Now, per usual, my motion for resistance, in response.  Please, also, take note of the paragraph, giving the court MY opinion on this dumbass's Confidentiality clause:

Now there's one thing I'd like to say about Jesse's little letter to the judge in this case:  Notice how it's dated the same day as my letter to John P., within just hours of my sending John his love letter even?  I'd say this proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt even, that this motion, produced by the current un-documented attorney in charge of this case; gotten, I'm sure, at the last minute, is doing this in desperation, at John's command.  Tsk, Tsk Johnny boy.  Bad move on your part.  This one could very well be your tie to conspiracy against my civil rights...in the Fed Case, forthcoming.  OK EVERYBODY, SAY AWWWWW!

In case you haven't quite put your finger on what this all means, it means that I went to Iowa for nothing.  You and I both know that the criminal element in Polk County is going to grant this continuance.  They'll stretch the shit out forever and ever, until they get me to give up.  Problem is?  Ain't happening.  Lastly, I have one parting shot for the Judge in this case, Judge Jeanie Vaudt.  Your name, as YET, is NOT on the BBL...but it will be if you grant this continuance.  If nothing else, you shall, with this article, be forever immortalized...as will Jesse whatever the hell his name is.  The Wetback criminal county attorney...you know, the one that works for the WOP CRIMINAL JOHN P. SARCONE.  See you in court...I don't care WHEN IT GETS CONTINUED TO...I WILL BE THERE, DICKHEADS.

NOTE:  The date this request for a recast and for a continuance is heard, by the way, is 8:30 the day before the trial, on April 26th...in case you'd like to be present for this kangaroo shit.  :D

Jeanie Vaudt, District 5C Judge in charge of the PCCE case.

Homelessness Part IV - The "Downtown Rescue Mission" (HSV, AL)

The sign out in front of the Downtown Rescue Mission in Huntsville, AL reads, simply, this:

"Where We Have A Heart For The Homeless."

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Upon my arrival here, I wrote up a tasty article about homeless missions in general, just one article down, inspired by my stay at this mission.  Now, it's inspired me to write just one more.  Not unlike the Gospel Mission in Sioux Falls, SD, this one has now incurred my wrath as well, but not due to the actions of just one person there; no, this time, the entire mission managed to piss me off.  And, not unlike what I did to the other one, so shall I do...to this one too.  Kick me, I kick back...remember?

Upon my arrival at this mission, I was told that cell phones, nor laptops...nor, for that matter, anything with a camera was allowed here.  The reason for this would be quite apparent very quickly.  If I were to be in charge of a mission as disgusting as this, I wouldn't want people to have cameras either.  The floors (also the sleeping areas) were filthy, and I wouldn't ask my dog to lay on anything closely resembling them.  Your beds were worn out prison mats, the showers were open for other clients' viewing pleasure, and your entry into the place wasn't too far off of what you go through at the airport.  Your bags are torn apart daily (no bag bigger than a standard duffel bag is allowed in...if you have anything bigger than the half of a school locker that you can store things in, you are asked to throw it away), and a big metal detector ensures that nothing of metal is allowed past this point.  Cigarette rollers and loose tobacco are confiscated (usually WITHOUT your knowledge), and your pockets are to be emptied.  OK, I can deal with this (thank you PATRIOT ACT).

Enter in, the rub.  Should the staff at the front door miss anything, and you're caught with it later...you're the one at fault.  Again...whatever.  I'm a decent guy, I'm not going to bring any weapons or drugs in anyway, so no real sweat off of my skin...until yesterday, that is.

I had taken up with a gentleman named Troy, who was not only supposed to put me to work, but was also offering me a place to stay, and so yesterday (I thought) was SUPPOSED to be my last day at this horror of a mission.  Thank God for small favors, I say.  I cleaned out my locker, and handed in my lock to get my lock deposit back, bagged up my things, and headed off of the property.

After waiting what turned into 2 hours for Troy to pick me up for the move, then work, I started talking to another resident of the mission, who it happened had already had an experience with this Troy person...and, of course, it wasn't a good one, by any stretch.  He informed me that leaving to work and live under this man was not only a serious mistake (he was, I was told, a coke-head, and loved to cheat hapless homeless people out of their money), it would be a step down, and that I was better off staying right where I was, at the mission.  After thinking about it for another hour, I turned my happy behind around and went right back.  I talked to the Chaplain (Mike), and got my locker and lock back.  I moved all of my things back in, and took off to take care of other business.

Upon my return, I checked in, and went my way.  An hour or so later, a guy named Lowan (a program based man, with a mohawk and tattoos, evidently in charge of those running the security desk) told me that he wanted to speak to me.  I didn't hesitate, and went to find him.

With him was a woman, who was, evidently, someone who worked for the administration of the shelter on the shelter side.  Lowan informed me that, after I had left (when I left, I left my locker wide open, since there was no need to shut it), someone spotted a kitchen knife in the locker.  I told Lowan, flat out, that it did not belong to me, and knew of no such knife.  Following this, the woman in administration sidled up to inform me that, since there had been a knife in my locker, that I was to be put out of the shelter for 30 days.  Not 3.  Not 7.  30 days.

Now, I want you to think about this for a moment America...the locker was vacated, and I was no longer a resident for 3 whole hours.  There was no lock on the locker.  I had left the door of the locker gapingly open.  Anyone could have put this knife in the locker.  What's more, if it HAD been my knife...wouldn't I have taken it with me?  Why would I leave it behind?  Finally, there's a metal detector and a person at the door supposedly going all through my things when I bring in my things.  Shouldn't this be the person getting in trouble for not doing his job???  Why is it that I have to be one being put out in the rain, for bringing in a knife?  And there are cameras everywhere, can't we check those out?  Evidently, not.  "A Heart For The Homeless" indeed.  Oh, and since I got upset at these people and swore at them (as anyone would, naturally...what a sham!), Lowan decided he was going to beat my ass if I said another word to him.  Of course, being the NON-VIOLENT, NON-KNIFE CARRYING citizen I was, I turned and kept on truckin'.  I wanted nothing more to do with this place, that was certain.  How I managed to stay that long was miracle enough.  Where I am now is absolute Nirvana in comparison.

Yes, finally, and not unlike the Gospel Mission, in S.D., as well, we shall write this article...place it in the Feature Article position for an undetermined period, and send it to the churches in the area, as well as the local newspapers and elected offices of the city of Huntsville, AL.  Enjoy, you bastards.  May you rest in pieces.  :D

Homelessness, Part III - Homeless Shelters

Hey America, Tis I...well, you know whom.  To prevent blog stagnation, I've decided to write about what I've endured, during my soon to be brief homeless period; being, currently, a man of no State to call my home...yet.  I'm currently working on that, as we speak...sort of.  Good news, I won't be this way for much longer; I'm where I think I want to be for good, start a job tomorrow, and by the following morrow, will have a home to call me own...also sort of.

You'll note that this is Part III of the subject of homelessness, mainly because there were two previous parts, naturally.  These are phenomenal articles, done back in those days waaaaaaaay back when I started this blog, and can be found here:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/06/homelessness.html

and here:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/08/homelessness-part-ii.html

If you'd like, you can start there, and come back...or just forget the whole thing, and read this one.  Matters to me not, as long as you read ANYTHING I've written, and I'll be as happy as I can be.

As we know, the demographic of the homeless is e'er changing, because, well, the Government and those of the financial world are currently in the process of recalling those things, places and properties that never really belonged to us in the first place...those thingies we call "Homes".  I don't care if you paid off your property; your ownership of these places is not at all real, and can be repossessed or sold off at anytime, if you don't pay your straw man's taxes.  Just wait til the day you can't pay your $2,000 property tax some year, and they sell your home, for just that amount.  Funny, how you can pay $200,000 to own your home...and they can take it all away for just a measly amount of taxes that you couldn't afford to pay, is it not?

Anyhow, my point is, that more and more middle-classers, especially those who couldn't, even for a single moment, imagine that they COULD have been homeless, are now joining the lower class in their homelessness, much to their dismay.  When you arrive there, please, by all means, prepare to stare the worst directly in the face, in the form of today's homeless shelters.

One thing you'll notice is that there now only appears to be two kinds of missions remaining...Gospel Missions and Salvation Army missions.  Oh sure, you could further categorize and say "wet" shelters and "dry" shelters, but those categories still fall into the main ones.

The Salvation Army missions have been around almost as long as the homeless problem itself.  The others, Gospel Missions, are primarily only Gospel Missions for one reason...because this is the only lucrative type of mission to have today.  This type of mission is the one that gets the majority of federal funding.  If your mission is any other type, and you can pretty much bet that you're going to have to fund it yourself.  To get federal funding, you must now prove that your mission is, in some fashion, religiously or "program" based.  You don't really have to act it to the fullest...but that helps, I'm sure.  So whether or not your mission of choice is REALLY religiously-based is questionable...but they have to say it is, or not much fed funding will be made available to you.

That means that you, as a "client", are going to have to attend a flurry of things that you didn't used to have to back in the pre-present days, such as mandatory chapels (usually held prior to meals...you don't attend, you don't eat.  You don't eat, you don't stay).  Another thing you'll probably notice, is that once you apply to stay in one of these missions (applications in places like this require an awful lot of personal information that you wouldn't normally be comfortable giving your employer, i.e., SSN's and the like), you will be required to stay EVERY day, for as long as they need you there...or you will lose your privilege of having a temporary home.  That's because, if you don't stay there EVERY day...they don't get paid.

Is this what being homeless, as well as helping the homeless stop being homeless has come to?  Evidently so.  I'm sorry, but some of the homeless are going to take longer to get out of being homeless than others, thank you very much...and religion, as I understood it, was a personal choice.  Now, the majority of these missions stuff it down your throat.

Another thing you'll notice is that all of them are now "Program Based"...and in accordance with this, the living conditions for those that choose NOT to be on some "program" are very shabby indeed, comparatively.  Funny thing too, all of the program guys and girls are evidently encouraged to encourage YOU to be on "The Program", so that you can enjoy the special privileges that they enjoy...as they do it almost continuously, during your stay on the "dark" side (The non-program side).  That, I'm sure, is because certain "programs" also receive some type of federal funding.

I've noticed that some shelters are quite AA and NA program-based as well.  These AA and NA based shelters often make it so you almost HAVE to attend these kinds of meetings in order to be inside.  Very non-useful for those with no alcohol or drug type issues.  Again, living conditions on the non-program side of these shelters is no picnic; it often involves such bad conditions that living on the street or outside is often better.

I don't know what happened to this country, America, but everything seems to revolve around federal funding anymore, even non-profit agencies..as I've previously written about in the history of this blog.  Nothing is the real deal, and phony is the new in; if you can't feel it, pretend to be it is the motto.  Whatever it takes to get the money...right?  This, in and of itself, is socialism at its finest.  If nothing is done out of the goodness of your heart, but only for money, then how is a non-profit organization going to be allowed to really be a true non-profit organization?

Homelessness, by the way, in my current city, has dropped 22 percent since 2014.  After being in the shelter that I've been in for nigh a week now, I can most certainly understand why.  Homelessness these days is hardly a personal choice, so let's not make the homeless's lives more miserable than they already are.  Most of us don't ask or choose to be this way.  :D

The *Past-Due* Wake Up America Tour, Update Part II

Welp, my FaceBook profile is resurrected, the sun is still shining, I'm still South, That1Lurker is still a spastic retard, and comments still, even though no one on this planet sees it, even me...and the tour is still off....

OR IS IT?

Hmm...this is a wait and see sitchyation America.  See, even though I sorta pussed out (I didn't really do this all by myself mind you...YOU guys did too!) because some moronic troll who didn't know me OR my story decided to strike where it hurt (and only managed to get me down for what, 3 whole days?  A record short time), I'm back...I'm not exactly mobile, like I thought I was gonna be...but I'm still moving.  I had big plans to go around and around...Idaho WAS looking phenomenal, and so was Massechuesetts...but it would seem that both have kinda fizzled, like everyone and everything else in my bad-kharmatic life of late...but the south APPEARS to be revived.  People from AL are suddenly popping up all over the place, and corruption seems to be fairly BEGGING to be exposed...kinda like I thought it would, once I made my appearance here...SOO...

PLAN RE-VAMP #1:  I'll just say this...shows are NOT out of the question...but you'll have to wait til I make it your way, OK?  Right now I'm drumming up business in cajun country, so we'll see how it is afore I go.  More than likely though, I'll be weaving my way north.  Not only because I have to re-appear at my post-conviction case, but because corruption stories are simply BURSTING at the seams up yonder.  The Bruce?  Is certainly NOT dead, nor do I have plans to let ANYONE i.e., That1, and whoever this other chick was, kill me off either.  No, the criminals are gonna have to be the ones to do that, and I'll be more than ready for 'em when they come for me.  They won't get away with it, that I guarantee.  Nuff said.  ON WITH THE COUNTDOWN.

PLAN RE-VAMP #2.  I got something cooking that I'm not letting out the bag JUST yet...but when I do, you'll know you've been scratched...well, not YOU in particular, I mean in general, natch.  We'll get back to that plan re-vamp later, k?  It's gonna be worth the wait, I promise  :D

"Unseen Warrior - A Whistleblower's Story

Sean Bosilovick, after being brutalized, per his story

OK America.  Since you don't wanna come to me with your corruption stories, well, I'll just pick one out of the air.  This guy has been literally BEGGING me to get his story out.  This one might possibly get me in a lot of trouble, but hey...I love trouble.  I look for it.  It sure doesn't have to find me, I swim in it nearly every day, don't I?  Besides landing me at the bottom of a lake somewhere in cement shoes, what could they possibly do to me that's really any worse than what I've already been through?

So...the story timeline goes something like this:

The emails that you will read after this story, written by our star, went out first, and tie into the story itself.  The story, "Unseen Warrior" was written two years ago.  Remember, if you will, that our star was psychologically evaluated and cleared before the story was produced.
“Unseen Warrior”

To whom it may concern: Att; Danielle Salisbury


My name is Sean Bosilovick. I was first introduced to Lance Laird in December 2012, for contract work with JNET for an epidemic in the community regarding various drugs; a specific focus of heroin. Before I get started, I wanted to state who I am.


I was recruited by the DEA in 2002 for “Homeland Security” as a confidential agent through the “war on drugs campaign”. My partner, David Rucker, whom passed May 13, 2014, he and I were to infiltrate the Iraqi militants (gangs); as well Iraqi revolutionary militants selling drugs in the USA and to also protect the trade market IE; trade shows, state fairs and events throughout the country. The government feared after 9/11, these could be target areas! As Director of Trade Shows for the last decade, we/ I worked these shows and did a lot of good over the years. I was assigned to David and through following his lead was introduced to various sources from Colombian gangs and top dealers in CA, FL, AZ. NV, and MI. I also met some unmentioned celebrities and many more affiliated persons in my 13 years working with him on a multitude of cases.


It took 10 years undercover work to come back to Dearborn, Michigan; home town of David. Here we intercepted an unseen message from an undercover agent stating that the local bars had been flooded and had taken over by a particular group of said militants. Also, it had come to our attention that there were local police on payroll by this group. My partner fell very ill and was hospitalized during the International Women’s Show 2013; we were working an event that he never made it to.


With David ill, I was looking at other contract work, all the while never forgetting my connection within the bar I was introduced to in Detroit; that was and is being run by different suspects/commanders in this group. It was brought to my attention that they were buying arms and becoming a stronger threat to the community and national security from the sales of cocaine.


After discussion with Lance and the commander of JNET in early January 2013, I decided that although we had no contact between then and March 2013, I would finally be able to sit down with another agent. Lance was to create an operation targeting the heroin dealers and aforementioned Iraqi militants, as he was also committed to tackling multiple issues going on at the time. I was investigating known suspects involved with the Nigerian attacks with internet scams (ie: Craigslist, E-Bay); and my direct involvement with the Secret Service that was linking China and Nigeria to similar scams of this nature. The cases I was working on involved a grant scam and “mystery shopper” scams, fraudulent checks, American Express cashier checks, United States Postal money orders and hacking of the carrier companies. These scams involved hacking into FED EX, UPS and USPS shipments to obtain information on various individuals, by which they delivered instructions regarding transferring money to them under false pretense via Western Union. I was in communication with those initiating, performing and operating these scams.


I created, with other agents, “Operation Snow Drop” a subsect of “OUR commitment to the solution”. The mission of this operation was to infiltrate the aforementioned bars so that we may take out these militants and affiliates. We were also aiming to find dangerous, drug-manufacturing young adults, some of who used 2 liter pop bottles to manufacture dope and, in some cases, blowing up in their faces. It had come to my attention some soldiers from the military were bringing in large quantities of cocaine and heroin via military transport. At this point, I became aware that I was required by our team to get the support or JNET and any equipment vital to the success of our operation. This equipment may already be in play or could be in play or used from police property and impound.

Days after submitting these operations, I was called for a meeting wherein I had the opportunity to speak one-on-one with a commander of JNET, who referred to himself as “Mike” on our submitted operation. In this meeting, I was informed that the request I had submitted for support and equipment would cost too much money for the operation and the requests I was asking for via operation snow drop. So, I offered, in an effort to extend a basis for trust and reliability, a half ounce heroin “buy” (heroin recovered from the streets, as promised). This would benefit JNET as it would link group members selling that drug, thus they could be linked further from this individual. They were not interested in my proposal and were waiting for an operations lead in Lansing to confirm my affiliation which they did. They also declined the efforts to stop suspected terrorists selling drugs in Dearborn, MI by claiming that it was out of their budget was the final decision . I was also rejected for the contract work previously offered to me to bring down heavy heroin dealers in Lansing, Flint, and Jackson, MI. I requested that my record be cleared and to obtain my life as it was, written in AZ federal contract I signed in 2006. No communication returned.


2 weeks later I was awaken by my partner while working the Nashville Southern Women’s Show. Upon awakening, I saw CNN report that Edward Snowden had left the country in regards to video surveillance, wiretapping and NSA data collection secrets. Much of my operation earlier weeks I submitted.


I had contacted JNET several times and my call was never returned. My messages went on for days and weeks after Snowden arrived in Russia. I have lived with this for two years, all while mourning the loss of my partner David. I have been attending Recovery Technology for PTSD from the years leading and prior to this. I have lost 2 case managers with the Director of Recovery Technology, telling me they cannot help me and advised by legal department whom referred me to Danielle Salisbury. She is the reporter that wrote the first story on a bust that I verbally consulted, although could not attend, early and led to bust late January 2013.


“These terrorists have become more powerful in the last two years and have been successful in their missions”.


I decided to make an effort to restore my wife’s reputation of being married to a man of my background, which included a profile of a drug dealer with Mafia associations, my cover with war on drugs. The operation with Lance & JNET, was an operation was my last attempt to regain my life back and walk away from my country’s drug war. It had gotten out of control and I received no help from the task force that could have helped bring it down and restored my life.

I have found myself so depressed over my efforts to resolve all of this for the last 13 years. This year, the depression had gotten worse. Leading me to being put on new bi Polar meds starting earlier in May, which led me to me trying to take my own life On May 11, 2015?


I overdosed on my medication hoping to die. I couldn’t live with this burden any longer. My wife called Lifeways and they called the police. They came to my house and I demanded to speak with the commander of JNET. After my request, for 25 minutes I was subject to a police stand-off with no ambulance dispatched but full tactical. I came out unarmed, surrendering as requested, and was immediately tackled by 5 to 6 officers. I was then struck in the eye with the butt of a 9mm and told to “shut the f*** up”. I was then told the commander I had requested to speak with resigned 2 years prior and still never to this day have not spoken to a commander to answer why they did not want to take down the Iraqi revolutionary army selling cocaine and arming cell groups in MI?.


I then was handcuffed and escorted to Allegiance Hospital. I had my stomach pumped and eye stitched and bandaged and was hospitalized for 72 hours following. I was mentally cleared for the second time in 2 months, as I had been hospitalized as I began leaking this information on social media. They also left an image for community watch groups as it appeared as “raid” as some group members where talking about it on social media groups day of days following.


I am writing this overview and will be glad to answer questions for you in a Q&A and willing to give Danielle exclusive on this story.


This is my last attempt to move forward in my life. What I have submitted is the operations in email and communication setup via Lance Laird and JNET. There is also a picture of my eye taken at the hospital from the day of the police standoff. This was abuse after already having been through 2 years of anxiety and PTSD. I am finally letting everyone know my position with Homeland Security, and why I was blacklisted (or shunned) by this agency to aid in the efforts.


I have not seen or heard from Lance since the day we met for my request with support of the operation. I have not been contacted since. I created this with other team members, including myself, are going underground. I am not alone in this but voicing my life and the abuse is unethical and has caused me much more mental anxiety. We did our part and I am asking for my life back as it was not my fault what these sergeants do with this strong resistance. Other agents have gone missing or have been killed in the last two years as we see in the Baltimore case currently being investigated. 
We should still get credit for doing our jobs. I am asking for Rand Paul 2016 for help as well and Stand With Edward Snowden and Supporters


Sincerely,
Bosilovick Sean

Date: Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Subject: Fwd: Operation "Snow Drop" Attn:Balou
To: seanquno@gmail.com
i am a confidential asset who has been compromised... i am part of the body and not alone.. 

From: jacob walker

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jacob walker <fliboi036@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:12 PM
Subject: Operation "Snow Drop" Attn:Balou
To: lancelaird22@yahoo.com

This communication was set up via (Lance Laird)

What we are offering is a solution to the epidemic that has taken control of this city. "WE" have the ability to intertwine our social network and this solution, to devise a plan of action. We have the ability to have an unknown as to said suspects, a direct connection regarding this problem. With the proper atmosphere provided by you, top players in this ongoing drug epidemic problem, and at the same time make it known to law enforcement who the many users and dealers are, We" are going to outline what "we" need from you and we are going to lay out our terms as well. ALL TERMS are negotiable given said statues. Are ability is to provide an unsuspected cooperating body that is trusted in the realm of said users,dealers,manufacturers both at the top and at the bottom. With the element of a timely seizure of said parties, with out reveling our "identities" prematurely, we can provide a multitude of cases. Such efforts will not go unnoticed and have never had such a profound effect. We believe that at a time such as now, it is crucial to act. Such efforts we believe cannot be matched by law enforcement alone. This body will provide the confidence of a factor that is conceivable, and trust able to said drug parties in this small town that will bring results. Our loyalties will remain honored by said contract that together we negotiate.

We will consent to the placement of an undercover officer into this body, however, said officer MUST for our protection and safety be brought in from another jurisdiction and be unknown in this town as well. This officer will play to the role needed as described, to protect the cities interest and to provide a full awareness of the laws necessary to complete our objectives. "WE" have the utmost faith in the integrity of Your law enforcement teams. We expect that same faith of integrity in "our body". 

How this body will conduct this operation:

*(JNET) will have full authority after negotiations are finalized.

*(JNET) will have complete access to all information at all times.

*(JNET) can stop all investigations upon their request as long as our terms are met, regardless of the point in which they deem it necessary to stop said investigation.

*(JNET) will be given the ability to closely monitor all actions;ie,communications,money transfers,purchases,involvements,etc.

*(JNET) will be required to provide the funding that is necessary for all aspects of the operations anonymity.

*(JNET) will be required to provide a location that is wired with audio and video surveillance. ALL through location except bathroom (audio only) ~ Jackson has 3,000 empty homes available.

*(JNET) will be required to provide a tapped land line, a laptop that is internet ready and as well as monitored.

*(JNET) will be required to provide a vehicle from police impound that is equip t with a lo-jacked monitoring device as well as audio surveillance inside vehicle.

*(JNET) will be required to provide all cellular communication telephones.

*(JNET) will be required to not depict "this body's" actions; because of direct interaction and or involvement, as criminal behavior due to the direct link. (immunity MUST be granted to this "body"; to aid in the efforts and safeguard the interests of said "body")

*(JNET) will be the only armed defense in this effort.

*(JNET) will be required to set the status of this effort as top priority, as for our protection; being that we will be unarmed and in some cases "unaware" of the outside threat potentials of said criminals.

*(This Body) will receive a monetary compensation negotiated by all parties for said efforts.

*(This Body) will require law enforcement to expunge a specific members probation term and or warrant.

This Operations Plan of Action: (to unfold as negotiated by all parties)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sean Q <seanquno@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: "OUR" Commitment to the Solution~ ATTN: Mike w/ Operations
▼ Hide quoted text
To: jon gillette <jgillettejukebox@yahoo.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jacob walker
Date: Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Subject: Fwd: "OUR" Commitment to the Solution~ ATTN: Mike w/ Operations
To: seanquno@gmail.com



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jacob walker <fliboi036@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:47 AM
Subject: Fwd: "OUR" Commitment to the Solution~ ATTN: Mike w/ Operations
To: lancelaird22 <lancelaird22@yahoo.com>

This is the perfected and revised edition. See now you know we are not playing and we are still as always part of your team, let's clean this up. If you want us to find out more about that dirty money thing, plug us in. And we deliver that too!!

Your Brothers in Christ; James and Sean


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jacob walker <fliboi036@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:31 AM
Subject: "OUR" Commitment to the Solution~ ATTN: Mike w/ Operations
To: teachoutm1@michigan.gov

This communication was set up via (Lance Laird)

What "We" are offering is a solution to the epidemic that has taken control of this City/State. "We" have the ability to intertwine "Our" social net work and this solution, to devise a plan of action.

"We" have the ability to have an "unknown(s)"; as to said suspects, and a direct connection regarding this problem. With the proper atmosphere provided by You, seizing top players in this ongoing drug epidemic problem, (and at the same time); make it known to law enforcement who the many users and dealers are; providing cases on both. This operation will be outlined and specifically broke down, so there is no loss of funds to the City and or State, and seeing that "Our" interests are protected as well.

"Our" efforts can be combined directly with Your Law enforcement team(s). You know the statues and laws; "We" can abide by such terms and conditions, so no ones efforts are fruitless. "We" are going to outline what "We" need from You, and "We" are going to lay out "Our" terms as well.

ALL TERMS are negotiable given said statues and/or Laws. "Our" ability is to provide an unsuspected cooperating body that is trusted in the realm of said users,dealers,manufacturers; both at the top and at the bottom of this problem. With the element of a timely seizure of said parties (criminals), with out reveling "Our" identities prematurely; "We" can provide Law enforcement a multitude of cases.

Such efforts will not go unnoticed and have never had such a profound effect. "We" believe that at a time such as now, it is crucial to act. Such efforts; "We" believe cannot be matched by Law enforcement alone.

"This body" will provide the confidence of a factor that is conceivable, and trust able to said drug parties in this small town, that WILL bring results. "Our" loyalties will remain honored by said contract that together "We" negotiate with Your Law enforcement team(s).

"We" will consent to the placement of an undercover officer(s) into "This body", however, said officer MUST for "Our" protection and safety; be brought in from another jurisdiction and be unknown in this town as well. This/These officer(s) will play to the role(s) needed as described, to protect the Cities/States interest and to provide a full awareness of the Laws necessary to complete "Our" objectives. "We" have the utmost faith in the integrity of Your Law enforcement teams. "We" expect that same faith of integrity in "Our" body.

How "This body" will conduct this operation:

*(Your Bureau) will have Full authority after All negotiations are finalized.

*(Your Bureau) will have complete access to All information at All times.

*(Your Bureau) can stop All investigations upon their request as long as our terms are met, regardless of the point in which they deem it necessary to stop said investigation.

*(Your Bureau) Will be required to share with "This body" Any and All information of said (profiles/parties/criminals).

*(Your Bureau) will be given the ability to closely monitor All actions;ie,communications,money transfers,purchases,involvements,etc.

*(Your Bureau) will be required to provide the funding that is necessary for All aspects of the operations anonymity.

*(Your Bureau) will be required to provide a location that is wired with audio and video surveillance. ALL through out the location, except bathroom (audio only) ~ Jackson has 3,000 empty homes available.

*(Your Bureau) will be required to provide a tapped land line, a laptop that is internet ready and as well as monitored.

*(Your Bureau) will be required to provide a vehicle(s) from police impound that is equip t with a lo-jacked monitoring device as well as audio surveillance inside said vehicle(s).

*(Your Bureau) will be required to provide All cellular communication telephones.

*(Your Bureau) will be required to not depict "This body's" actions; because of direct interaction and or involvement, as criminal behavior due to the direct link.
(Immunity MUST be granted to "This body"; to aid in the efforts and safeguard the interests of said "body.")

*(Your Bureau) will be the only armed defense in this effort.

*(Your Bureau) will be required to set the status of this effort as top priority, as for "Our" protection; being that "We" will be unarmed and in some cases "unaware" of the outside threat potentials of said criminals.

*(This Body) will receive a monetary compensation negotiated by All parties for said efforts.

*(This Body) will require law enforcement to expunge a specific member(s) probation term and or warrant(s).

This Operations Plan of Action:
(to unfold as negotiated by All parties) (As a show of good Faith in Your Bureau/Law enforcement team(s); "We Will start by an attempt at providing A case that is currently in discussion as of now with Your Officers; that is Not directly linked to said efforts /investigation(s).)......

The Wake Up America Tour End

Tracey Kollmar-Sylvia

THE NAME OF THE TROLL THIS TIME?  TRACEY KOLLMAR-SYLVIA (it's always the ones with the hyphens, isn't it?)

In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,^[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response^[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,^[3] often for the troll's amusement.

This sense of both the noun and the verb "troll" is associated with Internet discourse, but also has been used more widely. Media attention in recent years has equated trolling with online harassment. For example, the mass media have used "troll" to mean "a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families."^[4][5] In addition, depictions of trolling have been included in popular fictional works, such as the HBO television program The Newsroom, in which a main character encounters harassing persons online and tries to infiltrate their circles by posting negative sexual comments.

                                                                                                                                              - Wikipedia

Well kids, as soon as it started, the Wake Up America Tour is now officially ended.  Thanks to some nasty comments after posting the best way to contribute to my cause (after several people inquired), I have decided that helping others expose what has happened to them isn't what this country wants from me.  Fine.  I will continue to write about my own case, and what's going on with me...the rest, is fini.  America has spoken.  The words used after I posted were "Disgusting", and "I'm reporting this"...screw those people.

My Facebook account?  Is de-activated...permanently.  I apologize to all of those who supported and helped until now.  You are the true warriors in this country.  I applaud all that you have done to expose this evil, but it seems that not all agree with my methods.  Oh, and That1Lurker?  You continue to waste your time.  No biggie.  The delete button still works great for all that you comment.  I continue to not read what you say, and I don't care what you say.  Your efforts are most wasted.  No one but me can ever see what you write, and I don't even see it.  Blabber on.

One final round of thanks go to Theodore Booker...I love you fam.  Thank you Trina, you know what you mean to me, and I appreciate what you did.  You will be compensated.  Thanks to Ms. Winter, and thanks to Sean Que.  You are a true patriot friend, and thank you for loving your country.

I apologize to all of those who misunderstood my last post.  I was merely giving people what they asked for, and wasn't trying to ask for anything.  The Department of Human Services, those who agent for them and the corrupt officials that are trying to shut me up, and Iowa's Judiciary have totally destroyed my life, and that of my family's lives, but no one seems to get that.  Working for me is not an option at the moment, due to various complications (a nice new record of Stalking and Harassment for example, a year in jail out of my life for that sure didn't and isn't helping me, and the loss of the ability to live where I lived are all good show for putting me where I am).  Finally, those who work for those who wish to stop me in all that I do have finally won out...at least on Facebook, and on the show.  Well, that's ok.  Now I have all the time in the world to concentrate on Iowa and those who will eventually go to jail and pay up for what they've done.  You succeeded in this mini-battle, but you're about to lose the war, thanks to the time I have to fight it.

The "Minimum Wage" and Part-Time Positioning

https://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/l/low_pay.asp

Well folks, it's been a while since we addressed a REAL American Deadly Sin, hasn't it?  Well say no more, because you've been duly updated on yet another subject that "grinds my gears."

Let's do this in two parts, just to make sure we don't cross wires, OK?  Let's start with my favorite, the all-American "Minimum Wage."

Now, I'm sure that the majority of America is well aware that what we're being paid, often the lowest wage possible, is by no means what the average citizen of this country needs to survive.  And they wonder why theft is such a problem these days.  Hate to tell ya, it's not because drug use and abuse is an issue...although that contributes, surely.  No, the problem is that corporate greed (one of our more deadly sins, as should be quite obvious by now) and the profit line cuts off any chance we have of making what we're worth.  Neither here nor there, the minimum wage has not only not ever been what it should be, nor, does it look like it ever will be.  I think we all know that this is because the more a business has to pay us, the less a business makes.

Lobbyists against higher minimum wages should, in this writer's opine, all be shot.  Their argument is that if the minimum wage gets raised, businesses will collapse, and jobs will be lost.  This is, of course, a half-truth.  Businesses collapse and jobs are lost every single day of the week, so tell us something we don't know, willya?

The real deal is, that businesses, especially small ones, start out with this grand scheme based on pretty much nothing, and the owners of these businesses usually have dollar signs in their eyes, thinking all they have to do is pluck profits off the money tree, not really thinking through the actual facts...that A.  They'll either have to put in countless hours into their businesses and do all the work themselves for a while to save money, or B. That they'll have to hire employees, if the business's demands for their product gets to be too much for them to handle all by themselves.  Regarding fact A, this really only works until fact B becomes an issue.  Now we have to involve employees, whether one more or many...and that's when all the fun really begins, because now we have to insure our business considering them as well, we have to pay them, we have to cater to their needs, we have to include them on our taxes, and most of all, we have to benefit them enough, to ensure that they don't leave.  The problem these days, is that no one cares if their employees leave anymore, mostly because there are 1000's of unemployed people standing right behind them, dying to take their spots.  What the pay and the benefits package is really doesn't appear to matter to most Americans anymore either, mostly because they're just so damned happy to be working again, it doesn't factor into your new job...at least for a time, anyway.

Just for example, let's talk about the minimum LIVING wage.  Now we all know that the "minimum wage" doesn't reflect today's real cost of living.  People are fighting to have the minimum raised, mostly because it just HAS to be!  No one can live on the minimum...worse yet, minimum is what most businesses PAY.  The more they pay, the less profits they make, and WHOOP, there go your chances of turning out public stock later on.  Bend over and kiss your own owner's behind, because next year, it's likely that you'll be filing to receive capital losses on your next H&R Block tax return.

The current living wage SHOULD be nearly $12.00/hour for the menial of the menial, let's not even TALK about educated executives and the like...and here we are, arguing to have the minimum raised to $9 and $10/hr.  This is ludicrous people.  Stop thinking about your own profits, and think instead about your employees and THEIR families.  More so, instead of bitching about your high turnovers, think instead that, quite possibly, you're not paying your employees enough.

My take on this is that you should think about the fact that, if you can't pay your employees enough, maybe you shouldn't be in business to begin with, because it's likely that you either A. Didn't do enough market research to see if there was actually a real demand for your services/products; B.  Don't charge enough for your services/products, or C.  Are too lazy to put the required effort into making sure your business grows...or even remains open, for that matter.  If you aren't able to pay your employees what they're worth...or even just enough to make sure they stay alive themselves, then its time you closed your doors and re-think your business strategies.

If you're still having a problem with those high dollar salary figures, maybe you should consider this instead:  Well-paid employees = less turnover.  Less turnover = lower training costs for new employees, who will probably leave too because you offer no real pay/benefits.  Moreover, well-paid/benefited employees = more productive employees, which = better business, better products and better profit lines.  BUT NOOOOOOOO.....no, we may have to lower our standards, and get an Audi instead of a Rolls Royce.  Gimme a break, will ya?

I turn to a good prime example, my former kingdom's bus service, in Des Moines, Iowa, DART.  (The Des Moines Regional Transit Authority...by the by, how does this even come close to DART for an acronym??)  Now, DART, even though it has made a couple of leaps and a couple of bounds, where paying their employees, running now on Sundays and getting new buses are concerned, has traded these new beneficial improvements off for a couple of things essential to any business...service, in general, and customer service.  For one, they still don't use printed tickets, something that every city I've been to BESIDES Des Moines, has.  Monthly bus passes are still 1st day until last day of the month, not from the printed date you first use it.  They also aren't able to offer those planning to truck all over the city on just one day of the month (mostly done by those on limited fixed incomes like disability and social security), a printed daily bus pass (where you can ride the bus unlimited on any chosen day.)  Even worse, they cover MAYBE a third of the entire metro area, where only those without cars reside.  Sure, this makes sense when you consider the price of driving buses empty through neighborhoods countless times, but does nothing for increasing the feasibility of taking the bus as opposed to every member of your family taking their own personal cars wherever they go.  And customer service, are you NUTS??  The CORNERSTONES of any business is service and customer service.  And when it comes time to raise the rates again, things will only get worse.  Customers will opt instead to go back to driving their own cars (against any logical thought, mind you), and bus service will then decrease once again, causing even less to take the bus.  Less bus service = less happy riders who will stop being riders, and...either cost some drivers their jobs, or which may cause a lowering of their pay rates, or worse yet, may cause less full-time positions, and more part-time positions.  WHICH...just happens to bridge me into the other glaring problem we Americans are facing in our work-happy environment, the discrimination against those who go "part-time, or who are only hired as such.

Now, I just gotta say this, this is probably the part of what has happened to this country's employed portion just falls apart.  Since it has been ruled (long ago) that part-time employees are, somehow, inferior to those who opt for full-time torture, employers are no longer required to cater to these lower forms of life, like they do to their more permanent fixtures.  Employees that turn in hours of 32 or less hours a week are now all deemed to be "Part-Time" employees, who often get no benefits whatsoever, or partial benefits that they often have to pay for themselves.

Worse than this, employers have now figured out (more recently) that part time staff is the way to go now.  No more full-time employees sucking at your profit lines by demanding they get raises, demanding paid for healthcare, paid for parking, etc.  No more having to compete for benefits offerings.  More so, you won't have to pay these part-timers nearly as much unemployment benefits (even though these workers paid for their own unemployment benefits...go figure.)  Finally, you won't have to pay these people like you do your full-timers.  Win-Win-Win, right?  YEAH...FOR YOU!!

What has happened now, America, is that no one wants a full-time employee anymore...meaning we all have to not only get 2 or 3 part-time jobs to survive, and we now have to pay for all of our own benefits, out of our own pockets.  Not only that, we have to juggle our already way too busy and stressful lives around these due to be absurd work schedules.  Finally, and most importantly, no one has to pay anyone anything close to what they're worth, or worry about retirement for these part-timers coming out of your profits in upcoming years.

Competition in offering benefits to employees?  PSHAW...not needed.  America's jobless and homeless populations, bogged down from getting jobs because of unrealistic background checking, let alone the massive countless unemployed out there, all looking for work, will take whatever they can get, wherever they can get it, doing whatever it is they're asked to do.

America, if these issues are not addressed, capitalism and the free market will very soon be dead...but then, maybe that's what we need...or, quite possibly, maybe this is what big business, and the government that shakes their hands and gives them bail-out money to save them is really shooting for, huh?  Check into it.  Raise the minimum wage to what it SHOULD BE.  Don't let these monsters get away with this shit, talk to your legislators, and let them know how you really feel, before you have to move again, because of the raise in the living wage.  Ask for what you deserve...and if you can't get it, TAKE IT.  :D

The State Post-Conviction Relief Case, Part II

Yup, yup, it's that time again...time for yet ANOTHER fun document filed in the post-conviction relief case, due to air April 27th, in none other than good ol' IOWAY...right where I wish I was 1000 miles away.  AND I WILL be...well, to start, anyway...then it's weave back over time, so I can kick some ass.  Better yet, I really hope I lose...more fuel for my fed case, that way.  So go ahead ya crooks...cream me.  Ram it up me kiester...I DARE YOU...Wouldn't I just love to amend that defendant's list...AGAIN.

Annnnnnnyways...here's legal doc #...oh, I've lost count.  THE MINUTES OF TESTIMONY...filed today by who else?  Yours truly...should be a wing-dingy!  So enjoy Linda Lane...enjoy Judgees.  Enjoy John P.  Can't weasel off the stand EVERY case...I'll catch yer little Italian behind somewhere, sometime, m'friend.  :D

WITNESS LIST

1. Judge Robert Blink, District 5C Judge, Polk County, Iowa

2. Judge William Kelly, District 5C Judge, Polk County, Iowa

3. Judge Carol S. Egly, District 5C Judge, Polk County, Iowa

4. Clerk of Court, Randy Osborn, Polk County, Iowa

5. Linda Lane, Asst. Polk Cty. Atty., Polk County Attorney’s Office, Polk County, Iowa

6. John P. Sarcone, Polk County Attorney’s Office, Polk County, Iowa

7. Grant Rogers, Reporter, The Des Moines Register, Des Moines, Iowa

8. Lucas Taylor, Mark R. Hinshaw Law Firm, West Des Moines, Iowa

If called by the plaintiff at trial, each witness listed above will testify as follows:  On or around January 26th, a warrant was issued for the plaintiff, christopher (bruce) the living man for the charge of Harassment in the 1st Degree, an aggravated misdemeanor, based on police reports taken by the Altoona Police Department on September 8th, 2015, and another on January 14th, 2014, and the charge of 1st Degree Harassment was then approved 12 days later by the Polk County Attorney, John P. Sarcone on January 26th, 2016.  On the same date, while the plaintiff was en route to the Polk County Jail, two more police reports were filed against the plaintiff at the Altoona Police Department, and immediately approved on the same date for Stalking, an aggravated misdemeanor, and for Threats, a class D felony.

On the date of January 26th, 2016, plaintiff Bruce was arrested by the Carroll City Police Department and held for transport.  By the time plaintiff Bruce arrived at the Polk County Jail, two more charges, Stalking and Threats had been added.  Plaintiff Bruce was held in the Polk County Jail from January 26th, 2016, until April 11th, when a trial by jury was held to determine his guilt or innocence.  Plaintiff Bruce was found guilty of the charges of Harassment in the 1st Degree, and Stalking by a jury of his peers.  The charge of Threats, a Class D felony, was discharged.  The Plaintiff, Bruce, was then allowed to bond out, pre-sentence, on a $4,000 bond ($2,000 for each of two aggravated misdemeanors).  Plaintiff Bruce then re-appeared on May 4th for sentencing.  He was given a 1 year suspended sentence, to serve two concurrent 30 day sentences for a total of 60 days, then was to report for probation for a period of two years.

Upon his release, plaintiff Bruce, before signing up for probation, decided on serving the remainder of his sentence instead, and immediately asked Judge Blink for a reconsideration.  Judge Blink then set a court date, a few days later, for the date of August 18th, to reconsider, revoke his probation, and allow plaintiff Bruce to serve the rest of his time.  Later, on or around July 25th, 2016, Judge Blink would then order a warrant be issued for plaintiff Bruce for probation violation, and plaintiff Bruce, as a result, wrote to Judge Blink, reminding him that he had not signed up for probation, and had asked to be reconsidered, and to not issue the warrant.  Judge Blink still issued the warrant, and the plaintiff, Bruce, was then arrested on that warrant and 3 more simple misdemeanors 2 days before the reconsideration hearing would take place, on August 16th, 2016.  Plaintiff Bruce did then serve the rest of his sentence, and was released on December 30th, 2016.

The witnesses noticed herein will testify to all matters contained in or referred to in the resulting criminal cases, FECR292141 and FECR292312.

Each witness will describe their relevant personal or professional background including their
education, training, experience and responsibilities. In general terms, each will testify about the
events of January 26th, 2016, throughout to the date of August 18th, 2016, including their
observations of the people, places and things relevant to the crime charged, and all events that occurred thereafter.  Each witness will testify about their impressions, conclusions and opinions reached as a result of their observations. They will explain the pertinent relationships among the people, places and things at issue. To the extent they encountered the plaintiff, each witness will describe the plaintiff’s actions, the plaintiff's statements and the plaintiff's filed paperwork. To the extent each witness recognizes the plaintiff, they will identify the plaintiff. Each witness will testify about their own actions and the reasons for those actions. They will testify about the relevant statements and actions of others. The witnesses will testify about any matters relevant to authentication, chain of custody and venue (that the events they observed took place in Polk County, Iowa).

The witnesses noticed herein will testify to all matters contained in or referred to in the resulting criminal cases, FECR292141 and FECR292312.

On or around January 26th, a warrant was issued for the plaintiff, christopher (bruce) the living man
for the charge of Harassment in the 1st Degree, an aggravated misdemeanor, based on police reports taken by the Altoona Police Department on September 8th, 2015, and another on January 14th, 2014, and the charge of 1st Degree Harassment was then approved 12 days later by the Polk County Attorney, John P. Sarcone on January 26th, 2016; even though the life of the alleged victim, Jeanne Munson, had been threatened by the plaintiff 12 days earlier.  Plaintiff Bruce called his bondsman that afternoon, and gathered that the price of the bond was $2,000 ($200 bail, as it should have been).  After the date of this alleged "crime", the plaintiff, Bruce, had no more contact with the alleged victim.  On the same date of his arrest, while the plaintiff was en route to the Polk County Jail, two more police reports were filed against the plaintiff at the Altoona Police Department, and immediately approved on the same date for Stalking, an aggravated misdemeanor, and for Threats, a class D felony.  After his arrival in Polk County, and after another call to his bondsman, Plaintiff Bruce then found that his bond was $70,000, when it should have been around $9000.

In the first month of Plaintiff Bruce’s incarceration, he opted to not have a court appointed attorney, and immediately challenged the jurisdiction of the court.  Judge Carol S. Egly will testify that plaintiff Bruce did so on the very first day of his incarceration, but denied plaintiff Bruce his right to do so on the day of his initial appearance by not answering the challenge, even after being prompted by the associate judge to do so.  Judge Egly will also be asked to testify that several cases for plaintiff Bruce were open at this time, and that later, at the request of Asst. Polk County Attorney Linda Lane, these cases were all closed and consolidated, and that a request for a jury trial in the case SMAC359086 was discarded, and that a new motion, typed up by the courts, was substituted, and that the cases that had been listed were then consolidated into just 2 cases, FECR292312, and FECR292141.  Judge Egly will then be asked to testify that this motion was NOT the defendant’s motion, but that this was substituted by the courts to show that he had NOT asked for a jury trial in the SMAC case, then altered the record of the court to show that Plaintiff Bruce has specifically asked for a NON-jury trial in that case.  Judge Carol Egly will also be asked to testify as to why she denied an initial challenge of jurisdiction, and did not address that challenge until nearly 3 weeks later.  Judge Egly will also be asked to testify as to why she ruled that the jurisdiction of the court was a “State” jurisdiction, when later Judge Blink would belie that ruling, stating the jurisdiction held over the defendant was a “Subject Matter” jurisdiction.

Witness Randy Osborn, Clerk of Polk County court, will be asked to testify concerning the motion that was designed by the court, and filed on behalf of the plaintiff, and the change in the record of the court, showing that plaintiff Bruce had “specifically asked for a NON-jury trial,”, even though the recorded record of the court will prove that defendant Bruce asked for a jury trial SEVERAL TIMES.

Later, on or around February 4th, 2016, Plaintiff Bruce submitted a demand for Pro Se rights in case FECR292312.  On or around February 29th, 2016, Judge William Kelly would issue an order denying Plaintiff Bruce his right to defend himself in his own person, and stated that he would need to obtain, at state expense, a “Stand-By Attorney,” if he wanted to file documents and do everything that he should have had a right to do on his own, such as depose witnesses, investigate his online/computer related crime, listen to prosecution’s DVD testimony, and properly prepare his defense.  Judge Kelly will be asked to testify as to why he chose to violate the plaintiff’s Constitutional right to defend himself in his own person while incarcerated.

On or around February 29th, 2016, Plaintiff Bruce was then assigned Lucas Taylor, to be a “Stand-by attorney.”  Mr. Taylor will be asked to testify as to why he did not file an appeal in case 292312, why he did not ask for a new trial due to an obvious tainting of the jury just prior to a conviction (reason for a mistrial),  and why he chose to not show up for a hearing involving the dismissal of 199 pieces of filed evidence of plaintiff Bruce’s in this case, and the quashing of the subpoenas of 29 elected officials, all asked to testify on the behalf of plaintiff Bruce, just 3 days before trial began.

On the date of April 11th, Monday, trial for the defendant, Bruce, commenced.  In attendance in the trial was Des Moines Register reporter Grant Rogers, who sat through one day of the trial, the first day.  Mr. Rogers will be asked to testify as to why he chose to only speak to the prosecution about the trial and plaintiff Bruce, and will be asked to testify as to why he never approached either the plaintiff, Bruce, or the plaintiff’s stand-by council for their part of the story.  Mr. Rogers will also be asked to testify as to the story fed him by John P. Sarcone, the County Attorney, and by Linda Lane, the Asst. County Attorney, and the FBI.

John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and Linda Lane, Assistant County attorney, will be asked to testify as to why he fed a libelous story, with no factual basis, to Grant Rogers, two days before the jury was to deliberate, that lumped Plaintiff Bruce in with an alleged group of possibly murderous, lawless domestic terrorists, knowing that the story was likely to run the next day, before jury deliberations.

Linda Lane, Assistant County Attorney, will be asked as to testify as to why she has personally prosecuted against plaintiff Bruce in 3 subsequent criminal cases, assisted in denying the plaintiff, Bruce his right to defend himself in his own person while incarcerated, and as to why she ignored all attempts by plaintiff Bruce to settle his “Debt to Society”, prior to sentencing, and why she refused to answer several attempts at communication concerning this matter.  Witness Lane will also be asked to testify to why she motioned, in limine, that the defendant not use his rightful name, that he not testify to any matters concerning his juvenile cases (all relevant to the case), or refused to investigate whether he was a U.S. Citizen as he continuously claimed, a fact that has not been addressed by the district court, but has been avoided at all turns.

Also prior to conviction, the witnesses that remained from plaintiff Bruce's witness list (around 11 out of 40) all showed up to testify on the first day of trial, and were asked to leave by Lucas Taylor and by Linda Lane, because it would be another day before they could testify.  The next day, they re-appeared again, and once more, were asked to leave.  Wednesday, when the turn for the defense finally came, no witnesses for the defense returned.  The defendant, plaintiff Bruce, with little choice, rested his defense, since there was little evidence to prove his innocence remaining, and no witnesses to testify on his behalf.

Witness Judge Robert Blink will be asked to testify as to why he deemed 199 pieces of filed evidence by the plaintiff, Bruce, to be irrelevant to this case.  Plaintiff Bruce submitted a notice of why the evidence was relevant, and why the witnesses (29 elected officials) were being called to testify, but no discussion of that motion was addressed or considered.  Reasons given by plaintiff Bruce in the hearing on the relevance of 199 pieces of evidence was over-ruled, without discussion.  Witness Blink will also be asked to testify as to why he went out of his way to ensure that even MORE prominent elected/civil servant witnesses subpoenas were quashed, even though neither them nor their attorneys were present.  Witness Blink will also be asked to testify as to why he threatened plaintiff Bruce and his friend, Brent Swallers, with harassment of Linda Lane, the Assistant County Attorney prosecuting the case, because they attempted to politely contact and communicate to Linda Lane, the settlement of plaintiff Bruce's offer to pay off his “Debt to society" without unneeded incarceration.  Mostly, Judge Blink will be asked to testify as to why he allowed the quashing of the subpoenas of 29 elected officials, the Friday before the Monday of trial,  and why he chose not to address the matter a lot sooner, in order to give Plaintiff Bruce time to recover his position, and properly defend himself.  Witness Blink will also be asked to testify as to why he issued a warrant for the plaintiff’s arrest for probation violation, even though the plaintiff had clearly asked to be revoked, for probation he never completely signed up for, and had, later, asked him, in a timely manner following the request of him NOT to issue a warrant with sufficient cause, since he was scheduled to appear in court on that matter.  Witness Blink will also be asked to testify as to why he chose not to give a new trial to plaintiff Bruce, because of the obvious taint of the jury by the Des Moines Register’s libelous article, printed 1 day before the jury’s deliberation.  Judge Blink will also be asked to testify as to why the plaintiff’s bail was set so high, in an un-Consitutional manner, and was never reduced, prior to conviction.

The plaintiff hereby gives notice and reserves the right to call and/or present any testimony or information provided to the defense throughout the course of these proceedings.


/S/christopher (Bruce) the living man
christopher (Bruce) the living man
Sui Juris, All Rights Reserved
UCC1-308, formerly UCC1-207
Without Prejudice

How CPS Subverts Due Process