The Fed Funny Farm, Part V - The Amended Complaint

As promised, the federal case complaint has been updated!  I'm still not finished with it, but I will be soon!!  Hours upon hours were spent on this to ensure this complaint was  JJJUUUUUUUST right, and advanced copies have been sent to select few of the criminals, so they can better adjust their trousers for the high waters of TRUTH AND JUSTICE!!!  Enjoy, America!  As for you criminals?  Enjoy your new found notoriety!

"Christopher (Bruce), the Living Man

v.                                                                                                         Case #______________________

Polk County Iowa Attorney’s Offices                                                COMPLAINT

The Iowa Department of Human Services

The Des Moines Police Department

The Altoona Police Department

The City of Carroll Police Department

The Iowa State Attorney General’s offices

Iowa FSRP Services (Children and Families of Iowa)

Judge William A. Price, District 5C, Polk County

Judge William Kelly, District 5C, Polk County

Judge Robert Blink, District 5C, Polk County

Judge Carol S. Egly, District 5C, Polk County

Judge Jeanie Vaudt, District 5C, Polk County

Magistrate Anastasia Hurn, District 5C,

 Polk County

Linda Lane, Assistant U.S. Attorney

 (Formerly Asst. Polk County Attorney)

Dale Mays, Attorney

Paul White, GAL Attorney

Beth Walker, Attorney

Officer Greg Bellinghausen, Carroll PD

Central Iowa Family Services (Des Moines, Iowa)

Comes now, Christopher (Bruce), The Living Man, in his federal complaint and sworn affidavit against these defendants, and designate it as truth, using my best recollection of the events as they occurred. Two initial points of importance to note:

 1. That jurisdiction shall be defined, proven and granted to the court by the complainant, as is my right.

 2. Some defendants listed in this complaint will certainly claim immunity to prosecution, as well as sovereign immunities. It will be the burden of the complainant to show this court how these immunities will not apply to them in this complaint.

JURISDICTION

The court shall have jurisdiction, in that this complaint is being brought under Federal Code 42 U.S.C. §1983; (Deprivation of our rights using color of law), under 18 U.S.C. §1961 (The RICO Act. Concerning this matter, RICO will define a criminal organization operating under the guise of leadership on the state, county and city levels) and under 18 U.S.C. §241, (Conspiracy against my unalienable, due process and civil rights;) and will also address the violations of my 4th Amendment right (against illegal searches and siezures), my 5^th Amendment right (due process of law,) my 1^st Amendment right (free speech), my 6^th Amendment right (the right to represent myself); and my 8^th Amendment right (against unreasonably or excessive high bonds/bails/fees without good cause.), all guaranteed me by the United States Constitution as a first party witness.

THE COMPLAINT

 1. On July 21^st, 2014, The Iowa Department of Human Services did unlawfully remove my legal daughter, T.B., from the biological mother’s care, at Methodist Hospital, at just 9 days of age. Six to seven felonies would occur during the course of this removal, including kidnapping, depravation of her rights under color of law, denial of the possibility of intervention of ICWA for nearly six months, falsification of legal and Government documents, forgery of a judge’s signature to a legal document, and finally, her later perjury, slander and libel of us, as she testified on the stand, and wrote in her reports; concerning not only the removal of T.B., but also in the 21 day assessment of our family, which caused us to be temporarily and wrongfully placed on the abuse registry. The allegations used to remove our daughter were not valid nor warranted, as it was later determined in an appeal of the child protective assessment at the Department of Human Services (further identified in this complaint as DHS, or "The Department"), in front of an ALJ, in July of 2015. The matter was then appealed up to the Director of the DHS at that time, Charles Palmer, and he would uphold the same ruling, again in our favor. Emily Nieman, the social worker that removed T.B., testified in our assessment appeal that she had no experience with newborns at that time, and that T.B. had been her first removal of ANY child from a family.

2.    A recording was made of the entire 18 minutes of the temporary removal.  Emily Nieman and E.B. were clearly present.  During this recording, Ms. Nieman is heard asking the mother if she had any Indian Heritage in her family.  E.B. would say yes, and Ms. Nieman would then check "No" on the removal form.  She then filed her affidavit to the court that the mother had no Indian heritage in her family on July   21st, 2014.  E.B. is 1/8th Cherokee, T.B. was the minimum required, just on her mother's side, at 1/16th.  This of course means that everything that happened after this box was checked "No" is VOID.  The district court of 5C in Polk County, Iowa, from that point forward, NEVER had ANY VIABLE, JURISDICTION of ANY kind to hear ANY matter concerning T.B. and E.B., until their heritage was properly determined.  They most CERTAINLY had no jurisdiction to hear any matter concerning me, and said so as well; but only after 6 months of my being their favorite target, only after they felt that they had sufficiently made an example out of us both, and only when I was about to eat them all for lunch - lawfully, at the permanency hearing.  No, then, I was determined to be an unnecessary party to the case.  Ms. Nieman, by checking "No" on E.B.'s form when E.B. stated "yes" constitutes falsifying court and government documents and information.  That act alone also constitutes FRAUD, and vitiates any and all orders issued by Judge Price concerning the matter. All decisions made by his court are, therefore, VOID.  On this matter ALONE, the child and the mother's rights should be immediately restored to her rightful biological mother, who was in possession of her at the beginning, and helped fight for her for all the time Polk County had her.  If that isn't good enough by itself, then pray, stay on, for the rest.  On the recording, Ms. Nieman states that she is going to read the entire order to E.B., then have her initial the check boxes to show that she was read, and understood everything on it, then said she needed to sign it.  She read her three lines of the order, lines one, two and four, and did not read to her anything that concerned the reasons for removal, anything that told the mother her rights concerning the removal, only those lines that explained that she was taking T.B., a petition would be filed, and that her rights might be terminated.  She then puts check marks in all of the boxes for her (and, effectively, forging the mothers initials in the boxes with a mark, showing the mother heard and understood what she was about to sign when she most certainly did not), and puts her under duress saying that if she doesn't sign it, a judge will look unfavorably on it then states it doesn't matter if she signs it or not, the child will be removed to foster care.  In addition, per Iowa Statute, steps must be taken in order to prevent or eliminate the removal of an Iowa child, and they MUST be listed on the removal form.  The box was checked, and three empty lines  followed it.  NO steps were taken, and none were listed.  At the bottom is a signature that purports to be the signature of Judge Price.  It is not his signature, and this is shown by these facts:

a.  Judge Price, on over 800 court documents, never ONCE signed his name on an order or anything else.  The name is always stamped.

b.  Even though stamped, most people do not always sign their name the way it is on the stamp.  Even so, there are major and obvious inconsistencies between his stamped signature, and the signature on this form.

Even if it had been Judge Price's actual signature, it is signed fraudulently, especially by his order on the form; since, if nothing else, in the order, it states that he finds that reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate have been taken and none are listed; and, since they are required to be listed by statute, Judge Price flew in the face of that statute and broke the law by signing it.  More so, Mrs. Nieman, on this recording, uses legal duress to have the mother sign her child into foster care, and uses color of law, by stating that the removal is court ordered ALREADY, and that if she doesn't sign it, it doesn't matter, the child will be removed to foster care, regardless.  It DID, and DOES matter, of course.  She is trying to coerce her to sign the consent for removal, and it isn't "court ordered" until the court ORDERS IT, and it can't be court ordered, unless she signs it.  

3. On July 22^nd, 2014, at our first Family Team Meeting (called this while in attendance, but later claimed to be a "Post Removal Hearing", and was then claimed to be a separate and ADDITIONAL effort made us to help our family reunify), attorneys were assigned both the mother and I (Mr. Dale Mays for the mother, Colin McCormick for the father), Attorney Paul White was assigned to T.B, as GAL. Katie Gosch was assigned as our caseworker for the duration of our proceedings, and Ashley Andrews of CFI (Children and Families of Iowa) would be our visit Supervisor.

4. The removal hearing took place on July 29^th, 2014. The order confirmed the need for removal and the child was designated as a CINA.

5. Drug testing of both the mother and I was ordered by the court at the removal hearing on July 29^th, 2014. Both the mother and I immediately complied and tested at Central Iowa Family Services. Both results came back as positive for both amphetamines and meth amphetamines. I mentioned the possibility of being positive for 2 drugs in a recent blog post, because they had been using what I was writing about against me, in reports and in court, and I wanted to see what would happen with this one. When we tested, the worst of the two I mentioned ended up being what we would both came up positive for. Neither of the parents do any drugs. It would later be proven by me that the mother’s 1^st testing results had been a false positive caused by her inhaler (she used an albuterol inhaler, and this inhaler is has been known and proven to cause false positives for amphetamines in drug testing).  Before taking a drug test, the employee did not ask E.B. if she was using any medications.   The manager of these facilities, Anthony Reed, would testify at our appeal to our child protective assessment that this question isn't asked because the test is so sophisticated that it automatically filters out any possible prescription taints.  Our 2^nd drug tests, done on us both at a later time were purposely falsified, and we filed proof of this in our case.  (complaint #).  For 4 days, this evidence was never admitted into the case, even though it was filed by me in person.  4 days after I filed it, I was removed from the CINA case as a necessary party, and the original evidence that I "filed" was then thrown away.  Fortunately, I had taken pictures of it, just in case.

6.  I then wrote an article concerning the 1st test, and posted it on August 4th, 2014.  In it, I described the manner in which the testing was done, and described in full detail the location that the testing was done in.  It had dirty shag carpeting and had no furniture in it anywhere, save a large hotel type desk.  There was one employee present, and sitting at a large desk in a big open room with no other furniture or walls in it.  As I entered and told him why I was there, he stated "Man! I’m going to have to butcher your hair to get a good sample!” He then proceeded to procure a sample by cutting my hair off with an un-sanitized pair of school scissors, and wearing no gloves.  He then sealed the hair into a small envelope to mail to a lab, and dismissed me.

7.  Later, on December 14^th, 2014 I would serve a subpoena for the owner or manager of this establishment to bring documents to one of our court hearings and testify concerning them.  (see complaint #).  Upon entering, I noticed they had spent a considerable amount of money on remodeling, and that they now had several employees working there, all dressed professionally and wearing gloves.  Included in those improvements were walls, a waiting room (with furniture), security cameras and more.  Mr. Reed, the manager, had obviously made these improvements specifically to dispute what I had written about his business.

8.  The CINA petition was filed on July 22^nd, 2014, and was drawn up and filed by Stephanie Brown, Asst. Polk County Attorney and Advocate for DHS.  Per Iowa Code, the petition is to be immediately served to the parents, and a document is to be signed, agreeing that it was served.  Filed on July 30th were two documents that we had allegedly signed, agreeing that we had received service of this petition.  We had not, nor did we remember seeing or signing the papers stating that we had been served.  We testified this fact to the court.  Neither parent received this petition until the Adjudication hearing on September 12^th, 2014, when Judge Price ordered a copy be given to me, since I had decided to represent myself, and asked to receive a copy.

9.  Drug testing results, per Iowa Statute, are not allowed as evidence in an adjudication hearing.  The results of the drug testing done prior to our adjudication was used as evidence against us in our adjudication hearing, held September 12^th, 2014.

10.  Since both the mother and I had lost our home because of DHS’s actions against us (and their unwillingness to assist us with FIP and food, though we had applied for it before our interview) the mother was forced to stay in a homeless shelter, and I chose to stay with friends.  We had been without money for weeks, because the mother had been forced to take a 6 week mandatory leave from work because of the birth of T.B.  She would finally return to work on or around September 1^st, 2014.

11.  On September 5^th, 2014, another Family team meeting (our 2^nd) was held.  Immediately following this meeting, Dale Mays would insist that E.B. fill out another financial affidavit, showing that she was now working (at $8.25 an hour for 20-24 hours a week), and had no expenses (because she lived at a homeless shelter).  This affidavit followed a financial affidavit that was already in place from the month prior, showing the mother had no income, which allowed E.B. to be assigned Dale Mays at State expense.  At no other time during the course of this case was another financial affidavit required of us to fill out, or asked for.  I finally had E.B. fill another one out on January 8th, and filed it in our case.

12.  On September 18^th, we asked Attorney Mays to withdraw as the mother’s attorney.  Judge Price did not set a hearing to hear that request until October 1, 2014.  At that hearing, we asked Judge Price if we could get her another legal appointment for E.B He said that, if he did that, he would just re-assign attorney Mays to her again.  We then grudgingly allowed Mr. Mays to remain as her attorney until his 2^nd request to withdraw that he filed a day or two before December 11^th.

13.  My attorney, Colin McCormick, was asked to withdraw from my service on September 5^th, 2014.  On September 12th, 2014, Judge Price allowed him to withdraw; and I represented myself pro se for the remainder of the proceedings to follow.  The mother’s attorney, Dale Mays, would remain on E.B.'s case until he finally withdrew, 3 months after we requested that he do so, on December 11th, 2014.  Shortly after the adjudication hearing, on September 18^th, 2014, Stephanie Brown stepped down as the Asst. County Attorney in charge of our proceedings, and Asst. Polk County Attorney Kevin Brownell appeared in the case in her stead.

14.  In an order issued September 12th, 2014, Judge Price would order a drug assessment and treatment for E.B. and I.  We refused, stating that we did no drugs.  Judge Price would also order that we both have a mental evaluation and treatment.  We refused.  I did not have mental issues, and the mother had already been evaluated, and results showed that she only had a learning disability.  E.B.'s evaluation was not acceptable for their files, DHS stated, because it wasn't done by a DHS approved evaluator, but it would be used to claim that she was unfit to parent, and filed and used against her as evidence, in order to claim that fact.  The evaluation had been done by Iowa Vocational Rehabilitation, using a more than qualified specialist in the field.

15.  After the adjudication, I immediately posted an article about what had had happened on my online blog, and published the court documents that had been filed in it, then posted it the same day.  2 days after this article was posted, I was locked out and denied access to any document filed by the prosecution in our case, due to my being "a security risk", according to the Electronic filing system.  This block was on my account until well after the disposition hearing, when, after E.B. was ordered to pay for her attorney at the Disposition hearing (see complaint #), and Attorney Mays billed us to get documents from him, I finally asked to speak to Randy Osborn, the head Polk County Clerk.  He acted as if he had no idea what had happened, and had no why I wasn't allowed to look at the prosecution's filed documents.  He then called Judge Price to ask if I could be allowed access.  Judge Price said yes, and the next day, Price would file an order, to allow me full access to the case, as if I didn't have this already, as my own attorney.  This would indicate to me that he and the Clerk of Court had, purposely, denied me access (as well as my due process) to my court documents for almost 2 months, then moved to cut off access to those documents from my wife's attorney side as well, by the use of the 2nd financial affidavit, to justify ordering her to pay for her attorney's fees, which allowed Mr. Mays to charge us for our documents if we asked for any.

16.  On September 12^th, 2014 following our adjudication hearing, I contacted Ashley Andrews of CFI by text and demanded that she remove herself as our visit supervisor, and get us a replacement.  We did this because Mrs. Andrews had taken the stand in our adjudication hearing and testified and lied against us.  Not a single good thing was said about us.

17.  Ms. Andrews went to her supervisor, Jamie, to report my text.  Ms. Andrews also contacted Katie Gosch and her supervisor, Stephanie Rhinehart about this.

18.  Just a couple of days later, we had a visit with T.B.  Before it proceeded, all four of these women wanted to talk with only me, in order to discuss the events following our hearing, and to discuss the messages I had sent to Ms. Andrews.  They would then state that Ms. Andrews would continue to be our visit supervisor, and told me that I was to no longer contact her for any reason directly, by text or phone, but that I would text her supervisor, Jamie to verify my attendance at our visits.  They also stipulated that I would not speak to Ms. Andrews in our visits.  I agreed to the terms.  I had recorded the entire meeting and the visit.

19.  One September 24^th, 2014, Supervisor Stephanie Rhinehart called my phone and left me a message.  In it, she stated that she didn’t care for what I was writing about in my online blog (about all that the Department and the courts were doing to us), and that, until I stopped, and would agree to meet with her supervisor, that I would no longer be allowed to visit my daughter.  I then returned her call, and in a voicemail left for her, told her that there was no way I would agree to her terms, and, essentially, told her that she could go to Hell.

20.  On September 30^th, 2014, I would then receive a call from a detective Greg Morse of the Des Moines Police Department.  He told me that Stephanie Rhinehart, together with Ashley Andrews, were attempting to file harassment charges against me.  As he went over the facts, I stopped him when he mentioned a message I left her, telling her to go to hell, and told him that message had been in response to her call to me, and that I had a voice message recording from her that stated "Call me back", and that I had recorded the entire meeting and visit from the day before, showing that we had all been OK with the whole message problem by the time the visit ended, in dispute of their facts that they related to him.  He stated “Well…I guess I need to have another talk with Mrs. Rhinehart, huh?” I agreed and hung up.  I never heard anything more about it, and no charges were ever filed.

21.  In late September, I became employed, and I kept that job for 6 months.  On October 1st, 2014, the parents acquired an apartment, complete with expenses (electricity, heat, etc.) Neither of us were ever asked to fill out another financial affidavit.  DHS refused to acknowledge that we had gotten an apartment, and testified and reported several times in the days that followed that we claimed that we had an apartment, and that she (Katie Gosch) had never been to this apartment to verify that.  At no time did our caseworker ever talk to us about our apartment, nor did she ever ask to come over to verify that we had one.  On October 16th, I filed a change of address with the court.  All court documents from this time forward until our termination of parental rights came to this address, including our entire file, sent to us by Dale Mays.  The only thing that did not ever arrive was our file from DHS, which we requested from Katie Gosch three times - by message, by phone and in writing and never received it.  We would testify to Judge Price that we had acquired an apartment in October at our December 11th hearing to hear motions that I had filed, and informed him that we had filed a change of address with the court.  He stated "I don't pay attention to things like that." In the order for our Dispositional hearing, filed on October 21st, 2014, and in the order for Permanency, filed January 15th, 2015; Judge Price listed "continued homelessness" as one of the reasons the primary reasons T.B. "shall remain in out-of-home placement."

22.  On October 21st 2014 at the Dispositional hearing; Judge Price, using the financial affidavit Attorney Mays had the mother fill out on September 5th, 2014 (showing the mother to be homeless and having no expenses), would then order E.B. to now be financially fit to pay for her court appointed attorney.  Later, after telling Dale Mays that we didn't want him at our hearings in order to represent E.B. anymore; and, since my access to the record was still blocked; that we would need a copy of everything he had on our case.  He informed us that would this would be quite expensive, and that he would have to bill us to do that.  We told him to forget sending them to us, and that we'd find another way to get the documents.  He sent them anyway, with his bill included in the package.

23.  Katie Gosch and CFI's visit supervisor, Ashley Andrews, between September 12th and January 15th, 2014, would downplay every effort made by E.B.  and I to have our daughter returned to our care, and both continuously spoke badly of us - on the stand in court and in their reports.  Mrs. Andrews and her supervisor continuously reported us as not able to be good parents, falsified all reports to the Department and the courts, claiming all the while that the mother NEVER learned to properly change a diaper, or properly put her in a car seat.

24.  On December 11th, at 11:30, we attended a hearing that was set in osrder to hear approximately 10 motions I had filed.  One motion I had filed concerned a motion Mays had filed a couple days prior to this hearing that asked Judge Price to withdraw from E.B.'s case...again.  He had listed reasons in it that were out and out lies, making himself look like an angel, and us parents like mental patients.  I had, prior to the hearing, filed a motion to correct his motion, in order to have him list the actual reasons for his withdrawal request.  Judge Price, in order to protect attorney Mays, as well as to help cover up any proof of his own involvement in what Dale had done against his own client's best interests, first, dismissed Attorney Mays from the case, then, threw out my motion to correct the facts of his motion; claiming it was now moot, because Mr. Mays was no longer associated with the case.  Later, in the middle of a motion, that involved addressing the issue of DHS attempting to have me arrested for harassment; Judge Price interrupted me mid-sentence and loudly yelled "Lunch!" at exactly 12:00, and then ordered the hearing be continued the for a week later, on December 18th, 2014.

25.  As it seemed that we would never get justice under Judge Price, or get our daughter returned to us; I called Kevin Brownell, the Assistant Polk County Attorney in charge of the case, on December 17^th, 2014; to inform him that I had a change of heart, and had decided to stop fighting, and that I wanted now to go along with the services that were ordered of us.  I did this as a favor to the mother in order to possibly turn around what seemed to be inevitable, the loss of our daughter.

26.  On December 18^th, 2014, following a 2^nd continued hearing to hear motions that I had filed; DHS's Stephanie Rhinehart and Katie Gosch asked to speak to me before I left, concerning my "change of heart." They then re-iterated the terms of our future

 interactions, and repeated the services they wanted us to engage in.  They then introduced me to a man I had seen them sitting with, during the hearing.  I was told his name was Tony Reed, and that he had come to do a field test on me for drugs.  I would later discover that he was not just anyone, he was the current manager for all of the testing centers in Iowa, including Central Iowa Family Services.  He had come, he stated, because I had served a subpoena on his testing center for someone to come and appear on their behalf.  I told him that I had also asked that someone bring along specific documents, and that I see that he had not brought any documents along.  I then mentioned that, because of a change in plans, that I had not required his center to testify, after all.  Mrs. Rhinehart would then tell me that my wife was to do a drug test just as soon as she got off work, at their facility.  This had not been ordered by Judge Price, nor was it requested of me or mentioned that it would happen after the hearing by Mrs. Rhinehart, until the hearing was over, and outside of the courtroom.  In an effort to be compliant, I immediately agreed to do it, with no argument.

27.  Since I had just used the restroom prior to our hearing, and wasn’t ready to submit a sample just yet, I informed Mr. Reed of this, and he stated that he would wait, and that I should drink some water.  While we waited, I engaged in explorative conversation with Mr. Reed, relating to him the events of my first testing, and described the place to him; not knowing yet who he actually was, or his position.  I described how that first test had gone, and how the place had looked.  He became visibly miffed, and stated that he worked closely with those of that facility all of the time; and made it clear that it had NEVER been like I described. Knowing then that I could not trust this man any more than where I had done my first test, I decided to play Mr. Reed a little, to see just how far DHS would take things, in order to keep me down.  I then lied to Mr. Reed, by pre-warning him that it would be very likely that I would test positive for drugs in my test today.  He stated that we would see about that, soon enough.  Five minutes later, while I paced, I feigned a slight move towards one of the courthouse doors and Mr. Reed quickly moved to block my way out, and stated that there was no chance that I would be getting out of doing this test - as if he had the power to force me.  I laughed (there was no exiting these doors anyway, it was not one of the entryways guarded by the sheriffs, and was locked down) and told him that I had no intention of missing out on it, then informed him I was ready to do it now.

28.  I submitted a sample, and watched what Mr. Reed did following that.  After watching for a moment, I asked Mr. Reed if he would tell me exactly what happened in the field test, and how the cup worked, or determined I was positive, and for what.  He blithely described how the test worked, in full detail, and told me how I would know the results, had I been the tester.  I then asked him what my results were; and he began turning the cup away from my view, took out his phone and started taking pictures of it.  He stated, “I’ll be sending Ms. Gosch pictures of your results, and it will up to her to tell you what your results are”

29.  Mr. Reed then had me pour my sample into a smaller container and seal it, telling me that the lab would test this portion of it.  He then had me throw the original cup in the trash.  Neither he nor I, at any time, wore gloves.  He then stated that we were finished, and that I was free to go.

30.  After Mr. Reed left, I went back into the restroom to attempt to retrieve the testing cup.  The trash can in the restroom was locked, and my arm was not long enough to reach into it.  I then dropped my keys into the garbage, and told a sheriff that I had accidently lost my keys in the garbage, and asked if someone would let me into it.  He stated that he would do it for me, and when we arrived, I got my keys, and removed also the cup that I had thrown into it.  As I got into my car, I looked at it.  None of the things that Mr. Reed had described as occurring in the test results had happened.  The cup was inactive.  No result showed on it at all.  To verify my theory of what had happened here, I called my caseworker, Katie Gosch, and left her a voice message to inform her that I had passed my drug test.  I then went to pick up my wife from work and took her to Central Iowa Family Services, where we had tested previously in our first tests.  On the way, I told her not to do a test unless she could have a witness to it.  After she went in, Katie Gosch called me back, and began to tell me how my drug test had come back positive for meth again.  I hung up on her in the middle of that statement and waited for my wife to return.

31.  When E.B. returned, she informed me that she was not allowed a witness to her testing.  I then told her to get her things, and that we were leaving.  When she returned, she had, in her hand, her unused field testing cup.

32.  Upon returning home, I did another test in the mother’s unused cup.  It came out exactly the same as the one I had thrown away at the courthouse…inactive, with no results, positive or negative.  We then realized that this had been a trick to make us look guilty and in need of the court’s intervention, as well as gravely in need of the drug assessment and treatment services we had been ordered to engage in unnecessarily, by Judge Price.

33.  I immediately took pictures of the two cups, one of the cup that I had just done the test in (with the sample still in it); wrote an article about these events and posted it on my blog, knowing Ms. Gosch would eventually read it.

34.  On January 2nd, 2015, an order was filed in the case by Judge Price, granting Attorney Mays (again?) permission to withdraw from the case, and stated the effective date for that permission to be December 15, 2014, half a month earlier.  This effective date was four days following the initial one of two motions hearings that had been held on December 11th, 2014, in which Judge Price had, at that hearing's onset, granted Attorney Mays permission to withdraw from the case - supposedly effective THAT day at THAT time.  Price would then dismiss attorney Mays from the courtroom, and, following this, subsequently threw out a motion I had filed to correct Mr. Mays' motion, claiming my motion to be moot, because attorney Mays was no longer associated with the case.  Then, the complainant remembered that Mr. Mays had been served a subpoena to testify at the second continued motions hearing, and it was served by me on Mr. Mays on...December 15th, 2014 Immediately following this service, Mr. Mays then electronically filed a motion to quash the subpoena in the case, although he supposedly was not associated with the case.  On January 15th, when I myself was removed as a necessary party to this case, I was un-indexed from the electronic filing system within a half an hour.  I most certainly was not able to do what Mr. Mays had done, four days after his removal from this case.  I DEFINATELY could not have gotten Judge Price to address anything I might have snuck by him into that case, after my removal from it, as Mr. Mays did.  His motion to quash was honored, as well as admitted instantly, upon his filing it...and his subpoena? Quashed like a bug.  My motions, after I was dismissed, were tossed in the garbage without a single T being crossed, and my evidence, filed in person by me 6 days before the hearing for permanency, although not a lick of it was ever admitted as exhibits in that hearing (because I was about to be removed from it, and they knew the absolute brevity of it would have eaten their case for breakfast) it was, after my removal as a party, instantly destroyed just after the hearing, and was not retrievable upon my return to get it back that same afternoon.

35.  Strangely, I did not bring this matter up until January 22nd, in my answer to the permanency order.  I've been through these court documents over and over again, and just like it happened this time, things appear and disappear in it almost every time I look for something.  This order, filed on the 2nd of January, 2015, looks as though it was submitted as a definite after-thought, very obviously filed in order for Judge Price to cover Judge Price's mistake in covering for Attorney Mays, then allowing him to continue to be electronically able to view and file documents in the case, though he was no longer associated with it, per Judge Price...and yet...though it was submitted by Judge Price on January 2nd, 2015, more than 2 weeks after this matter occurred, (which is, by itself, strange enough), the matter wasn't noticed by me, nor was it brought up, or addressed by me until January TWENTY second, over a month later than the December 11th hearing, and over a week later than the order for permanency.  Most strange of all was that, after I was once again able to see all court documents filed in this case, following Judge Price's order allowing me that privilege, I never once got a notification that this particular item that was allegedly filed on January 2nd, had ever been filed.  Prior to this very date, the complainant has not ever seen this particular motion.  Ah, but this would not, by any means, be the first, or hardly the last time I would catch those of the Polk County District courts playing with the record - substituting my motions saying what I wanted - with theirs, changed to say what THEY wanted; doctoring or changing transcripts, or skill in the art of leaving things said out or, where needed, putting something not said., in to cover something or someone else.  Best of all, however, is still the absolute fairy tale that can be found only in every line of every page of the transcripts for the termination hearing, where the script presented is not only unbelievable, it's all but IMPOSSIBLE to believe, if you only knew but one of any of the actors who played in it.  Thanks to neither parent guaranteed not to attend, and a guaranteed year minimum before they would be asked for, there was plenty of time and confidential cover with which to make them just so, before the eyes of the Supreme Court of Iowa would even glance at them.

36.  Later, on January 9th, a report was filed by DHS, authored by Ms. Gosch; her final report to the court before the determination of permanency.  As I expected, it contained an alternate version of the story I had told on my blog, and details that I described there were meticulously covered in exact denial of everything I had written, showing that they had obviously read my side of the story.  First, according to Mr. Reed’s version, he was the only one who ever handled the testing cups, and it was he, during the test, who, after getting no results, determined that the cup he used in my FIRST test sample was inactive, and therefore, defective; and that it was he that threw the cup away in the garbage.  He then stated that he got another cup out, and acquired a SECOND test sample from me (remember - I was, at that time, barely able to provide enough for a first sample, see complaint #), and that he had also been the one to throw the second cup away, after the results of that test.  When I had retrieved the cup from the trash later, he stated that I must have grabbed the defective one that he had thrown away from the first sample.  After telling that story, Ms. Gosch went on to report on the calls Id made to both her and Ms. Nieman on January 2^nd, 2015, then boldly lied to the court and stated that, in Ms. Nieman’s messages, I had threatened to kill her.  (NOTE: The transcripts for the voicemails were filed by DHS in BOTH of our juvenile cases, shortly after they were made.  There was no message to either that described, related, or repeated any of the words that Ms. Gosch would claim were stated to Ms. Nieman, nor was that threat even insinuated).

37.  On February 17^th, 2015, not at all daunted by her first failed attempt to have me arrested the first time (see complaint #), Ms. Rhinehart, Katie Gosch and Emily Nieman would again allege that I harassed both Emily Nieman and Ms. Gosch, and, according to Jake Lancaster of the Des Moines Police Department, the detective who had called me, they now intended to claim that I had been harassing them all since July of 2014.  After several harassing phone calls to me from Mr. Lancaster, (because he refused to stop calling me incessantly, I then turned my phone off), a warrant was then issued for my arrest.  Unbeknownst to all that mattered, however, we had decided by this time to move away (and transfer in my job) to Carroll Iowa, without notice to anyone but my boss.  When he couldn't find me where we had said we lived in Des Moines, or, where I had said I was working, Mr. Lancaster then took to visiting and harassing my relatives in Des Moines, by coming by their homes constantly to ask if they knew where I was.  He did not stop this behavior until the time I was finally arrested, almost a full month later.

38.  The warrant for my arrest contained these charges: Harassment in the first degree (this charge concerned my “threat of Ms. Nieman’s life” on her voicemail, something that never happened), an aggravated misdemeanor, and two other simple misdemeanors, also for harassment, but in the 3^rd degree instead, one for each of the two workers.  The “victims” were Emily Nieman (I called her one time, in the time I'd known her from July 2014 until that day, January 2nd, 2015), on the weekend, to let her know that I was about to win because of what I had filed for the Permanency hearing, and that she was likely to lose her job; and Katie Gosch - who was, at that time, still our active DHS caseworker - the same day, on the weekend, when I knew it was likely to leave a message, and said pretty much the same thing to her.  Prior to that, I never had the desire to even see Katie Gosch, let alone did I ever speak to her, if I could avoid it.  The calls were made on January 2^nd, 2015.  The charges were filed a month and a half later.  Upon filing these charges, and as he was most anxious to find me and arrest me, The DMPD would then place me in the NUMBER #1 POSITION of the “Metro’s Most Wanted” website, as well as that segment on the Channel 13 news, and in CityView Magazine.  I was the #1 wanted criminal in the area there for well over a month, until and even a week AFTER I was arrested (they then just put up my mug shot and put the word ARRESTED over it).  I was, evidently, more important to be than murderers, bank robbers, and other felons; more so than anyone in the Polk County area...The Metro’s MOST wanted.  Because of my fear of being arrested at this critical time, with a very important assessment appeal coming up, and another obvious appeal on the way, and because we didn’t have transportation available back to Des Moines, we decided it was in our best interest to NOT attend our termination hearing...as was their plan.

39.  Finally, because I couldn’t be located, and no one would turn me in, the DMPD and the County Attorney’s offices would turn to others in Government who might help.  After perusing my entire blog, they found a single sentence that they could use, that stated “I’m going to Washington D.C., and I’m going to camp out on Obama’s doorstep until he does something about corruption in Iowa.” They then turned this over to the Secret Service, somehow convincing them that I was a credible threat to the President of the United States.  They did this because this agency had access and authority to ways that they could legally use to find me that the DMPD and the County Attorneys did not.  The Secret Service agent assigned then located me by my IP address, and had me arrested finally in Carroll, Iowa.

40.  Upon my arrival in the Polk County Jail, the Secret Service agent interviewed me for 2 minutes, then walked out on the interview after he discovered that this was all about my stolen daughter, and determined that I was so obviously hardly a credible threat to anyone...let alone the President of the United States.

41.  I appeared before Judge Birkenholtz, District 5C in the morning and plead guilty to the two simple misdemeanors, in order to bring bail down to an amount I could pay; and in order to get back home to work on this case and my appeal.  Much later, when the issue of the aggravated misdemeanor of harassment in the first degree was pressed to the limit by me, prior to trial (long after my arrest, and well after the termination hearing), the charge was dropped suddenly, with prejudice, just a few days prior to trial.  They had never had proof of this crime, and claimed that they dropped the bigger charge (where I threatened to kill someone) because I plead to the two lesser charges (where I just simply harassed someone somewhat to make them a little nervous, a rather major difference of 2 huge upgrades in misdemeanors) – even though the pleas had occurred nearly a month earlier.  Later, it was determined, after reading our termination appeal’s cross appeal, that this arrest warrant for me was issued when it was for a very important reason.  Throughout the cross-appeal, it mentions over and over again (I think I counted like 20 or so times over a spread of like 5 different filings by the Attorney General's offices) that, because we did not attend our termination of parental rights hearing; and, also, because I was no longer considered to be an interested party in the CINA case, that neither E.B. NOR I had any standing to appeal the matter to the Iowa Supreme Court. 

42.  The determined “biological father”, R.S., had sex with my wife only once, in January of 2014, while we were briefly separated, and, after that, wanted no more communication, and nothing more to do with my wife.  After we reunited a month later, and I discovered that she was pregnant, she didn’t know exactly who the father was, since she had had sex with two men during this time, and one had died.  When it was determined that J.B. (the possibility that was dead), who the mother thought WAS the biological father of our daughter, was determined to not be the father, DHS then pressed E.B., and eventually pried the name of the other possible father, R.S., out of her.  As soon as they got his name and where he was possibly living, the department then hunted down the biological father, R.S. of Newton, Iowa during the course of our juvenile cases, and had him also do a paternity test The results would show that R.S. was indeed the biological father of T.B.

43.  After a paternity test proved that R.S. was the actual biological father of T.B., the petition to terminate, not just our rights, but the rights of the biological father, R.S., as well, was filed in the newly formed termination case on January 9^th, 2015.

44.  On January 15^th, 2015, after we left our permanency hearing, Judge Price, in a surprise move, would order that R.S, who hadn't even been officially involved in the case at all until that day, should, as T.B.'s real father, get the same chance that I had, to be compliant with what DHS would ask of him (which was nothing compared to what they asked of us, was infinitely simpler for someone to accomplish, and would require very little effort on R.S.'s part) and then awarded him full unsupervised visitation with his (our) daughter.  After we had acquired an apartment, both E.B. and I would ask DHS and motion the courts SEVERAL times for, at the very least, supervised visitation in our apartment, as well as re-allow me my visits T.B., without DHS's ridiculous stipulations.   Each and every motion and request was denied or ignored, depending on who was getting the request or motion.  As a matter of stated fact, after the date of September 12th, nearly EVERYTHING, especially various things filed in our case, were not addressed, were completely overlooked, not noticed, never answered, ignored, and outright thrown away or destroyed.  And if all else fails? Let's throw him out of the case, and everything he brought with him!

45.  On January 21^st, 2015, Katherine Walker would appear in the case to represent R.S.

46.  Immediately following her appearance, I contacted Ms. Walker at her firm; not only to inform her about what had occurred involving us up to that time, and warn her not to trust DHS or Judge Price, but also to inform her that a petition to terminate ALL the parents’ rights, including her client’s rights, was already in force.

47.  On January 25^th, 2015, Ms. Walker filed a motion to continue the termination of parental rights hearing.  On it, cited as one of the reasons for the continuance, was that Ms. Walker could not possibly attend on that day.

48. On February 19^th, 2015, suddenly, in the final hour, the petition to terminate parental rights was amended to disclude R.S. from his parental rights being terminated.  A flurry of reports appeared and were filed, from seemingly nowhere; in just a matter of a few days; from both DHS and CFI, all unerringly praising R.S. and his most apparent wont to be a father, and about his total compliance in going along with all that DHS asked of him willingly (which, at this time, had been only visits, the paternity test, and a drug test...something we had ALSO done, willingly), and portraying him to be a saint, and very nearly God-like and perfect in his parenting style and skills; were filed like mad, in order to get them placed there in time for the all-important termination hearing...which, by the way, it's important to note that Attorney Beth Walker? She was miraculously able to attend in support of her client, after all.

49.  On February 28^th, 2015, our rights were terminated, and R.S. would go on to be the real hero and father in T.B.’s life, even though it was more than a year after he had irresponsibly shunned and shut out the mother, not caring to even check up on her afterwards, just in case she may have gotten pregnant with his child.  Instead, and only after DHS hunted him down to tell him that he had a daughter, R.S. raised his finger at the last minute to claim her, after I fought and was the court’s target in his stead as her father for six straight months.  Our daughter was in foster care from July 2014 until February of 2015, when the mother’s rights were terminated.  I was removed from the CINA series of court hearings in January, 2015 by Judge Price of the district courts of Polk County because of my paternal status (the non-biological LEGAL father), and my “lack of any rights to be a party of interest in these cases”; and yet the same rights that I supposedly didn’t have to be an interested party in the matter of T.B., in the CINA case were terminated in our termination hearing by this same judge in February of 2015, a month later.

50.  This complainant brings that reunification was NEVER the intent, either of the DHS, or the courts that supported them and their illegal and unlawful actions entirely; no matter how ridiculous their lies got, no matter how wrong their retaliatory and vindictive behavior was in turning against the parents.  The complainant also claims that ALL, and at the end of the proceedings, even R.S.’s attorney, conspired with Judge Price, the DHS, and all at the county attorney’s offices to make sure T.B. went somewhere, ANYWHERE…and to ANYONE, as long as no one gave her back to the long married and loving parents who wanted her to begin with and still do, and who had fought to have her returned, quite literally against all odds, for 6 long, traumatic months.

51.  On appeal to the Iowa Appellate division, the Appellate court blatantly refused to stay our terminations based on the assessment appeal decision of the ALJ and the Director of the Department of Human Services ( See Complaint #.), even though these decisions more than determined that, initially, the child was wrongfully found to be in need of the removal, and in need of the court’s intervention; and that they made a mistake taking her from us.  This decision of the Department should have, by all logic, nullified anything that was decided afterwards, including all orders given by Judge Price from that point on.  These decisions of the director and the ALJ were submitted 3 times, and the appellate courts would deny the stay 3 times, long before they would even consider the case.  They would also refuse to pay for transcripts that concerned anything other than the termination hearing unless we paid for it ourselves, which came to around $1,000.  This order came out just 2 weeks before they made their final decision on the matter, giving us no time to get the money together to pay for them.  Naturally, they would then rule in full agreement with the district court; and in total disregard of all of the district court and Judge Price’s unlawful actions against us.  New evidence (the 18 minute recording of the worker breaking several federal laws in removing T.B. from the mother) was then entered by us into the case.  This same evidence had been filed in our juvenile cases, but was never admitted by the State’s juvenile clerk of court employees into the record, nor filed for six days, more than likely because all of the evidence and motions I had filed for the permanency hearing would have completely destroyed the State’s entire case and the district court would have been lawfully forced to return T.B. our care and admit that what they did was wrong.  The appellate court followed the District Court’s lead, and would then officially reject this new evidence, and ruled that it was nothing short of a sad attempt by us to get them to reconsider their final decision, even though such “new evidence”, had it been presented in a court of law would have been powerful enough to warrant a whole new trial.  This decision, of course, came to us almost a full year and 3 months after we filed it, very nearly almost 2 full years of the very first part of our daughter’s life. I'm certain that the verdict, even if it had been ruled in our favor, would have included this addendum, that, “Since she’s been away this long, why rip her from all she's known by this point in her life; and why cause her the unnecessary trauma it would inflict on her by returning her to you? Surely, this wouldn’t be in the best interest of the child!”

52.  A final decision was rendered in June of 2016, by the Iowa Appellate division (just prior to my release from doing a full year in jail, for more alleged “harassment”, (see rights hearing (see complaint #,) and that hearing ONLY, albeit neither one of us was able to be present due to the conspiracy to jail me or put me in fear of being jailed in order to win out, via the avenue of keeping us out and away from this hearing so that we wouldn't be able to speak for ourselves; and, more importantly, so that they could leisurely fabricate in the transcripts that they said and did just about ANYTHING; without anyone else knowing exactly what actually did occur.  Because Judge Price had ruled that I had no rights to my legal daughter, and that I should not be further subjected to the court bullying he often engaged in, in his court room, the Appellate Court had no choice but to vacate the decision to terminate MY rights.

52.  Anyone reading the transcripts from the complete fabrication that Polk County expected us to believe was what had actually occurred and had been said in our termination hearing, would have chuckled privately at the obviously false bravado transcribed into this absolutely grandiose farce, an event that couldn't have possibly occurred in the REAL world, even if they had NOT known anyone who had been in it.  Page after page, each person who sought to deprive us of our daughter all would take turns in waxing eloquently (to the nth degree and beyond), as to every reason they believed might justify them in sadly terminating our rights, an action that no one obviously wanted to do, but felt that it was something they just had to do, in order to best serve our daughter's best interests.  Paul White, the GAL, who barely spoke more than 2 words in any hearing up to this one, said so much at the termination hearing, I thought he might break out into song after he finally stopped talking.  Judge Price, who never once spoke a kind word to or about anyone, particularly the parents; whose voice on any given day of court fairly dribbled with sarcasm and a condescending tone at all times towards any who would dare speak to him from the floor of the courtroom and below it, almost had me in tears after reading what he had to say in THIS hearing; and his obvious remorse at what he was being forced to do to us because of our criminal lack of interest in reunifying with our child was heart- breaking, to say the least.  It's good to know that, even though I didn't think he cared, even a little; that Judge Price really DID care, after all...I just didn't see it.  How could I have been so very blind? I'm sure that, someday, I'll look back on what he did for us, and I'll quietly take a moment to whisper quietly to his memory, "thank you...thank you Judge Price, for showing us the way", and then I'll take just moment to remember him, fondly, as one of the fairest, kindest most wonderful men I've known, so full of love, understanding and Solomon-like wisdom.  And then, I woke up from this nightmare, screaming.  Maybe this wasn't the most legally written portion of this complaint, but I believe I've made myself clear as to what I know, for an absolute fact, happened with our termination transcripts.

53.  Finally, concerning the Iowa Supreme Court appeal, the complainant believes that the matter of our case and all the atrocious behaviors and actions of all who were involved in unison against us and our claimed inalienable rights as parents, involved against us, in order to, initially anyway, claim that we were unacceptable parents and people in every imaginable way, in order to seem justified in later terminating our rights, then place our daughter out to the foster parents, who I’m certain, had their eye on her and didn’t rule her out as a good ,addition to their ever growing adoption income.  I’m also sure that they were DHS’s first and foremost choice for placement, but had to take a lawful detour when someone of the family, closely related by blood, was came in, however late, armed with a real paid lawyer (not those in on the scheme and who are, allegedly, appointed to us to “represent us”, but instead, did nothing and said nothing at all to help the mother in any way, but instead willfully acted out for the other side, the State’s side, at every turn) and who had a salary that was acceptable to Judge Price (among his first 3 questions of the biological father at the permanency hearing were –“ Where are you employed? “ and “How much money do you make there?”), then their plan was forced to change, and R.S., who is a single working parent, was considered to be a much better, as well as ridiculously perfect choice to raise this child, over the now settled and long married parents.  I believe it's quite important to mention, also, that, had I been in DHS's position, the first thing I would have noticed, to consider R.S. to maybe not be a good choice to parent this child, would have been his obvious shirk of real adult responsibility, in consideration of his actions in totally ignoring the possibility that E.B. may have gotten pregnant with his child after they had relations, and totally cutting off any and all communication with her, in denial of any possibility that she might be pregnant.  These are not the actions of a responsible adult, let alone a possibly responsible parent choice.

54.  It should not be difficult for this court to find that a most definitive meeting of the minds occurred between all that have been mentioned thus far in this complaint, as defendants.  If not, of course, there is more.

55.  During the year and a half that we waited for the Appellate court to address these issues, I had been continuously sending emails containing relevant news and clippings, recordings of legal atrocities, paperwork and proof of what was happening to our family, as well as things that were happening to other families all over Iowa, to Darren Tromblay, the Editor-In-Chief at CityView magazine in Des Moines, Iowa.  Emails were also being sent to all who had been involved in their criminal actions against us.  At no time during this period did anyone ever respond or ask/tell me ever to stop sending them these things, and Mr. Tromblay even began to respond to them favorably, from time to time.  Finally, in November of 2015, Mr. Tromblay would send me a reply to an email that I had sent him, and asked me to give him a call.  I did, and he mentioned that he thought we could get a story on this, He would then mention that, since there were an awful lot of facts and elements to this story, that we would need to go through it all to sort out what we needed and what would he wouldn't be able to use.  He then sent me a follow-up email, signed with a digitally produced signature, that clearly stated his intention to send a reporter of his, Jeffrey Pitts, my way, very soon, in order to discuss what I would give him for the story (no vagueness in the language, no “maybe”…that he certainly would do thee story) Nearly two months later, in January, 2015, I contacted Mr. Tromblay twice by email in quick succession to ask, somewhat angrily, what the big delay was, and mentioned that I had heard nothing from the reporter at all.  I heard nothing back from Mr. Tromblay following those emails being sent out, and on January 23rd, 2016, members of the Carroll City Police, including Officer Greg Bellinghausen, were again knocking at my door.

56.  My wife answered the front door, and with the door shut, asked who it was.  There were two officers present, and the officer at the fore identified themselves as the Carroll City Police.  My wife then asked these men for their identification and a warrant of arrest.  They stated that there was a warrant for arrest, but that they didn't have it with them.  My wife then told them that they would have to produce this warrant, and asked them to leave the property.  The officers then obliged her, and left.

57.  Posted on both doors of our home, at both the front and back doors, we had a sign that requested that all who came onto our property, purporting to be law enforcement or claiming to be associated with any government agency therewith, who came with the intent to enter onto the premises was required to produce official documentation that proved who they were, and their lawful purpose to come onto the property, with or without a warrant.  It also stated that, should they choose to not provide what we asked them for, and they should choose to enter the property of their own volition regardless, that in doing so, they would be contracting with me to pay us a land use fee at a rate of $10,000 per person, per day, or any portion of that day.  This sign was printed in bold black and white, took up the size of an entire 8"x11" page, and was posted at eye level, so that none would overlook it.  With all the time that these officers had spent at our front door, the complainant claims that there was little chance that they could have missed reading it.

58.  Upon their return 20 minutes later, the officers once again knocked at our front door.  My wife then asked to see the warrant, and when she was satisfied that what they were holding was a warrant, she opened the inner door to our property.  The officers then moved to open the screen door with the obvious intent of contracting with us for our agreed upon land use fee, then entered the premises on their own.  They then inquired as to whether I was Christopher Bruce, as I was sitting right by the door when they entered.  I told them that I was not.  Officer Greg Bellinghausen would then step forward, and state "You ARE Christopher Bruce, and you're under arrest." He then handcuffed me, and took me to the Carroll County Jail and put me behind bars to await transport to the Polk County Jail by the Johnston, Iowa City Police Department.

59.  This arrest took place in the afternoon on January 23rd.  The transport from Johnston Iowa took around an hour to arrive.  The transport by the Des Moines Police Dept., a year earlier, had taken around an hour to arrive from Des Moines to Carroll, Iowa, as well (see complaint #).

60.  Later, it was discovered, upon receiving filed documents about this case while I was incarcerated (I was arrested again almost immediately after I bonded out for this case, and was then sentenced to do a full year in the county jail) that the warrant used to arrest me, supposedly in the possession of the Carroll City Police Department; and, more specifically, Greg Bellinghausen, was NOT an arrest warrant, but was a search warrant.  At no time did officer Bellinghausen "search" any portion of my property.  He came in, made his false identification of me, arrested me without verifying my identity, and did not ever touch anything else in or on the property.

61.  The complainant presents that Officer Greg Bellinghausen was in charge of the operation resulting in my arrest at my property, and is wholly responsible for the debt he incurred by contracting with us, the current residents of the property at that time, my wife and I, by willfully entering our home of his own volition, though duly warned of the consequences, and without invitation, and using an illegal warrant to do so.  We have concluded this as fact, in that a.  He had been the first and only officer to speak the entire time, b.  had accepted the liability of my welfare by taking the action of placing me in handcuffs in order to complete this unlawful arrest; and c.  there were, at final count, two officers who had entered the property at that time; and, thereby, officer Bellinghausen did, by engaging in these actions, choose to claim responsibility for the intrusion onto our property, and is in debt to us for our land use fee in the agreed upon total amount of $20,000, upon our demand, and in legal tender.  We now so demand. 

62.  Important to note at this time were several strange occurrances, all pointing to actions by the County Attorney's offices.  On or around April of 2015, until the present day, emails that were being sent to them would be opened by them at, say, 9:00 a.m. in Des Moines, Iowa.  5 or so minutes later, the same email, opened by the county attorney would be then opened in Omaha NE.  I have a program that tells me where all of my emails are being opened, by whom, and how many times, and when.  I then started noticing the same emails being opened in other major cities:  Kansas City, Minneapolis, St. Louis, MO; and the circle of cities from there, until present day have gotten wider and wider with every passing month.  Upon doing some research, it was discovered that not only had my computer been connected to these same cities in my network connections (on my personal computer), but that Facebook and Google kept giving me alerts stating that these locations were also logging into my computer and accounts.  Upon further research, it was discovered that every city listed had rather large branches of the FBI located in them.  There was, by the way, a year's reprieve, during the time I was jailed.  Upon sending certified letters of settlement (prior to this action, something normally done by attorneys or pro se litigants who are about to file actions in federal court) to the County Attorney's offices prior to this complaint, there were again opens occurring, lately, as far away as Massachusetts.  It is stated by this complainant that, in order to get me off his case, the County attorney has taken to calling just about every office branch of the FBI in an attempt to have me federally arrested, for no real crime.  Of course, this hasn't worked too well for John P. Sarcone, since the complainant has YET to commit any crime, save the crime of not letting the County Attorney off the hook for what he has done to this complainant and his family, and shall never, until justice is done.

63.  On the date of January 24^th, the day following my bonded release for the harassment of Darren Tromblay, the complainant posted a story concerning Theodore Booker, a fellow warrior against child trafficking, and posted it on my blog.  Upon investigation of the website for the DCFS (The Department of Children and Family Services) offices in Los Angeles, I located a folder containing the names and email addresses for every social worker in L.A. county, CA.  After posting Theodore’s story, I then emailed every one of the 8000 social workers that worked for DCFS, to let them know that their crimes against Theodore Booker were online for the world to see.

64.  On January 25^th, the plaintiff had involved himself in a case in Carroll County, where he resided; where a child had been wrongfully taken from a family.  On the same day, the plaintiff’s friend, Theodore Booker, was arrested in L.A. County, for no charges that were ever filed against him for 7 months, using affidavits filed by those of the LA County DCFS offices, and that had my name on them.  He was released a few months later, with no actual charges that were truth, and, of course, no real conviction.

65.  On January 26th, 2016, The Carroll Police showed up at my house again, with a warrant for my arrest, using a single aggravated misdemeanor charge of harassment in the first degree, with the alleged victim being one Jeanne Munson of Altoona, Iowa.  This incident with Ms. Munson had allegedly occurred nearly a month before the charge was approved by the county attorney's office in Polk County, and it had, also, been nearly a month after the police in Altoona, Iowa had filed the police report alleging the same crime.  It's obvious that, if this had ever been a crime that I would have someday been arrested for, it would have happened long before this date, or would have been brought against me while I was already in custody, just a couple days before this, for my harassment of Darren Tromblay.  This arrest occurred because of what had happened with the DCFS offices in Los Angeles, as well as my newly formed war with my local DHS office in Carroll, Iowa.  Since they couldn't rightfully charge me with speaking freely, or accuse me of using email addresses that I'd found in a folder that was publicly available on their website, they instead called in the help of the County Attorney's office in Polk County, who in turn, scoured the records of the surrounding police departments in order to find a report of some crime they could charge me with.  The complainant would later discover that Ms. Munson had been involved in a deal with Charles Palmer, the director of DHS, and had been already been paid for a few months to cause dissent in her group in any way she could, and to subvert those that sought her help, as well as others that they might seek help from.  The Department had removed Ms. Munson's grandchildren from her care a while back, and Ms. Munson had started and was the administrator for a large group of 9000+ parents that had been leading the war with others that had also been wrongfully victimized by DHS in Iowa.  Charles Palmer had, along the way, sought Jeanne out, since she was the admin in the group against him, and made a deal with her, offering her to once again be allowed to visit with her grandchildren; and in exchange, Ms. Munson and her boyfriend, Mark Worthington, along with another woman, Linda Downs (these were the agents we knew of.  It's likely that there were more in on this) would give the victims of Iowa DHS bad direction in legal matters, and cut them off from people who were legitimately attempting to help them - like myself for instance; which explained to me why we had all of a sudden come to war against each other after an amicable relationship of nearly a year, prior to that time.

66.  Upon my arrest, there was only the Harassment charge; and I was taken once again to the Carroll County Jail to await transport to the Polk County Jail, via the Altoona Police Department.  Strangely, unlike the other two times, where the transport took only an hour to arrive, this transport would take four and a half hours.  The reason for this would soon come clear.  I had called Kenny's Bail Bonds, and found out that my bail for the harassment charge was just $200 dollars.  I then told him I would give him a call once I arrived in Des Moines.  While I waited, the Altoona Police Department would file two more police reports; one for Stalking, another Aggravated Misdemeanor charge, and a Class D Felony, Threats.  Miraculously, those reports, unlike the one that took nearly a month to net any charges, these reports brought charges that were approved by John P. Sarcone's offices IN THE SAME HOUR the reports were filed.  These actions, hereby, show a most CERTAIN meeting of the minds of the County Attorney of Polk County and the Altoona Police Department, to conspire against the rights of the complainant.  By the time I arrived in Des Moines and called the Bondsman again, my bond had shot up to $70,000, and would now require a home to guarantee my release.  Under normal circumstances, my bond should have been no more than $9,000 ($2,000 for each aggravated misdemeanor, and $5,000 for the Class D felony.).  This excessive bond was “justified”, they said, because I had an “extensive criminal history”, which, at this time, included only plead to convictions of the two simple misdemeanors of harassment from the year before (see Complaint #3), and three other simple misdemeanors over a 42 year lifetime, all unrelated.  In my whole life, I never missed a court hearing, have never skipped on bail, wasn’t a flight risk in any way, and, since all the calls made to Ms. Munson were made all on one day, 2 months prior to the complainant's arrest, and never happened again, it wasn’t at all likely that the crime would re-occur if the plaintiff remained free.  This unreasonable bail, then, was unconstitutionally imposed, in violation of my rights under both the U.S. and Iowa Constitutions, concerning imposing excessive bonds/bails and fees."

That's it for now, kids....so, stay tuned for the FINAL draft, to be posted on January 4th, one day before the criminal's complaints are certified to them!  :D

The Ficticious Legal Entity Called “a Person”

Col. Edward House

Hi Class!  Today, we're going to discuss how you've been, are now being, and will continue to be defrauded in the future.  Now, there are couple of terms in this article that are going to cause you to scratch your head a little...but that's OK, because you know me...I will do everything I'm able to make certain that you don't get lost, trying to get a grip on it.  Let's define the terms FIRST, then point you to the article so that you can better understand what your role in these United States...and in the rest of the world, in your further developed countries...everywhere.

Plausible deniability is the ability of people (typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command) to denyknowledge of or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by others in an organizational hierarchy because of a lack of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved in or at least willfully ignorant of the actions.

- Wikipedia.com

Social insurance is any government-sponsored program with the following four characteristics:

• the benefits, eligibility requirements and other aspects of the program are defined by statute;
• explicit provision is made to account for the income and expenses (often through a trust fund);
• it is funded by taxes or premiums paid by (or on behalf of) participants (but additional sources of funding may be provided as well); and
• the program serves a defined population, and participation is either compulsory or so heavily subsidized that most eligible individuals choose to participate.^[1]

Social insurance has also been defined as a program whose risks are transferred to and pooled by an often government organisation legally required to provide certain benefits.^[2]

In the US, programs that meet these definitions include Social Security, Medicare, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation program, the Railroad Retirement Board program and state-sponsored unemployment insurance programs.^[1] The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) is also a social insurance program.

- Wikipedia.com

Now that's over, we can now move on to the meat and potatoes.  Afterwards, if you have any question or desire any further proof of this fraud against the people?  Please contact me however you like.  Please click on the link below to wake up:

The Ficticious Legal Entity Called “a Person”

Revolution, Part I - Has Our Time Come?

Well folks, Donald's been in for a year now...and we have to ask, are the people happy?  Hell no, they're not.  These are scary times to live in, I'll say that much.

There are still millions of people asking for the current President's head.  Me?   I think he's doing no worse or any better than any other one...no, I take that back, I think he's doing better than most.

I figured it out.  I thought long and hard on why this President isn't the public's favorite, and I finally saw the light.  You know why the people are mad at him and hate him?  Because he doesn't hide what he's doing behind a bunch of smiles and lies, like every other President we've had.  President Trump obviously doesn't pay a speech writer to write up something pretty to say to the people.  And that's the only difference.  Obama and GW were destroying our country and taking us down, but they paid someone to write up enough fairy tales to tell the people to placate them while they did it.  Kudos to Trump for not feeding us full of BS.

It makes a lot of sense, if you think about it.  Let's look at George Carlin.  Half the nation adamantly loved or hated the guy.  Why?  I thought the guy was the best comedian EVER, because he didn't pull any punches.  He TOLD PEOPLE THE TRUTH...what was really going on out there.  Americans don't like the truth, can't handle the truth, and would rather hear lies, fairy tales and bullshit.

Let's move on to the last two Presidents we've had.  I was in a group (that I obviously do NOT belong to anymore...you'll see why in a minute) and saw a picture of President Obama and his...OK, please hold on while I take a quick gag..."Gorgeous" wife Michelle, and family.  The first thing I noticed were thousands of comments, all pretty much saying how beautiful the picture was, and how much everyone loved and missed this President.  It was then I realized just how duped the American people are...and were.  This President tripled our national debt.  He sent millions more troops to the Middle East to die; in what is one of the longest and deadliest wars we've EVER HAD. The man promised to bring our troops home...and didn't do it until the END of his Presidency...and folks?  There are STILL troops over there!!!  He spied on the people, he EXPERIMENTED ON US TO GET US TO VOTE HIM BACK IN FOR A 2ND TERM, FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!!  Please, wake your asses up, and re-read this article I wrote, back in the day:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/search?q=sOCIAL+MEDIA

At the very bottom, you'll find the executive order that Obama put into place to experiment on the people...any time he felt like it.

And don't even get me started on G.W. Bush, that beady-eyed idiot.  This is the man responsible for little gems like the Patriot Act, and the War on Terror...let's not even get started on the towers, and Afghanistan, Iran/Iraq...hell, the whole friggin' Middle East...and what he did there.  For God's sake America, the man was STUPID.  He made things up as he went along, and you could see the lies coming 10 miles away.  But the man was a hell of a golfer, wasn't he?  THERE WAS NOT a terror attack people!  Wait, no, there was...but it wasn't any terrorist, unless you wanna put that label right smack in the middle of G.W's forehead.  Can you say INSIDE JOB?  Been proven over...and over...and over again.

And Clinton?  Do I really need to go there?  Mr. Clinton is part of one of the biggest child trafficking rings this country has ever known or seen.  What's more, he's never been his own man.  Hilary was the true power back then.  We can't let her be President!  For one, she's already been President for two terms, she can't serve again!  Add to that, she's the real author of the Adoption and Safe Families Act, the very act that turned CPS into a business, and caused the majority of our children to be removed from their true families, often for no viable, chargeable, true or good reason.  All Bill did was sat in his office, smoked marijuana without inhaling, played the saxophone and got blow jobs from anyone he was able to talk into it.  I shudder to imagine what the man did with the REST of his time in office.

Folks, I want to make something abundantly clear - You don't miss Obama.  You certainly don't love him, or his family.  What you love and miss are the well-planned speeches that made you feel better about all the stuff that shouldn't have been happening.  You miss the beautiful dresses that Michelle was buying with your taxpayer dollars.  You miss their family...because America doesn't have families any more...at least not ones that don't include adoptive or foster parents; or adopted children.  The family has been systematically destroyed by the very Presidents you thought were wonderful and good...all because of their fake ear to ear smiles and their pretty speeches.

You've been duped into believing that our last two Presidents were two of the best we've ever had...and that's the only truth I can't swallow.  Trump is one of the best we've had to date, but he tells you the truth, and doesn't present as someone he isn't, like the rest of our Presidents have...and YOU DON'T LIKE IT, because it isn't all a fantasy or a lie, told to us to make us believe that it's all gonna be all right...or all right in the future.  America is screwed, and you don't want to hear that.  For once in our country's history, you're truly afraid...of our future, of the futures of our children, and for the future of our country.  You want to continue to hear that we're the greatest nation in the world, something that hasn't been true for decades.

Kinda reminds me of when people used to talk well of FDR.  This guy was a serious crook, yet we believe he was one of our best.  Look into it, folks.  Do some damned research.  This man sent FBI agents all over the country with guns in their hands, to knock on America's doors and steal our gold from us.  This is the man partially responsible for international bankers, income taxes and the need for welfare.  He was just the first in a long history of bullshitters, who wrote impressive speeches that would insure that we never saw what was really going on...the beginning of the imminent and total destruction of our great country.  He did a fine job of it too...as did G.W. and your precious President Obama.  Hillary would have taken us the rest of the way down.

Thank God for the Trump reprieve, friends...because the next President may just continue to take us down the path we've been headed for all along - U.S. Hell, in a hand-basket.  Me?  I'm ready.  I can't stand it anymore.  Take Trump out, I dare you.  It will be the biggest mistake this country could make.  You'll be looking for Trump to take over again, when the next one continues the destruction, or, more than likely, finishes us off...I guarantee it.  :D

The Promise, Part III - The Response

I'm told it's my duty to fight against the law
That wizardry's my trade and I was born to wade through gore
I just want to be a lover, not a red-eyed screaming ghoul
I wish it'd picked another to be its killing tool

- Blue Oyster Cult

Well kids, the response to the letters I just mailed out to the criminals residing in office in Iowa; which were delivered by certified mail, just this morning?  Just came in.  What you see above is a screenshot from a program that I have that tells me every time someone that I sent an email to opens that email...and where they are, how many times they open it, etc.

The letter the top entry refers to is an email I sent out what now...almost 2 years ago?  And the person I sent it to...who was in Iowa, just now opened it again...but not in Des Moines, Iowa...in BALTIMORE, MD!!!

"Christopher", you say..."hasn't this happened before?"  Oh hells yes.  Many, many times.  For instance, I would send out a letter to the County Attorney in Polk County Iowa...the Criminal John P. Sarcone, and he would open in in Des Moines, Iowa.  Then, 5 minutes later, the SAME county attorney would THEN open it....in Omaha Nebraska...then in Minneapolis, MN...then in Olathe, Kansas,  Washington DC...just anywhere that had a branch of the FBI.  Thanks to the idiot criminals in PC Iowa, I had them on my computer for 3...solid...years.  Here's proof of THAT time in my life...

Oh, and I called the FBI back then.  Know what I asked them?  I asked if they had a case open on me.  They didn't say yes.  They didn't say they didn't either.  Know what they said?  "How do you know"...pshaw...like I was gonna tell them.

Let 'em come.  What are they gonna arrest me for?  Telling the Truth?  Making settlement deals with criminals in Iowa?  Exposing criminals in Iowa?  I'd like to see 'em try.

Anything For A FEDERAL Buck, Right?

Rest assured, America, that there's NO CHANCE IN HELL that I'm letting this one get by me.  These pictures, the post attached, and the site it came from will be emblazoned here for the world to see on America's Deadly Sins, then, once again, we shall be emailing the Kentucky chapter of this criminal agency to let them know that their business is out on the web...just like we did with LA county.  If I get arrested for THIS one, well...you'll know it's all about BULLSHIT, like it was in Iowa.  Allow me to include their contact information, so that you can call them...shoulds't anything happen to me, as it is sure to.  THIS IS OUR RIGHT, FREE SPEECH people! They posted this right on Facebook, so it's public knowledge anyway, as is their contact information at their Department!  Don't let them take that right from you, no matter how hard they try and take it from me, in the meantime.

Here, then, is the link to the FB site we found this on...and the picture and post are also under this picture, along with their contact info.  Be sure and call them and tell them just how disgusting the lengths they'll go to, to get federal funding.  I'm sure that, someday, this little girl will be looking back on this and wonder if she'll ever be able to tell her kids/grandkids the story about how she got adopted out after being stolen, more than likely, from her natural parents; and, also more than likely, for no good, decent, legal or viable reason.

https://www.facebook.com/dcchcenter/posts/10155948526935763

DCCH Center for Children and Families added 2 new photos.

Yesterday at 8:00am · 

Our lifelike recruitment sign is on the move! We call her "Jesse". "Jesse" is going on adventures around northern Kentucky in search of a "family"! If you spot our "Jesse" sign, you can win a gift card! Just take a selfie with the sign and post it on Facebook! Add #Family4Jesse and tag DCCH Center for Children and Families! You'll then be entered into a monthly drawing for a gift card! Check out the photos for a hint on where she's hanging at this month!

Call (859) 331-2040

I'd call them right now!  Tell 'em you saw their sign on FB, and make 'em give you a gift card...AT THE TAXPAYER'S (YOUR) EXPENSE!!

The Promise, Part II - The Settlement Letters

Well, as you folks already know, the plan to go to Federal court is now in high gear.  Here are 3 letters I sent out certified mail yesterday...should be arriving this coming Friday.  Damn, if only I could be a fly on the wall of their offices, I'd LOVE to see these criminals' faces when they get these!!  :D

First, THE Attorney General of Iowa:

"Mr. Miller,

As you subsequently stated in just about every subpoena quash hearing, where I requested that you or one of your minions testify for my defense, you probably don’t know or remember me or anything about any of my cases (which I happen to know is utter bullshit).  The truth of the matter is that you only WISH you could forget about me or them, which, of course, I have no intent to let you do.

Our child was removed from our care on July 21st, 2014, by one Emily Nieman, who was at that time, a new S4 with The Department of Human Services.  This woman had no experience with newborns, and had NEVER in her capacity, removed a child from anyone before.

As I’m certain that you remember, a child protective assessment appeal was held in front of an ALJ, and she found...against you, and in our favor, in July of 2015.  The matter was then taken to Charles Palmer in another appeal...and after I sent him a rather damaging packet concerning our case, he opted to uphold the decision of the ALJ.  All allegations against us were cleared, we were expunged, and we were removed from the Central Abuse Registry.

Just to show you that we do indeed have a case, our appeal to the assessment was scheduled to be heard AFTER the termination of our parental rights.  The courts then, even after being presented all of this evidence in our appeal, and after we filed the decision of the Director of the DHS in the Supreme Court of Iowa PRIOR to our appeal, found in favor of you and the District courts in the termination of our parental rights.  In case you didn’t understand that, even though the very agency that took her, ruled that they shouldn’t have removed our daughter in the first place, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled in favor of our termination, and our daughter has not been returned.  Do you understand yet how you are going to lose on a federal level?  If not, you are welcome to contact me personally so that I can explain it in greater detail.

You criminals that reside in the Iowa State Attorney General’s offices will not be able to rescue yourselves or the DHS from prosecution, believe that.  I am informed enough in the law of the land to move this case DIRECTLY to the U.S. Supreme Court, and will do so if necessary.  The final decision in our Supreme Court appeal started the Statute of limitations to be filed in Federal Court at July of 2016; and since I will be proceeding with this matter pro se, there will be no lawyer to drag the matter past those limitations.  I will, therefore, offer any of your departments one chance to settle with me and my family before we begin bringing the matter to federal civil court.  That offer goes like this:

1.  You will once again conspire with the courts (this is something I can easily show happens between our Iowa Court system and your department quite frequently anyway, so this shouldn’t be difficult for you) of Polk County and the Supreme Court to have our daughter returned to her mother’s care, and to restore our parental rights to her.

2.  You will collectively award emotional distress and punitive damages; as well as damages to our characters and reputations in the amount of $250,000.

3.  You will fire any of these employees of this department immediately, if they are still employed by you:

Grant Dugdale, Asst. Attorney General
Katherine Miller-Todd, Asst. Attorney General
Yourself

4.  You will all tell Iowa that you screwed up, concerning our case and with our daughter, via the Des Moines Register.  I expect the story to take up at least a half a page.

5.  Upon the return of our daughter to our care, you will tell the South Dakota offices that they are not to bother us ever again.

Rest assured that, if this matter reaches those of Federal court, that the demands for damages will be much higher, and the publicity alone will damage your department permanently.

I thank you for your consideration in this matter.  I suggest you get moving on resolving this with the District and Supreme Courts, as well as with the criminals, both in John P. Sarcone’s offices, and in the Department of Human Services, as you have just 30 days to respond to my requested settlement, before I file.  They will be made aware of my settlement terms as well, since they will both receiving their own letters, as well as copies of yours.  A copy of this letter will also be sent to the ACLU, the Governor, all media, and the Lieutenant Governor’s offices...so retaliation in any form is not advised.

To anyone else in law or in law enforcement who may be reading this letter, I am representing myself in this matter.  I am merely making a settlement offer, in the manner of attorneys."

Then the County Attorney's head criminal...these letters, by the way, read pretty much the same, but I personalized them very well:

"Mr. Sarcone, AKA State Actor/Criminal,

As you subsequently stated in just about every subpoena quash hearing, where I requested that you or one of your minions testify for my defense, you probably don’t know or remember me or anything about any of my cases (which I happen to know is utter bullshit).  The truth of the matter is that you only WISH you could forget about me or them, which, of course, I have no intent to let you do.

Our child was removed from our care on July 21st, 2014, by one Emily Nieman, who was at that time, a new S4 with The Department of Human Services.  This woman had no experience with newborns, and had NEVER in her capacity, removed a child from anyone before.

As I’m certain that you remember, a child protective assessment appeal was held in front of an ALJ, and she found...against those of the DHS and the Attorney General’s offices...and in our favor, in July of 2015.  The matter was then taken to Charles Palmer in another appeal...and after I sent him a rather damaging packet concerning our case, he opted to smartly uphold the decision of the ALJ.  All allegations against us were cleared, we were expunged, and we were removed from the Central Abuse Registry.

Just to show you that we do indeed have a case, our appeal to the assessment was scheduled to be heard AFTER the termination of our parental rights.  The courts then, even after being presented all of this evidence in our appeal, and after we filed the decision of the Director of the DHS in the Supreme Court of Iowa PRIOR to our appeal, found in favor of the AG’s office and the District courts in the termination of our parental rights.  In case you didn’t understand that, even though the very agency that took her, the DHS, ruled that they shouldn’t have removed our daughter in the first place, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled in favor of our termination, and our daughter has not been returned.  Do you understand yet how you are going to lose on a federal level?  If not, you are welcome to contact me personally so that I can explain it in greater detail.

You criminals that reside in the Polk County Attorneys offices will NOT escape the cases to come, believe that.  I am informed enough in the law of the land to move this case DIRECTLY to the U.S. Supreme Court, and will do so if necessary.  The final decision in our Supreme Court appeal started the Statute of limitations to be filed in Federal Court at July of 2016; and since I will be proceeding with this matter pro se, there will be no lawyer to drag the matter past those limitations.  I will, therefore, offer any of your departments one chance to settle with me and my family before we begin bringing the matter to federal civil court.  That offer goes like this:

1.  You will once again conspire with the courts (this is something I can easily show happens between our Iowa Court system and your offices quite frequently anyway, so this shouldn’t be difficult for you) of Polk County, The AG’s offices and the Supreme Court to have our daughter returned to her mother’s care, and to restore our parental rights to her.

2.  You will collectively award emotional distress and punitive damages; as well as damages to our characters and reputations in the amount of $250,000.

3.  You will fire any of these employees of this department immediately, if they are still employed by you:

Stephanie Brown, Kevin J. Brownell, Kevin Bell, Linda Lane, and yourself.

4.  You will all inform Iowa that you screwed up, concerning our cases and with our daughter, via the Des Moines Register.  I expect the story to take up at least a half a page.

5.  Upon the return of our daughter to our care and prior, you will tell the Minnehaha County offices of the County Attorneys here that we are never to be bothered again.

Rest assured that, if this matter reaches those of Federal court, that the demands for damages will be significantly higher, and the publicity alone is sure to damage you and your offices permanently.

I thank you for your consideration in this matter.  I suggest you get moving on resolving this with the District and Supreme Courts, as well as with the criminals, both in Tom Miller’s AG offices, and in the Department of Human Services, as you have just 30 days to respond to my requested settlement, before I file.  They will be made aware of my settlement terms as well, since they will both receiving their own letters, as well as copies of yours.

To anyone else in law or in law enforcement who may be reading this letter, I am representing myself in this matter.  I am merely making a settlement offer, in the manner of attorneys."

Annnnnnnnnd finally, Iowa's new director of the Department of Human Services:

"Mr. Foxhoven,

It is good to see that someone with legal training has taken the reigns from the former criminal in charge of your department, Charles Palmer.  Once you receive copies of my civil lawsuit against your department, I can rest assured that you will understand the seriousness of these charges against your department, and the employees thereof, whether they remain employed by you...or not.  One that I know still is, has already been contacted and informed that her name is certain to be included...one of your supervisors, Stephanie Rhinehart.

Our child was removed from our care on July 21st, 2014, by one Emily Nieman, who was at that time, a new S4 with your department.  This woman had no experience with newborns, and had NEVER in her capacity, removed a child from anyone before.

Just so that you are aware, a child protective assessment appeal was held in front of an ALJ, and she found...against you, and in our favor, in July of 2015.  The matter was then taken to Charles Palmer in another appeal...and after I sent him a rather damaging packet concerning our case, he opted to uphold the decision of the ALJ.  All allegations against us were cleared, we were expunged, and we were removed from the Central Abuse Registry.

Just to show you that we do indeed have a case, our appeal to your assessment was scheduled to be heard AFTER the termination of our parental rights.  The courts then, even after being presented all of this evidence in our appeal, and after we filed the decision of the Director of your department in the Supreme Court of Iowa PRIOR to our appeal, found in favor of the District courts in the termination of our parental rights.  In case you didn’t understand that, even though the very agency that took her, your department, ruled that they shouldn’t have removed our daughter in the first place, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled in favor of our termination, and our daughter has not been returned.  Do you understand yet how you are going to lose on a federal level?  If not, you are welcome to contact me personally so that I can explain it in greater detail.

The criminals that reside in the Iowa State Attorney General’s offices will not be able to rescue your department from prosecution, believe that.  I am informed enough in the law of the land to move this case DIRECTLY to the U.S. Supreme Court, and will do so if necessary.  The final decision in our Supreme Court appeal started the Statute of limitations to be filed in Federal Court at July of 2016; and since I will be proceeding with this matter pro se, there will be no lawyer to drag the matter past those limitations.  I will, therefore, offer any of your departments one chance to settle with me and my family before we begin bringing the matter to federal civil court.  That offer goes like this:

1.  You will once again conspire with the courts (this is something I can easily show happens between our Iowa Court system and your department quite frequently anyway, so this shouldn’t be difficult for you) of Polk County and the Supreme Court to have our daughter returned to her mother’s care, and to restore our parental rights to her.

2.  You will award emotional distress and punitive damages; as well as damages to our characters and reputations in the amount of $250,000.

3.  You will fire any of these employees of this department immediately, if they are still employed by you:

Emily Nieman, Social Worker
Stephanie Rhinehart, Supervisor
Katie Gosch, Caseworker

4.  You will tell Iowa that you screwed up, concerning our case and with our daughter, via the Des Moines Register.  I expect the story to take up at least a half a page.

5.  Upon the return of our daughter to our care, you will tell the South Dakota offices that they are not to bother us ever again, no matter what comes at them...reports of abuse and the like.  I am not a neglectful or abusive parent...the registry proves that, I had, by that time, raised three boys into their 20’s (and they’re doing just fine) as does my record PRIOR to the last 3 years; so anything that comes in is, more than likely, lies or retribution.

Rest assured that, if this matter reaches those of Federal court, that the demands for damages will be much higher, and the publicity alone will damage your department permanently.

I thank you for your consideration in this matter.  I suggest you get moving on resolving this with the District and Supreme Courts, as well as with the criminals, both in John P. Sarcone’s offices, and in the Attorney General’s offices, as you have just 30 days to respond to my requested settlement, before I file.  They will be made aware of my settlement terms as well, since they will both receiving their own letters, as well as copies of yours.

To anyone else in law or in law enforcement who may be reading this letter, I am representing myself in this matter.  I am merely making a settlement offer, in the manner of attorneys.

Christopher (Bruce), the Living Man.
515-868-9401
cbstraighteight@gmail.com
Pro Se, Sui Juris
Without Prejudice"

Once again, I feel that, prior to them signing for this, I had best repost my affidavit of truth.  Shoulds't anything happen to me....well, you know:

Comes now, CHRISTOPHER BRUCE, STILL THE LEGAL FATHER, in his Affidavit of Truth:

To whom it may concern: if anything happens to me, then Wrongdoing May Have Been Done.

i, Christopher William Bruce, am of very sound mind and very sound body.  My cars and home are well maintained, i am in very good spirits and looking forward to a very long and rewarding life.  i and others are involved in lawful actions of holding county and state officials to the proverbial fire of upholding their Lawful Constitutional Oaths by means of Lawful Affidavits and Criminal Complaints containing abundant evidence charging them with Felonious Acts against the People of the Country and in placing Lawful Commercial Liens potentially worth billions of dollars on both their Surety Bonds and their personal assets, and further, seriously impacting the defendant’s ability to hold any future office.  Therefore, if “anything” happens to myself, I have an “accident” or go missing and end up dead; be it known here that i, Christopher William Bruce, did NOT commit suicide or have an “accident” and further, i am not careless with poisons, old food, toxins, flammables, firearms, nor have any known enemies.  i am asking that if anything happens in the form of a negative or deadly event, even if it seems to fit well within the scope of what’s “Normal”, i seriously request that very capable and responsible persons with excellent skills and expertise, take a really good look into the Who's, What's, When's Where's Why's and How's of my demise; as it may in all likelihood be, in fact, a purposeful Act, There but for the Grace of God go i.  i certify the foregoing is true, correct, complete and not misleading to the best of my knowledge so help me God.

Christopher, The Living Man

Polk County Iowa Attorney...Guilty...but still hard at work!

Joseph Crisp...back to work!

A little tidbit via the Des Moines Register...the very paper who libeled me to DEATH before the jury went into deliberations in my case, may just be getting the picture about John P. Sarcone's corrupt offices....FINALLY.  Thank you for your contribution.  Your timing?  Could NOT have been MORE perfect, tankyooberrymutts.

To those not savvy enough to pick out the true news in articles like this these days, have no fear...I'm here to assist you, per usual.

Please note, first of all, that this man ACTUALLY, with absolute proof, physically abused his child.  Does he still have possession of his child?  Darn tootin.  GuarAAANTEED he does.  Will he lose possession of him?  More than likely not.  Does he still have a job working for John P.?  Why wouldn't he?  This is one of his own...evidently one of his more successful own, or a.  He wouldn't be working in any official capacity, or b.  Wouldn't be pulling down $120,000 a year.  Think about this for a moment...this is an ASSISTANT attorney.  Can you just imagine what John P. must be pulling down, paid for by....YOUR TAXES??  People, if you don't get this man out of office, I will lay money that you will when I'm through withya.

Worth mentioning...when I was arrested for a class D felony charge and charges of 2 aggravated misdemeanors, I had a bail of $70,000 and didn't get out of jail until 4 months later.  This guy is presumed innocent, probably had very little to no bail, got out the next day and is still working for the same guy whose office filed the charges....AND he makes $120,000 a year while he awaits trial...on the outside.  Get the picture yet?

"An assistant Polk County attorney was arrested and charged with child endangerment last week, but remains employed with the county. 

Joseph Darsean Crisp, 35, is accused of striking a 2-year-old child with an open hand across the back as "punishment for going poop in the minor child's diaper," according to the Nov. 17 criminal complaint. The strikes reportedly caused multiple bruises on the child's back.

Crisp admitted to striking the child, according to the complaint. Child endangerment causing bodily injury is a class D felony.

Iowa Department of Human Services employees reported the possibility that the child was abused to West Des Moines police on Nov. 15, the complaint states.

Crisp was arrested and jailed Nov. 16. He was released the following morning, according to a Dallas County Jail official. 

Crisp remains employed with the Polk County Attorney's Office, Polk County Attorney John Sarcone confirmed Tuesday. He works as a prosecutor in the office's criminal division.

"He's presumed innocent," Sarcone said. "Other than that I have no comment at this time. I don't think it's appropriate." 

Crisp did not return a voicemail left Wednesday at his office. 

County records show Crisp started working for Polk County on Jan. 5, 2009. His salary is $119,672 a year. 

Dallas County Attorney Wayne M. Reisetter filed a motion to appoint Madison County Attorney Matthew Schultz as a special prosecutor for the case.

There's an "ethical obligation to withdraw," Reisetter told the Register on Wednesday, because Crisp has a "relationship to a member of the Dallas County Attorney's Office."

Joseph Crisp and Erica Clark were married on July 18, 2015. Clark, who also goes by Erica Crisp, is an assistant Dallas County attorney.

Reisetter declined to describe what types of cases Clark has prosecuted for the county. 

"As your inquiry is clearly related to a pending criminal matter, I decline to comment in any fashion," he wrote in an email. 

Joseph Crisp's attorney did not immediately return a phone call Wednesday. He entered a not guilty plea during a Nov. 20 hearing. "

- The Des Moines Register, November 22, 2017, Reporter, Mackenzie Elmer

The Promise, Part I

Hey America...been a while, hasn't it?

After a month of moping around my apartment, I decided that enough is enough, where the judiciary is concerned.  I'm never going to see justice...that much is obvious.  So?  It's time to get back to my favorite job...Vengeance against the criminals involved in their conspiracy against me...served COLD.

Hence, a little statement I filed in each and every case I've been involved in.  Updates on this plan will be forthcoming, as they are done.  Should be good, eh?

"I,Christopher (Bruce), the Living man, do make this statement to this court, and every court he has been involved with since 2014.

I had intended to appeal this case to the Supreme Court of Iowa, but, since it took them a year and a half to address the last case they reviewed; and after they upheld the decisions made during the course of our juvenile matters, including the termination of our rights (even though the very agency that took her cleared us of all allegations and said they should have not removed her, expunged our records and removed us from the abuse registry; and made that decision prior to our case being heard by the Supreme Court), and have left the matter open so that it can never be resolved, it would seem obvious to this plaintiff that justice will NEVER be served, in any legal matter involving those criminals of Polk County, no matter what their position. I imagine that you all get together for drinks and laugh it up over how well you put me in my place.

I imagine that bringing these matters to Federal Court, where I had planned to go with these matters, would be no better; and would also cost me a lot in God knows how much time and money.

Therefore, for the record of the court in this case, I will exercise my only remaining viable option, an option I have gone with since day one, and that is massively more effective, when done right, and that is to Expose, Educate and Inform. I’ll just have to hit you all where it hurts most - In your personal lives, in your careers, and, most of all, in your pocketbooks.

This, by the way, is no threat. It is a promise. Within the next few months, I will be compiling mailing lists...both USPS and email as well. By the new year, Polk County will be saturated with the misdeeds of everyone that has been involved in all of my cases. They will also be provided with proof of all that you have done, right down the line. I am also saving up to pay a private detective to find out all about each and every one of you...where you live, what you do with your days, and what you have. Polk County will know everything about you when I am done...where you live, what liquid and property assets you have, what you are paid...even what color underwear you wear, if I can afford to find out about it. Even if you could possibly manage to avoid the damage this will do to you in the voting booths, you will never escape the years of embarrassment and damage this will do to your characters...not that they aren’t damaged enough already, but hey...every little bit helps, doesn’t it?

You know, the smartest move I’ve made since this all started....was to move out of the State.  No longer can I be arrested by the criminals in elected office in Iowa, and the feds won’t touch me.  Why would they?  What am I doing?  I’m exercising my right to free speech...and nothing more.  It’s obvious that exposure of your crimes against my family, as well as against other people’s families in Iowa will shine brighter than the brightest star in the heavens when I get finished with the lot of you.  Only in this way will I ever (lawfully) get what I deserve...TRUE vengeance against all of you.

Others are convinced that going through Iowa’s legislature and getting change in Iowa’s laws is the way to go.  I do not share their optimism, though I do applaud their continuing efforts.  They are making some changes...but it won’t be enough, and laws can be changed BACK.  No, the only way to bring change to Iowa is via moral outrage, I know that...therefore, I take it upon myself to produce that moral outrage.  The people have to be educated on the legal shams that purport as “Justice”, but are really just sources of revenue, and the people that are involved in these shams.  Most of what goes on in our judiciary goes on, very much without the knowledge of the majority of Iowa’s citizens, until they are directly involved in some fashion...and by that time, it is usually too late.  More so, those who supposedly oversee these criminals...those of the Iowa Supreme Court, are just more of the same criminals, just in higher positions.  This system has worked for you for many a year, I’m sure...but the upcoming year promises to be different.  The fleecing of those less fortunate in Iowa will end in 2018, and I will get the majority of you cleared from office...through impeachment, or though the voters.  I will get this done, come Hell or death.  Either is welcome, neither is feared.

Oh, just one more thing...Thanks to another Iowa victim, I just got my hands on the training manual given to Iowa’s social workers, the manual that trains them in their Nazi tactics in removing Iowa’s children.  This will be the crown jewel of my little mail packet to the residents of those in Polk County, and all over Iowa.  It’s time that Iowa’s citizens become truly aware of the child stealing business that keeps a lot of you in your jobs.  I really hope you, the district and Supreme courts of Polk County and Iowa,  the Attorney General’s office, and the Department of Human Services can survive the upcoming purge"

/S/Christopher (Bruce) The Living Man