Going for the B***S, Part Last - The Final Motions (B)

http://www.fotosearch.com/CSP994/k16535393/

Let's keep on, shall we?  Here are the two NEW motions to surpress evidence, with some new surprises, as well as the perfect defense for the blog...:D...first, the one for the drug testing...

*******************************************************************************************************

COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, in his motion to suppress evidence submitted per the prosecution for drug testing, pro tempore in the adjudication hearing, as well as it will be in our upcoming permanency hearing, with clear and convincing evidence for exhibit.

1.  The father has acquired two urine cups that will used as exhibits.  These two cups are used to do official drug testing at a facility that serves DHS in their efforts.  One was used to find the father dirty for methamphetamines after the hearing held at the Polk County Courthouse on 12/18/2014.  After the test was completed, the cup was taken out of the bathroom trash minutes after the administrator of the test had left.  It showed, and CONTINUES TO SHOW, NO results, clean or dirty.  Another clean cup, not used, was acquired by the mother, who took her cup from Central Iowa Family Services after she refused to do her drug test, after they denied her the right to have a witness to her test.  This cup was fresh, and not used.  Upon our arrival at our home, I did another test in the witness of the mother in this clean cup.  It also showed NO RESULTS once again, even after the father did the test in the exact same fashion as the tester had done at the courthouse, after a 3 minute waiting period (the same period waited for at the courthouse).  These test results of the father, given to DHS and showing the results of the father to be positive for methamphetamines are FALSE, AND WILL BE SUPPRESSED IMMEDIATELY, as will be the hair follicle tests, done by this facility back in August of this same year and also false.

2.  The person who did the father’s drug test the day of 12/18/2014 was informed in full detail of the condition of this facility on 2911 Merle Hay Road; and was told of the results of the father’s initial hair follicle test back in August of this year, and after the father had described this facility in full detail, he then informed the father that he had been in constant contact with this facility for over a year, and that it did not at all resemble the father’s description of this place.  When the father served this place with a subpoena on 12/15/14 of this year (3 days prior to the hearing held on the 18th, and too late), it had changed completely from the date that these parents had attended the place earlier this year, upon completion of the hair follicle test in August of this year.  The large room with a single desk was gone, and had been replaced by a closed off wall, a security door and cameras, and now had a small waiting room and the dirty carpet I witnessed back in August was replaced.  The father will very soon have more witnesses to this fact; it would appear obvious that after the father wrote about this in his blog post in 8/14, concerning this facility, that DHS then asked that they change it in order to disprove what was written and make it appear more professional.  The father is in the process of finding more clients in general, and in an open records request that will testify as to the parents’ knowledge of the look of this facility back when we did our hair test, and will bring fraud charges against this facility as well as against DHS, when they discover that DHS is this facility’s only client.  Charges will be filed immediately without hesitation, and proof provided against all, as the client list grows.  Open records requests will be filed tomorrow, and client lists will be called to add more issues to the list for witness.

3.  The father will also submit as proof of this, also, his blog posts, which the prosecution uses as evidence against him.  This evidence, thanks to his Honor, has yet to be suppressed, so will instead be used in the father’s favor, as well as it is for the prosecution, and WILL be used as factual against them..  These posts are used against the father often, as well as duly stated to be fact, yet, as the author, the father is refused the same privilege in his defense.  It is, therefore, the father’s statement of fact, as posted in HIS blog, that the results of these tests are duly false and fabricated.  These actions, claiming things said in his blog, and used against the father will be brought up, not only in front of the Iowa Supreme Court as unconstitutional and suppressive, but in the United States Supreme Court as well.

4.  Immediately following this motion will be brought a writ of Habeus Corpus against the Judge William A. Price for bias in this case.  I will bring to the fore every action this judge has made in this case against these defendants, besides this drug testing being claimed as fact, including the removal order, done with no proof and no basis, as well as without merit, and forced of this defendant’s wife to sign under duress.  This interaction is recorded to it’s end, as well as posted in my blog, a source of truth and fact, as presented and found so by the D.A.’s office, and will be considered so in subsequent hearings, or I will be stretching this matter out to the United States Supreme Court.  Most recent in this long list of biased actions is when he callously and flippantly dismissed a motion to correct facts stated in this defendant’s motion to correct Attorney Dale Mays’ motion to withdraw as my wife’s attorney on 12/11/14, because this attorney had been, just a few minutes earlier, dismissed in our case immediately at the start of that hearing by his Honor.  Yet, Attorney Dale Mays, upon receiving from this defendant, a subpoena to appear in our hearing on 12/15/2014 (to appear in court on the hearing held on 12/18/2014), was allowed to file a motion in our case on 12/16/2014, regardless of the fact that he was no longer involved, to quash this subpoena; then his Honor then granted that motion to quash, even though he was no longer involved, in this judge’s own words.  This, of course, is only one of many biased actions this judge has made in our case that will be presented in this separate action.

5.  That each and every test done at this facility should be either retested at a true and legitimate testing facility, far out of the reach of the Department of Human Services, or  suppressed for all who have attended this facility.  I am advertising everywhere for others who have had their testing done here, and I have already gotten 3 recent clients in response.  More will be continuously added to the list.

***********************************************************************************************

And of course, still my favorite, suppression of the blog...except this time, there's no place to run and hide.  If they can shoot a single hole in this one, I'd like to see it...

***********************************************************************************************

MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

1.  COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce:  In his motion to suppress, as evidence, NOW AND PRO TEMPORE, presented throughout this case, proceeding and open; in first, the removal hearing, held July 29th, 2014, second, the adjudication hearing, held September 12th, 2014, and, in the order and petition; causing the legal removal of the designated child in these proceedings, Trilynn Brueggeman, as legal reasons that have been presented as evidence in this case, also given to have this child removed, legally; I now state, in defiance of the use of this blog as evidence and reported evidence; against these defendants; as unconstitutional; for the court’s records, I now give these reasons:

2.  Because this blog; an editorial piece, presented by this author, Christopher Bruce, as such, and also as his given opinion; concerning any subject, up to and including this case, its facts, as well as his wont to declare his decided opinion concerning all entities involved; is intended to be only a way for this author in which to candidly present, to his audience, feelings and fleeting thoughts concerning whichever subject he should be considering on any given day at any particular time.  These time frames may only take up as many seconds as it takes for a thought to be processed; and should not be framed otherwise by anyone else, who is not the author; who might choose to peruse this blog; as a set time frame for factual statements or to be used in an evidentiary manner.  Hereby, it is the finding of this defendant and author:  that any idea, opinion or thought; expressed in the body of any of these stated editorials, as they are presented; should never be able to be legally brought against any person, who might also be involved in this case; in a legal manner, up to and including the author; or be used as evidence against this or any defendant.

3.  Regardless of this court’s argument, as well may be refuted against this motion, that Iowa Law provides this court, as well as this proceeding, confidentiality for all involved in this case, as well as its content,  the author and defendant in this case, Christopher Bruce, has a God-given Constitutional right, per the first Amendment to its Constitution of the United States; to be able to; per this Federally-mandated right; be able to publish this author’s continued opinion of the facts presented here in this case, the entities who prosecute and rule over this case, as well as the instigators of this case, presented as themselves, and hereby named, as belonging to The Department of Human Services/Child Protective Unit; regardless of its confidentiality; as long as the author refrains from stating these facts as stated, word for word, by its participants; without fear of it being used in an evidentiary or a reported evidentiary manner against the aforementioned author and defendant in this case.

3.  That ALL evidence, presented as fact; as used as evidence or reported evidentiary; in the Order for Removal, the CINA petition, the Removal Hearing, The Adjudication Hearing, as well as any subsequent documents or hearings in which this editorial blog is or will be used as evidence or reported to be such, should be hereby suppressed and no longer used as such evidence, and should also be stricken from all court records as such evidence.  Using editorial opinion as evidence of fact should not be allowed in any court-related legal proceeding, as this action, on the part of the prosecution, presents itself in such a manner as to indirectly or directly, inhibit, prevent or, through threat of intimidation or deprivation of freedom, would serve to deprive this author, as well as any given defendant; of their wont to express said opinion, thereby becoming direct in its attempt to suppress this author’s wont to express the afore-mentioned ideal, thought, or opinion; defining these actions; as taken by any court in any such legal action; to mean they desire, through whatever indirect means, to cease any effort made by the author and/or defendant, to express his opinion, a right given freely by the afore-mentioned Amendment.

4.  That this editorial blog, which is used against the defendants now as well as pro tempore, and in the removal order, is deemed to be truthful and factual when used by the prosecution, yet is deemed otherwise when used by this defendant in his defense.  Also duly noted is the fact that the defense only uses fractions or snippets of one sentence in order to make these defendants look guilty, yet totally ignores all facts and posts beyond the scope of the same guilty looking portion that would otherwise defend these defendants noble actions or intents, as well as anything that might fuel consideration of their innocence.  This blog therefore, should be used to its full intent and include all stated as fact, or not used at all.

5.  I now hereby move that all evidence, presented in the form of evidence, or reported as such, and used by the prosecution against this author, the defendant, and his wife, be hereby stricken from all court documents or reports; and in the hearings pro tempore, stated as fact, also involved in this case, as well as from all court records which might describe the proceedings of this case.  Any further use or mention of this blog in an evidentiary manner in this case will subsequently involve a United States Supreme Court action and ruling to be brought against the prosecuting and trier-of-fact entities involved in this case.

/S/ Christopher Bruce

Going for the B***S, Part Last - The Final Motions (A)

Well kids, it's finally come down to it...us, against them.  And with it, the biggest guns and B***S I can muster.  Let's see how they like these...


COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, with a MOTION, A STATEMENT TO THE COURT: AND MOTION TO DISMISS

1.  That the time of this court, it’s trier-of-fact, it’s prosecution, as well as DHS and their affiliates; in playing childish games with these defendants is over, and the true battle for the custody of our daughter has fully and actually begun.

2.  In the motions to be filed subsequent to this one, there will be no more statements to be filed, save this one, as well as the ones filed PRIOR to our hearings, held 12/11/2014 and 12/18/2014 concerning those statements.  All statements refiled will have the added clause of PRO TEMPORE, and will be made in order to readdress facts found by his Honor, Judge William A. Price, and will be found, with more than clear and convincing evidence to be false, as well as incorrectly arrived at, regardless of proof to the contrary.

3.  This Judge will, as of this date, be also brought up, in a separate action of habeus corpus, for bias in our case, also with more than enough evidence to support it.  We will also be asking this judge to show just cause in ordering the removal of Trilynn Brueggeman, our daughter, since he had, at the time, no proof or basis, save the rantings of a corrupt and lying CPS worker and a mentally disturbed, vindictive reporter from Florida to go by (her mental issues are fully documented as such in my personal blog AS FACT, as well as signed and confessed as truth by her own admission, in these defendants’ defense, on a date PRIOR to the removal, and disregarded as fact by the CPS worker responsible for the removal), as well as a documented forced stay of the mother with her daughter at Methodist Hospital, a benefactor of equal or greater value at having this child removed, who scrutinized this mother for 72 hours, found little to nothing to prove neglect in the child, used inconsistant feedings (I dare the prosecution to find me three babies at once in an hours’ time that all eat the same amount at exactly the same times) and supposed (yet not medically proven in any of their exams; and the child weighed MORE than when she was born, something the website of Methodist says doesn’t happen until AFTER 2 weeks of life) starvation, as well as watched her for 24 hours a day for three days for this mother to sleep and go out in order to mark these as times she was neglectful, including an initial period, when the CPS worker abandoned the mother at the drug testing facility, with no means of transportation, in order to show her as carefree and neglectful for over 3 hours at this stay’s behest, using another false reason on the removal order as being that her only reason for wanting to leave the hospital was to go home and check on our dog, when in fact she was wanting to get clothes for a stay she had not known would happen until the SW told her so while she was already at the hospital.

4.  That DHS WILL, as of this date, be brought up on charges of fraud, utilitizing falsified drug testing results in order to hold our daughter out of our care, and make us do their bidding.  This will be shown WITH CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE, as well as  with many witnesses and their testimonies pertaining to the actions and the previous condition of this facility.  Also to be included in this action will be Central Iowa Family Services, the drug testing facility, an obvious affiliate, as well as benefactor of DHS state and federal monies,  This will all ll be exposed with current irrefutable proof, as well as an open records request, which will be implemented IMMEDIATELY.

4.  The facts related in the statements previously filed will be REFILED and appealed properly if once again rejected, all with the pro tempore clause, as well as more than sufficient proof and evidence to disprove all facts found by this court and this court’s trier-of-fact.  Please note that further disregard of these motions will, of course, further play into our bias case with ease, now that the proof we have of events up to this motion are in place as clear evidence of his Honor’s obvious bias against these defendants.  Many witnesses, hostile and friendly, will be brought to greatly disprove all facts stated in all hearings, as well as show the deceitful and callous actions of bias wrought by this case’s trier-of-fact.  Relief, of course, will be asked for in each and every statement..

5.  Also to be refiled will be both motions to suppress evidence, as well as the mother’s rescindment of signatures to ALL documents signed, pro tempore.  Clear and convincing evidence will be brought for those suppressions, and witnesses will abound to disprove the need for either method of proof that is used against the defendants of this case.

6.  Let the defendants then submit this fact to the court, that this battle will wage up to and long after the permanency hearings; and this action, taken by the prosecution, is well on it’s way to being lost on the same side..  All actions taken by the prosecution and this court will be appealed to their end, as well as motions filed and refiled, until justice is properly done, until the charges are dropped or until all involved in our case have fallen legally.  Many separate actions and appeals will all happen long before this upcoming permanency hearing, and will more than serve their purposes.  We ask, in this prelude statement, as relief, that this court and the prosecution drop all charges in this case against these defendants and return the child to our care, or all will be done as stated.  His Honor has, time and again, greatly underestimated the resolve of this defendant, in his stubborn nature, in revealing this case and each and every wrong done to these defendants, to the citizens of Iowa and the United States utilizing every means legal and necessary.

The Punisher, Part III

http://vectorolon.deviantart.com/art/The-Punisher-skull-vector-112188699

Hey kids!!  Just wanted you to know I'm still here and still in the game, as well as still hard at work.  In my vigil, I happened to (very quickly), without much effort, caught DHS trying to (already) assert their power as if my rights were already gone...they made a request of the Judge that the child be able to go out of state in January...before permanency is decided.  Papa don't play dat way.  I whipped out a little denial for them.  First, they tried to use the words "we're done" against me in their motion, by, as is their apparent wont, twisting the words out of my mouth to mean whatever they want it to mean.  What did I mean by that?  Well, you could twist it...but why bother?  Us reasonable people have a clue.  DHS obviously, does not.  They presented those two little words to the Judge to mean that I wanted no further contact with them.  What I MEANT by that, something they can never prove when, say, using the blog, is that I wanted them to quit expecting me to play along, cause it wasn't gonna happen, tankyuberrymutts.  I never said "don't contact me"....that's what they wanted it to mean, for this motion, is all.  They also said that they couldn't contact the mother...Oh really....you can't snail mail her?  There's plenty of time for that...what you don't have her email address?  Ask Ashley, she has it...and she works for DHS at Children and Families of Iowa...so you folks should be good enough buddies to share those kind of things.  Wait, no...dare I say it?  Here's a novel concept....COME ON OVER, and see once and for all that we have a place that we both live in, and that, once again, there is NO IMMINENT DANGER, NO domestic violence, no drugs or dealing drugs, more than enough baby supplies, food and furniture, as well as my vehicle, in order to prove that, maybe we're not the horrid people it's been your testimony as well as your hearsay in stating for this judge...nor is there a mad father waiting to take you out....or, see her at work, I sure she'd buy you a coffee.  Or....maybe I'm being a bit hasty.

Anyway, so they want to get permission from the judge (like he's my daddy or something) in order for the baby to go out of state.  DHS?  This is neither your baby, nor is it the foster parents.  Besides, I'm still gonna win here, so don't go too far just yet.  This could still drag on for months, rest assured.  Besides, you've bypassed my parental rights back as far as the removal, so why  bother the Judge?  He'll have plenty to do soon enough, he's about to be REALLY busy...so leave the guy alone, and just do what you do, which, for the most part, is almost anything you want to...except arresting bloggers on false charges, anyway...that one didn't work so well.  Oh well, better luck next time.

**************************************************************************************************

Oh, and just so we know what happened?  Big Surprise here....the court denied my motion, and granted theirs.  I had NO IDEA that was gonna happen!!  It's almost as if my rights don't matter already...it's ok though America...she'll be home, this I swear.  So sayeth...ME.  The Mighty Sword will prove his worth in battle soon enough.  I know, I know, I've been spouting that nonsense for some time now, haven't I?  I'm tellin' you, it's gonna happen.  Hang in there.  :D