Well guys, the time has come. Yes, it's Continual Mandamus time! Now, just to show you that corruption isn't just limited to the district and supreme State courts, but extends itself far into the realm of the Federal and U.S. Supreme Courts as well, we present that the Federal District court has sat on its butt for far too long on this already, and needs a quick kick in the pants. To do this, we plan to file a Continual Mandamus with the court above this one.
For those of you who are still greenhorns in this case, as well as new to swallowing giant red pills; you can find all the corrupt State cases that led up to this, as well as the current corrupt actions that are NOT occurring (as they should be, per their OWN rules of court, by the way) in this one, just below this personal news update, with abandon.
For those of you green to what our country now calls 'Law', but which is instead Statutory law (which as some of us awake people know, is not real law at all), know that "law" in an actual FREE country is called 'common law'; or the law of the people. A 'mandamus' is a common law writ that, essentially, compels a higher court to demand of its lower counterpart to do what is is supposed to do...or, in certain types of the same writ, demands the same quit doing what it shouldn't be doing, both according to and per this 'law'. Buuuuuuut, since we are no longer privy to an ACTUAL court of "law" (these used to be called Article III courts of law), but are now representing the law of commerce (in an Article I court, no less...A military tribunal, or martial law court), the law of ships and the sea; we shall be forced to try and demand that the appellate court act like they used to, once upon a time; and tell the lower court to do the same...and on a continuing basis...hence the Writ of Mandamus. We will now present my version, being filed in the case...well, as we speak:
IN
THE APPELLATE COURT OF THE 8th CIRCUIT
IN
RE:
Christopher, The Living Man
Elizabeth The Living woman
Plaintiffs
v.
Petition for a
Writ
Of
Continuing Mandamus, Polk
County Attorney’s Office et al
for Magistrate
Judge
Defendants
Celeste F.
Bremer
Concerning: Case #4:18-cv-40
Pages: 7 Case being heard by The
District
Lines: 149 Court for the Southern District
Words: 1098 of
Iowa. Assigned to: Judge
Per Microsoft Word
Rebecca
Goodgame Ebinger;
Referred to: Magistrate Judge
Celeste F. Bremer
The claimants the above captioned
case, claimant Christopher (Bruce) the living man and Elizabeth (Bruce) the
living woman do petition the court of the 8th Circuit of appeals for
a writ of Continuing Mandamus, based on the following:
1. The
claimants filed this claim of damage (#4:18-cv-40) on the date of 2/12/2018.
2. The
claimants filed motion to proceed in this case In Forma Pauperis on the date of
2/15/2018, and it took the District Court until the date of 4/05/2018; over a
month and a half to grant the motion to the claimants.
3. The
State of Iowa, defendant, on the date of 5/14, 2018, did file a motion to seal
documents filed by them in the case, (that were totally irrelevant to the
entirely NEW lawful claims that were actually referenced by the plaintiffs; and
stated, along with every other defendant unerringly, in their respective
answers, that the plaintiffs were allegedly attempting to bring “an appeal from
a juvenile case;” a total fabrication and unfounded assumption; since the
claims made by the plaintiffs cover over 9 state cases, both Juvenile and
criminal) and when they did so, the court granted the order, on the SAME DAY it
was filed via text order, and sent the written order, IMMEDIATELY, to the
claimants. The claimants then replied to
this filing; and stated that these documents were filed and sealed in error,
and no order from this court has, to this day, addressed the claimants’
rebuttal for the need to seal these documents, let alone did not address the
need for these documents to be filed in this case at ALL.
4. On
the date of 5/22/2018; the defendant Lucas Taylor, by and through his attorney
Helen C. Adams did motion the district court for an extension of time to answer
the plaintiffs’ claim. The district court
granted this motion immediately ON THE SAME DAY, via Text order.
5. The
Court, on 5/31/2018, ordered the plaintiffs to immediately provide proof of
service on defendants Katherine Walker and Anthony Reed, so that both could
either be dismissed (were they not properly served,) or so that they might
answer to the claim filed by the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs did so, per the order of the district court, and filed
proof of service on 6/6/2018; and the district court has done NOTHING.
6. Claimant
Christopher filed motion to file electronically on 6/6/2018. Court granted this motion 5 days later.
7. The
claimants have motioned the District Court for an immediate permanent
injunction against one of the defendants, John P. Sarcone, on the date of
6/19/2018, stopping him from taking unreasonable and unlawful action against
plaintiff Christopher. The district court
has done NOTHING concerning this motion.
8. The
plaintiffs then asked the district court to dismiss stated and NAMED defendants
from the case in dispute immediately; so they could file a new claim against
the same defendants in their individual capacities (4:18-cv-223;) on the date
of 6/20/2018; and the district court has done NOTHING concerning this motion.
9. After
waiting for the district court’s response to the motion to dismiss certain
defendants and keep others; filed on the date referenced in item 8 of this writ,
claimants filed motions to have evidentiary hearings and set a scheduling
conference on the date of 7/13/2018. The
court then IMMEDIATELY denied this motion filed by the claimants via Text order
within a couple of days, utilizing the absurd and already disproved reason that
the court has no clear idea, nor can they seem to make a clear determination
who the defendants in the case are at this time, though the defendants the
claimants asked to have dismissed and remaining as parties are clearly named in
the afore-mentioned motion filed by these claimants in item 8 of this writ.
10. The Plaintiffs then, on the date of
7/13/2018, and according to stated rules of Federal Procedure, filed motion to
the district court to award relief sought in fraction against defendant
Katherine Walker, so named, and the district court has also done NOTHING; even
though the time for her answer to be filed in this action is well past the
original answer date; as well as far past the date the claimants provided proof
of service, per the district court request (over 2 months.)
11. The plaintiffs then filed with the district
court, on the date of 7/25/18, a demand for the district court to take action,
in a timely fashion, for the claimants’ motions; as it is obvious to the
Appellate Court that they do so for the defendants, immediately; or at least in
accordance with the district court’s own rules of civil procedure. The District Court is obviously and
purposefully dragging its feet on this action in favor of the defendants, who
are all alleged elected officials and alleged civil servants of Iowa; the
county of Polk and the cities of Des Moines, Carroll and Altoona Iowa.
12. On the date of 7/29/18; the claimants did
file a letter on the record, and mailed this letter to the chief justice, Chief
Justice Jarvey, asking him if he would address this issue. Chief Justice Jarvey has done nothing, in
response.
The claimants, herein named, do
petition those of the appellate court to issue a writ of Continuing Mandamus to
the District Court of the Southern District of Iowa, as our relief; post haste;
so that the District Court will act for the claimants, the injured parties in
this matter, as they do for their friends in elected offices and civil duty in
Iowa; and have them do so on a continual basis, until the matter is resolved;
in a timely, efficient and reasonable manner.
Christopher
(Bruce), The Living Man
Date:____________________
701
S. Duluth Avenue, #1
Sioux
Falls, SD 57104
Phone: 605.271.3377
Email: cbstraighteight@gmail.com
Elizabeth
(Bruce), The Living Woman Date:____________________
Same Contact Information as
Christopher
**********************************************************************************************************
NOTE: FOR ANY OF YOU THAT WOULD CARE TO SEE ALL 800 DOCUMENTS FROM THE JUVENILE CASES THAT STARTED ALL OF THIS, INCLUDING ALL OF MY COMMENTARY AND MOTIONS TO THE CONTRARY; AND ALSO ANY OF THE CRIMINAL CASES INVOLVED HERE, PLEASE FOLLOW THESE LINKS:
the Juvenile Cases:
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/03/and-away-we-go-termination-part-b.html
LET'S ALSO INCLUDE THE CASE THEY WON'T ADDRESS AT ALL, THE CASE BEFORE THE ALJ OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, WHERE THEY FOUND US INNOCENT OF ABUSE, EXPUNGED OUR RECORDS, AND TOOK US OFF THE ABUSE REGISTRY. THE AG THEN APPEALED THIS TO THE DIRECTOR OF DHS, WHO ALSO APPROVED THAT DECISION, IN OUR FAVOR...AND THE COURTS WILL NOT RETURN OUR DAUGHTER???? THIS DECISION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE APPELLATE COURTS 3 TIMES. IT WAS DENIED 3 TIMES AS WELL.
Now, the petition of appeal, and the Supreme Court case:
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-ol-double-cross-appeal-part-ii.html
Harassment of 2 social workers, 2015, first criminal case:
Darren Tromblay (CityView EIC) Harrassment case, and the felony charges concerning Jeanne Munson, and Mark Worthington, DHS agents (including the events that caused this arrest):
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2016/02/bravingthe-banjo-part-viii-new-and.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2016/04/calling-bluff-part-12-stage-is-set.html
Misdemeanor case, after I was released for probation; and after I asked to be taken OFF probation and do the rest of my time, and they responded setting a date to hear the matter, and then by issuing a warrant for my arrest:
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2017/01/home-again-home-again.html
Next: Post-Conviction relief case, just before this case was filed:
And last but not least, the 1st claim for THIS case:
And, after I learned that I was messing up big time in the first one, the 2nd, amended and puttin' the fear of God in these crooked bastards (which have caused them to completely stall on addressing any more of EITHER claim, is right here:
