Wednesday, July 25, 2018

The Fed Funny Farm, Take 2, Part II - The "Wikit Motion of the DAY!"



NOTE:  In order to not deprive my friends and other folks who are already familiar with the this story, of the ability to IMMEDIATELY read the most recent update on these FEDERAL cases - links to previous articles, paperwork and more, concerning EVERYTHING...former cases involved in this, the current cases and where they're going, how they're doing and how they began, etc. will now be placed AFTER each new article; for those of you new-comers to the "ART OF CORRUPTION" in our current judicial system~

***********************************************************************************************

OK America, it's time to start calling these people out, and call them out good.  Let's begin, shall we, and let's go over the timeline and chain of events here; what we have so far; concerning BOTH "CLAIMS" that I have filed in FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT, in SOUTHERN IOWA...located in DES MOINES IOWA, against 30 state, county and city officials.

Now, the district court calls them Complaints.  We the People call them claims of damage in fact, then they change them to read "complaints" in reply.  We are not complaining, nor should we, people.  We need to claim against these criminals, there's the rub.  We complain, we get no place, we all know this.  Stop complaining about your elected officials, and start CLAIMING.  Don't fall into their language, don't let THEM change the language; stick to your guns!!!  You are a CLAIMANT...NOT a complainant!

So...The first claim was filed on 2/12/18.  That CLAIM was filed in the Federal Courthouse in Des Moines, Iowa.  I did it badly; in that I did not claim any damage in fact in which relief could be granted...but the thing is, people, that I did what they instructed me to do!

In the answers to this CLAIM, they then started stating this; summarily asking to all be dismissed, due to various idiotic reason...."Oh....oh, we're all immune to prosecution (per state edicts, put in place to protect criminal lawmakers and THESE idiots), WWWWaaaaah....he's not making proper allegations against us......BOOHOO, he's not playing by the rules and blindly respecting us!........yada yada yada...wha whaaaah, wah wah wah waaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!"

Bullshit...bullshit.....BULLSHIT!!

Folks, these criminal criminals MUST BE SHUT DOWN!!  YESTERDAY!

So...I said, OK.  Let's get rid of the first case, and start a new one.

I said, you get rid of all of these people, and we'll start over, bringing this case in a whole different direction....and they're dragging along again, in the same ol' manner.  So...it's time we bring an end to this Federal fal-de-ral, and start doing what I do best....lightly threatening the bastahds WITH impunity.  So...today's motion, by example, for those of you having issues getting your respective courts to start moving, I give you today's "Wickit Motion of tha Day"  Use this, or something along these lines, to poke the beast.  They won't like this, of course, but you gotta do something....right?  I call this my DEMAND FOR COURT ACTION.  Let's get it on:


"Christopher the Living Man and Elizabeth, the living woman, do demand this court to act on the Claimants motions, as they do for those defendants of Government, in a timely and efficient manner.

1.       The claimants filed this claim of damage on the date of 2/12/2018.

2.       The claimants filed motion to proceed in this case In Forma Pauperis on the date of 2/15/2018, and it took this court until the date of 4/05/2018; over a month and a half to grant the motion to the claimants.

3.       The State of Iowa, on the date of 5/14, 2018, did file a motion to seal documents filed by them in this case, (that proved absolutely nothing concerning the entirely NEW lawful claims that were actually being claimed, but addressed an alleged and imagined “appeal from a juvenile case,” which this claim does not, in any way, claim to be addressing; and this has been proven over and over in various answers filed by the claimants) and when they did so, the court granted the order, on the SAME DAY it was filed, and sent this order, IMMEDIATELY, to the claimants.  The claimants then replied to this filing; and stated that these documents were filed and sealed in error, and no order from this court has, to this day, addressed the claimants’ rebuttal for the need to seal these documents, let alone the need for these documents to be filed in this case at ALL.

4.       On the date of 5/22/2018; the defendant Lucas Taylor, by and through his attorney Helen C. Adams did motion the court for an extension of time to answer the claimants claim.  The court granted this motion immediately ON THE SAME DAY.

5.       The Court, on 5/31/2018, ordered the plaintiffs to immediately provide proof of service on defendants Katherine Walker and Anthony Reed, so that both could either be dismissed, or so that they might answer to the claim filed by the plaintiffs.  The Plaintiffs did so, per the order of the court, and filed proof of service on 6/6/2018; and the court has done NOTHING.

6.       Claimant Christopher filed motion to file electronically on 6/6/2018.  Court granted this motion 5 days later.

7.       The claimants have requested a permanent injunction against John P. Sarcone, defendant, on the date of 6/19/2018.  The Court has done NOTHING concerning this motion.

8.       The plaintiffs asked the court to dismiss stated and NAMED defendants from this case immediately; so they could file claim in a new case; on the date of 6/20/2018; and this court has done NOTHING concerning this motion.

9.       After waiting for the court’s response to the motion to dismiss certain defendants and keep others; filed on the date referenced in item 8 of this demand, claimants filed requests to have evidentiary hearings and to have the court schedule conference In motions on the date of 7/13/2018.  The court then IMMEDIATELY denied this motion filed by the claimants in their order within a couple of days, utilizing the illogical reason that the court has no clear idea, nor can they seem to make a clear determination who the defendants are at this time, though these defendants being dismissed and remaining as parties are clearly named in the afore-mentioned motion filed by these claimants in item 8 of this demand.

10.   The Plaintiffs then, on the date of 7/13/2018, and according to stated rules of Federal Procedure, filed for action of this court to award relief sought in fraction against defendant Katherine Walker, so named, and this court has also done NOTHING; even though the time for answers to be filed in this action are well past the original date; as well as far past the date the claimants provided proof of service, in addition.

The claimants now DEMAND that this court act towards the claimants as they act for, and in collusion with the defendants, in a TIMELY MANNER, treat the injured parties in this claim with the same respect and uphold the rules of FEDERAL RULES OF PROCEDURE for the claimants, as they do for the defendants in this action; the people’s civil SERVANTS…AS YOU ARE as well; stop protecting yourselves and them by stalling this action and hear and decide on the claimants’ motions in kind; in a TIMELY MANNER, according to your own rules of court.

Should this court further refuse to act like an Article III court of law, the claimants will make appeal to the Chief Justice of the District Court; then, if further delay occurs, will then file writ of Mandamus with the appellate circuit.

“Respectfully,”



Christopher (Bruce) the living man"


Remember, boys and girls, these are your PAID CIVIL SERVANTS, put in place to follow YOUR orders, because you pay their salaries!!!  DO NOT fear them!!!

See ya soon!  :D


**********************************************************************************************************


NOTE:  FOR ANY OF YOU THAT WOULD CARE TO SEE ALL 800 DOCUMENTS FROM THE JUVENILE CASES THAT STARTED ALL OF THIS, INCLUDING ALL OF MY COMMENTARY AND MOTIONS TO THE CONTRARY; AND ALSO ANY OF THE CRIMINAL CASES INVOLVED HERE, PLEASE FOLLOW THESE LINKS:

the Juvenile Cases:


LET'S ALSO INCLUDE THE CASE THEY WON'T ADDRESS AT ALL, THE CASE BEFORE THE ALJ OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, WHERE THEY FOUND US INNOCENT OF ABUSE, EXPUNGED OUR RECORDS, AND TOOK US OFF THE ABUSE REGISTRY.  THE AG THEN APPEALED THIS TO THE DIRECTOR OF DHS, WHO ALSO APPROVED THAT DECISION, IN OUR FAVOR...AND THE COURTS WILL NOT RETURN OUR DAUGHTER????  THIS DECISION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE APPELLATE COURTS 3 TIMES.  IT WAS DENIED 3 TIMES AS WELL.



Now, the petition of appeal, and the Supreme Court case:



Harassment of 2 social workers, 2015, first criminal case:


Darren Tromblay (CityView EIC) Harrassment case, and the felony charges concerning Jeanne Munson, and Mark Worthington, DHS agents (including the events that caused this arrest):


Misdemeanor case, after I was released for probation; and after I asked to be taken OFF probation and do the rest of my time, and they responded setting a date to hear the matter, and then by issuing a warrant for my arrest:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2017/01/home-again-home-again.html

Next:  Post-Conviction relief case, just before this case was filed:



And last but not least, the claim for THIS case:


And there are a couple more articles about what's already been happening til this point, here: