Oh, my friends, my friends, my friends...it saddens me to have to write just one more article concerning "The Law Itself"...but there are things that I forgot to address in the last reprise..yes, it was a CONTINUAL post for a time...but it's been completed...and now, I have more for you. You see, I forgot to tell you how, in ANY MATTER INVOLVING OUR COURTS...will you EVER...EVER..NEVEREVER...win out against anyone that isn't your neighbor. You cannot. Why? Because you just Can't! Period!
What?
Well guys, it's a secret that's been hidden from you for oh so very long. Anything that involves government...city, state, fed...just can't be won against...not any more. Let me explain.
You have your lawyers. Your judges. Your elected officials. People that serve and protect you - and then there's you. So any matter that comes into a court of law cannot and WILL not involve these people and won out in...unless it's publicly declared, via the media or in some other fashion.
LEGAL TERMS
Now, before we begin, there are legal terms that you should know in order to get why you will never win against any level of "Government"
Legal Precedent is case law; which is decisions/opinions/rulings of former judges who have already decided in high courts about cases just like yours.
Here is the problem with this little ditty. No case...anywhere in this country is going to be anything like yours. It involves different people...different laws...different judges...and different circumstances. How is it then, that any judge anywhere, in any case is able to use this case law or legal precedent, quote it as applicable to a case completely different in every sense of the word...except that it has one element that is primarily the same..on the surface.
Another thing we should be looking at here is this....WHAT IF THE JUDGE BEING QUOTED...WAS SMOKING POT THAT MORNING? WHAT IF HE WAS GROUCHY BECAUSE HIS WALLET WAS STOLEN? What if his child committed suicide 3 days before that? How do you know the judge, and his circumstances before this earth-shattering decision was made, was RIGHT IN HIS DECISION??? This author intends to state that there is no possible way to determine that what happened the day of the trial concerning the precedent you used, decided by the judge quoted, who we know absolutely nothing about...his record, his previous cases, whether he discriminates or not, drinks right before trial or not, hates women or not....is CORRECT IN WHAT HE DECIDED?
And most people, and most lawyers are going to do NO SUCH RESEARCH...as a matter of fact, we don't know if the lawyers even care to do all the research they can. For all that you and I are aware of, this case, the one they're quoting in their decision, is even a real case. And who's gonna check? Who is going to challenge the wisdom of a judge, besides your lawyer...who, for all you know, is going to benefit from your losing in some way. YOU JUST DON'T KNOW, DOOYA?? Finally, one fact, told me by a professor of mine in law school...there is, on our computers, and computers everywhere, only 15% of all case law that is cataloged.
The rest of all 85% of that case law resides across the country in dusty tomes, and is never known, known of, and is not presentable, anywhere but in those offices and nowhere else. And who is going to know who it was that ended up selecting what case law would be available for us to find? How do we know that they didn't just catalog the 15% that only shows us losing against such entities?
