Going for the B***S, Part Last - The Final Motions (B)

http://www.fotosearch.com/CSP994/k16535393/

Let's keep on, shall we?  Here are the two NEW motions to surpress evidence, with some new surprises, as well as the perfect defense for the blog...:D...first, the one for the drug testing...

*******************************************************************************************************

COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, in his motion to suppress evidence submitted per the prosecution for drug testing, pro tempore in the adjudication hearing, as well as it will be in our upcoming permanency hearing, with clear and convincing evidence for exhibit.

1.  The father has acquired two urine cups that will used as exhibits.  These two cups are used to do official drug testing at a facility that serves DHS in their efforts.  One was used to find the father dirty for methamphetamines after the hearing held at the Polk County Courthouse on 12/18/2014.  After the test was completed, the cup was taken out of the bathroom trash minutes after the administrator of the test had left.  It showed, and CONTINUES TO SHOW, NO results, clean or dirty.  Another clean cup, not used, was acquired by the mother, who took her cup from Central Iowa Family Services after she refused to do her drug test, after they denied her the right to have a witness to her test.  This cup was fresh, and not used.  Upon our arrival at our home, I did another test in the witness of the mother in this clean cup.  It also showed NO RESULTS once again, even after the father did the test in the exact same fashion as the tester had done at the courthouse, after a 3 minute waiting period (the same period waited for at the courthouse).  These test results of the father, given to DHS and showing the results of the father to be positive for methamphetamines are FALSE, AND WILL BE SUPPRESSED IMMEDIATELY, as will be the hair follicle tests, done by this facility back in August of this same year and also false.

2.  The person who did the father’s drug test the day of 12/18/2014 was informed in full detail of the condition of this facility on 2911 Merle Hay Road; and was told of the results of the father’s initial hair follicle test back in August of this year, and after the father had described this facility in full detail, he then informed the father that he had been in constant contact with this facility for over a year, and that it did not at all resemble the father’s description of this place.  When the father served this place with a subpoena on 12/15/14 of this year (3 days prior to the hearing held on the 18th, and too late), it had changed completely from the date that these parents had attended the place earlier this year, upon completion of the hair follicle test in August of this year.  The large room with a single desk was gone, and had been replaced by a closed off wall, a security door and cameras, and now had a small waiting room and the dirty carpet I witnessed back in August was replaced.  The father will very soon have more witnesses to this fact; it would appear obvious that after the father wrote about this in his blog post in 8/14, concerning this facility, that DHS then asked that they change it in order to disprove what was written and make it appear more professional.  The father is in the process of finding more clients in general, and in an open records request that will testify as to the parents’ knowledge of the look of this facility back when we did our hair test, and will bring fraud charges against this facility as well as against DHS, when they discover that DHS is this facility’s only client.  Charges will be filed immediately without hesitation, and proof provided against all, as the client list grows.  Open records requests will be filed tomorrow, and client lists will be called to add more issues to the list for witness.

3.  The father will also submit as proof of this, also, his blog posts, which the prosecution uses as evidence against him.  This evidence, thanks to his Honor, has yet to be suppressed, so will instead be used in the father’s favor, as well as it is for the prosecution, and WILL be used as factual against them..  These posts are used against the father often, as well as duly stated to be fact, yet, as the author, the father is refused the same privilege in his defense.  It is, therefore, the father’s statement of fact, as posted in HIS blog, that the results of these tests are duly false and fabricated.  These actions, claiming things said in his blog, and used against the father will be brought up, not only in front of the Iowa Supreme Court as unconstitutional and suppressive, but in the United States Supreme Court as well.

4.  Immediately following this motion will be brought a writ of Habeus Corpus against the Judge William A. Price for bias in this case.  I will bring to the fore every action this judge has made in this case against these defendants, besides this drug testing being claimed as fact, including the removal order, done with no proof and no basis, as well as without merit, and forced of this defendant’s wife to sign under duress.  This interaction is recorded to it’s end, as well as posted in my blog, a source of truth and fact, as presented and found so by the D.A.’s office, and will be considered so in subsequent hearings, or I will be stretching this matter out to the United States Supreme Court.  Most recent in this long list of biased actions is when he callously and flippantly dismissed a motion to correct facts stated in this defendant’s motion to correct Attorney Dale Mays’ motion to withdraw as my wife’s attorney on 12/11/14, because this attorney had been, just a few minutes earlier, dismissed in our case immediately at the start of that hearing by his Honor.  Yet, Attorney Dale Mays, upon receiving from this defendant, a subpoena to appear in our hearing on 12/15/2014 (to appear in court on the hearing held on 12/18/2014), was allowed to file a motion in our case on 12/16/2014, regardless of the fact that he was no longer involved, to quash this subpoena; then his Honor then granted that motion to quash, even though he was no longer involved, in this judge’s own words.  This, of course, is only one of many biased actions this judge has made in our case that will be presented in this separate action.

5.  That each and every test done at this facility should be either retested at a true and legitimate testing facility, far out of the reach of the Department of Human Services, or  suppressed for all who have attended this facility.  I am advertising everywhere for others who have had their testing done here, and I have already gotten 3 recent clients in response.  More will be continuously added to the list.

***********************************************************************************************

And of course, still my favorite, suppression of the blog...except this time, there's no place to run and hide.  If they can shoot a single hole in this one, I'd like to see it...

***********************************************************************************************

MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

1.  COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce:  In his motion to suppress, as evidence, NOW AND PRO TEMPORE, presented throughout this case, proceeding and open; in first, the removal hearing, held July 29th, 2014, second, the adjudication hearing, held September 12th, 2014, and, in the order and petition; causing the legal removal of the designated child in these proceedings, Trilynn Brueggeman, as legal reasons that have been presented as evidence in this case, also given to have this child removed, legally; I now state, in defiance of the use of this blog as evidence and reported evidence; against these defendants; as unconstitutional; for the court’s records, I now give these reasons:

2.  Because this blog; an editorial piece, presented by this author, Christopher Bruce, as such, and also as his given opinion; concerning any subject, up to and including this case, its facts, as well as his wont to declare his decided opinion concerning all entities involved; is intended to be only a way for this author in which to candidly present, to his audience, feelings and fleeting thoughts concerning whichever subject he should be considering on any given day at any particular time.  These time frames may only take up as many seconds as it takes for a thought to be processed; and should not be framed otherwise by anyone else, who is not the author; who might choose to peruse this blog; as a set time frame for factual statements or to be used in an evidentiary manner.  Hereby, it is the finding of this defendant and author:  that any idea, opinion or thought; expressed in the body of any of these stated editorials, as they are presented; should never be able to be legally brought against any person, who might also be involved in this case; in a legal manner, up to and including the author; or be used as evidence against this or any defendant.

3.  Regardless of this court’s argument, as well may be refuted against this motion, that Iowa Law provides this court, as well as this proceeding, confidentiality for all involved in this case, as well as its content,  the author and defendant in this case, Christopher Bruce, has a God-given Constitutional right, per the first Amendment to its Constitution of the United States; to be able to; per this Federally-mandated right; be able to publish this author’s continued opinion of the facts presented here in this case, the entities who prosecute and rule over this case, as well as the instigators of this case, presented as themselves, and hereby named, as belonging to The Department of Human Services/Child Protective Unit; regardless of its confidentiality; as long as the author refrains from stating these facts as stated, word for word, by its participants; without fear of it being used in an evidentiary or a reported evidentiary manner against the aforementioned author and defendant in this case.

3.  That ALL evidence, presented as fact; as used as evidence or reported evidentiary; in the Order for Removal, the CINA petition, the Removal Hearing, The Adjudication Hearing, as well as any subsequent documents or hearings in which this editorial blog is or will be used as evidence or reported to be such, should be hereby suppressed and no longer used as such evidence, and should also be stricken from all court records as such evidence.  Using editorial opinion as evidence of fact should not be allowed in any court-related legal proceeding, as this action, on the part of the prosecution, presents itself in such a manner as to indirectly or directly, inhibit, prevent or, through threat of intimidation or deprivation of freedom, would serve to deprive this author, as well as any given defendant; of their wont to express said opinion, thereby becoming direct in its attempt to suppress this author’s wont to express the afore-mentioned ideal, thought, or opinion; defining these actions; as taken by any court in any such legal action; to mean they desire, through whatever indirect means, to cease any effort made by the author and/or defendant, to express his opinion, a right given freely by the afore-mentioned Amendment.

4.  That this editorial blog, which is used against the defendants now as well as pro tempore, and in the removal order, is deemed to be truthful and factual when used by the prosecution, yet is deemed otherwise when used by this defendant in his defense.  Also duly noted is the fact that the defense only uses fractions or snippets of one sentence in order to make these defendants look guilty, yet totally ignores all facts and posts beyond the scope of the same guilty looking portion that would otherwise defend these defendants noble actions or intents, as well as anything that might fuel consideration of their innocence.  This blog therefore, should be used to its full intent and include all stated as fact, or not used at all.

5.  I now hereby move that all evidence, presented in the form of evidence, or reported as such, and used by the prosecution against this author, the defendant, and his wife, be hereby stricken from all court documents or reports; and in the hearings pro tempore, stated as fact, also involved in this case, as well as from all court records which might describe the proceedings of this case.  Any further use or mention of this blog in an evidentiary manner in this case will subsequently involve a United States Supreme Court action and ruling to be brought against the prosecuting and trier-of-fact entities involved in this case.

/S/ Christopher Bruce

Going for the B***S, Part Last - The Final Motions (A)

Well kids, it's finally come down to it...us, against them.  And with it, the biggest guns and B***S I can muster.  Let's see how they like these...


COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, with a MOTION, A STATEMENT TO THE COURT: AND MOTION TO DISMISS

1.  That the time of this court, it’s trier-of-fact, it’s prosecution, as well as DHS and their affiliates; in playing childish games with these defendants is over, and the true battle for the custody of our daughter has fully and actually begun.

2.  In the motions to be filed subsequent to this one, there will be no more statements to be filed, save this one, as well as the ones filed PRIOR to our hearings, held 12/11/2014 and 12/18/2014 concerning those statements.  All statements refiled will have the added clause of PRO TEMPORE, and will be made in order to readdress facts found by his Honor, Judge William A. Price, and will be found, with more than clear and convincing evidence to be false, as well as incorrectly arrived at, regardless of proof to the contrary.

3.  This Judge will, as of this date, be also brought up, in a separate action of habeus corpus, for bias in our case, also with more than enough evidence to support it.  We will also be asking this judge to show just cause in ordering the removal of Trilynn Brueggeman, our daughter, since he had, at the time, no proof or basis, save the rantings of a corrupt and lying CPS worker and a mentally disturbed, vindictive reporter from Florida to go by (her mental issues are fully documented as such in my personal blog AS FACT, as well as signed and confessed as truth by her own admission, in these defendants’ defense, on a date PRIOR to the removal, and disregarded as fact by the CPS worker responsible for the removal), as well as a documented forced stay of the mother with her daughter at Methodist Hospital, a benefactor of equal or greater value at having this child removed, who scrutinized this mother for 72 hours, found little to nothing to prove neglect in the child, used inconsistant feedings (I dare the prosecution to find me three babies at once in an hours’ time that all eat the same amount at exactly the same times) and supposed (yet not medically proven in any of their exams; and the child weighed MORE than when she was born, something the website of Methodist says doesn’t happen until AFTER 2 weeks of life) starvation, as well as watched her for 24 hours a day for three days for this mother to sleep and go out in order to mark these as times she was neglectful, including an initial period, when the CPS worker abandoned the mother at the drug testing facility, with no means of transportation, in order to show her as carefree and neglectful for over 3 hours at this stay’s behest, using another false reason on the removal order as being that her only reason for wanting to leave the hospital was to go home and check on our dog, when in fact she was wanting to get clothes for a stay she had not known would happen until the SW told her so while she was already at the hospital.

4.  That DHS WILL, as of this date, be brought up on charges of fraud, utilitizing falsified drug testing results in order to hold our daughter out of our care, and make us do their bidding.  This will be shown WITH CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE, as well as  with many witnesses and their testimonies pertaining to the actions and the previous condition of this facility.  Also to be included in this action will be Central Iowa Family Services, the drug testing facility, an obvious affiliate, as well as benefactor of DHS state and federal monies,  This will all ll be exposed with current irrefutable proof, as well as an open records request, which will be implemented IMMEDIATELY.

4.  The facts related in the statements previously filed will be REFILED and appealed properly if once again rejected, all with the pro tempore clause, as well as more than sufficient proof and evidence to disprove all facts found by this court and this court’s trier-of-fact.  Please note that further disregard of these motions will, of course, further play into our bias case with ease, now that the proof we have of events up to this motion are in place as clear evidence of his Honor’s obvious bias against these defendants.  Many witnesses, hostile and friendly, will be brought to greatly disprove all facts stated in all hearings, as well as show the deceitful and callous actions of bias wrought by this case’s trier-of-fact.  Relief, of course, will be asked for in each and every statement..

5.  Also to be refiled will be both motions to suppress evidence, as well as the mother’s rescindment of signatures to ALL documents signed, pro tempore.  Clear and convincing evidence will be brought for those suppressions, and witnesses will abound to disprove the need for either method of proof that is used against the defendants of this case.

6.  Let the defendants then submit this fact to the court, that this battle will wage up to and long after the permanency hearings; and this action, taken by the prosecution, is well on it’s way to being lost on the same side..  All actions taken by the prosecution and this court will be appealed to their end, as well as motions filed and refiled, until justice is properly done, until the charges are dropped or until all involved in our case have fallen legally.  Many separate actions and appeals will all happen long before this upcoming permanency hearing, and will more than serve their purposes.  We ask, in this prelude statement, as relief, that this court and the prosecution drop all charges in this case against these defendants and return the child to our care, or all will be done as stated.  His Honor has, time and again, greatly underestimated the resolve of this defendant, in his stubborn nature, in revealing this case and each and every wrong done to these defendants, to the citizens of Iowa and the United States utilizing every means legal and necessary.

The Punisher, Part III

http://vectorolon.deviantart.com/art/The-Punisher-skull-vector-112188699

Hey kids!!  Just wanted you to know I'm still here and still in the game, as well as still hard at work.  In my vigil, I happened to (very quickly), without much effort, caught DHS trying to (already) assert their power as if my rights were already gone...they made a request of the Judge that the child be able to go out of state in January...before permanency is decided.  Papa don't play dat way.  I whipped out a little denial for them.  First, they tried to use the words "we're done" against me in their motion, by, as is their apparent wont, twisting the words out of my mouth to mean whatever they want it to mean.  What did I mean by that?  Well, you could twist it...but why bother?  Us reasonable people have a clue.  DHS obviously, does not.  They presented those two little words to the Judge to mean that I wanted no further contact with them.  What I MEANT by that, something they can never prove when, say, using the blog, is that I wanted them to quit expecting me to play along, cause it wasn't gonna happen, tankyuberrymutts.  I never said "don't contact me"....that's what they wanted it to mean, for this motion, is all.  They also said that they couldn't contact the mother...Oh really....you can't snail mail her?  There's plenty of time for that...what you don't have her email address?  Ask Ashley, she has it...and she works for DHS at Children and Families of Iowa...so you folks should be good enough buddies to share those kind of things.  Wait, no...dare I say it?  Here's a novel concept....COME ON OVER, and see once and for all that we have a place that we both live in, and that, once again, there is NO IMMINENT DANGER, NO domestic violence, no drugs or dealing drugs, more than enough baby supplies, food and furniture, as well as my vehicle, in order to prove that, maybe we're not the horrid people it's been your testimony as well as your hearsay in stating for this judge...nor is there a mad father waiting to take you out....or, see her at work, I sure she'd buy you a coffee.  Or....maybe I'm being a bit hasty.

Anyway, so they want to get permission from the judge (like he's my daddy or something) in order for the baby to go out of state.  DHS?  This is neither your baby, nor is it the foster parents.  Besides, I'm still gonna win here, so don't go too far just yet.  This could still drag on for months, rest assured.  Besides, you've bypassed my parental rights back as far as the removal, so why  bother the Judge?  He'll have plenty to do soon enough, he's about to be REALLY busy...so leave the guy alone, and just do what you do, which, for the most part, is almost anything you want to...except arresting bloggers on false charges, anyway...that one didn't work so well.  Oh well, better luck next time.

**************************************************************************************************

Oh, and just so we know what happened?  Big Surprise here....the court denied my motion, and granted theirs.  I had NO IDEA that was gonna happen!!  It's almost as if my rights don't matter already...it's ok though America...she'll be home, this I swear.  So sayeth...ME.  The Mighty Sword will prove his worth in battle soon enough.  I know, I know, I've been spouting that nonsense for some time now, haven't I?  I'm tellin' you, it's gonna happen.  Hang in there.  :D

The Punisher Part II

http://images2.layoutsparks.com/1/84922/the-punisher-1-skull.jpg

Well kids...The days of DHS are just about done and gone.  The last straw has been thrown, the camel's back, broken.  For those members of DHS still reading, as soon as the appeal to this assessment is over and we win in it (and we WILL WIN), well, let's just say that a lot will be changing, and a lot more people will be paying attention.  And since the case will be closed, (our records at DHS of course, will be gotten PRIOR to that) and all that you have done will finally be out in the open for all to view.  The confidentiality will be gone (and every document of the court during this case, every recording of  EVERYONE will be posted and shared continuously online) your immunity irrelevant.  I know you folks forget this often, but Federal trumps State every time.  You'll be using that has your department's motto soon enough.


Now that nothing matters anymore, I will remember to ask for the safety and risk documents; from what I understand, those will be useful in subsequent actions.  You folks might all be immune to prosecution for taking our daughter, but there are further actions concerning related issues I most certainly CAN sue for, and some of those could be quite damaging, and may just go on...and on...and on....eventually, you'll all pay...one way or another.

I will spend each and every spare moment for the rest of my time in this crummy state picketing your pet drug facility in order to have it closed, as well as begin starting my bid for the position as Iowa's new Governor.  All involved with this, of course, are advised to retire early, when I win.  I will drag this and all future appeals out to the largest stretch, and all witnesses will be served in accordance this time:  No more quashing subpoenas this time Mr. Daily Maize, you and the judge's misdeeds are most certainly going to be there for the record this time.

Judge Price, please, if you will your Honor, be ready.  Appeals for those motions to suppress, as well as a minimum of one motion a day will be filed with the court til the day you can no longer postpone the final gavel on the permanancy of our daughter...and then that one will also be appealed as far as it can go, as well...that's if the recusal or the writ doesn't get you first.

And count on me taking that blog supression on a wild ride all the way to the United States  Supreme Court.

Also on the menu wil be the promised side motion to reveal, at last, your "just cause" reasons for signing the removal order, as well as the bias writ of H.C. that will all be done PRIOR to permanancy, as well as a few other aces I have up my sleeve that you don't know of.  Never let it be said that I am an unfair headhunter...I'm giving my prey the option to run àhead before I cross the starting line.  The war has indeed only just begun.

OMG....what's wrong with me?  I very nearly forgot to tell you what this was all about...see, I opted to finally quit butting my head against the wall and start playing along...you know, for my wife's sake.  It didn't last long.  About 24 hours or so.

First, they started right in with the same old song, and offered us just one visit a week...and with Ashley Andrews again, no less, after she lied on her reports as well as on the stand...But I bit my tongue...and whaddya know, insult to injury, they wanted me to do a drug test, while I'm at the courthouse, no less...but hey, it was a urine test...so I gritted my teeth and agreed.

Yet, on a hunch, and just for the fun of it, I told the goon taking the test about the first one, and as I  described the place, he heard it out to his own personal boiling point, then stated that he went there all the time...and that it was and had never been like I described it.

I then had what I suspected...that, because of what I had said in my blog after the hair test, they had changed it to be more presentable, I was sure. When I went there again, I whistled.  Different indeed.  The changes implemented in just that short 4 month period of time, was nothing short of miraculous...mostly because the only people I'd ever seen pull rabbits out of their asses like that, were none other than those of DHS.  Needless to say, I also, then, proceeded to  peg this guy as being no more legitimate than the first batch of testers.

I gotta say, my people skills have really paid of at times, and this time was no exception.

So I tried something else for fun, I told the guy I was gonna come up dirty.  He didnt relay the results...and because of that, I fished the cup out of the garbage after he left.  It was, of course, clean.

After that, I went and got my wife so that she could take hers too, and before I got there, I called to tell Katie I had tested clean.

Imagine that, we had to go to...THE SAME DRUG TESTING PLACE, where we had our hair test done.  I told Liz to not do the test without a witness, and to record what happened.

As she went in, I got an expected call from none other than Ms. Gosch, telling me
I had, once again tested dirty for meth...I couldn't believe they tried to do it again!  Then Liz came out to inform me that they had refused her a witness, like I thought they would...and I had just about had enough.  I told her to grab her stuff, we were leaving.  Why I had ever expected anything from this (let alone this late in the game) after all they had already pulled is far above my understanding.  I KNEW better, and I did it anyway.  And what, you might ask would benefit them from doing this a 2nd time??  It's fairly obvious, my friends....to INSURE, FINALLY, that this author (not Liz, she was a good candidate for hoop jumping in and of herself) would be made an example of.  Permanacy would be found elsewhere, more than likely with her current foster family, or, as I predicted, she'll be the poster child for next year's DHS adoption drive.

Oh, and there's one more thing I should mention as well, see, Liz had been handed another cup identical to the one I had fished out of the garbage...and had walked out with it.  Now, you need to believe me when I say that there was NO doubt in Liz's mind that I was clean...but for the further move of "beyond reproach", I used that 2nd cup to prove these people bogus beyond all unreasonable doubts.  Would that I had done this (or had thought to do this) in front of a variety of people that the court might have been deemed CREDIBLE witnesses...but this instead served as a much deserved dual purpose.  First to prove to my wife once and for all that the purpose of this test was always meant to keep us and our baby in the system for the whole enchilada...and they managed it.  2nd, to prove to myself once and for all that I WASN'T CRAZY AFTER ALL...the World and everone in it really WAS out to get me.

I used the 2nd cup, and peed in it again...and Liz and I watched it for the required 3 minutes together, while NOTHING happened.  No result...at all...clean or dirty.  And then it hit me.  They didn't falsify this result...the cup did nothing at all, and the results from this inactive cup could, thereby, be whatever they wished it to be.  'Magine that.

The most fun we deserve to experience in the upcoming weeks, after all of this, is on its way.  May your experience in your role as " The Audience" be as memorable and enjoyable as ours.  Remember too what a damn sore loser I can be.  Too bad I wont be losing  :D

The Punisher, Part I

http://images2.layoutsparks.com/1/84922/the-punisher-1-skull.jpg

Ohhhh...so the judge is a game player.  And here I thlought he was just an asshole!  It's O.K., I like games!!  I say, let the games BEGIN!!!

Bravo!! (Idiots....)

https://donewithaa.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/dunce21.jpg

I love the way these guys poke me, then stand back 20 ft. to see what I'll do next...

I just gotta say it America....how this idiot ever became Judge is beyond me.  Oh, and Bill?  You're losing sucker.  Every little smirk you smile, every bit of condescendence you spit down your chin at us, just brings your job closer to its end.  Enjoy your little walks on the West side of the courthouse, looking over your shoulder the whole way....it won't be long now, and you'll be a memory in the court system, a washout...a HAS BEEN....that's the kinda life for me...scared to walk down the street...lol.  I saw your little ass walking up 6th Street 'round 11...it's a wonder you make it to the end of the block, for real.  Dirt like you isn't even worth shakin' off my shoes.

As I said, America, this circus ends soon...as do the careers of all involved.  This still stands.  Kevin?  You're cool.  Paul?  Super Cool.  You're still idiots, but you're cool.  You're on the wrong side there, Kevin.  Get with the program son...the only thing prosecuters can brag about to their friends is what psychopath is threatenin' you THIS week.

Oh, and to my special new friend Stephanie Rhinehart....you and the folks at DHS are worthy of my very special attention....your whole DEPARTMENT will soon be a memory, the way it stands now anyway.

So...

I've just a thing or two left to say
Go ahead William A. Price.  Give it your stupidest moves....you're history, and you know it, it's just a matter of time now.  Once this case is over, you will lose on so many levels you won't know what elevator to take to avoid it.

This moron thinks he pulled the first goody on me by (childishly) scheduling our hearing...at 11:30.  He asks me a question, knowing full well this is the sort of thing I'm waiting to answer...and at 12:01 like a 7 yr. old who leans over to check out your card hand, he says LUNCH....right in the middle of my sentence, like that's gonna hurt my wittle feewings....what a DICK!  Better yet, he continues this hearing...for another week!  I don't think I've played that way since I was somewhere around 8 yrs. old...lol.  Just goes to show you the moral fibre and lack of intelligence and originality at which our current elected officials, these conveyers (supposedly) of law and order are made of....DOESN'T IT?  TIME FOR A REVAMP!!

The part I loved the most today tho?  Anybody who might be afraid of this idiot?  He thinks he played a good one on me by dismissing the Snake Daily Maize FIRST, THEN denying my motion to change his motion for the permanent record to show my reasons as the right reasons the snake wanted out.....ONLY ONE PROBLEM, IDIOT....it's on the record that you asked me what the reason was that I wanted him gone, and THAT YOU DENIED THE CHANGE TO CORRECT IT....Because now that you've relieved that attorney you don't feel it's an issue any longer...BUT YOU ASKED ME WHY I WANTED IT CHANGED, THEREBY PUTTING IT ON THE RECORD AS NOT CORRECT...THEREBY PROVING MY POINT, THAT YOU'RE THE ONE WHO ORDERED HIM TO FILE THE AFFIDAVIT!!  Bravo!  You lose....lol.

Look guys...I'm just not really into the games anymore, and I definately am not fond of playing with children, or those of lesser intelligence....so I'll tellya what.  It's on file, and it's in the record right where I wanted it.  So here's how the game is played now, ya snobby yups.  My house, my blog, my rules....k?  Aww, don't cry...get over it.

We won't be attending your little kangaroo court hearings any more either.  DHS, you lost ages ago.  See, both of you are about to figure out just how dumb and ignorant and small I really am.  Oh, we're going to the assessment appeal, and we're gonna win.  But Judge William Price?  Call yer little buddy attorneys and tell 'em to take the day off...cause we ain't gonna be attending your little circusses any more.  Terminate, PLEASE....I DARE you....then put your peabrains between your knees and tremble, because your  rule?  Is just about over.  So sayeth the Mighty Sword.

P.S. - You like playin' dirty?  I can play dirty....hehe...

The Whole Enchilada

http://foodimentary.com/tag/national-enchilada-day/

Hey kids!  Thought I up and died din'tcha?  Sorry to disappoint.

It's time now to say goodbye to all things DHS.  This month, whether I win or not, whether I accomplish anything at this time or not, signals the end of this horror...one way or t'other.  If I don't win this war...well, you can best bet I'll win some other ones once the case is closed.  See, the courts pretty much have it made where this sorta thing is concerned...nobody has the ability to look into anything that matters at all, and no one can really do anything either; until your case is closed, your rights terminated, your child gone...leastways not in the conventional sense.  Good thing I'm pretty unconventional.

I'm going to forego the standard invitation-style method and just handle it this-a-way.  The tried and true method.

December 11th, a mere 3 days from now, signals a primary battle; one that wasn't on the original schedule.  If there was any doubt at all to my innocence, where anyone in this court is concerned, there shouldn't be any left.  I have, quite easily, told my side of this story to its nth degree in quite a few statements to this court, all myths have been laid bare, all facts found, exposed for their obvious flaws.  I have been careful to take note of all things done and said wrong...everything is in its place or filed with the court in this case, ready to roll; and will be used a-plenty once the case is closed and our child gone...if it goes that route...which I don't plan to let it.  For those of you interested, this battle takes place at 11:30.  As usual, anyone interested in attending is invited to meet up with me a half hour before on the courthouse steps at 11.  I'll be the guy in the shirt and tie and this crazy looking face:

This will be one for the history books, of this you can be sure.  Maybe this judge cowed me once, but there shall be no repeat of that, count on it.  I'm more than ready for this room now.  Let 'em bring in whatever D.A. Hammer they like, but there will be no backing down, no fear in this defendant's eyes.  This baby is overdue to be returned, and the travesty that had her removed exposed for the wrong it was.  If she isn't, I of course will NOT be giving up there.  This matter will, without question, be appealed, along with a few surprises I plan to implement, should things go other directions.

Soon to follow will be the appeal to our original assessment.  For those of you who haven't been fortunate enough to view this little fairy tale, full of lies and untruths, please see "Going for the B***S, Part II, found here:

http://themightyswordamericas26deadlysins.blogspot.com/2014/09/going-for-bs-part-ii.html

This one will easily be one for the books as well, and will include a list of hostile witnesses the likes of which have yet to be seen in such a case, and will be the end of Ms. Emily Nieman's career...when I get finished with her, she'll be flippin' burgers and rememberin' the good ol' days, when she could do whatever she wanted to and get away with it.  My favorite part though, will be the 18 minutes of taped conversation that I plan to make this court listen to, between her and my wife, where it's quite clear of her intention to deceive...both my wife and the courts.  I always thought I'd love to see her face while I played this for a court somewhere, and this one is most assuredly no exception.  I'm betting this is going to be one f***-up DHS isn't gonna stand for, allowing herself to be recorded while she callously put this mother under duress to sign the baby away.  Til then, Ms. Nieman...I can't wait, for sure, for sure.  You're about to be shredded meat when I get done with you, count on it.  This will more than make up for your lies on the stand at our removal hearing...and I plan to push for a perjury charge on that, once we get our daughter back and I can focus on you and all the Hell you've put our family through.  Our revenge on you will most certainly be the sweetest.

So....here's the deal my friends.  All of this 5 months, and the hell we've been through is about to be over..one way or the other.  One thing I have noticed about this UPCOMING hearing, on the 11th, is that the prosecution has been very quiet....and not filed a single thing.  I will also, I'm sure, since he'll be required to be there (being that he has yet to be relieved as my wife's attorney) enjoy looking the snake Daily Maize right in the eyes as I tell him about the letter I've just sent to the attorney disciplinary board, asking for his disbarment.  I'll be sending an additional copy of that letter to his hiring firm, and we'll see how they like it.  I'm not finished with Mr. Mays by a long shot.  I strongly suggest that he find another state to practice in, because I plan to deprive him of the rest of his days in the sun, where his career as an attorney is concerned.

After I get a recorded DVD copy of every hearing that's taken place up to this point, the fight to gather the heads of all involved will continue, even if our daughter is lost.  Every recorded copy of these proceedings, along with every recording of ALL interactions with ALL the parties involved, as well as every court document will be packaged up and shipped to every available person in charge of all of these parties, and the people in charge of those people...and to quote a commercial popular in the 80's concerning the AIDS virus...and so on, and so on, and so on"...and every available avenue to bring charges against all involved will be taken.  No one will be safe from my persistance.  And if the Governor, who I hear is quite on the side of DHS and does nothing to stop them won't bend, well then I guess my campaign to relieve him of duty will be implemented, immediately.  These portions of Iowa Code, as well as the immunity they provide will be changed, or I guess I'll just have to run for Governor (and win) FIRST, BEFORE I run for the prize position in 2020, so I can change them myself.  To anyone who would doubt my resolve to right the wrongs done to Iowa citizens daily?  Try me baby.  I'm sure I can find more than enough people that wouldn't mind getting a better option than "The Moustache".

So you see, America, the fight for your rights to be returned to you, as well as the Government that has totally lost it and run amuck, has begun.  To quote a line given by the more recent news addition who calls themselves "Infowars", "The answer to 1984 is 1776."  The Revolution has begun.

Going for the B***S, Part VIII - Suppression of Court Evidence

Here, we will show two suppression motions, to be efiled immediately.  Please, if you will, take note of it, all the while taking further note to observe the smug look of an over-confident and giddy defendant...:D

MOTION TO SUPPRESS:

1.  COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce:  In his motion to suppress, as evidence presented throughout this case, proceeding and open; in first, the removal hearing, held July 29th, 2014, second, the adjudication hearing, held September 12th, 2014, and, in the order and petition; causing the legal removal of the designated child in these proceedings, Trilynn Brueggeman, as legal reasons that have been presented as evidence in this case, also given to have this child removed, legally; I now state, in defiance of the use of this blog as evidence and reported evidence; against these defendants; as unconstitutional; for the court’s records, I now give these reasons:

2.  Because this blog; an editorial piece, presented by this author, Christopher Bruce, as such, and also as his given opinion; concerning any subject, up to and including this case, its facts, as well as his wont to declare his decided opinion concerning all entities involved; is intended to be only a way for this author in which to candidly present, to his audience, feelings and fleeting thoughts concerning whichever subject he should be considering on any given day at any particular time.  These time frames may only take up as many seconds as it takes for a thought to be processed; and should not be framed otherwise by anyone else, who is not the author; who might choose to peruse this blog; as a set time frame for factual statements or to be used in an evidentiary manner.  Hereby, it is the finding of this defendant and author:  that any idea, opinion or thought; expressed in the body of any of these stated editorials, as they are presented; should never be able to be legally brought against any person, who might also be involved in this case; in a legal manner, up to and including the author; or be used as evidence against this or any defendant.

3.  Regardless of this court’s argument, as well may be refuted against this motion, that Iowa Law provides this court, as well as this proceeding, confidentiality for all involved in this case, as well as its content,  the author and defendant in this case, Christopher Bruce, has a God-given Constitutional right, per the first Amendment to its Constitution of the United States; to be able to; per this Federally-mandated right; be able to publish this author’s continued opinion of the facts presented here in this case, the entities who prosecute and rule over this case, as well as the instigators of this case, presented as themselves, and hereby named, as belonging to The Department of Human Services/Child Protective Unit; regardless of its confidentiality; as long as the author refrains from stating these facts as stated, word for word, by its participants; without fear of it being used in an evidentiary or a reported evidentiary manner against the aforementioned author and defendant in this case.

3.  That ALL evidence, presented as fact; as used as evidence or reported evidentiary; in the Order for Removal, the CINA petition, the Removal Hearing, The Adjudication Hearing, as well as any subsequent documents or hearings in which this editorial blog is or will be used as evidence or reported to be such, should be hereby suppressed and no longer used as such evidence, and should also be stricken from all court records as such evidence.  Using editorial opinion as evidence of fact should not be allowed in any court-related legal proceeding, as this action, on the part of the prosecution, presents itself in such a manner as to indirectly or directly, inhibit, prevent or, through threat of intimidation or deprivation of freedom, would serve to deprive this author, as well as any given defendant; of their wont to express said opinion, thereby becoming direct in its attempt to suppress this author’s wont to express the afore-mentioned ideal, thought, or opinion; defining these actions; as taken by any court in any such legal action; to mean they desire, through whatever indirect means, to cease any effort made by the author and/or defendant, to express his opinion, a right given freely by the afore-mentioned Amendment.

I now hereby move that all evidence, presented in the form of evidence, or reported as such, and used by the prosecution against this author, the defendant, and his wife, be hereby stricken from all court documents or reports; and in the hearings, stated as fact, also involved in this case, as well as from all court records which might describe the proceedings of this case.  Any further use or mention of this blog in an evidentiary manner in this case will subsequently involve a United States Supreme Court action and ruling to be brought against the prosecuting and trier-of-fact entities involved in this case.

/S/ Christopher Bruce and Elizabeth Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE AND ELIZABETH BRUCE
1169 9th Street #5
Des Moines, Iowa 50314

MOTION TO SUPPRESS:

COMES NOW, Christopher Bruce, in his motion to suppress, as evidence entered, exhibits 2 and 3 from the Adjudication Hearing, held September 12, 2014, at the Polk County Courthouse.

1.  These exhibits, presented and named as Hair test Elizabeth Bruce, and Hair test Christopher Bruce, are false, as well as beyond the scope of Iowa Code, section 232.73 as required in a CINA action, where drug allegations are involved.  I hereby request this court to suppress this evidence, until proof is provided by this facility, that the samples were not or able to be tampered with, as well as witnessed by another employee working for Family Services of Iowa, a DHS choice (as well as an obvious benefactor from this entity) for its drug testing of defendants in their actions against them.  This is proved as such, because assessments, done by EFR, another such DHS choice (as well as another obvious benefactor from this entity), following drug testing, is obviously ordered, by DHS and by the trier-of-fact involved in this action (as found as fact in a statement made by the trier-of-fact, Judge William A. Price, stated as a certainty as to the results of an assessment against ANY defendant involved in such an action, that drug abuse training will be found to be required of the defendants, AFTER such an assessment, proving to be fact, as well as leaving no possibility that any other assessment result will be considered, i.e., these defendants do NOT use drugs, and need no drug abuse training).

2.  I also bring, in an effort to back up the reason for this suppression, that we already know there were no witnesses available at the time of our testing that will willingly attest to the safety of these samples, or that would be able to guarantee them tamper-proof, since the responsible participating party who administered the test was operating the facility by themselves, this fact being personally and obviously witnessed by the defendants being tested in this interaction.

3.  That the mother, during her birth at Methodist, came up clean in her cord stat test, done at the hospital following the child’s birth.  Had the mother been using at any time, during or before the birth, the results of the hair stat test would have proven their existence to include that time as well.  It did NOT.

4.  There is clear and convincing evidence that will be provided to this court at a later date, that will show this mother as having severe asthma, severe enough that a single hit of Marijuana, used by this defendant 5 years ago, produced an emergency situation in the mother that could very well have included her death.  To allege this mother as using meth internally is ludicrous at best, per this evidence.

5.  There is clear and convincing evidence that shows the amount that the defendants showed in these results could only be determined as environmentally acquired, if the results were indeed factual at all.  Users of this drug have come to show results closer to 2000-3000 pg/mg.  The father, who claimed in his blog, which will be suppressed as evidence soon enough, claimed to POSSIBLY be dirty for this drug, only in environmental conditions, and only produced a showing of 558, barely over the cutoff result, showing his as the ONLY possibly factual result in this instance, but only because of his blog and the statements made therein.  The mother’s results, as aforementioned, are physically impossible, as this mother has neither used, nor been around other users of this drug in her entire life; as she is aware of, yet showed a result almost twice as large as the father’s result, at 852 pg/mg, also not a number of an average user’s much larger proportions, so, should also be ruled as environmentally acquired, again, even if the evidence is indeed factual.

6.  I hereby move to suppress this evidence, used as fact in the adjudication hearing, held and ruled September 12, 2014.

/S/Christopher Bruce
Christopher Bruce 1196 9th Street, Apt. 5
Des Moines, Iowa 50314

GOING FOR THE B***S, PART VII (The Upcoming Disbarment of Daily Maize)

http://abstract.desktopnexus.com/wallpaper/485783/

OMG KIDS!!!  the UNMITIGATED GALL OF THESE PEOPLE!!  DIDNT YOU PEOPLE IN THE COURT HEAR WHAT I SAID IN THE COURT STATEMENTS?  SENATOR GRASSLEY IS NOW INVOLVED, and, against your immunity and confidentially, is more than allowed to view ALL of these court documents....without being able to be stopped, WHILE YOUR RIDICULOUS CASE IS WIDE OPEN....You like apples?  How you like THOSE apples?

Here, I will state, that Dale Mays, the snakey lawyer, who works for Benzoni Law Firm (SNAKE PIT, EVIDENTLY), has asked to resign as my wife's attorney...but get this...remember that little move he pulled, in an attempt to cut off my ability to get court documents needed by these parents to defend themselves, and making Elizabeth pay for 2 state appointed attorneys on minimum wage + at $8.25, all while living at the homeless shelter...you would not BELIEVE WHAT THIS SNAKE just tried to pull over our eyes...  Well, believe it, because I'm pulling the wool off.  The sheep shall know it ALL, BELIEVE THAT, as will Senator Grassley's office.

Here, I will state (as a restated quote, so as not to IDENTICALLY reveal anything from a confidential juvenile case document) that Attorney Dale Mays, just tried to file a motion to withdraw as the wife's council, and stated in his third reason that after I threatened his Bar status for doing this to her against her better interests, that I gave, as a reason, that I was mad at him for making her file another affidavit, allowing the court to claim her as indigent and be able to help her with her attorney fees...like nobody would notice that he was COVERING HIS ASS FOR HIS STUPID MISTAKE, as well as "His Honor"'s ass for signing such an order.  Here then, was my soon to be efiled rebuttal to CORRECT the FACT STATED IN that motion...ENJOY!!

Comes now Christopher Bruce in his motion to modify reasons given to withdraw:

1.  It is stated, as reason to withdraw #3, in Attorney Dale Mays’ Motion to Withdraw that:



(this is the confidential part that I cannot repeat, for fear of imprisonment...good thing I paraphrased it above...because I couldn't copy it into this document)



The actual fact is, that this attorney received an email from the father, this date stated, what is claimed, but that my reason was NOT that council had requested (I would imagine this to also be at this Judge’s request that he do so) his client, Ms. Bruce, fill out a financial affidavit which would enable the court to make a finding of indigency and appoint her counsel...that had been done AT FIRST, back in July.

On September 5th, this counsel, against his client’s best interests, after this client had just started back to work at her part time job at $8.25, had his client, with her full trust, sign yet another financial affidavit, just five weeks after being claimed indigent and able to receive a state court appointed attorney, in order to have her state her income, with no expenses (because she WAS INDIGENT AT THIS TIME, staying at a homeless shelter, as ALL, including the trier-of-fact, and the county attorney, as well as DHS were duly aware, and in search of permanent housing with obvious expenses in order for us to effectively reunify with our child, since the courts have, throughout all of our hearings, claimed this as their primary reason for not doing so), in order for the Judge, William A Price to sign this affidavit to claim her NOT INDIGENT, to, effectively, force the mother to pay for all of this attorney’s services, as well as her baby’s attorney’s services...all on $700 gross a month.  This served the dual purpose of effectively eliminating any possibility that the father, whose rights to view confidential documents already had been cut off, could not, without fees, access the same documents, rendering the family as unable to defend itself.

It should also be brought before this court, that no more affidavits have been requested, even at another 6 weeks of passage.  This is because then, the court would have to find her indigent yet again, due to her now having apartment, bills and food expenses, and no better income.  This will be filed and corrected immediately for the courts records.  Nice try Dale and Judge.  This one’s going to be on the books as it happened, not stated incorrectly to disprove your bias.  If this statement of fact is not corrected immediately, I will file these emails, from and to the mother, as proof of your attempted deceit.  I’ll leave that decision in the Judges hands.

And Mr. Mays?  This obviously giant paragraph long typographical error goes on your record as well, as trying to cover up your grevous and disbarable error...to further prove your need for disbarment."

SEE?  I TOLD YOU NOVEMBER WAS GONNA BE FUN FOR ME!!  WAS I LYIN'?

The Dating Game - Day 3