 |
| M____ P___ T__ H____ |
NOTE: One thing I'd like to state, immediately, is this: my favorite thing about "The News" is, just about every time they opt to do a story on me, the first thing they almost ALWAYS do, just to bias their audience, is claim that I state I'm ABOVE "the Law", and that "the Law"....THEIR law, doesn't apply to me. THIS STATEMENT IS A HALF TRUTH; BUT MAINLY A LIE, AND QUITE SIMPLY, IS LIBEL. I do say that THEIR law does not apply to me...because it doesn't; not because I don't WANT to obey it....it's because it's not, and has NEVER BEEN the PEOPLE'S law. I do, by the way, abide by Common Law, Constitutional Law, God's law and NATURAL law. So until I am involved in some way in the Lawmaking process - I mean really, just because you say something is "against the law" at some point, behind my back, doesn't mean it is "The Law". What's more, these "laws" come from someone I never voted for or granted authority to, who never asked me for my opinion before they "passed" it as such. Part B to that is, just because it's "The Law", according to you, doesn't mean it's good, lawful, reasonable or Constitutional law. No, folks, I don't claim to be above what these people imagine is "The Law"...but it should be obvious, by the end of this article, that if anyone here believes themselves to be above "The Law"...it's these criminals in elected positions.
Howdy Kids! I suppose you're all wondering where I've been last coupla months....well please, if you don't mind, I'd like ta tellya...and you know, there's no time like the present....is there?
I've been in the Minnehaha County Jail locked down with a HIGHLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNREASONABLE BOND OF $50,000, CASH ONLY, for a low-level unlawfully charged level 6 felony stalking charge. Since the Constitution obviously does NOT apply to the lowly sheep of this country, I will tell you that I am being threatened to not speak freely about this, and that I cannot tell you who is behind this charge, as he is the ALLEGED victim in this matter...although the news has already pretty much told EVERYONE who this victim is countless times over the last 2 months; I, as the alleged perpetrator, evidently am not someone who is allowed to spread THE NARRATIVE, and because I want to tell you the TRUTH....I cannot legally provide you with the proof that I have in my possession that shows I am innocent of the charges.
So, since I am not allowed to tell you who this person is, although EVERYBODY ALREADY KNOWS, I will instead give you the links to two of the hundred or so lying stories that are already out there, so you know....if you don't already. I'll let "The News" tell you who this asshole "victim" is instead of hearing this from me. I have ALREADY been threatened with re-arrest, should I "disseminate" any more proof of my innocence this corrupt case.
https://kelo.com/news/articles/2019/jun/07/who-is-christopher-bruce-the-living-man-who-accused-of-threats-to-the-mayor-and-council/
https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/2019/06/14/christopher-the-living-man-bruce-has-history-clashing-public-officials/1448694001/
Fortunately for me, this stupid, legally inhibiting, un-Constitutional "law"; something called "Marsy's Law" (that is only a law in just 6 states), that I have never heard of before this month; does NOT and CANNOT stop me from speaking freely about the rest of the criminal officials that are involved here. Since the alleged "victim" is the ONLY victim in this matter, I can talk about the rest of these idiots all I want to...not that I can't freely talk about the alleged victim...but you know, corrupt is as corrupt does.
Here are some links to "Marsy's Law", to show why it is only a "law" in 6 states, and why there are real problems with it. Let's start with what Marsy's Law IS:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/south-dakota-could-be-the-first-state-to-tweak-marsys-law
https://www.ksfy.com/content/news/Marsys-Law-implementation-has-made-it-harder-for-victims-to-access-services-483278121.html
Let's now go over why this stupid law is a real problem for real victims of crooked officials, like I am:
#1, AND PROBABLY THE MOST GLARING PROBLEM IS, I HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT (allegedly) TO FREE SPEECH. What happened to that???
#2, I can't show you the libel-filled police reports that show this was a setup, and a conspiracy against the same right.
#3, what I was "disseminating" as that truth didn't even have the "victim's" name on it, let alone any other information about him.
#4, What I can't show you is hearsay, according to the courts...and cannot be used as evidence that I can show to the jury...but the same HEARSAY was used to have me arrested for this unlawful "crime."
#5, If what the "victim" said happened is hearsay, and more importantly, IF IT'S ALL LIES, and can be used to have me arrested, shouldn't it be allowed to be evidence in order to help prove I'm innocent????
#6, if I'm not allowed to show you anything about the victim, and not tell you who he is, or be arrested, then why can't the news be arrested, when they present you with pretty much all the same information?
#7, until the jury says so at trial, this unidentified and alleged VICTIM, is just that....an ALLEGED victim; no different than my label of alleged "perp", until I prove my innocence...so why is he already being protected? Why don't I receive any consideration?? I'll let YOU figure that one out. Besides, this man is NO victim...he's a liar, and a slanderer. I just haven't had my shot at proving that yet...but you can best believe that when I do? He's FINISHED. The only reason he's a "victim" in ANY sense of the word, is because he made his call to report this FIRST...well, that, and he has buddies in and is in control of the SFPD...that might also be a factor. Had I gone down with the same evidence he used and filed those same reports against him? They would have looked at me like I was a mental case. More so, do you believe for even a single minute that they would have arrested HIM based on MY hearsay? Not a chance, and you know it.
https://kelo.com/news/articles/2019/jun/07/who-is-christopher-bruce-the-living-man-who-accused-of-threats-to-the-mayor-and-council/
https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/2019/06/14/christopher-the-living-man-bruce-has-history-clashing-public-officials/1448694001/
Fortunately for me, this stupid, legally inhibiting, un-Constitutional "law"; something called "Marsy's Law" (that is only a law in just 6 states), that I have never heard of before this month; does NOT and CANNOT stop me from speaking freely about the rest of the criminal officials that are involved here. Since the alleged "victim" is the ONLY victim in this matter, I can talk about the rest of these idiots all I want to...not that I can't freely talk about the alleged victim...but you know, corrupt is as corrupt does.
Here are some links to "Marsy's Law", to show why it is only a "law" in 6 states, and why there are real problems with it. Let's start with what Marsy's Law IS:
"On January 24, 2018, a proposal to repeal Marsy's Law in South Dakota was introduced in the state legislature as House Joint Resolution 1004 (HJR 1004). After a compromise with proponents of this initiative, HJR 1004 was changed from a proposal repealing Marsy's Law to a proposal making certain changes to it. The proposal requires approval by a majority of members in both the state House and the state Senate and approval by the voters. HJR 1004 was sponsored by 41 representatives—58.6 of the 70 members—and 16 senators—45.7 percent of the 35 members. Sponsors included House Speaker Mark Mickelson and House Majority Leader Lee Qualm. The sponsors in both the House and the Senate included one Democrat each: House Minority Leader Spencer Hawley and Sen. Craig Kennedy.[1]
On February 21, 2018, the state House unanimously approved HJR 1004, sending it to the state Senate.[2]
This would be the first effort to ask voters to repeal or change one of the six Marsy's Laws that had been approved. As of January 2018, a Marsy's Law amendment had never lost at the ballot. Montana's 2016 Marsy's Law was overturned by the Montana Supreme Court on November 1, 2017. The ruling was based on the state's separate vote requirement for constitutional amendments on the ballot rather than the substantive content of the amendment. South Dakota does not have a single-subject rule or separate vote requirement for initiatives.
Before a compromise with Marsy's Law for All was proposed, South Dakota House Speaker Mark Mickelson said that the legislature would pass bills adding rights to the state's statutes regarding crime victims before putting a proposal to repeal Amendment S before voters. Mickelson said, "We’re going to strengthen South Dakota victims’ rights. Part of that is removing the unintended consequences of Marsy’s Law from the constitution.”[3]
Gail Gitcho, a representative of Marsy's Law for All, responded to the introduction of HJR 1004 and to Mickelson, saying, “If it goes back into statute, then those rights are spineless. They have no teeth. It looks like the speaker wants to take away rights from people that were already guaranteed to them by the constitution.”[3]
Implementation of Marsy's Law
The implementation of Marsy's Law resulted in some changes to procedures by various law enforcement or criminal justice system departments. One such change was that the South Dakota Department of Public Safety began holding accident reports for at least three days in order to allow the victims of crimes to claim their rights under Amendments S, where previously the department had processed and released reports more quickly. Tony Mangan, a spokesman for the department said in mid-November 2017, that victims had claimed rights under Marsy's Law in 10 instances out of a total of about 16,000 accident reports since the enactment of the law. The office of Attorney General Marty Jackley also printed out lists of the rights granted by Amendment S for police officers to give to victims in order to fulfill the requirement in Amendment S that police officers inform victims of the Marsy's Law rights. Many of the amendment's victim notification requirements are fulfilled through an automated notification system that sends updates on court dates, hearings, and releases through text, email, or phone calls.[4]
One instance that drew national media attention involved a police officer of the Bismark police department who, after being involved in a shooting on October 15, 2017, opted in to the rights granted by Amendment S. The police department, which usually releases information about police-involved shootings—such as the officer's identity—after the investigation into the incident is concluded. Citing the list of rights within Amendment S and the fact that the officer invoked these rights, however, the department withheld the officer's name in this instance. The man who was shot was charged with assaulting a peace officer and robbery.[5]"
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/south-dakota-could-be-the-first-state-to-tweak-marsys-law
https://www.ksfy.com/content/news/Marsys-Law-implementation-has-made-it-harder-for-victims-to-access-services-483278121.html
Let's now go over why this stupid law is a real problem for real victims of crooked officials, like I am:
#1, AND PROBABLY THE MOST GLARING PROBLEM IS, I HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT (allegedly) TO FREE SPEECH. What happened to that???
#2, I can't show you the libel-filled police reports that show this was a setup, and a conspiracy against the same right.
#3, what I was "disseminating" as that truth didn't even have the "victim's" name on it, let alone any other information about him.
#4, What I can't show you is hearsay, according to the courts...and cannot be used as evidence that I can show to the jury...but the same HEARSAY was used to have me arrested for this unlawful "crime."
#5, If what the "victim" said happened is hearsay, and more importantly, IF IT'S ALL LIES, and can be used to have me arrested, shouldn't it be allowed to be evidence in order to help prove I'm innocent????
#6, if I'm not allowed to show you anything about the victim, and not tell you who he is, or be arrested, then why can't the news be arrested, when they present you with pretty much all the same information?
#7, until the jury says so at trial, this unidentified and alleged VICTIM, is just that....an ALLEGED victim; no different than my label of alleged "perp", until I prove my innocence...so why is he already being protected? Why don't I receive any consideration?? I'll let YOU figure that one out. Besides, this man is NO victim...he's a liar, and a slanderer. I just haven't had my shot at proving that yet...but you can best believe that when I do? He's FINISHED. The only reason he's a "victim" in ANY sense of the word, is because he made his call to report this FIRST...well, that, and he has buddies in and is in control of the SFPD...that might also be a factor. Had I gone down with the same evidence he used and filed those same reports against him? They would have looked at me like I was a mental case. More so, do you believe for even a single minute that they would have arrested HIM based on MY hearsay? Not a chance, and you know it.
#8, Aren't criminal cases supposed to be public record? As to protecting the alleged "victim" and calling everything in the case "confidential" to do so; who exactly are we protecting him from besides me? Isn't that what the No Contact Order is for? So why are these things "confidential?" Are we somehow afraid that someone else is going to see the alleged victim as an easy target, and attack him as well? C'mon guys...this is a no-brainer. The only thing we're doing is protecting crooked elected officials here.
WHAT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND: Whatever this law or ANY law, for that matter, might have began as and for whatever good it may have been enacted for initially, the Government and Law Enforcement will ALWAYS find a way to twist it into something that protects THEM...AS THEY HAVE ALREADY; IN THIS CASE, and in countless others too. These people are the real criminals here, and I am the true victim...but I can't show you that, thanks to Marsy, and thanks to those who twisted the law to suit themselves.
Now that that crap is done with; let's begin with the only person that will stand up and swear that what the alleged "victim" is saying (I always called this HEARSAY) is the truth, nothing but the truth, so help him somebody....'cause it sure ain't GOD.
SIOUX FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT SERGEANT SEAN KOOISTRA
This PERSON, the REAL stalker here, is the 2nd person listed in a federal lawsuit I filed against him, and the unmentionable "victim", and both conspired to have me arrested just 2 hours after I sent "The Victim" a copy of this lawsuit.
Prior to June 6th, 2019 (my arrest), I had only talked to this guy once, and had never met him in person.
Between the dates of 11/19/2018 and today, however, this guy knows what I look like, knew my name, my wife's name, knew my phone number, my wife's phone number, knew where we lived, knows where my wife works, has "investigated" me on Facebook continuously, has called me twice, left me voicemails, left my wife voicemails, knows my email address, read my emails sent to better than half of this city's government, has read all my emails going in and out while I was in jail, has listened to all of my personal phone calls to my wife, has reviewed all of my visits with my wife, and filed 3 more police reports on me AFTER my arrest while I was in jail; has attended each and every one of my court hearings; and has had several open cases on me since November of 2018. All one could possibly ask after knowing what this man knows about ME, is "WHO'S THE REAL STALKER HERE???"
I can't show you the paper containing what he said about me, evidently (or risk getting arrested again), but I can tell you what he said in those things I can't show you. It only states that I can't show you the report and the affidavit ITSELF....and that I can't mention the victim's name...although you already know who that is....but I can, technically, show you what's said IN the reports and the affidavits, sans the victim's name....I don't believe that's part of this stupid law.
But hey, I don't even really have to do that. I only have to tell you two things, neither of which are said anywhere in this case or any of these affidavits and police reports: They say I first met with the victim on November 2, 2018...but there are 3 police reports that were filed against me up to 3 days before this meeting ever occurred...except that this WASN'T the date that I met with him. That meeting happened almost a full month before this. We'll be calling the "Secretary" of the "victim" to the stand to testify 'bout that, trust me.
2nd, the good sergeant...and I use this term very loosely...was trying to arrest me for stalking before the crime even happened, according to the statute's OWN LANGUAGE, and according to a police report he filed on 11/20/19. There are 2 occasions being referenced in this alleged crime...November 16th and 7 months later on June 5th (this is stalking now?)...so how is it that the report says that I was already stalking 7 months before "stalking" had even occurred? Because it says that I was violating this statute then - in the report that I'm not allowed to show you or the jury...'magine that.
More on all of this soon.
AARON MCGOWAN, STATE'S ATTORNEY
You should know that I was arrested for stalking, and convicted for it once before....IN IOWA...and that those responsible for this legal travesty are ALL (32 Iowa elected officials) defending against me for these actions in the 8th Circuit federal court at the moment. I'll give you 2 links where you can read about this...first, in the 64 page Federal Complaint I filed against them, that can be found right here:
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-fed-funny-farm-take-2annnnddd-action.html
Damn straight I've "clashed" with elected officials before...and they had to CHEAT to get me convicted of Stalking there, trust me. Not only did they literally destroy my entire defense 2 days before trial, they had to run a libelous article in the local paper to influence the jury to find me guilty. At no time did these "reporters" ever ask me a single question or check a single fact. The judge out and out denied me a mistrial based on that. Yeah...they cheated to get me put away for a year for this...and I even got the felony charge dropped, regardless....mainly, because I didn't do what they accused me of. They tried to give me 9 years. They got one...even though they cheated. I only wish that was all there was to it, but you know where to go to get the FACTS, now, at least.
You can read what the paper said here:
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2016/04/christopher-bruce-domestic-terrorist.html
The reason I bring all of this up is two fold.
#1, the state's attorney in THIS matter is ALSO calling me a "sovereign citizen"....as a matter of fact, the term was used over 20 times during my initial bond hearing. This is a new term, dreamed up by the FBI and the judicial system, created for the sole purpose of demonizing those people who recognize the fraud of Government and the judiciary; who have, if you'll excuse the term "Seen through the bullshit." This term was first applied to me in Iowa, and was picked up on and used often by this State's attorney as well...though I have NEVER associated myself in this way, using this term. It's a lot like "Conspiracy Theorists" (MORE people that have seen through the bullshit) being associated with the term "Tin-foil hat lunatics"...what better way to get the attention off of the people trying to lie to you about what's REALLY going on, eh?
#2 - when this "crime" was charged on me initially, I was charged with MISDEMEANOR stalking. Since then, it's been upgraded to a felony, due to my IOWA Staking conviction....there's only one problem. Let's see if you can figure it out, just by reading the last paragraph in the SDCL statute; Statute 22-19A-1:
"A violation of this section constitutes the crime of stalking. Stalking is a Class 1 misdemeanor. However, any second or subsequent conviction (not CHARGE) occurring within ten years of a prior conviction under this section is a Class 6 felony."
I'm sorry, but I have yet to be arrested, charged OR CONVICTED of Stalking in South Dakota, UNDER THIS SECTION of SDCL LAW...so how is this able to be made a felony again???
Remember too, this man chose to handle this matter PERSONALLY, in the first 3 bond hearings...and is up for re-election this year, too. All great reasons to be seen handling his victim buddy's matter, huh?
Two more things, and we can just wrap this up, OK?
First, I have uploaded for you 4 videos on youtube that you are more than welcome to view, of the 4 sheriffs that BUSTED DOWN MY DOOR..for a misdemeanor.
Also worth knowing, FOR ANY OF YOU FROM SIOUX FALLS, SD, I am going to offer a $125 PER SHERIFF reward for anyone who will give me the names of these 4 criminals (since the sheriff's detective refused to identify these men for me)...and they ARE criminals, by the way...since not a one of these people identified themselves or showed me a warrant. Oh, and I'll up that reward by $50 ea. if you can give me the address for these criminals, so I can serve them their summons at their homes; since I plan to file a federal lawsuit on them for $10,000 ea, plus the cost of my door in federal court. Here's why I believe I'll win. This is posted on every door in my house:
You can send that information to me at my email address at: cbstraighteight@gmail.com, and we can discuss how you can pick that up.
Here are the links to those videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e8gyQENcIs&t=18s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epshydyMXCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMlS_SefQgM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiaOfAbF1sE&t=19s
Second, Here is the story I had PLANNED to "disseminate;" and, after only handing it out to one news station (KELO, who IMMEDIATELY called the State's attorney's office to let them know I was handing it out; who then called me and threatened me with re-arrest if I handed out any more copies of it.); I was immediately told I could not speak freely. The names have been blacked out to protect the guilty; namely, the criminal "Victim":
"MAYOR TEN HAKEN AND THE CITY COUNCIL
On June 6th this year, a man was arrested for "Stalking" the Mayor of Sioux Falls, Paul Tenhaken...on what started out as a misdemeanor. That man was Christopher William Bruce, The Living Man; and in case you haven't guessed, that man was me.
In October of 2018, I passed out over 1500 15-page information packets on 5G, the new cell phone network, and it told the citizens of this city how this was not only an unnecessary upgrade, but that it was very dangerous as well. If you did not receive this packet, you can find it at:
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-end-of-life-as-we-live-it-part-i-5g.html
The Mayor, who is all for 5G, didn't really appreciate this. After eliminating his not being very smart, or that he didn't care about the health of his family, his children, himself or the city's residents, the only possible remaining reason for his insane position to install this here would either be that he was paid off, or that he has a large amount of Verizon stock (they got the contract to install this here.)
Thanks to some occasional tramplings on my right to speak freely on this subject (I did this at 9 city council meetings in a year's time; by passing out this information to a majority of you and with a couple of emails to his and the council's publicly posted email addresses), and just after I had spoken at a council meeting on June 4th (2 days prior to my arrest,) I decided I would file a federal lawsuit against Mr. Tenhaken, and also named in it a rogue Sioux Falls Police sergeant, Sean Kooistra, on June 6. Two hours later, I sent a copy of the suit to the Mayor, select council members and some of my friends, for my protection. 2 hours later, 4 sheriffs broke down my door, guns drawn, and arrested me for stalking. They drove up in an unmarked vehicle, refused to identify themselves, and wouldn't show me a warrant. I have provided you with a video disk of this arrest, which I recorded. I have also included a copy of a case sheet, filed by Mr. Kooistra, showing that they had been planning to arrest me for this way back in November of 2018, long before the statute was allegedly violated. Later, these 2 men claimed I had threatened the mayor on 2 occasions...November 16th, 2018 and June 5th, 2019. The arrest didn't happen on the 5th, though. It happened 2 hours after I sent a copy of the lawsuit to the Mayor.
After sitting in jail on a $50,000 cash only bond, I was finally released on my own recognizance. Trial for this will be in the week of October 15th, this year. The charge was upgraded to a felony, by the way...also for no reason, and in total defiance of the language of this statute. There is also a protection order for the mayor, his council, and his family (in Minnesota)...though the only person complaining is still the Mayor, all by himself.
If this sounds a little suspicious and conspiratorial to you, it's probably because it is. The point here, folks, is this: If I can be arrested for speaking out against the Mayor and the City Council, though I have every right to per our Constitution...so can you. This Mayor and Sergeant Kooistra need to be impeached and ousted.
By the way, are you aware of the fact that South Dakota is said to be the 2nd most corrupt state in the United States? Is this really what you want to be known for, as a citizen of this State? Is this what you want for your children and grandchildren? Together, we can fight this corruption, beginning with the Mayor, his council, the State's attorney and the SFPD. Who's with me?
Thanks for listening, Christopher, the Living Man."
I will, more than likely, be arrested again ANYWAY, even though at this point I am breaking no law relating this to the world...which is fine by me. When I get to trial and beat this case...with my hands TIED BEHIND MY BACK, GAGGED, AND DEPRIVED OF WITNESSES AND ALL EVIDENCE THAT PROVES MY INNOCENCE, ON MY KNEES...I will then put these people out of office, and have THEM arrested and put in my place.
Last, but certainly not least, is this...if I'm SOOOOOO dangerous, and everyone is SOOOOOOO afraid of me...then why did they let me free before trial???? Here's a question you should all be asking "all" of the alleged "victims"....don'tcha think? :D
Also worth knowing, FOR ANY OF YOU FROM SIOUX FALLS, SD, I am going to offer a $125 PER SHERIFF reward for anyone who will give me the names of these 4 criminals (since the sheriff's detective refused to identify these men for me)...and they ARE criminals, by the way...since not a one of these people identified themselves or showed me a warrant. Oh, and I'll up that reward by $50 ea. if you can give me the address for these criminals, so I can serve them their summons at their homes; since I plan to file a federal lawsuit on them for $10,000 ea, plus the cost of my door in federal court. Here's why I believe I'll win. This is posted on every door in my house:
You can send that information to me at my email address at: cbstraighteight@gmail.com, and we can discuss how you can pick that up.
Here are the links to those videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e8gyQENcIs&t=18s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epshydyMXCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMlS_SefQgM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiaOfAbF1sE&t=19s
Second, Here is the story I had PLANNED to "disseminate;" and, after only handing it out to one news station (KELO, who IMMEDIATELY called the State's attorney's office to let them know I was handing it out; who then called me and threatened me with re-arrest if I handed out any more copies of it.); I was immediately told I could not speak freely. The names have been blacked out to protect the guilty; namely, the criminal "Victim":
"MAYOR TEN HAKEN AND THE CITY COUNCIL
On June 6th this year, a man was arrested for "Stalking" the Mayor of Sioux Falls, Paul Tenhaken...on what started out as a misdemeanor. That man was Christopher William Bruce, The Living Man; and in case you haven't guessed, that man was me.
In October of 2018, I passed out over 1500 15-page information packets on 5G, the new cell phone network, and it told the citizens of this city how this was not only an unnecessary upgrade, but that it was very dangerous as well. If you did not receive this packet, you can find it at:
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-end-of-life-as-we-live-it-part-i-5g.html
The Mayor, who is all for 5G, didn't really appreciate this. After eliminating his not being very smart, or that he didn't care about the health of his family, his children, himself or the city's residents, the only possible remaining reason for his insane position to install this here would either be that he was paid off, or that he has a large amount of Verizon stock (they got the contract to install this here.)
Thanks to some occasional tramplings on my right to speak freely on this subject (I did this at 9 city council meetings in a year's time; by passing out this information to a majority of you and with a couple of emails to his and the council's publicly posted email addresses), and just after I had spoken at a council meeting on June 4th (2 days prior to my arrest,) I decided I would file a federal lawsuit against Mr. Tenhaken, and also named in it a rogue Sioux Falls Police sergeant, Sean Kooistra, on June 6. Two hours later, I sent a copy of the suit to the Mayor, select council members and some of my friends, for my protection. 2 hours later, 4 sheriffs broke down my door, guns drawn, and arrested me for stalking. They drove up in an unmarked vehicle, refused to identify themselves, and wouldn't show me a warrant. I have provided you with a video disk of this arrest, which I recorded. I have also included a copy of a case sheet, filed by Mr. Kooistra, showing that they had been planning to arrest me for this way back in November of 2018, long before the statute was allegedly violated. Later, these 2 men claimed I had threatened the mayor on 2 occasions...November 16th, 2018 and June 5th, 2019. The arrest didn't happen on the 5th, though. It happened 2 hours after I sent a copy of the lawsuit to the Mayor.
After sitting in jail on a $50,000 cash only bond, I was finally released on my own recognizance. Trial for this will be in the week of October 15th, this year. The charge was upgraded to a felony, by the way...also for no reason, and in total defiance of the language of this statute. There is also a protection order for the mayor, his council, and his family (in Minnesota)...though the only person complaining is still the Mayor, all by himself.
If this sounds a little suspicious and conspiratorial to you, it's probably because it is. The point here, folks, is this: If I can be arrested for speaking out against the Mayor and the City Council, though I have every right to per our Constitution...so can you. This Mayor and Sergeant Kooistra need to be impeached and ousted.
By the way, are you aware of the fact that South Dakota is said to be the 2nd most corrupt state in the United States? Is this really what you want to be known for, as a citizen of this State? Is this what you want for your children and grandchildren? Together, we can fight this corruption, beginning with the Mayor, his council, the State's attorney and the SFPD. Who's with me?
Thanks for listening, Christopher, the Living Man."
I will, more than likely, be arrested again ANYWAY, even though at this point I am breaking no law relating this to the world...which is fine by me. When I get to trial and beat this case...with my hands TIED BEHIND MY BACK, GAGGED, AND DEPRIVED OF WITNESSES AND ALL EVIDENCE THAT PROVES MY INNOCENCE, ON MY KNEES...I will then put these people out of office, and have THEM arrested and put in my place.
Last, but certainly not least, is this...if I'm SOOOOOO dangerous, and everyone is SOOOOOOO afraid of me...then why did they let me free before trial???? Here's a question you should all be asking "all" of the alleged "victims"....don'tcha think? :D
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you very much for your comments! Thank you again!! I value your opinions!