The Corrupt Crooks Letter

As a lot of folks on Facebook are already well aware, I have made my intent clear to do something that requires crystal balls, which I have in abundance.  It would appear that I am to get no justice in America, and have my daughter returned...so those of the crooked and corrupt court of Iowa are going to watch with baited breath, while I try a move so bold as to either get what I want done, which would be to have our daughter returned to the mother's arms, where she belongs, and has belonged since day one, or go to jail trying.

Here, for the world to see, is the email these crooks received on Friday, in their inboxes:

"To all the crooks continuously committing crimes against the citizens of Iowa, the US, and the World:

On the 1st of November, I will be going to Newton, Iowa; to the home of Ronald Shaver, the biological "Father" of our daughter - who had sex with my wife one time, and left her out to dry for over a year, and never once checked up on her to see if she was OK, but because DHS sought him out to find someone, ANYONE, to take our daughter away from us that wasn't family (even though they had already offered her to the mother's sister, then never called her again) and who raised his pinky and said he wanted to be involved in her life; even though he had 2 convicted OWI's on his record, and an assault charge, and was single, they then gave our daughter to him, so they wouldn't have to give her to us or the mother's family, even though we were married, had no record - to pick up our rightful daughter, who should have, by this time, been returned to our care, and our parental rights restored.

Even though the director of DHS, Charles Palmer, himself, even stated that "The child should have never been removed from the mother", and agreed with the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, that all allegations were bullspit, and had us removed from the child abuse registry...for neglect of all things, niether the district court judge or the Supreme Court will consider this case, un-terminate our rights or give us our child back...even though this case should have never been in the hands of this Jurisdiction, due to the mother AND THE CHILD having more than enough Indian blood to be considered to be under ICWA rights.  What's more, neither the district court, nor the Supreme Court have the right to deprive ANY parent of their God Given or Constitutionally provisioned parental rights, and the Supreme Law of the land is to let parents raise their children as they see fit...this has been ruled many times in case law.

So, on November first, at noon, I will be coming to the home of Ronald Shaver to take the child in question back to the mother, where she belongs.  I imagine that you will, at that time, arrest me.  I say, go for it.  I do not mind being a martyr for what's right; you've had your chance to make things right, and yet you refuse to release our daughter.  We have expended every legal way to have her returned, all shot down by your crooked and corrupt judicial system.  Now it's time for me to stand up for what's right.

You are, of course, welcome to have me arrested, but keep this in mind - I have well over 2200 facebook friends that are behind me, all destroyed by CPS in their respective states; the entirety of Anonymous, the National Liberty Alliance, and several talk show hosts, several reporters, several newspaper folks, and TeamLaw standing behind what I'm about to do.  This story will be added to my blog, where I have more than a half a million views btwn. the blog and my Google plus profile; and will be uploaded constantly to Twitter, where I have a very large following of over 5500 people, over half of which are also involved in this...and the other half that include very famous people (including Montel Williams, the talk show host), several hundred patriots, rock and country bands and singers, and politicians.

This email will also be copied and sent to all the Congressman, Representatives, the Governor, the Lt. Governor, and anyone else in the community of Des Moines Iowa that I can possibly think of.  My coming to Newton will be also live recorded on several talk shows around the country, and my arrest, if that's the way you wanna play it, will be recorded and uploaded for all the world to see.  As you may have already guessed, the FBI and all law enforcement are, also, fully informed of my intent, as is Ronald Shaver, the father.

Keep in mind, as well, that I am a sovereign national now.  I have no ties to the Corporate US, and I am not a member of your system.  I am free, and only pledge allegience to myself, and I rule over myself.  I do not comply with your rules or laws, nor do I "Stand Under" your statutes and codes.  Touch me, arrest me, and you will have real trouble holding me.  My support network will flood your offices with calls, and you will be duly harrassed until my release, and my daughter given back to us.

Be it known, also, that yet ANOTHER rescindment of signatures has been sent to the Supreme Court of Iowa, retracting all signatures, agreements and contracts with the State of Iowa and The U.S. Corporation.

It's time to do the right thing by the mother, and for you folks, and Ronald Shaver, to give this child back to the parent who wanted her, all the way from the beginning until she was 6 months old, not at the last minute like the abandoning father, who unfriended the mother and never once checked on her to see if she was pregnant or not.

This letter to you all, along with the persons it has been sent to, will be immediately placed on my blog, 

You can, as always, read it here, at http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com

Sincerely,

Christopher Bruce

Legal Father, whether the courts say differently...or not."

And, just to make this little ordeal more public than it already is, we will be filing this affidavit with the courts, and forwarding it to a little agency in our state, the Iowa Department of Public Safety and Iowa Professional Standards Bureau, which will involve and alert the State and County sheriffs of my intent, and perhaps elicit their help to make sure that things go over more smoothly.  I highly suggest, that if any of you try this, that you file this affidavit immediately, reading like I have written mine...

Affidavit of Truth, and a Matter Forthcoming

The State of Iowa wrongfully, as well as admittedly stole our daughter, Trilynn Brueggeman, from biological parent Elizabeth Bruce, and legal father Christopher Bruce, on the date of 7/21/2014, and in the course of 6 months, terminated both parent’s legal and biological rights, as opposed to the Constitution of the United States, and the Supreme Court law of the land, that has ruled many times that those rights are naturally every parent’s rights, to raise their children as they see fit, and be in possession of those constitutionally provisioned parental rights, regardless of the state’s intervention.  The Department of Human Services/Child Protective Services administrative offices, in 2 separate assessment appeals, once by an Administrative Law Judge, Maggie LeMarche, and once by Charles Palmer himself, the Director, both ruled that “The child should have never been removed from the parents”, and that we should be taken off of the child abuse registry, and our records expunged of the allegations.  The case has been sitting in appeals to termination in the Iowa Supreme Court for seven months.  They refuse to hear the case, because the laws broken and the corruption goes so deep, that to bring it to the fore would expose them for their fraud in taking our child, even going so far as to completely ignore DHS/CPS’s own administrative ruling that says, in so many words, that they were wrong in taking our daughter.

Thereby, I plan to present this public notice and affidavit, that I will be traveling to the home of Ronald Shaver, the biological SINGLE father, whom the courts awarded sole custody of this child, in an effort to request that he give the child back to her rightful parents.  I have, at this time, exhausted every possible legal remedy to get her restored to us and our rights put back in place, but it would appear that the courts do not wish to dispense proper justice, nor admit that they didn’t even had jurisdiction of this child and her parents in the first place, considering the mother and child both had adequate Indian blood in them to show the need for tribal intervention with the Cherokee Indians, and that right to their jurisdiction in the matter was taken from the mother illegally by the social worker that removed her, and continued to withhold that intervention during the course of the entire case, until just before the rights were terminated.  Not only that, but all contracts, agreements, etc. were broken...with the United States Corporation, as well as with any state corporation sufficiently, with our rescindment of all signatures on all documents in November of 2014, and is filed in both the District and Supreme Courts.  No court in Iowa has the ability to exercise Jurisdiction over these parents OR the child, from that date.  We the parents also claim to no longer be citizens of this state or this country’s corporation, and are, as we speak, Sovereign Nationals living in the United States Corporate boundaries only, as free citizens.  We affirm that, not only have all contractual agreements been dissolved with this state, we also affirm that we no longer fall under the Jurisdiction of any state, city, county, or country Jurisdiction, and thereby have every legal right to reclaim our rightful property, one Trilynn Brueggeman, from the care of Ronald Shaver, post haste.

Signed, Christopher W. Bruce, legal father, married to the mother, and Elizabeth Bruce, rightful biological mother, on this date, 10/25/2015.


____________________________________
Christopher W. Bruce


____________________________________
Elizabeth M. Bruce

See folks, the only way you will be able to reclaim what's yours, is to stop "Standing Under" the city, county, state and U.S. Government's rule.  Be who you are, not who they have assigned you to be.  Be free of their rule, as well as their jurisdiction.  Stop paying for the right to travel, the right to speak, and the right to practice what you wish to practice.  You are not a ward of the state, nor are you an employee of Government, paying off the futures you were traded to get.  Be a sovereign national.  Don't let the Government tell you when you can drive, when you can go to another country, take care of your own children, or teach your kids the bullshit common core they're trying to shove down their throats in an effort to dumb them down.

Get with it America.  The only way we can stop this corruption in Government is to get rid of the Government, and rule ourselves.  Rip up your identification.  Burn your social security cards...hell, there isn't going to be any social security left by the time you get to our current retirement age, why do you think they keep increasing it?  Birth Certificate?  Tear it up.  You weren't in on that agreement anyway, you were way too young.  Driver's license?  Do you currently need to ask the Government if you walk to the grocery store?  Then why are you asking for the priveledge to drive...when you already have a right to travel any other way?  Car registration?  Gun Registration?  Really?  So what, someday they can declare them all null and void and someday take your cars and guns?  These are inaliable rights folks, we all have them.  We can speak about whatever we want whenever we want, do you really feel the Government gives you that right?  Because they don't.  By signing up for these things you are "Standing Under" the codes, statutes and are given priveleges by the Corporate United States, and paying out the ass for it.  Stop doing so, and Government has no more power....over you, over your money...or over your rights as a sovereign national.  Be a living breathing man or women, and shed the rule over you.  The more that do it, the quicker we get rid of all of our problems.

The Petition of Appeal

http://www.society30.com/online-petitions-victory-disobedient-citizens/

Hey America!  The Final Draft is finished!!!   Can you believe, these people wanted me to put together 17 copies to file with them?  Unreal...you don't think that maybe this is to make it harder for people to appeal, dooya?  I think so.

I think we have a winner peeps!!

Anyway...on to it, eh?

The Petition...with a little added "Mighty Sword" twist to see if maybe I could have them shaking in their boots a little.  This will also be immediately emailed to each and every member of our little party, so that they can enjoy telling their kids about it someday...  :D

However, keep in mind that this petition may just piss these people off.  But that's OK too, because then you know what's next...FED COURT!!!  There, I shant be quite so kind in my charge bringing, either.

And Away we go!!  We will, of course, be giving you the FINISHED and POLISHED copy before the day is out...

The Final Battle Part IV - The Last Reach For the B***S (B)

 DAMN I'M HAVING FUN!!!

Wheeeeelllllp....today I got to invite some great folks from Methodist to our upcoming permenancy hearing....it's gonna be a whoppin' good time!  Oh...oh, and that's not all....but, I'm afraid I just have to keep secrets, we don't want any preparations for my surprises...I just can't wait for Methodist's explanation for their part, and, thanks to the motion to NUNC PRO TUNC the removal hearing (to be filed...PRETTY DAMN QUICK, we're gonna rehash the whoooooole thing, starting with that bitch...you know the one.  I can't WAIT!!


Here are just some of today's motions, including another one I can't wait for, the drug facility, and their shining faces...not just to show the judge that ALL of their testing was FALSE, but to bring DHS's drug goon on the stand, you know, TONY REED, to testify about his 2nd drug test of the father after our last hearing, just 3 days after I served the facility to appear...well, they did, but not to produce records, like they most certainly WILL at this hearing; but to, IN THEIR REVENGE OF THAT ACTION, TO TAKE AND PRODUCE ANOTHER TEST THAT THEY COULD FALSIFY in order to try and teach the father a valuable lesson in f***ing with DHS...only one problem...they provided me with MORE evidence of DHS's snake-like actions (I'm thinking those folks and Daily Mays, of former attorney fame, might just be related somehow).  So now, we can have at his happy lying ass too.  We'll see if he tries any football tackles on this defendant, as I waltz out of the courtroom to go and get our daughter...tee hee. I do declare that all of these bastards will soon be a fryin' in the winter sun...legally, of course, and, just so the administrative branch of the Polk County Sheriff's office isn't confused about my borderline threat here, thsi one means:

I....PLAN...TO .....FILE...A....LOT....OF...CHARGES...AND...BRING...SEPARATE...ACTIONS...SOOOOON...NO....PHYSICAL...HARM...IS...INTENDED...HERE....BY...THIS...DEFE...NDANT ...OR...HIS....WIFE...EITHER....

**********************************************************************************************

Now comes Christopher Bruce in his motion to supress evidence, as presented by the prosecution for drug testing,  in the adjudication hearing, as well as it will be brought against us in our upcoming permanency hearing, with clear and convincing evidence for exhibit.

1.  The father has acquired two urine cups that will used as exhibits.  These two cups are used to do official drug testing at a facility that serves DHS in their efforts.

2.  Two days after this defendant did file a motion to suppress this evidence, DHS did file a report to this court, with an included version of this 2nd test, complete with an explanation for the cup that was thrown in the trash, as being a cup the tester found to be inactive, and that was thrown in the trash by the tester as well, after doing one test on the defendant.  Then, that a 2nd cup was used, and found this defendant dirty for methamphetimines.  Proof of this deceit on the part of the tester, as well as DHS, is as stated below:

a. That the defendant, who was asked by DHS to take a urine test (not ordered by this court, or its trier-of-fact, to this defendant’s best knowledge), agreed to do so without argument, even after DHS had made
it clear that all was the same as before, 1 visit a week, supervised, with the same worker, Liz still a drug user, and in need of abuse training, the father the same, as well as having mental issues.  The father, in an attempt to go along with what this court has asked, was willing to do what it took in order to accomplish this.

b. That this defendant, who had relieved himself just prior to the hearing, and this hearing only had taken 15 minutes at most, had yet to have to go again.  This defendant then drank water in order to comply with this test.

c. Once, while the defendant wandered and spoke, the tester, thinking this defendant was leaving the courthouse in order to avoid this test (even though he had willingly agreed to do it), moved to block his path so that he could not leave, as if he had the power and the right to accomplish this. This, to this defendant, proves his desire to do the test this time, as false, because if this defendant were to leave, he would have to produce another inactive cup or something else might go wrong as opposed to doing it this time.

d. That this defendant, while waiting to produce enough to take the test, did inform this tester (without his knowledge of his being the owner of the contract with DHS for drug testing until the report showed in efile this fact 2 days later) the story of the first drug test, at the facility on Merle Hay Road, to the letter, in order to deem whether this tester was more honest than the facility he had tested at for hair.  After describing the condition of the facility, this tester then claimed that he had many dealings with this facility, and knew the staff well, and that this facility looked nothing like I had described it to him.  This brought to the defendant that this was no person that the defendant could expect or trust to issue accurate and honest drug results to this court.

e. That upon this realization, the defendant declared that maybe he should inform DHS now that he would be coming up dirty in this urine test, then proceeded, after a time to provide the drug test sample.  After watching how the test was done, this defendant then inquired as to how the test worked.  The tester told the defendant of the process, and claimed that there were several tabs, each containing the name of a drug, and that they would not only move up as the drug in question was recognized, but that bars would appear in color to signify a clean or dirty for result; and finally that one or two of the tabs had already begun moving. When this defendant tried to change his view as to witness the test, the tester then turned the cup away from the defendant.

f. After the test had completed, after the related time period to this defendant of three minutes for the test to complete, the tester was asked for results, to which the tester pulled out his cell phone and took pictures, and told the defendant that DHS would hear the results first, then inform the defendant of those results. Afterwards, the tester asked the defendant to pour the sample into another container, sealed this, then asked the defendant to dispose of this test cup into the court’s bathroom trash.  The tester left, and the defendant remained at the court house, with the intention of retrieving this cup.

g. The defendant asked a member of the Polk County Sheriff’s staff to get the key to the garbage, because the defendant claimed that he had dropped something into the garbage and could not reach it to retrieve it.  The staff then procured the key from the janitor and watched as the defendant retrieved the ONLY cup in the garbage.

h. This defendant brings that DHS and this tester’s story that the tester  taken two complete samples from this defendant one right after the other, and then threw the discovered inactive cup away after a first test, then did another after discovering the first cup to be inactive is false, and that DHS and this tester have an agreement and contract to cover each other’s story, in case such a falsehood is discovered to be so in such a case. There was no 2nd sample taken from this defendant, and the testee, not the tester, threw away the cup; not because the cup was inactive as discovered by the tester, but because the inactive cup was found out by
the testee, and was, in fact, required to be trashed by the defendant.

i. After discovering that nothing showed on the cup whatsoever (no marks, and no rising tabs), this defendant did, in an effort to procure more proof needed to convince this court of this deceit, decided to go and pick the mother up from work, just to see how her drug test would come out.  The father then drove the mother to 2911 Merle Hay Rd., the very place this defendant was hoping that he would have to go to.  On the way, this defendant called Katie Gosch to leave a message on her voicemail that the results had shown clean for the father’s test, in order to flush her part in this deceit out.

j. Upon arriving at Central Iowa Family Services, this defendant told the mother to do her test, ask for a witness to this test, and to record the interaction.  The mother went inside to do her test.  Then the phone rang, and it was Katie Gosch, who informed that my test results had not come back clean, as I had told her, but that they had, once again, come up dirty for meth.  I then hung up on her, realizing that they had done this to these defendants once again, utilizing the same facility’s testing results as proof.  The father then called DHS again to inform Ms. Gosch only these words,“We’re done, no more of this BS”, we’re done here.”...and that’s it.  There was no mention of no more contact to be had between DHS and I, as claimed by Ms. Gosch.

k.  Just a moment later, the mother exited the facility with her test cup still in her hand (not on purpose), and informed me that they had denied her the right to a witness, as she had asked. I was upset, of course, thanks to the phone call from Ms. Gosch and said “Come on, we’re leaving.”  The mother had to then go back in, because she had left her purse inside.  She came out and, upon noticing that she had a cup, we decided, as we drove home, that we would attempt the test again in this unused cup, with the mother as witness to see if we had the same problem with this new cup as we did with the test cup taken from the courthouse. Upon arriving at home, the father took the new unused cup into the bathroom and filled it to the top with fresh urine, and put the cap on it.  We waited the 3 minutes the tester had waited...and discovered this 2nd cup as inactive, just like the first one.  My wife took pictures of the cup after the test had completed.  The inactive result of this test is submitted as evidence with this court, as of this date.  Later, not unlike the removal recording, we realized again that we had forgotten we had recorded this, and listened to it today, in order to see if there was anything we could use as evidence. The only voice you can clearly hear is the mother’s unfortunately, but if you listen closely, you can hear the female tester as she denies this mother her witness to the test she wants to willingly take; by stating there is only a single collector who works there, and no witness can be or will be provided to her.

l. I find it very interesting that the female tester involved with the test of the mother is surprised when she says that she wants a witness to the test, then remarks on her surprise by saying that NO ONE has ever asked for a witness to the test.

m. That with the blog post dated back on 8/14/14, named “The B&S Railroad Job, Part II - The Drug Thingymabob” posted on this defendants website, even now, describing this facility in full detail, as having, upon your entrance to it, a very large reception area with a single large desk in it, with only one person working in the entire place, with nasty shag carpet, that looks nothing like your average drug testing facility; and a side room with an ugly smaller desk in it, where this man (or woman) who works there, cuts your hair with a pair of school scissors and sends it in.  Nowhere in this facility is there another piece of furniture, or anywhere for anyone who might be waiting to take their test to sit and wait.  This defendant finds it quite interesting, then, that 5 months later, it’s been completely remodeled, again, as witnessed by both defendants, with all that this defendant witnessed and posted about back in August, gone.  Now, there’s a small waiting room with differently colored low carpet, clean, with a giant wall now separating the main area from the front, with security cameras in place and a lot of nice furniture at which you can sit and wait for your appointment in it; as well as a nice and  new professional look to it.  When this defendant had described this place to his tester, remembering he had said “over a year” as a time frame that he’d been working with the place, thought to serve a subpoena on this facility in order to gain a client list, and upon his entry to this place found it completely remodeled because of his post alone, this defendant is absolutely certain of this fact, beyond all reasonable doubt.  This, of course, gives this tester, just three days after serving them a subpoena to appear at our hearing with all of their records to present in this court, who is not only the owner of this testing facility, as well as the owner of this contract for drug testing with DHS, more than enough motive, JUST 3 DAYS AFTER THIS DEFENDANT SERVED THEM WITH A SUBPOENA TO APPEAR, appears,, NOT with their records, but to only give this defendant a drug test and find him guilty, once again, and to find this defendant and his wife dirty for the same drug with an alternate falsified test.

n. That the mother’s drug test was as the results produced, falsely positive, due to her just receiving an inhaler with Albuterol, around the time of the hair stadt test, by Primary Healthcare.  and is shown in this website, the answer provided by a professional working for the company shown in Exhibit #40-42, efiled this date, 1/9/2015.  This answer given by a website, Drugs.com (Drugs, Inc.) proves this inhaler to produce false positive for meth, as well as for amphetimines.

3.  Here, then, is the relief these defendants hereby seek with this motion:

4.  That each and every test done at this facility should be either retested at a true and legitimate testing facility, far out of the reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, or  suppressed for all who have attended this facility.  I am advertising everywhere for others who have had their testing done here, and I have already gotten 3 recent clients in response.  More will be continuously added to the list.

5.  That the Department of Human Services owes an apology to Elizabeth Bruce, and that her need for drug testing, drug assessment, as well as drug abuse training be rescinded by this court.  Slander and Libel charges shall be filed against this Department, post haste.

6.  That all accusations of the alleged drug use, as well as her recommendations be stricken from all court records.

7.  That drug testing, in the form of Urine testing, be ordered to be done on this father again, by another facility far out of reach of the influence of the Department of Human Services, post haste, and, pending these results, that the relief sought in paragraph 5 and 6 of this motion be repeated for this father.

S/ Christopher Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE

We also took a minute to file the recording for all to hear, and the drug result pictures and the other drug cup fished from the trash, then, tomorrow, we are going to file the motions, NUNC PRO TUNC, for ALL of our hearings to be reheard, and put appropriately in place for the Writ of Mondamus soon to follow the appeal to the permanency...matter of fact, just as soon as I walk out the door of the courtroom.  All of this will delay things JUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUST LONG ENOUGH to make room for all of this defendants little aces, that he's been a savin'....and a savin.....and a savin' up for this upcoming Writ.

DAMN I'm having fun!!  What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall, however, when our beloved DA, Stephanie Brown, and Judgy William A Price Esquire see THIS ONE, to be filed...wellll....NOW!!

******************************************************************************************

From what I've heard?  Judgy Price doesn't like losing Either....lol.  I really and truly, wish I could see his face, when he sees this, and pending his decision to WILLINGLY and GLADLY recuse this case..well, shoot, I wish I could say the words...but I just can't do it.  Here then, is the motion that will turn these people on their respective behinds.  Enjoy Judgy!  All my love Stephanie Brown....you little mynx you  ;)

Toodles!

(SORRY....this motion is still in the process of being edited, and will be posted for your viewing pleasure A.S.A.P.)