Showing posts with label Dale Mays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dale Mays. Show all posts

Saturday, August 5, 2017

The Corrupt Courts/Corrupt Officials List, Part II



To kick things off, I began this with the intention of getting information from folks about their corrupt courts, judges and officials sent to my email...not commented below the last article, as most decided to do.  That email AGAIN is:


Please, if you will, MAKE A NOTE OF IT!!

After this portion, I highly suggest you make your way down to the asterisk line, where you will find information that will change your life, bet on it.  For those of you that are already victims of judicial fraud, well, you've already experienced your fair share, and will validate it with this.  This is primarily aimed at those who are still walking around asleep.  You there!  Yes YOU!!  Yeah, I'm talking to YOU!!!  Wake up, before you're the next contestant on "The Price Is Your Rights!"

I believe that I will kick things off, where this is concerned, by submitting the folks that I know need submitting...along with all I know of them.  I suggest, highly, that you use this as a template to do your own lists; of which, after checking my email, I have...none!!!  Not one list!  I imagine this is due to your not knowing exactly what I want from you, and how to do it...well, that roadblock no longer exists, thanks to what I'm doing RIGHT NOW!  SO GO CRAZY!!

Let's do this then, eh?

THE JUDGES

For Polk County, Iowa, home of Des Moines, Iowa, the State capitol, and my former home of 42 years, District 5C, The Judges List:

Judge William A. Price


Judge William A. Price (The A, of course, stands for MAJOR ASSHOLE!)  This man has an enemies list Omar Khadafi would envy.  I once....ONCE, saw this man walking to get some coffee during a break of his...SHIFT? as a judge, and, I kid you not, the man looked over his shoulder at LEAST ten times, in just a block of walking.  That's the life for me!  I wanna be a corrupt evil judge!

Neither here nor there, this is, actually, a man I should be thanking...well, had he not upheld the legal kidnapping of my wife's only daughter; told an associate magistrate "Get him!  He's a piece of cake" before I was tried by her for harassing a poor editor of a local rag to do my story after he sent me a SIGNED email stating he would; placed a cash only bond of $1500 on me for 3 simple misdemeanors once, and not only refused to recuse (dismiss, in legalese) himself from all of my cases when I ordered him to, but also refused me my right to have a recusal haring to determine his bias against me.  Yes, you heard that right...the judge that I needed to dismiss himself from ruling over me was able to deny me the right to have a hearing to determine whether he was able to rule on a case involving me due to possible bias.  No, no, our system isn't broken!  The reason I should be thanking him, is for kicking me in the shins as to the condition of our judiciary; and the fleecing through the court system of the American people by these foreign officials; through the use of the law of the sea (commerce) and martial law courts.  Had he not been the most corrupt judge I've come across to date, I would not know what I know now, that our judiciary is in bad need of a total dismemberment.

I'm just going to put it like this, people, this guy has no listed properties in Iowa, I have NEVER seen this guy in public, aside from his one trip to get some coffee, and it took me almost two years to find a single picture of him anywhere.  I would hope that would be enough for you, to convince you not to vote him BACK in for yet another of a hundred terms; but in case it isn't, and you need more, well, here you go:

(Takes a deeeeeeep breath)...I was going to list links for every single article that has this judge's name in it; but that would be wayyyy too much work.  For anyone wanting actual proof and paperwork concerning these allegations, go to the brownish looking sidebar of this blog.  There, under the archives portion of that sidebar, click on any week of the first year, 2014, anytime after 6/22, and just about every single article has his name in it somewhere; and usually includes some accompanying paperwork.  This carries on into 2015, until around May, then he resurfaces again in January, February and March of 2016, and briefly again in August and September of 2016.  Will you have to go that far?  Probably not.  Believe me, once you've gone through just a couple of my 2014 articles, it should be more than enough to convince the majority of you folks that the only good places for this judge are jail or the grave.


Judge Robert Blink

Now, this guy has his job as a judge down.  Unlike Judge William Price, who is so corrupt that he doesn't even try to hide that fact anymore; to the public, and to those who don't know him yet, or haven't appeared in front of him, this guy initially projects like a fair, decent guy...but a fair and decent guy wouldn't dismiss 200+ pieces of evidence relevant to my defense in a felony trial, and, not only let all of his buddies, the 29 elected officials he dismissed as having to testify for my side of the case, get out of testifying, but went through my witness list a couple more times to ensure that even more could get out of testifying, even though they nor their lawyers were present at the hearing to quash those subpoenas.  More than that, even after setting a hearing to have my probation revoked (I opted for this, and asked him to set a hearing for it...and he did), then issued a warrant for my arrest for...probation violation, even though I hadn't even signed up for probation, nor met with an officer of the court.  This is also the guy who put me in jail for a year for a justified crime, refused, after promising he would, to issue a protective order involving a key witness who was half responsible for having me arrested and jailed, and threatened harassment charges against me for wanting to discuss possible ways to pay my debt to society, without jail, with the prosecuting attorney, Linda Lane.

For more about this Judge and what he did to me in my felony case, see these links:


and then stay tuned, very soon, for the transcripts from this case that were submitted as evidence in my post-conviction relief case concerning this case, where I am trying to get these wrongs righted...not that they will be.  See also all of my post-conviction relief case submissions here in my most recent blog posts, around the last two links listed above. 


Carol S. Egly

There's a rather special place in the "Bruce Bitch List" for this alleged "Judge".  She ignored an initial challenge of her jurisdiction, issued the very first time I appeared in front of her, didn't address that challenge for 3 WEEKS (challenges to jurisdiction are supposed to be addressed IMMEDIATELY, before another proceeding or judicial action can take place); then claimed an unlawful jurisdiction to try me under, without any proof.  Then, because I had asked for a jury trial in this simple misdemeanor case, but had just submitted it a couple of days before they had combined cases for it and my felony trial (that ran parallel with this case) and had misplaced that motion to ask for it, she would then OK a submission of a court produced motion that was not designed by me, that didn't show that I wanted one; then, to cover up their screw-up, changed the record of the court to state that I had specifically asked for a NON-jury trial in that motion, and denied me that.  From what I gather, this Judge spends an awful lot of her free time drinking (I would too, if I were involved in the shite these Polk County Judges get away with daily...anything to alleviate the pangs of guilt, eh?), and shouldn't really be on the bench, after just THESE shenanigans. 

The picture above?  The product of a well-planned photo shoot, I'm thinking.  The times I appeared in front of her, I was ready to change the E in her last name to a well-deserved U, due to both her looks, and her rather ugly soul.



Judge William Kelly


Judge William Kelly is young yet...his only saving grace.  He seems OK, not quite as corrupt as the ones that have been around FOREVER...but this Judge already has a black smudge on his record.  This man, on the record of the court even, denied me the right to defend myself in my own person, unless I took on, at the very least, a state provided attorney.  Yes, you heard that, he denied me the right to get case files, hear evidence, etc...and defend myself, while I was incarcerated.  For those of you still lost, that means that I was not able to do all those things the Constitution guarantees me, as long as I was locked up.  I'd say that's a pretty hefty smudge.



Magistrate Anastasia Hurn



Now Magistrate Anastasia Hurn was mentored by, and, evidently, reports to, none other than Judge William Price.  This in and of itself is more than enough for me, personally.  Add to that, she ruled that I had harassed those poor members of the Des Moines media, in particular CityView managing editor Daryl Tromblay and kid reporter Jeffrey Pitts; by asking them to keep their word and report on Des Moines corrupt officials and courts, where I was concerned.  Of course, when 2 months after that promise had gone by, and I had yet to here from these folks, I got a wee bit upset.  We had been in constant ambiguous contact, via email, for nearly 2 years prior to this, and had never had an issue...until I asked for them to complete the promise I had hoped they would make, after witnessing this apparent series of judicial horrors.  C'mon...I had a head editor's signature on an email, promising that he would do the story...how could a judge fault me for emailing them twice to ask WTF, why they hadn't even made a move after 2 whole months?  Funnier still, the managing editor, on the record, testified that stealing my child unlawfully using no provable allegations didn't constitute a story.  The fact that they found me innocent of those allegations, but still didn't restore my rights or my child wasn't news either, evidently.  I suppose that the written email, (which, in any court of law, be essentially a signed contract) wasn't sufficient cause to email them asking why they hadn't done anything.  Let's not forget that Judge Price had come into the court room prior to the start of the trial by judge, to tell his prize magistrate pupil to "Get Him...he's a piece of cake" before he left her chambers.

This magistrate deserves a place on Polk County's "Evil Judges to Watch" list.  She's going to do great things for Iowa, I guarantee it.

Anastasia, unfortunately, was the only magistrate or judge I could find, in Polk County, with a facebook profile.  I'd like to thank her for posting this great candid picture of her having some beach fun, like us regular folks, after corruptly ruling against me in my harassment case.  Funny I can't see her profile anymore...I wonder what happened?  We were getting along so well too!


Judge Jeanie Vaudt


Judge Jeanie Vaudt refused me my right to videotape the proceedings in my post-conviction relief case, and quashed the only official's subpoena I was able to get served for my post-conviction case...her buddy John P. Sarcone (See evil official's list, later to be added to this article), Polk County Iowa's head racist and most criminal County Attorney.  She would not compel the state to tell me where Linda Lane, the recently upgraded attorney in John Sarcone's office had disappeared to (at just the right time), so that I could call her as a witness in her case; and ordered that I be refused justice in every way in her case.  It seems funny to me that hardly anyone ever wins out against the State...any state, for that matter.  Gee...I wonder why?  They sure don't have much problem appealing and appealing and appealing when and if they should lose, using your hard-earned tax dollars to try you over and over again...until they win...or at the very least, get a stalemate.  The numbers, showing how many times the state wins out against John Q. Criminal are, of course, more important to show us.  We can't have those numbers, showing how many of those "criminals" were cleared, expunged or admonished of the county attorneys allegations, getting too high.   Then the jig, the court cash cow, would be "up", as it were, and Iowa would lose out on some of its fed funding to keep a certain so amount of people in jail, at any one time.  Can't have that...right??


ELECTED OFFICIALS

OK, so that's it for the judge's list.  Let's move on to Polk County's Elected Officials.


Attorney General Tom Miller


Tom Miller is supposedly still Polk County's Attorney General.  This ancient piece of crap needs to be ousted, if this is the real truth.  I've heard a lot of crazy things concerning this man.  Among them is that he once arose from his seat in Des Moines and made his way to Clinton Iowa, where he excused a social worker from her charges of perjury that had been brought against her in a civil case, because, he stated, "She was immune to prosecution."  I've also heard that his son is in jail for all kinds of crazy things as well.  Either way, this man has been in office entirely too long...if indeed he really is still in office.  

Anyway, this man's office is responsible for fighting you in any case that brings charges against ANY State official, or when you appeal the same official's actions.  For example, should you fight the Department of Human Services in their Child Protective Assessment of whether you are actually abusing your children or not, it's the Attorney General's office who defends their side of things.

The only case I ever beat in Iowa was such a case.  They even appealed it up to the Director of DHS, who agreed with my side of it.  Of course, there wasn't much that he could say.  It was way too obvious that they most certainly did mess things up.

This office also was responsible for defending the courts when my termination case went to the appellate courts.  I did not fare so well in that one...even though I had just won in the case that showed that I did not abuse my child.  So how is it that it was shown that they did wrong in taking the child, yet, didn't do wrong in terminating my rights because of that?  Here are documents (and of course, my opinion of all that occurred in those documents) to show that maybe these people aren't quite on the up and up in Iowa.

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-appeal-to-termination-part-i-this.html

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-ol-double-cross-appeal.html

** Honorable corruption-related mentions in this office are as follows:

Katherine Miller-Todd, Asst. Attorney General
Grant Dugdale, Asst. Attorney General 





John P. Sarcone, The official head of the Polk County Attorney's offices, is one of the most corrupt individuals STILL in office in Des Moines Iowa to date.  Where do I start here?  I think I've done enough on this man and all he has done to me and my family.  For links on this guy, well, I'm just going to say that I could almost dedicate my entire blog to getting this man put out of office.  I guarantee, that if you were to go just about anywhere in this blog, you would find his name tagged in just about any article I've written.  This man even went as far as to call the Secret Service on me, to get me arrested, because he wasn't able to find me.  He wanted me arrested so that I would not be able to attend my Termination of Parental rights hearing.  He has called the FBI offices, all over the country, in an effort to shut me up and get me off of his case.  He wants me gone...or dead...which is fine, since I want the same for him.  At the very least, this man deserves serious jail time...not just for what he's done to me, but what he has done to an awful lot of people in Polk County.

Try and call him sometime, at 515-286-3737.  Ask to speak to him personally.  I dare you to try.  His secretary screens his calls for why you're calling.  I've seen this man once, I think...in 42 years.  His office is lined with bullet-proof glass.  These are the actions of a serious criminal, my friends.  Stop re-electing this criminal into office, Iowa, PLEASE!

On the right side of this blog, in the brownish side-bar, is a search box.  Put in "John P. Sarcone", and stand back.  All you would ever want to know about this criminal is right here.  Make a note of it.

**Honorable mention of those criminals who work under this criminal attorney:

Linda Lane
Stephanie Brown
Kevin Bell
Kevin Brownell
Jesse Ramirez

                - Assistant Polk County Attorneys

For more information about these assistants, just search for them in this blog.  I also dedicate a paragraph to each of them further down, when I attack attorneys.


Charles Palmer, Former director of DHS, Iowa


Charles Palmer, Director of the Iowa Department of Human Services, is a criminal of a higher order, and the head of the department that has stolen more children in Iowa than all but 5 other states in the union.  Yes, Iowa is #6 in the country for taking children from parents...and never giving them back.

Thank God, that, just about the time that Iowa finally decided to look into what exactly was going on in this state department, this 100 yr. old asshole finally decided to retire.  But pay attention, Iowa, because I'm sure that whoever is going to replace this criminal (Jerry Foxhoven) will be no better.  More importantly, this department, once it comes out what they have done to Iowa, needs to be stripped down to its bare bones, and all that caused Iowa grief, INCLUDING Charles Palmer, should be brought to justice.

Honorable mention for Iowa DHS employees:

Jeannie Munson, Agitator and Collaberator
Mark Worthington, Agitator and Collaberator
Emily Nieman, S4, Child Protective Services
Stephanie Rhinehart, Supervisor, CPS
Katie Gosch, Caseworker, CPS

For more information on any of these, please search for them in this blog.

Here, Iowa, is your new director.  Be on the lookout for more crimes, involving him:


Jerry Foxhoven, Current Director, Iowa DHS

Naturally, I'll be paying close attention...:D


*******************************************************************************************************



Well, it would seem that we need to get going on more corrupt Iowa Officials, the attorneys that I know well.  Let's begin with the more recent, and work our way backwards.  Now, keep in mind, a lot of these "officials" of the court stay very well hidden, and pictures/info on them is all but impossible to find...but that doesn't or won't exclude their coverage.  Some, I found pretty ancient pictures of...and that will do.  A few, some of the more corrupt, I've opted to include links to their Linked-In profiles, so that we can blast what they're up to these days as well as what they've done in their oh-so-sordid pasts.

So what do you say we get this pahty stahted?

We'll start with the County Attorney's office, and John P. Sarcone's assistants in his crimes.  We'll begin with the one that's attacking me right....this...minute, Mr. Jesse Ramirez.  Here's his mug:

NOTE:  I picked this one, because he's wearing glasses, like he is now.  I'd say he's about 20 in this picture, approximately 8 years before I met him.




Now, I shouldn't have to tell you everything this slime ball has done to me, mostly because there are about 15 articles here in this blog, all just recently written (See all articles just above and below this one, entitled "The State Post-Conviction Relief Case").  This one is on our "Evil Attorneys to Watch" list, for sure.



Another infamous FORMER county attorney under the thumb of John Sarcone once upon a time is none other than Linda Lane, pictured below:



who, according to her Linked In profile, found here:


is now a (probably more so) corrupt Asst. U.S. Attorney...though no longer in Iowa (you Iowa "lawbreakers" can thank your lucky stars).  I will, of course, be finding out exactly where SHE is, mostly because we have unfinished business in Federal Court.  For more on all that she did, all you need do is peruse just about any article from 2016 in my archives, or, you can just jump up a few articles to my "transcripts" articles under my "State Post-Conviction Relief Case" Series.

Lucas Taylor, of the law offices of Mark R. Hinshaw, is the "Stand-by attorney" who witnessed AGAINST me in my post-conviction relief case.  Now I don't know about the rest of the world out there, but how can an attorney, who is supposed to be representing you and your best interests, allowed to witness against you?  Got me.  Let's not even talk about the fact that this is an experienced felony lawyer who didn't ask for a bond-reduction hearing or depositions (probably the two most important things you should do for your client, especially in a felony case), didn't appeal my case (when I asked him to), didn't poll the jury to find out if a mistrial was warranted (it was, without question), wasn't able to attend a very important hearing to determine whether 29 witnesses should be allowed to testify on my behalf (they were), or whether 200 pieces of filed evidence should be relevant (it all was).  I think that's enough said here...don't you?


The entire cast of Mark R. Hinshaw Law Firm.
That's Lucas, 3rd from the right.



Now attorney Dale Mays, of Benzoni Law Firm fame in Des Moines, Iowa, pictured at a much younger age here:  (sorry, this was all I could find, America)



is a snake of a lawyer of a higher order.  This man screwed my wife over by staying silent in each and every juvenile hearing we had, and weaseled out of getting slapped on the wrist for not doing his job...and doing it UNLAWFULLY as well.  For more on what this man does when he "does his job", see about any article I wrote here from 6/22/2014 until May of 2015.  Here, let me get you started with one of the better ones:


and for a more complete list of his incompetent infractions, you can go here as well:


And yes, that was BENZONI LAW FIRM in Des Moines, Iowa...don't forget that.


Now we move on to assistant county attorneys and a state of Iowa GAL that are so corrupt that NO information can be found on these people WHATSOEVER, save a case law quote here and there.  No pictures of these criminals could be located either, though, when you search the names, the only things that come up in their image counterparts are from my blog.  They, of course, deserve extra special mention.

Kevin Brownell, who was the Asst. Polk County Attorney in our later juvenile cases, had me thrown out of my own case that I had been in for 6 months, because I was the legal father of our child, not the biological one, when the evidence against him, the judge and the State was so damning that there was no other way out, but to get me out of it.

Stephanie Brown, another assistant, was the one that brought a whole list of false allegations against us (that we were later cleared of, by the very agency that removed her), and who purported to be an advocate for the department of Human Services.

Kevin Bell was the assistant County Attorney who brought false charges against me in my first harassment of social workers back in 2015.  He later dropped the more serious charge, when the damage had already been done, and when it was discovered that he had no proof of his allegation.  He would state in the dismissal that he did it because I plead to the lesser simple misdemeanors...and that the charge against me for threatening these social workers lives (something I didn't do) could just be ignored because of it.

Finally, the last and final corrupt official worth mention is Paul White, a cobra State of Iowa GAL (Guardian Ad Litem), who did absolutely nothing but sit in court in his $1000 suit and look pretty, and point his finger at us, the "criminal" parents.


EPILOGUE

Well, America, here is your blueprint.  Should you want to join into the fun, please contact me on FB, or email me using the email at the top of this article.

Until you do...this is the mighty sword, signing out, until the decision in my state post-conviction case.

************************************************************************************************


ATTENTION!!

A good friend of mine could really use some more votes to get a judge out of office, by the way...and with that, he posted some very enlightening information, for those of you who still doubt that our system of law and those who purport to uphold it is a sham.  For those of you who still believe what we've been duped into believing, that "The system works", I suggest you read it well!!  Thank you Michael C. School! (again...lol)  I highly recommend his website for relevant LAWFUL information concerning this very thing and other similar subjects.  Please note too, Michael C. School, that your name, along with others, now graces the list of websites I support.  :D  Now for his contribution:

There are no "Judges" just BAR Attorneys.... Gloria Navarro is an executive trust administrator FRC vs. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller vs. PE 261 U.S. 428, 1 Stat. 138 -178) “Judges do not enforce statutes and codes. Executive Administrators enforce statutes and codes.


Gloria Navarro has a Certificate of Standing on file to practice law on file with the federal courts same as any other BAR Attorney.

MILITARY FLAG WITH THE GOLD FRINGE

Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.The Law of the Flag regulates the laws under which contracts entered into will be governed. (See Ruhstrat v. People.)

Any courtroom that displays such a flag behind the Judge is a military courtroom which Is operating under military law and not constitutional law, or common law, or civil law, or statute law, Restrictions. (Note added: This court is thereby receiving public funds under false and fraudulent pretense and is committing Treason against the Constitution under the 16th American Jurist Prudence Section 177).

Whereas : 1,2 American Flag such as a gold fringe MUTILATES the flag and carries a one year prison term. This is confirmed by the authority of Title 36, Section § 176 (g). The gold fringe is a fourth color and, purportedly, represents “color of military law” jurisdiction and when placed on the Title 4 U.S.C. Section §§ 1,2 Flag, mutilates the flag and suspends the Constitution. Refer to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242, see BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY.

Uniform Bonding Code- 5.4 - Bonding of Judges

A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable:




1. if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of any citizen appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen appearing in any court of the county in which he works whose case may come to his attention 12y a means.


An attorney shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable,:

if he fails to protect the remedies of due process and the equal protection of the law of either his client or of the adverse party in an action. In an adversary system of law, each lawyer or attorney shall protect the representation of fact not only for their own party, but shall protect the legal process for both parties without, exception.


OATH OF OFFICE MAKES PUBLIC OFFICIALS “FOREIGN”
Those holding Federal or State public office, county or municipal office, under the Legislative, Executive or Judicial branch, including Court Officials, Judges, Prosecutors, Law Enforcement Department employees, Officers of the Court, and etc., before entering into these public offices, are required by the U.S. Constitution and statutory law to comply with Title 5 USC, Sec. §3331, “Oath of office.” State Officials are also required to meet this same obligation, according to State Constitutions and State statutory law.
All oaths of office come under 22 CFR, Foreign Relations, Sections §§92.12 - 92.30, and all who hold public office come under Title 8 USC, Section §1481 “Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions.”
Under Title 22 USC, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, Section §611, a Public Official is considered a foreign agent. In order to hold public office, the candidate must file a true and complete registration statement with the State Attorney General as a foreign principle.
The Oath of Office requires the public official in his / her foreign state capacity to uphold the constitutional form of government or face consequences.
Title 10 USC, Sec. §333, “Interference with State and Federal law”
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Such willful action, while serving in official capacity, violates Title 18 USC, Section §1918:
Title 18 USC, Section §1918 “Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the government”
Whoever violates the provision of 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—
(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(2) Is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both. And also deprives claimants of “honest services:

Title 18, Section §1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”
“For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.
and the treaties that placed your public offices in that foreign state under international law and under the United Nation jurisdiction:
49 Stat. 3097; Treaty Series 881 CONVENTION ON RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF STATES

1945 IOIA –That the International Organizations Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; Title 22, Sections 288 to 2886 U.S.C.) the US relinquished every office
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1101
The term “foreign state” includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be regarded as separate foreign states


The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

Is Gloria Navarro registered as a Foreign Agent? FARA.GOV

http://www.citizensactionnetworks.com/…/Ethics%20for%20Fede…

http://www.citizensactionnetworks.com/…/Prosecutorial%20Mis


For more proof of our U.S. Judicial corruption and the mockery of our Constitution and all it's supposed to provide us free citizens, as well as provide us FREE justice, visit Michael's page at:

www.citizensactionnetworks.com

Tell'em Christopher (Bruce) the living man sentcha...:D

Saturday, April 11, 2015

The Petition of Appeal

http://www.society30.com/online-petitions-victory-disobedient-citizens/


Hey America!  The Final Draft is finished!!!   Can you believe, these people wanted me to put together 17 copies to file with them?  Unreal...you don't think that maybe this is to make it harder for people to appeal, dooya?  I think so.

I think we have a winner peeps!!

Anyway...on to it, eh?

The Petition...with a little added "Mighty Sword" twist to see if maybe I could have them shaking in their boots a little.  This will also be immediately emailed to each and every member of our little party, so that they can enjoy telling their kids about it someday...  :D

However, keep in mind that this petition may just piss these people off.  But that's OK too, because then you know what's next...FED COURT!!!  There, I shant be quite so kind in my charge bringing, either.

And Away we go!!  We will, of course, be giving you the FINISHED and POLISHED copy before the day is out...



























































Sunday, February 8, 2015

Going For The B***S, Fini



OHWOW....I'm sorry kids, it's been a craaaaaaaaazy week.  We just received word that our little stall with the Indians did NOT work, mostly because, even though there is indeed full Cherokee in our child;'s heritage, evidently the great grandmother didn't feel like registering herself or any of her children in the Governments mandatory registration rolls...so we're back to square one.

We have, then, decided to fore go all things termination related, and just shoot right for a shot in this trier of fact's balls....yeah, I said it...SO WHAT?  WHATCHA GONNA DO?

ANYWAY...here is our affidavit...be sure and read to the end, even though the body contains more of the same crap, you're gonna really like where it ends up (snickers):  This will, naturally, be filed in the court for all to see, immediately:

Now comes ELIZABETH BRUCE in her affidavit

1.  My child was removed from my care on 7/21/14 due to lack of bond with my child (as well as with the legal father’s lack of bond); and my husband and I’s alleged inability to care for an infant in addition to failure to provide adequate supervision.

a. There were no REASONABLE EFFORTS provided to my husband and
in order to help us keep our child in our home before Iowa DHS removed
her.

b. The services provided to reunify our family, as REASONABLE
EFFORTS, were not useful or reasonable because they had nothing to do
with our situation.

2. Concerning THE Reasonable effort this court listed (after the removal hearing), then called IT (a reasonable EFFORT, singular); reasonable effort(S) made;

a.   DHS failed to provide a house/apartment for the baby and parents at a time when the parents had no income and were forced to live separately.

b.   DHS did not offer to expedite the application for FIP that we had applied for, denying us the very help we needed during this time of temporary unemployment for both parents.

c.   The only “reasonable” effort DHS supposedly made prior to the removal (and this was NOT listed or recognized as such, until the order came from the removal hearing) was to get the mother’s consent to make her and the baby stay at Methodist, using false information to keep her there the whole weekend (even though she had thought to be gone only an hour or two, according to what the workers told her) until, as stated in the doctor’s discharge plan for the baby; so that “DHS could find a home in which to place her”, without both proof of the allegations made as yet (or ever), and without a court order, which is allowed, per Iowa Code (amongst other things it has recently begun allowing).  This effort to prevent or eliminate the removal wasn’t reasonable to anyone, let alone these parents; in the situation they were in at the time; and would not be to anyone except those trying to kidnap our daughter for the purposes of adoption.The legal and rightful father, at the time of this affidavit, who has had his rights terminated even before this is officially done, and not allowed to participate in this hearing, will have, as of the time this court receives it, posted this document to everyone on the list to follow, as well as on his blog; and THEN will I file this document with the court system of Des Moines, Iowa; making it impossible, due to the posting and mailing of this document to the others to be mentioned PRIOR TO filing it with the court, will, because of the date and time stamps provided, both by emails and as postmarks on the letters delivered; to deem as confidential, and excluded as the crime defined in Iowa Code in publishing confidential court documents in a juvenile proceeding.

4.  This document, relating to the most hated phrase in our home “Reasonable Efforts Made”, will be our last testament...in this case, and in my life, relating to our daughter, where this matter is concerned.  I wish to hear no more about it, until this judge recuses this case due to his bias; whether about my color of skin or about my socio-economic status matters not, only that this is so obviously so.  Therefore, the time for “borderline threats” and wondering if all or any of this applies to you is over.  Here, is where I intend to make it known once and for all, who this list pertains to, and that, once on this list, you are either to be the recipient of information concerning this case, or the person who will be paying for it with your job...and that’s final.  Sounds pretty simple doesn’t it?  It is.

5.  Here is where we make our final stand.  We will, of course, be attending a few more hearings; one for the assessment appeal, which will be asked to be expedited to take place immediately, instead of two months from now, after our rights are to be terminated.  After we clear our names (and records) in this; it should be time to address the appeal to the Permanency hearing.  This one promises to be a winner as well.  Lastly, we should be closing up the termination case, although this could take longer than expected, due to the attorney for the biological father asking for a continuance.  I highly doubt that his honor will grant this continuance, due to his bias, but then, this would be of absolutely no surprise to these defendants, considering the massive list of serious felonious infractions this judge has already committed.  Let’s get this started then, shall we?

6.  First, I fully back up only this fact:  That on July 21 of this past year, 2014, CPS worker SW4 Emily Nieman and SW0 Amanda Barton brought DHS/CPS, the trier-of-fact, William A. Price, and all members of this court action into our lives, for no reason, with no grounds and no proof of allegations made against us by a lunatic woman and her puppy dog husband; as they were fleeing the state, in order to escape charges of harassment that had been filed against them by the defendants; and in retribution, after we had asked of them only to find other living arrangements in order to facilitate the safe return of the mother and her newly born baby to her new home, without stress.

7.  They refused, then caused a scene.  We had to forcibly have them removed.  Their revenge on these parents was a single phone call to DHS, and they were never heard from again; nor were they able to be contacted to confirm these allegations.  Ms. Nieman, due to these allegations, then interviewed us about this for exactly one hour, asked of us to please take a drug test to alleviate the charge of drug use and drug dealing, then left our home at around 5 p.m, and informing the parents as she did, that she believed our story; and that the actions taken by the reporter where out of vindictiveness, obviously, and the matter unfounded.  Later, Ms. Nieman would claim that the child named herein was in some sort of imminent danger of her life, yet Ms. Nieman left this child in our care, as well as the alleged “imminent danger” the child was supposedly in.  This fact alone shows this child to have NEVER been in imminent danger, for the child, who had been held almost throughout the entire interview by the other CPS social worker for the entire time, was then left in our care after her return to the arms of the mother, for the next 17 hours.  This action, alone, by this social worker, should have immediately labeled her as deceptive; and was, in and of itself, the first of many times this worker would later contradict herself, in the assessment and on the stand, under oath.

8.  Then these two social workers returned to the parent’s home (after this father had left); 17 hours later.   They prodded the mother to come with them to a pediatrics appointment they had made at Methodist (which any person might believe would only be for an hour or two) had her checked out by an initial emergency doctor (Dr. Jill Jasper), and found the baby to be wonderfully healthy....but in the middle of the whole thing, she states that the baby appears to be starving, because she’s sucking vigorously on anything that comes near her mouth...and yet Methodist, on their website, states this to be an inherent reflex babies are born with, and states that this behavior is perfectly normal, and is not a recognized sign of anything but inherent reflex.

Primitive Reflexes
Infants are born with a number of instinctual responses to stimuli, such as
light or touch, known as primitive reflexes, which gradually disappear as
the baby matures. These reflexes include the:  sucking reflex, which
triggers an infant to forcibly suck on any object put in the mouth

 (http://kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?dn=BlankChildrensHospital&lic=145&cat_id=20730&article_set=22211&tracking=P_RelatedArticle#)

Her action then was to admit this child to the hospital.

9.  Three hours later, a 2nd exam was performed, utilizing the same exact tests, and with all found as before. and that it’s believed (even though the baby weighed in at 5.72 lbs.; and Methodist’s website states that your baby will lose a slight bit of weight off of the birth weight, then after two weeks will gain up to and over that same weight.  This child was just seven days old and already weighed more than the birth weight) that the mother was more than likely only feeding her mostly water.  These doctors, with Dr.Michael Line at the fore, state that this baby’s discharge plan is now, on the first day, with no documented proof as yet that the child is indeed neglected by the mother, to:  “Hold the baby until DHS can complete their investigation; and alternate placement can be found for her”.  Let’s take a look at what Methodist states, once again, on their own website, to maybe shed some light on what they say about the baby’s growth:

How Newborns Grow
Babies are born with some extra fluid, so it is perfectly normal for a
newborn to drop a few ounces when that fluid is lost in the first few
days of life. A healthy newborn is expected to lose 7% to 10% of the
birth weight but should regain that weight by about 2 weeks after birth.

(http://kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?lic=145&dn=BlankChildrensHospital&article_set=21535&cat_id=162#)

10.  Mentioned, all through this worker’s assessment, is that the mother only feeds the child 4 ounces every 2-4 hours, and tries to stretch it out to as close to 4 hours as she can.  Yet this worker later states that it’s 2 oz. every 4 hours, then it goes back to 4 again later.  Also mentioned is that the only food this mother had was what was given to her by Methodist, also a false statement, since the father had bought her plenty of those little bottles as well.  At the time of the interview, the mother had just run out of those bottles, and was opening the Similac mix for the first time.  This is almost presented as criminal or neglectful behavior on the part of this first-time mother, because she has to read the directions.  Also mentioned is that the mother is mixing a bottle for the baby using a dirty used bottle...yet, when she’s finished, and hands the bottle to Amanda Barton, she takes it from her and FEEDS THE BABY WITH IT...as stated in her assessment.  Obviously this worker is OK with this as well, because she obviously didn’t stop her from using that bottle to feed her either, since it’s not mentioned.  Oh, and on Methodists website, it says this about feeding:

Is My Newborn Getting Enough to Eat?
Once your milk supply is established, breastfeeding should be "on demand”
(when your baby is hungry), which is generally every 1-3 hours. As newborns get
older, they'll need to nurse less frequently — some may feed every hour and a
half, whereas others may go 2-3 hours between feedings. Babies who are
getting formula will likely take about 2-3 ounces every 2-4 hours. Newborns
should not go more than about 4 hours without feeding.

(http://kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?dn=BlankChildrensHospital&lic=145&cat_id=20731&article_set=21869&tracking=P_RelatedArticle#)

11.  The mother has NEVER stated that the baby goes more than 4 hours without a feed, except when she’s sleeping...which this baby does an awful lot of; quite unusual for a newborn, evidently.  It states, on METHODIST’S WEBSITE, this about that subject:

Sleeping and Breathing
In the first weeks, infants usually spend most of their time sleeping.

(http://kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?dn=BlankChildrensHospital&lic=145&cat_id=20730&article_set=22211&tracking=P_RelatedArticle#)

12.  After this, the worker then tells the mother that she’ll need to stay the night with the baby, due to an electrolytes test result; then claims on her assessment that this is when she made it known what her expectations for the entire weekend stay would be for the mother (and made a special effort to claim one of the nurses at her command to be witness to this and ONLY this statement; as well as claims her to be the mother’s personal nurse; another obvious attempt at a 2nd deceit).  The mother, then realizing that she wasn’t nearly ready for an overnight stay; and having been gone 4 hours already; realized the dog hadn’t been out in this time and wouldn’t be for a while longer, and that she needed to get things for an overnight stay, as well as tend to our pet; then stated this.  The worker states that if the mother were to leave the baby now, it would be considered an act of abandonment (in a hospital filled with Doctors and nurses, as well as 2 social workers); then, in a 3rd deceitful and contradictory action, offered the mother a ride home some 20 minutes later, in order to leave her in a place where there was no transportation available to her, and create the initial “showing of neglect on the part of the mother”.  After the mother returned to the hospital (to, ON HER OWN VOLITION; stay with the baby for what would soon be revealed to her as the ENTIRE weekend); The overly attentive staff of Methodist nurses were then ordered to watch the mother at all times, in which to find situations with which to find this neglectful, carefree FIRST TIME MOTHER to be neglectful, and document it.  This is then claimed, in our case, to be the ONLY listed reasonable effort these people made in order to later claim to have made it, in order to say that A SINGLE reasonable effort(s) was made, prior to the removal in order to prevent or eliminate it.  Again, for anyone to claim this to be reasonable, they would have to be either mentally unstable, or be a party to something much more sinister.  I’m sure no mother would thank DHS for their “reasonable effort” either, put through an ordeal like this.

13.  Three days later (when the mother had asked if she could go on Saturday morning; because the worker had told her that she would be going then, the doctor then told her that DHS had ordered the hospital to keep her until Monday) the worker came back alone, beat the mother over the head to get her to adopt out the baby, then when that didn’t work, the worker illegally produced a situation that forced this mother to sign the baby into foster care.  Three hours later, the child was given to the foster parents, Lindsay and Nathan Pritchard of Ankeny, Iowa.

14.  The worker, upon her return, and speaking to the mother alone, now saw an opportunity.  Knowing her socio-economic status, the fact that they were (because of her being processed for FIP) on their way to being homeless; too poor to afford to pay a real attorney...and BONUS, she’s black; naive in the ways of the law and DHS; and, let’s just say this, thought the mother too stupid to fight back, and would therefore be easily swayed to sign documents she had no business signing without a lawyer.  Not aware of the fact that the father had asked the mother to record the interaction, a recording was made of the entire 18 minute removal to its end; and brings forth a host of felonies that were committed in the performance of her duties here, including, but not limited to:

a. Forgery, 2 counts

(1).  She says the mother will be asked to initial where she’s read to her, understands what’s being said and agrees to it...yet only reads her three lines of a nine line order, excluding the reasons for the removal; all lies, of course; and all lines that present to the mother any rights she has in this; then fills in X’s for the mother on all of the lines, knowing she can get the mother to sign it.  When this mother is asked to do something, she does it as instructed, and would have put initials in the lines as told to.

2).  It is determined, since Judge Price, in every order he’s given us, in our case, anyway, STAMPS his signatures on them.  These defendants have yet to receive one paper signed by the judge as SIGNED, in his own hand.  The signature at the bottom of the order has very significant differences in its execution, an obvious forgery by the worker).

b. Fraud (see count 1 of forgery, above.  Additionally, the worker mentions, long before the mother signs it, that “the court has already ordered this”, that “the child is officially in the system now”, and that “it’s too late, it’s going to happen, whether you sign it or not”; then, at the end when asked what will happen if she doesn’t sign it, is told “It’ll look bad to the judge in court.  Sounds like legal duress to these parents).

c. Falsifying Legal/documents:  See letter a. Forgery.  See also letter d. to follow)

d. Depriving the mother of both her civil rights/ICWA rights.  This mother, when asked by the worker if she had any Indian in her heritage said YES.  The worker, then opted to put NO in that box...both on the order, and on the legal form she needed to provide to the administration office of DHS.  This, of course, would have totally changed the game for all involved in our case, and would have meant that jurisdiction might have also fallen to the Cherokee Indians, of which it is determined that the child AND the mother have more than enough to qualify to fall under this welfare act, and in so doing, would have deprived this worker the joy of having us fall under the offensive and dishonest rule of this trier of fact, as well as telling her lies on the stand in order to condemn these parents without prejudice (see letter e., below)

e. Perjury.  This, of course, being this worker’s most SERIOUS crime against the parents, will be
brought in full force, once the U.S.Attorney’s office is consulted; and relief in the form of retribution will also be sought.  the U.S. Attorney will also be urged to file charges concerning both the removal and the hearing that followed, where this worker testified to ridiculous accusations, all the while looking down her nose at this mother and smiling.  The assessment that followed this event, filled with over 55 lies that damage these defendants, shall also be used in this charge, and falls under its umbrella.
See also charge f., below.

f. Libel/Slander.  The parents thank this worker whole-heartedly for both writing down AND testifying her accusations in full.

g. Conspiracy and Collusion.  Please see paragraphs - when they appear shortly.

h. Conspiracy to falsely embezzle state and federal funds.  When Conspiracy is indeed proven here, proving federal embezzlement of Federal Monies should follow close behind.  DHS, Methodist and this court greatly benefit from a child being in the system, as well as from the profits generated when a child is then adopted; something DHS mentions widely in their motion to terminate ALL of the parent’s rights.  Strange it is then, that all services and “reasonable efforts”; offered to these parents (and subsequently rejected as unneeded by these parents) are either run by or affiliated under/with Methodist Hospital and DHS, the very two agencies 100% responsible for the removal of our daughter.

15.  Before his Honor or the D.A. consider that this evidence might be inadmissible; due to the worker not having knowledge of it, think again.  In the commission of a felony (of which we have several here), recordings, if clearly heard, are OFTEN, and in some cases, ALWAYS admitted; even though mine was never admitted in THIS court, something these defendants just recently discovered.  How convenient it is that they weren’t, since, even though stating these things needed addressing at our hearing, even though we had filed them with more than enough notice (the judge’s own order states these exhibits should be filed 7 days or more prior to the hearing...and these were filed just 7 days prior to it) weren’t admitted even; or shown or addressed at this permanency hearing, mostly because the recording would have started showing crimes that were not only committed by the worker, illegally; but would have also presented to this court that the Judge obviously condoned this removal, regardless of its illegality; and therefore was found to be moot, following his attempt (and success) in removing the father from the case; also an illegal move; because this father’s rights had yet to be terminated. The motion to establish paternity (as well as have this father removed) was also presented to be heard in the same hearing as the permanency; and filed in a 2nd case, concerning the termination of his rights...but also was never addressed here, even though it was at the top of his Honor’s to do list in the permanency hearing, and had been filed only 2 days prior to the hearing.  How is it then that he can be found to be extraneous to this case, and not dismissed in the other?  He cannot.  This further adds to the conspiracy allegations these parents wish to address, soon enough.

16.  Because of this situation, these parents were caused to be homeless, due to the actions (and inaction as well, per the incomplete processing of our FIP assistance by DHS) of all involved in this, at this time.

17.  These parents, then, were thrown into a Post-Removal conference the following day, involving the parents, our daughter, 3 attorneys (one for each one of the family, mother, daughter and legal father), Kristen Cooley, a mediator/facilitator from Visiting Nurse Services (a Unity Point Healthcare affiliate), Ashley Andrews and an as yet unknown Supervisor (Jamie) of Children and Families of Iowa (A DHS affiliate), Katie Gosch and Stephanie Rhinehart, our caseworker and her Supervisor, of DHS/CPS of Iowa; and Nicky, a DHS provided “parent partner”, (a DHS paid affiliate, naturally) and was presented to us as the mother’s new BFF; and finally Nathan and Lindsay Pritchard, the happy foster parents. After an hour of accusatory actions made by all at this meeting, these parents, who were upset and angry were then flooded with paperwork, by the attorneys, by DHS, and per the other agencies involved.  Visitations were offered the parents four times a week, and needed to be verified 2 hours ahead of time.  At this time, the parents, who were homeless, in possession of a single bus pass and a single phone; only a week before a removal hearing to determine the needs of the baby, as well as to determine whether the child was removed properly and whether she should remain in foster care; with a full complement of paperwork to lug around with them that needed to be filled out, as well as actively struggling to get a place to live and a full visitation (and confirmation schedule), these parents were then thrown to the mercy of the outdoors and left to their own survival.  This would be deemed as reasonable effort #3, made after the removal, in order to affect reunification of this family.  It would be later claimed, in subsequent hearings from the court that DHS and CFI, the agencies themselves, would be deemed to be reasonable efforts made the parents #4 and #5.

18.  Concerning the “reasonable efforts” supposedly made us in order to claim this court as “doing everything, reasonable, in order to reunify this family”, these defendants claim that DHS has made NO efforts at all in order to reunify this family, because of their intent, first to hold the baby in order to make the state money, then to terminate our rights for the same purpose, except through the avenue of adoption instead.

19.  Due to poor representation provided by this court; as well as the attorneys propensity to serve the interests of this court, its trier of fact, as well as the prosecution; added to the fact that, because of this, we fear to use this option further; we state that we have been served Notice of a petition to terminate our "Parental Rights".  We also state that our child has been wrongfully detained in foster care for 7 months.  Visitation with her is denied us, but for DHS’s terms which are having the visits out of the home, once a week only, and with a worker who has falsified reports on how the mother is doing in her visits.  Visits for the father have been rescinded totally because he won’t come in and talk to a supervisor about the things he writes about in his blog, and is used to punish him for it.  He has not had a visit with our daughter since September, 2014.  Our motions requesting it are ignored entirely, or are found in some way, by the trier of fact, to not be addressed.

20.  The remaining efforts supposedly offered to us in order to help us reunify only serve to make other entities money, due to their affiliation with either DHS or with Unity Point Hospital, and are not needed by these parents.  Other efforts they list are exhibits; and some of these were filed by the defendants.  Others are false reports meant to make us feel like terrible parents and terrible people, and serve no purpose for reunification.  Other efforts this court and DHS claim are entities in and of themselves that they claim to be efforts made.  An effort made to someone is a service provided to someone, and to these parents, it’s meant to help them reunify with their daughter..  DHS is responsible for our daughter’s illegal removal, so how can they claim themselves to be a reasonable effort to help us now, after that removal?  The same thing applies to CFI, an agency.  They already list their service , and in order to claim more efforts they’ve made, they list the whole agency as an effort made.  Add to that, the list of exhibits (21-40) filed  in this court are never described, nor is reason given as to how ANY of these efforts they claim help us period.  In our statement concerning the disposition hearing, we describe fully how the efforts this court lists as efforts does nothing for these parents,  and the exhibits they list are part of a collective term, not defined for us as efforts made, giving us no chance in even knowing what these efforts are, or to give us an opportunity to refute them as such.  Listing them collectively without identification is no help whatsoever to these parents.

21.  We could have continued this court and this trier of fact’s illegal actions all the way to this present day, including his Honor’s calling “Lunch” a half an hour into a motions hearing set to hear all of the father’s filings in December, in the middle of the father sentence proving that DHS falsely accused him of harassment (and failed) in an attempt to deprive him of his inaliable right to free speech, then continuing the hearing a week later to finish him off; covering up for Attorney Dale Mays’s actions against the mother’s best interests, in asking the mother to fill out a 2nd financial affidavit; knowing she was still living at the homeless shelter, in order to cut off the defendants means for defense for nearly two months; etc...but why bother?  These parent’s opinion of the “reasonable efforts” provided us, under the guise of reunification, but have only served to detrimentally stop the parents in their defense. in order to keep moving along in order  have their rights terminated; are very well documented in several motions filed by the father, prior to this date.  This trier of fact has no proof of the facts he makes up in his orders, and rules against us, regardless of evidence glaringly obvious to the contrary; weasels out of hearing motions and statements and throws out evidence at his convenience, as well as ignores things that help these defendants get their daughter back, such as legitimate changes in address, and obvious dispositional changes.  These parents, then, choose instead to present to this court and his Honor that we, the parents, openly accuse this court of the following charges, and once all hearings are done and rulings found, this court will then be brought up on these charges by the U.S. Attorney’s office:

a. Fraud
b. Embezzlement of Federal Funds
c. Falsifying Records
d. Falsifying Documents/Legal Documents
e. Libel/Slander
f. Conspiracy/Collusion
g. Kidnapping/False Imprisonment

And will be brought, along with seeking restitution in full against these major players without delay;
named herein, including conspiracy of all named::

a. DHS/CPS employees Emily Nieman, SW 4, Katie Holmes, Case
Manager, and Stephanie Rhinehart, Supervisor
b. Children and Families of Iowa employees Ashley Andrews and Jamie, her
supervisor
c. The Polk County District Attorneys Office, including Justin Remaly,
A.D.A.s Stephanie Brown and Kevin J. Brownell; and D.A. John P.
Sarcone
d. Benzoni Law Firm, and Dale Mays, attorney for the same firm
e. Paul White, GAL for our daughter
f. Tony Reed/”Central Iowa Family Services” employees, a drug testing
facility in the service of and with exclusive contract to DHS; 2911 Merle
Hay Road, Des Moines, IA
g. Governor Terry Brandstad, Governor of Iowa
h. Charles Palmer, Director of DHS’s Administrative branch
I. Unity Point Healthcare/Methodist Hospital
j. Dr. Haugen, D.O., Unity Point Healthcare
k. Dr. Michael Line, .D.O., Unity Point Healthcare
l. Amanda Harris, D.O., Unity Point Healthcare
m.. Joyce DeGroote, S.W., Unity Point Healthcare
n. VNS (a Unity Point Affiliate)
o. EFR (a DHS beneficiary)
p. The Polk County Sheriff’s office
q. The Polk County Records Department, Juvenile Division/Randy Osbourne
r. The Polk County Court Reporter’s office
s. Judge William A. Price

Before this document is efiled, copies will be emailed and traditionally mailed or hand-delivered to these specific entities, and in this particular order, until my progress is halted:

a. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, both the Des Moines and
Headquarters offices in Washington D.C.
b. Senator Grassley’s Office, in Des Moines and in Washington D.C.
c. CNN, MSNBC and HLN News
        d. HHS Headquarters in Washington D.C., and the Regional Headquarters
in Kansas City
e. The Reverend Al Sharpton
f. The Reverend Jesse Jackson
g. Terry Brandstad’s Offices
h. President Barack Obama’s Office
I. NAACP
j. The Civil Rights Commission
k. The AAPD
l. The ACLU
m. The Eastern Band of the Cherokees
n. Creative Visions/Representative A.K.O.’s office
o. DHS/CPS of Iowa Offices at River Place, with copies earmarked to the
offenders.
p. All Local News in the Des Moines Area, both radio and TV
q. The Des Moines Register
r. Chuck Palmer
s. The DHS Administration Offices
t. The U.S. Attorney’s Offices, in Des Moines and in Washington
u. Benzoni Law Firm
v. The DHS of Iowa Advisory Board
w. The Iowa Supreme Court
x. Polk County Sheriff’s Office, Administration
y. Randy Osbourne
z. Juvenile Records, Polk County Court House
aa. The Office of The Polk County Reporters
bb. Judge William A. Price, 209B, whether’s he’s in session or not

We the parents have had about enough of His Honor’s kangaroo court, and fully intend to follow through with this threat, due to the fact that we fully disbelieve that the Supreme Court of Iowa, considering it’s just made up of judges who used to be where his honor is, will rule or find any better than his honor, and are, more than likely (due to the majority of them being appointed by the Governor, in the back pocket of the Governor anyway), going to find for the state as well, regardless of this case’s utter ridiculousness.

Elizabeth Bruce