Sunday, May 1, 2016

The Termination/Cross Appeal, Part III - A Final Statement To The Court



Well, America, it is as these parents have been sure of it, almost since the beginning of this appeal.  Justice has no intention of being anything but her usual blind self.  I am going to jail, and will have no ability to fight.  No money has been raised for transcripts, or for bail on appeal, either one.  Therefore, until I am freed, this will have to suffice, for now.  I sign off, and hope that I have trained my stand-in well enough over the last few weeks to be able to scan in what we all know will be an order from the appellate court that I have no real desire to read,  since I already know the decision in my very soul.

I present now, for the record of the court of the People, the last statement to the appellate court.  May these fair and just assholes all rot and burn well, in their assigned positions in Hell.  To be honest?  I pray God have NO mercy on their souls.  Bring a Kleenex folks, this one's a mover.

" Comes now, Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce, in their Statement to the Appellate court, and on the record of the court of the Supreme Court of Iowa Appellate Court:

The appellants would like to applaud the appellate and district courts for their ingeniousness in completely evading the issues that are prevalent for the appellants to win this appeal.  By only ordering the transcripts be produced for the Termination hearing, and knowing that most indigent appellants, after enduring the ridiculous costs of producing an appeal by themselves, let alone a diminished living wage made by most as well, and expecting them to pay for their own transcripts (which are obviously doctored anyway, upon inspection of the termination transcripts we received) in order to address the true issues, which would be the events leading up to the termination, is ludicrous at best, especially in such a short period of time.  It amazes the appellants each day how the district and appellate courts succeed in getting all the time they need, over a year now, to belay addressing this appeal, yet the defendants are always on a set time schedule, usually no longer than 30 days.  But then, to come up with a smart way to skirt the real issues takes time, so we understand your need.

As to what you have, the transcripts of the only hearing that we were not able to attend, due to the illegal actions of the DMPD and the Department of Human Services, and those of the county attorney’s office; to determine a termination appeal using only a termination hearing where anything could be put on paper as to what was said and done without witness, and look at nothing else, is idiotic at best.  But then, with no other option to make this appeal look good for those of you involved,  I can understand your dilemma.  So, knowing that the appellants would have no way to raise $800 in just 14 days (it also dumbfounds the appellants that they were quoted a price of almost $1000 for all of the court transcripts...but the termination transcripts only came in at a low price of just...$42.  So how is the other $958 a justified estimate for 5 more hearings?  One would imagine that the termination hearing, the most important one of them all, would be the highest priced one, with or without the parents in attendance), you have effectively solved all of your problems with this appeal that you never wished to address, because of all the crimes and criminal officials involved, in one fell swoop.  Again, the appellants say, bravo.

The appellants therefore, upon their realization that the two levels of Iowa courts are working in concert to defeat the efforts of appellants that obviously care and love their lost daughter very deeply, we state and swear these facts to be the truth of this matter, for the record of the appellate court:

1. That quite obviously, it was never the appellate courts intention to view this appeal in a timely, or fair manner.  ANY reasonable person would see, due to the continued fight from the appellants, that the appellants are grief stricken by the loss of their daughter, wish her justly returned to their care,
and would never abandon her, let alone any hearings or motions provided in the same.  A reasonable person would also see the importance of looking at the entirety of ALL involved matters leading up to a termination of parental rights, since this action is a very serious one, not only for “The Best Interests of the Child’, but for the parents and their lives as well.

2. That these illegal actions were done by those of the lower district court, including, but not limited to;

a. Depriving the mother of her child for no base discernible reason, using instead falsified, unjust and hollow reasons that were completely absolved and admonished in the DIRECTOR of DHS’s final decision, clearing them of all allegations, provided this court on several occasions, which proved that the ‘”CINA” should have never been removed from these parents, period.  That the parents refused to engage in unneeded services that brought in money for the state of Iowa did not ever show that these parents did not love their daughter, but instead showed that they felt they should have never been in the situation to begin with, and wouldn’t have been, were it not for the illegal and inexperienced actions of the worker that removed her.  It has also been proven to these parents, using our case against others in Iowa, that parents that do engage in services, needed or unneeded, have often gone years without their children, or lost them entirely, even when all courses and needs were met and satisfied.  We chose to not engage because the services offered us were not needed, and were massively over-burdening to the defendants/appellants.

b. Depriving the mother of all legal, civil, parental and ICWA rights for the course of the entirety of both cases, as well  as all legal rights of the father, long before their rights were even officially and “legally” terminated.  Rights of parents cannot EVER be “legally” terminated by any judge or court in this country; the right to parent is an unalienable right of all of mankind, as it has been stated in the Supreme Court over and over again, in case law these appellants have provided this court, in their Petition of Termination.

c. Depriving the parents of due process rights, from the start, including denying them the right to receive copies of their RECORDINGS of the Juvenile proceedings, which, in effect, will cause this action to go to the federal courts, once this decision against the appellants is handed down.

d. Continually attempting to, and succeeding in arresting the loving father over and over again, in order to win out in hearings, as well as in this appeal.  The father, who never had a record of harassment, stalking or threats prior to the removal of his daughter, will in just four days face four years in prison, thanks to the continued illegal actions of those involved in both the district court cases, and we believe, since this case hardly budged until after the defendant was illegally detained in the Polk County jail, could include those of the appellate courts as well.

e. The complete disregard for facts and factual testimony, related to in person and in motions of the defendants, as well as in any accusations made by those of the County Attorney and DHS.

f. Producing anything needed upon demand to show compliance with Iowa’s codes and laws concerning juvenile matters, in order to legally take, hold and give away the children of the citizens of Iowa’s lower and disadvantaged classes whether those things happened, or not.

It is obvious to these appellants that the district, as well as the appellate courts of Iowa have no desire to fairly determine this or any other case or its appeals, when it contains unjust and illegal actions, performed in abundance by opposing parties to the appellants.  Understandably, this appellate court, in order to keep the system running as smoothly as it is today, must go the extra mile to protect its own, as well as keep money flowing in, and criminals positioned in their jobs.  We hope that the appellate court, therefore, understands out position as well, in defense of having our daughter illegally kidnapped by tyrants in power in Iowa, as well as backed by the criminals who also infest our judiciary..  Understand, then, that the appellants, upon their realization that justice will not be done in this case, under any circumstance, do hereby swear:

1. As soon as a decision against the appellants is rendered, this matter will be MORE than eligible, and will, with the growing list of criminals involved, be immediately filed in District Federal Court.  We insist that the appellate courts please render this decision poste haste, so we can get started.  Your “just” and “fair” determination is the only thing holding us up...so why wait 14 days?  You know damned well that we aren’t going to have the rest of the transcripts produced, so get to it already.

2. That all of the criminal elements involved in hearing our cases, both in District Court and in this appellate court shall be brought to justice before a Grand Jury of the People’s choosing, at a time soon to come; and before God, ultimately at the end of days.  You are all guilty of conspiracy, collusion, kidnapping, and embezzlement from Iowa’s citizens, and you will all, with the possible mercy of the people, be held accountable for your crimes, more immediately.  God have mercy on your souls, should His day come later.  These crimes will be most easily shown and proven, using actual facts that will be presented to actual reasonable people, not those who would appoint themselves rulers, tyrants and traitors over our courts and “The Law”, i.e illegal codes, statutes, rules and ordinances tha
are not, nor have they ever been, “Law”.

3. That all of the “Confidential” documents in this appeal have already been downloaded off of E-file, and will be immediately posted to those of Iowa, this country, and its people, and will be broadcast continually until actual justice is done; save the final order, which I believe you MUST send me
anyway, by “Law”.  This will happen regardless of consequence, before I go to prison (you won’t be arresting me for posting them after that, since I’ll already be in prison anyway), with as many tags to tie the criminals to their actions as I’m able to include.  Your crimes will be forever engraved
in the minds of Iowa and the rest of the country’s citizens for as long as the internet remains, and justice, no, TRUE justice, in one form or another, will come for those who would steal humanity’s children and give them to others not in need of them, but in need of the money that comes attached
to them, only to discard them like the trash when the child reaches the end of their paychecks.  Your crimes against human-kind, treasonous in and of themselves, will forever be immortalized by myself, by others, as well as by your own actions, by my example.  Believe me when I state that the American People will only be pushed so much by tyrannous officials before action is taken.  I pity you when, not if, such action occurs.

In conclusion, the Appellants do state to ALL that have interest in all cases concerning our daughter, Trilynn Bruegemann, that a day will come, sooner than you expect, that will signal the end of tyranny and those who exhume the same.  Forces are already moving to make sure this happens, and at a rate you surely do not suspect.  You need to decide, now, before that time comes, which side you are on.  I would highly recommend moving to the side of the People, for that is where true power lies, where it has ALWAYS lain.  We do not thank those of the appellate courts for the decision they have yet to render, since we already know that decision, and have known it all along, just as we knew the minute we looked into the eyes of Judge William A. Price that we would never see our daughter again.  We most certainly do not thank the appellate court for their fair and just manner in dealing with this appeal, since, from the beginning, it was never either just, nor fair.  The parents will deal forever with thier loss and their pain.  What will the appellate court do, but move on and uphold more illegal decisions of the district court, causing more of Iowa’s citizens to lose their children as well.  These actions will cause more pain and more suffering, until it snowballs into an unsurmountable affect, that will someday easily cause your eventual undoing.  Repent now and return Iowa’s children to those who they have been stolen from unjustly, or that affect may cause actions in kind that may not present a pleasant experience for those who cause it.  This is not a threat, thinly veiled or otherwise.  It is, for your consideration, “A fact of life”, a relation of the formula for cause and effect, nothing more.  Heed this proven fact well.  To consider it, is to survive.  To ignore it, as it is to ignore anything proven again and again to exist, is to be a fool, and perish.

Finally, I’m sure you’re wondering if this means that we are going to take our lumps and stop fighting for our daughter?  No way Jose.  No, this battle now goes into higher gear, and will be brought full-force in whatever manner presents...whether I’m in, or out of prison.

Submitted, both without respect, and with prejudice,

/S/Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce
Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce
Appellants"

Thursday, April 28, 2016

The Termination Appeal/Cross Appeal, Part II - The Fairy Tales



Well, back in the last episode, we last left the appellants, as they discovered, with horror, how the Supreme Court of Iowa intended to wiggle out of addressing the real issues in this case, like 'Why we should have never removed the child in the first place', ;how the father wasn't there for the child in her life because we rescinded his visits two months into the case, because we didn't like what he was writing about in his blog", and "how this child should have never in life been under this court's jurisdiction at all, because the worker deprived the mother of all of her civil, ICWA, and due process rights, and when the mother said 'yes I do have Indian in my family' the worker put 'no' on the form.  No kids, the real issues, and the proof of those issues will cost me money, around $800, if I want the real issues addressed...and after receiving what I believe the crooks intend to dub 'The Termination Hearing Trascripts'...but what are, instead, the biggest pile of BULLSHIT I have ever seen put together on some pieces of paper.  No wonder it took 6 months to produce what came out to be 12 lousy pieces of paper...they had to scratch the entire hearing, I'm sure, and produce a whole new play, to cover up their illegal activities.

Here then, so you too can fully experience the absolute nausea we both felt upon reading this....this...fraud upon the court, we have scanned it in for you.  First, keep in mind that the judge in our case, Judge William A. Price, couldn't possibly speak a kind word in thanks or praise to anyone...ever.  I have never heard someone so polite and well-spoken as the judge was in this typed out travesty...so it is in my opinion either a.  An absolute fabrication, or b.  Someone else that sat in for the judge that day.  Second, is the elegant musings of Paul White the GAL in this little fiasco, who I believe said all of 2 words in each and every hearing....who goes on for page after page in what can only be a real live play, and his a quite lovely speech, written by someone very good at writing out non-offensive and lawful bullshit, when required to, as well as something that no appellate court in the land could possibly dispute, where finding in favor of the most reasonable and just district court.

What a joke...and it very much explains on so many levels why the state...or Judge Price and the Supreme Court, rather, refuse to pay for the transcripts of the other hearings.  For one, coming up with enough lies to cover the lies told here would be utterly impossible...in a "Light most favorable for the prosecution"...most likely, because no matter how you slice it, there IS no light most favorable for the prosecution.  They kidnapped our child...in very plain language, and in the head of every reasonable person in  this country...and by every legal definition in the book.  Had I done this very thing as a citizen, I would, of course, be brought up on a host of charges, and probably jailed for the remainder of my natural life.  But because these atrocities were done by those of the money-grubbing state and their county attorneys....suddenly, it becomes legal, and all involved will be protected at every expense, in order to continue to commit these crimes, and bring in more federal funding, for DHS, for the state of Iowa, for the foster parents, and for the courts.  Remember, 18 people that were involved in our lives for 6 months, and that doesn't include all of the court reporters, Clerks of Court, lawyers, judges, doctors, and the numerous service providers that are all allowed to keep their jobs, all because DHS is allowed to, at will, take whatever children and however many they want, whenever they want...as long as every bit player plays along and does the job right, money is made, and jobs are kept.

Whoever it was that was in attendance at this hearing, wasn't anyone that we had come to know as being the criminals that were talking in this one.  I guarantee, as sure as you're siting there, that no one that we had come to know as being involved in this case in any way said any of these things at this court hearing.  Now, had the foster parents actually been there, well, I imagine then...and ONLY then, would these things have been said...or, quite possibly, these things actually were said...mainly, because they knew it was sure to go to appeal, following our termination...but not without some serious scripting, on that you can most definitely bet.  The other thing you can also bet on, is that it practically killed everyone involved to have to lie and embellish things this much...or, more than likely, they've had to present things to the Supreme Court to cover their asses on a whole lot more than one occasion, and they've had (and rehearsed) their bullshit pretty damn well as time has gone by.  This "Transcript" of this hearing is pretty generic all in all..and surprisingly short.  A name change here, a flowery statement there, and it all looks so cut and dried, doesn't it?  Acting out parents got their asses handed to them, and rightfully so, by what's said here...but I'm sorry, 12 pages?  A hearing as important as the Termination of your parental rights should, even without the defendants, carry a lot more than 12 pages...maybe for a traffic accident, this might be reasonable...but something as critical as this?  "Oh, but there were all of those reports to the court (made by DHS, who stands to lose the most should Iowa discover their crimes) that describe in very big detail why we're doing this, and for good reason....except it kind of leaves out one very important side of things...ours.  See, a lot like the logic that standing in a garage does not make you a car...being a caseworker for DHS or being a lawyer at the county attorney's office does not automatically make you an honest person who couldn't possibly lie, or a thief that steals children (or someone who affiliates with them to bring the same end) to make money for the state and keep tons of people in their jobs.  Sit down and think about it folks...how many people's jobs would be affected or lost, if these kinds of cases didn't exist...they MUST exist...even if we have to make it all up as we go along...even if we have to all work together, in order to keep this up, we're going to have to, on occasion, lie...and steal...and break the law, in particular, FRAUD UPON THE COURT...which, in case you didn't know it, is almost impossible to prove...see, they claim that these transcripts are the only record of the things that occurred in our hearings...made up when the hearing is over...and only upon demand of the parties, from a recording the transcriber makes that they won't give you a copy of; and won't sign a piece of paper SAYING they won't give them to you.  Why?  Because if they gave you a copy of the recording, then you could compare that to the fabricated transcripts, only made by the transcriber if someone wants a copy...and if you can show even one thing that either didn't occur, or didn't go as stated on the transcripts, they auto lose the entire case, due to fraud upon the court...and that would cost the courts an awful lot of wasted tax-payer money that they themselves would have to be held accountable for.  So even though Iowa Courts has a document that states you can get recordings of ANY of our hearings, even the confidential ones...you can't...and they aren't about to sign any document that shows that they said that you couldn't have those recordings, if they don't want you to have them.  What we, the oppressed are beginning to figure out, however, is that these pieces of paper that they won't sign, stating that there were no recordings that could be copied, or that they won't give you a copy of them, that they won't, or refuse to sign...can be used as evidence in your lower court...in order to bump the whole thing up to federal court, showing the federal court (who puts up with zero to nada bullshit in legal matters) that the lower court is trying to get away with committing some serious shit that they really aren't immune in the commission, thereof.

Yes, even in refusing to sign this paper showing their fraud, or the unwillingness to show that fraud is being committed against you, they make a very grevous error  Upon refusing to sign this paper, they are putting themselves in a very bad and awkward position.  See, now, the piece of paper, when filed in your case, can now be a piece of evidence, in the consideration that you are, by their refusal to give you recordings or sign a piece of paper explaining their refusal to give you the very recordings they say you can purchase copies of at any time, they commit a crime,  and the refused signed receipt, showing that you cannot have your promised recordings, is now evidence...to which they must now be able to testify as to why they didn't give you something very important in any court case...due process.  Because, when asked to, then, testify, they can't give you a good clear reason as to why you couldn't have your recordings...they now commit a deprivation of the very thing American justice is founded on...due process.  No due process, and their fraud becomes very big and very clear.

 And, thanks to "extensions" of time to produce them, they can take all the time they'll need to go over their notes and come up with something that looks legal and good on paper, for both the Supreme Court, as well as for anyone who might suspect that something funny is going on....OH, BUT WAIT...that's right...confidentiality covers THAT part of it...so as long as the appellate court plays along, we can do...pretty much anything...we...like.  And to those of us who complain about it...well, who could possibly fool the appellate courts, right?  Who cares that each of these appellate and Supreme Court judges were once lawyers and district court judges themselves at one time in their lives, and that they were also probably very educated in the ways of keeping people in their jobs, and bringing money into the state and keeping it here....at the expense of a few psychopathic natural parents...but who cares?  They're already hardened criminals, thanks to our actions against them practically their whole lives, a push here, a factoid there, and a very well oiled machine, and we can make ANY parent look like a bad parent, or someone that shouldn't have or doesn't deserve to have their children...and make us a shitload of money in the process...and most importantly, keep our jobs, so we can continue to do this for a lifetime to come.

Sorry, shiny object....the point of the matter is this, friends.  If I let them get away with only paying for the transcripts of the Termination hearing...the one I couldn't be in attendance to because they put a warrant out for crimes they had no proof that I committed, just mere days before I was supposed to be at it...(I have to accept this...of course, being the unemployed and fighting father that I am, I have no $800 additional dollars lying around to pay for these transcripts), no justice will be done...or needed, and all that us parents have fought so hard to keep will be lost to us forever.  I mean, it's obvious just in the transcript itself....isn't it?  I read this bullshit, and the headaches felt after reading how the district court messed up in this case, all just kind of melts away, don't they?  Thanks to the tenacity and the audacity of our finest crooks and fairy tale tellers on the district level (and the poorness of the parents, in general), we can inch by this obvious catastrophe of justice and go on with our lives;  our jobs and pay (for whatever it is they actually do in the appellate courts....they don't ask for records on appeal, they don't make or obtain copies, they don't bind things, or go and get anything...this is all at the expense, as well as the time of the appellate....all they do is look it over and "DECIDE" it, when time allows for it) in tact.

You would think that a year out of the lives of wrongfully done parents, who are, as we speak, because of all of the time that we haven't had with her, nor have we seen our daughter, forgetting what she even looks like, save the 5 or six pictures we got of her at the five or six visits we were allowed to have with her, before they rescinded our visits all together, and a couple of the videos of the newly excited parents that got to enjoy her...for all of 7 days before this nightmare began...would be important here,  and would be quickly gotten to and decided, especially when it's most possible that these parents were done wrong...but, no, sadly, it is not.  No, what's MORE important, to those of the appellate level, once again, is to find ways to clean up the mess of the district court, and make the wronged parents look like they were at fault, using...and asking for NOTHING MORE than what that will take..and make them wait as long as possible...to insure greater success at finding in favor of the district court (as I guarantee, they will do, if only these transcripts of the termination are addressed) and keeping their child right where she is now...in the hands of the only paying client...the only person that could afford his own attorney, and paid well, I'm sure.  Because this man paid from his own pocket, the BAR is now satisfied, and rules in favor of the SINGLE biological father...who didn't even know he had a child, until DHS hunted him down after more than a full year after the last he had cared to see the mother.  He got laid...THAT was the important part of their relationship...after that, he didn't care to know anything about the mother...until DHS purposefully sought him out to tell him he had a daughter born to him of the biological mother, that he hadn't cared to know anything of the possibility even, until forced to that reality...but hey, as long as I don't have to have to have anything to do with the mother?  Sure, I'll take a free baby.  How much do I have to pay, and how long do I have to wait for the termination of their rights?  3 months?  Perfect...I should have my free baby just in time for Christmas then...where do I sign?

As for the Appellate courts?  They will, of course, do and say whatever it takes to make sure we don't get our daughter back...at the expense of our rights, and our wrongfully kidnapped and stolen daughter (remember, this is stated as fact BY DHS THEMSELVES, in the appeal to the Child Protective Assessment hearings...and by the DIRECTOR OF DHS AS WELL, in a further appeal of those proceedings).and in the protection of the actions of the most illegal district court's actions...actions, that if found out, could ruin our little con-game and all the money it brings in, and all the jobs that are secured by the industry.  We couldn't have that...I mean, look at all the time WE invested in getting that system going?  We can't have every wronged parent winning out...the whole thing would go down the drain, and Iowa would lose money.  No, best we sweep this mess up under the rug, with a sprinkle of undue process and a well scripted transcript?  No problemmo muchach.



\











To the criminals involved?  I can only say Bravo...and encore.  I have an offer to help pay for my other transcripts, and will be asking them to REALLY start lying...which will easily show their fraud, considering the fact that I was THERE for THOSE hearings.  This should be fun.


Saturday, April 23, 2016

Why I'm Going To Go To Jail For a Justified Crime


Judge Robert J. Blink, District 5C, Polk County, Iowa
Got an interesting bit of news from a friend of mine in the National Liberty Alliance...thought you might wanna read this email from him...

"Go to the following link, scroll down the page until you see the video on Darlene Novenger - audio interview (silver hair blonde - big hair).  This site was referenced on a thread that points to your court case....same M.O. They are apparently targeting CPS victims, and NLA members....by the same M.O. to the extent that the  "threat" is the same "to go to the person's house, kill the individual and then burn their house down".  Gosh, where have I heard that same line recently?..., was what went thru my mind yesterday when reading this story.  https://www.stewwebb.com  That is almost exactly what you said the boy friend was threatening to do to you and Elizabeth.....four times you said.  That is the idea planted in your head....the same line that Jeannne taped and was played in the courtroom in your voice.  duh. 

As for the other documents, containing the M.O. threat, I have to get permission first.  But I will bring up your case to the discussion because the excerpt in almost verbatim. I suspect that Jeanne Munson's boyfriend is a paid informant working for our servant government, like this gal is discussing in this video/audio. Professional liars.... check her story out.  You became visible on the CPS radar when you took on the S.C. role for Iowa.  You became a member in June of 2015, but the rally wasn't until August, according to you.  You were made a S.C. soon after you became a member and before the rally.   This is why I wanted a time line on when you met Jeanne. Nothing bizarre happened between you until after you both joined NLA (I think that was coincidence), and became a S.C. Since you had your show and were exposing their dastardly deeds, you became a target, is my guess.   Now the pieces are falling together. They set you up and the boy friend was the sting operation. He knew what to do to push your buttons.  What is his phone number and name?  Do you know if he has a job and if so, for whom does he work for? Where is he employed?  We already know Jeanne is an IT person and she works for John Deere."

- Anonymous

******************************************************************************************************

Well kids, I just spoke with my stand-by attorney...and he believes I won't spend any more than 3 more months in jail...and since I just got finished doing 3 months, I should, by all reason and logic, be able to do another.  I guess the thing that pisses me off the most, however, is that I now have even more of a harassment record (started against me for 'harassing' social workers and those of the criminals in my case), and something new I most certainly do not deserve, a record as a "Stalker".

It's important that I write this article, for no better reason than to not only show that I am no such thing, but to explain once and for all, in full detail, what actually occurred and why; and, in addition, provide my theory as to why these charges were brought against me at all by Jeanne Munson.

Let's begin by defining Iowa's law of stalking.  Now, you all know what a stalker is...at least what REASONABLE people believe a stalker is...it's someone who won't leave you be, who shows up everywhere you go, calls you constantly, etc.  Well, in Iowa, a stalker is defined as someone who engages in a course of action, repeatedly (in Iowa, 'repeatedly' is 2 or more times, meaning all you have to do is call someone 2 times without them wanting to call you...meaning just about anyone in business, bill collection, or with the police could be defined as a 'stalker'), with the intent to put someone in fear for their safety.  Now, given this definition, of course, any jury in the state of Iowa would HAVE to find you guilty of this crime...regardless of circumstance.

Harassment, on the other hand is even more ridiculous...which is why social workers and 'elected' officials choose to turn to this law to imprison more people engaged in a war with them than any other law.  If you choose to fight the system, count on this law to put you away so that you'll leave the criminals alone, more than any other.  It will be your new chosen criminal occupation, and you will be jailed for it.  This is, by far, the easiest law to be claimed to be broken against them, since they are, of course, constantly 'in fear' for their safety, and can produce, against you, a non-contact order at the drop of a hat.

Now, some of you have somewhat heard the story...but there are countless others of you that have it in your mind that what I did to poor Jeanne Munson was criminal, at the very least, and unjustified.  A reasonable person, however, knowing all the facts, would have understood, at the very least...and might have done the same, had they endured identical circumstances.  This will, of course, clear up those un-filled in facts.

Now you all know my story, and it's nothing short of absolutely ludicrous.  You also know my passion when it comes to exposing the criminals involved, as well as crimes committed against others enduring the same thing, all across the country.  My resolve in making sure this does not happen to others is legendary, and needs not be re-stated.  With that in mind, I now give you the truth, in all of its ugly glory.

Jeanne Munson and I met when this whole thing began for me, probably the first lie told in court, around August of 2014.  We were 'introduced' by a mutual friend (who, by the way, did everything he could to NOT testify at my trial.  I could have forced him, via the Polk County Sheriff's office during the trial, but opted not to...and thanks to that decision, that inaction produced a guilty verdict, delivered by the jury), who had been involved in the same fight for over 30 years.  Jeanne and I had spoken, over the phone and on Facebook for well over a year by the time we met, at an Anonymous induced protest on August 22nd, 2015.  Until this point, we had never been at odds, though she had, several times, chided me for the path I chose in fighting my battle.  She was convinced this could be won legally, through the courts...and I was, obviously, not.

Jeanne runs a group called "Protest Iowa DHS", and is, unfortunately, only one of two choices for protest groups in Iowa.  Both groups are administered by Jeanne.  I finally opted to start a third, called "The Great Big CPS Group" a month after the protest we attended together, for reasons I will relate later.

Now, keep in mind that I have a rather abrasive personality...but then, so did Jeanne.  The difference is that I am positively abrasive, and don't put up with any bullshit.  Jeanne...is destructively abrasive, and this will also be shown soon enough.

The protest we both attended was a nationally set protest, put together by Asher Gemler of #OpExposeCPS fame...and ran between the dates of August 20-22, 2015.  The times set for this protest were from 12-4 p.m...NATIONALLY.  Jeanne Munson was in charge of organizing the protest for Iowa.  Without anyone's prior knowledge (except for those of her immediate circle of friends), she had altered the show up time to be at 10 a.m.  Several people in Iowa that I knew planned to attend, did not live in Des Moines, where the protest was to take place, and did not speak to Ms. Munson on a regular basis...and one of these had planned to come and get me and my wife, who lived 100 miles away from Des Moines at this time, to take us there and take us home again.  Neither of us knew about the altered time.



We arrived at 12:15, a little after the NATIONAL time, because we didn't figure in the bus ride we'd have to take to get to the protest.  It was at the state fair, and we had to park several miles away and bus in.

When we arrived, there were around 8 people there, already protesting, including Jeanne Munson and her cohort, Mark Worthington.  She had printed up 1000 flyers to hand out, and had passed out around 200 by this time.  Introductions to those already there began immediately, and pictures with all of us were taken.  After the pictures were taken, Jeanne Munson and all that were with her left the fairgrounds, after only 2 hours.  The rest of us that had come from far away were left to protest in the hottest part of the day, and pass out the rest of the 800 remaining flyers, for the nationally agreed upon time of the protest, for four additional hours.

The following day, when I woke up, I noticed that Ms. Munson had already posted the pictures she had taken, making it look like we were all one big happy family...and it struck a note of discord in me, almost immediately.  We had passed out all of the 800 flyers, for 4 hours, sweating and burning in the hot afternoon sun, and upon seeing us all appear to be present for it upset me just a wee.  What I did next would spur a 4 and a half month war that should have prompted me to call the police on HER and Mark Worthington several times.  I never once did so.

First, I chose to, on one picture in her group, tell everyone the truth about what had happened.  This comment, made on HER posted picture, which could have, instantly, been deleted off of it simply by deleting it or the picture, caused Jeanne Munson to text me about it, then, because I wouldn't correct it to put her in the correct light, and tell her version of the story, she then blocked me and threw me out of her group.

Not long after that, her 'friend' Mark, who I had only met briefly for 15 minutes, and didn't know, began harassing me to delete the comment.  I then blocked him and continued on with my life.

At the time, a friend of mine, Wendy Greene, came to me with a possible solution to all of our problems, involving one Chief Fast Horse, of the Lakotas.  She assured me that this would solve our issues with CPS and the courts.  As you know, Wendy Greene, by this time, had been known as a true warrior in the fight against this entity, and I had worked with her in many capacities.  I took her word as gospel, and got started putting this viable solution out there as quickly as possible, assuming, as I should not have, that Wendy had done her homework concerning it, and knew it to be valid.  She had not, and it was not...at least, not in the sense I first thought it to be.  In order to get this to my friends more readily, I created a group called The Big Giant CPS group, and invited everyone I knew.

This was a grave error on my part, and I screwed up, this I admit freely.  I presented the idea, which later proved to be a con, to all of my friends.

The following week, I went to Des Moines to try something that I had heard would work, and when it failed, I got upset and disbanded my Facebook profile.  As all of you group owners know, this opens up your groups to be administered by others.  I found this out when I re-activated my profile.

The group I had started had been taken over by a person I did not know, someone named Janet Wilson Johnson (funny how that name had so many J's in it, isn't it?).  It had been renamed to be "Families Best Interest", and I immediately started getting messages from my friends, stating that this woman had been bad-mouthing me, on a constant basis, throwing out people who talked well about me, and was trashing those in  the group left and right.  I immediately assumed it was Jeanne...and I was right.  She stated things only she would know, and changed our protest pictures to read things she had said to and about me.  This person is not real (who in their right might would use a picture of themselves showing them to be cross-eyed with their tongue sticking out...especially a supposed "para-legal"...and would talk like this, if that was, in fact, what she was...about me, or to parents they were supposedly trying to help).  What really convinced me of this being Jeanne, was that this supposed person from Missouri used an altered picture from none other than the protest we had attended.  No one besides Jeanne would have thought to use these pictures, let alone know where they were located.  This 'person' did not know me, and had no reason to bash me.  She magically appeared around a week after the protest, and conveniently disappeared entirely just before I was arrested.







Keep in mind, those of you who thought as much, Wendy Greene, the woman that this person is referring to as 'Arrested' because of the idea, was the woman who GAVE me the idea...and said it was a good one...then got arrested...not because of the idea, but because she attempted to arrest the judge in her hearing.  Add to that, I have no idea who this person is that was supposedly "up shit creek".  This was, in fact, Ms. Munson, still mad about the protest comment, who didn't have all of the facts about what had happened with Wendy Greene.

Please, also, consider this "Victim Impact Statement", filed by Ms. Munson in my case (used to determine the sentence to be given by the judge), using almost identical language:




At various times, in particular, September 8th, after I had posted an article about the 'solution' I had found out about, I got several calls from Mark Worthington, using a restricted number.  They harassed me about it several times.

This bad-mouthing me and the parents in the group went on for 3 more months, until finally, this "person" disappeared off the face of the Earth, along with the group...but the badmouthing of me by Jeanne Munson continued on.  I would find this out at various times...usually after speaking to someone in one of her groups.

All was quiet for a while...but then, I attempted to find other Iowans that had experienced what I had, and was gathering information to bring a coup against those in power...I needed information from those wronged in my state, but, as I had stated earlier, the only Iowa groups concerning this were Jeanne's.  I went in, and found members, and friended them, in an attempt to gather info without her knowledge of it.

All of a sudden, those I was talking to began to, one by one, block me off...after we had talked amiably enough for some time.  My only thinking could be that Ms. Munson was being asked about me, and badmouthed me, causing them to block me off.  This in itself didn't anger me, it was that those who could have been helped were being told I was bad news.  I searched for Jeanne, on a whim...and found her.......she had unblocked me, and had been, as I suspected, watching my actions the whole time, and using that to make me look bad.  I immediately, at that time, blocked her.

After another 2 to 3 instances of this, I then unblocked her, and sent her a single message...it said this:

"You wanna know what the most sad and pathetic thing about you is, old woman?  You're a sorry bitch who will die old and ugly, and who will have accomplished nothing better in your life and lies than to destroy the chances for others in Iowa to get their children and grandchildren back"

Because of that message, I immediately began getting calls from Mark again, again from a restricted number.  Several times, he threatened the lives of both me and my wife.  He also had sent me several messages on Facebook, also threatening.  Knowing I couldn't call the police on him (because I didn't have a provable number, nor any recordings, since I had answered each phone call), I then began calling Jeanne to make him stop.  Here is the copy of the phone bill, showing Mark's number (it didn't show as restricted on the bill...I called it to verify that it did, in fact, belong to Mark.  He claimed, then, in the trial, that I had given him my number at the protest...something I would never give to a complete stranger....a lie):







Now, notice, that no calls were ever made to Jeanne Munson again...before the date of January 13th, or after.  I called so many times, because I told her that every time this man called me, until he stopped, I would call her 10 times for every time he called me and threatened me, until he stopped.  He finally stopped...so I finally stopped.  This is what was used to bring the charges against me.

While I was in jail, several nasty comments were eventually deleted off of my blog, one being from her son, who went to high school with my wife.  Here are some of those comments, posted by Mark Worthington, and Jeanne Munson's son, prior to and during my incarceration:













Here, also, in the comments under the article about who brought the charges against me, is Munson's son, who went by That1Luker, hitting on my wife, and telling her to leave me:




So all of this started for me, and continued for 4 and a half more months...because of a single comment made on one picture...something that almost no one would ever see...and now I'm going to jail for it.  Now, I don't know about you folks, but if someone were to call and threaten YOUR family, you would react in a similar fashion, wouldn't you?  I did...and now, because they called the police first, I am about to pay the price.  Sure, I could have called them...but I chose not to be a rat.  Now, I will go to jail for my alleged 'crimes'.....and Jeanne Munson and Mark Worthington, the real criminals here, get off scott free.

Another name is forever added to the imfamous 'Bruce Bitch List", and will forever remain there until the end of all things.  Linda Lane...welcome.

Thursday, April 21, 2016

The Termination Appeal/Cross Appeal, Part I - The Duck and Cover



Well, thanks to an order that come through the Supreme Court today....after months of what was certainly a very awkward silence (not unlike a child with it's hand caught knee-deep in a cookie jar; mainly because they see that there's no way to win here; and knowing that I won't, by any stretch of the imagination, keep the case quiet i.e., confidential), they've found a way to weasel out of addressing the issues brought against them in our appeal, in just about the only way that remains to them.  Tricky little devils they are, they are.

So, a little history here, there was an appeal, of course, filed back in March 27th of 2015...and because the crimes brought against Polk County in our child removal case were so numerous and heinous, and involved so many of the elected officials in our state and county, they've been stuck in neutral, and haven't wanted to proceed, trying to invent some way to get out without looking illegal and unjust.  The petition, filed by the appellants, can be found here, if you need a refresher:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-petition-of-appeal.html

After 6 months of waiting (most appeals are dealt with in around 4-6 months), and telling me, for 5 months straight that it was "under consideration", they then told me that it wasn't moving forward, and that it wasn't even a case as yet, because I have failed to do 3 things.  Now, not only are these things that the average citizen would even consider to be something they would have to do, but they were, because of these things, about to dismiss the whole thing...because I hadn't done them.

1.  They were waiting on the filing fee to be paid.  Wouldn't this be in need of mentioning almost immediately, if this were an issue?  Of course it would.  2.  I hadn't asked the lower court to shuffle the records of the proceedings to the Supreme Court...are you serious??  Wouldn't your average logical person think they would have to do that?  They didn't...and they don't.  This was made quite clear.  3.  I was required to not only pay for the transcripts of the proceedings and make pay arrangements (at $3.50 a page, somewhere around $1000 for all of the proceedings) to get them, I was required to ask the lower courts to produce them and get them to the Supreme Court as well.

This appeal, of course, did not only cover the Termination of our Parental rights, it covered the entire case, start to fini.  We of course, were indigent, and couldn't afford to pay $150 for the appeal, we certainly couldn't afford $1000 for transcripts...so we filed AGAIN for indigency, had the filing fee waived, and an order was issued by the criminal Judge Price, 6 months after being asked to issue another order claiming we weren't able to pay for things, ordering the transcripts be produced.  I saw the order, but evidently didn't read it too well.  How did I discover this?  I got this in our case, just the other day:




Now, in case you can't see what they've done here, see, we didn't show up for the termination hearing.  Why?  Because they made me miss it, by putting out a warrant for my arrest for something they claimed I had done almost 2 months prior to the hearing date...because they wanted me to miss the termination hearing.  Why did they want me to miss the termination hearing?  Because then, as far as appealing this case went, I would, according to Iowa Law, have NO STANDING to appeal it.  Fortunately for us, we covered this in our appeal, and provided proof of it for days, in our petition....with only one problem, now, in case you really missed how they intend to get away with it.

See, because of this order, stating that the transcripts of the court hearing we missed, the termination hearing' were to be produced at state expense, issued by Judge Price around 6 months ago (we smiled with satisfaction upon seeing it, but little did I notice that it only ordered that the transcripts FOR THE TERMINATION were to be produced at state expense), this order states that we have 14 days...to pay for the other hearings.  I knew they'd find a way, didn't you?  They know damn well we can't afford this.




So here's the deal America.  I've been exposing this state and its criminals for nigh on almost 2 years now...and they're about to win this war....because I can't cough up the necessary $800 or so needed to produce the transcripts for this entire case...the only transcripts that the state will pay for are the ones for the hearing that we didn't show for...'magine that.

I have never in my life ever asked you for anything, my friends.  I have battled hard for all of you, nearly every day of this entire 1 year and 8 months, and never have I expected anything from you in return.  NOW, I'm begging for your help.  I need $800 to get these transcripts produced, a.s.a.p...before the 14 days is up...or I may very well lose this case.

See that little DONATE button up there to your top right, at the top of the blog, in orange?  I need $800, and I have about a 1000X more likely chance of beating this case in court and getting my daughter back...please, help, with that, if naught else...and I swear, I will never ask for another thing as long as I live.  I am about to add 3 more "levels" of giving...all geared towards getting these transcripts made before the end of April...$5, $2, and $1.  I have over 2000 friends....surely a couple of bucks wouldn't kill you??  Thank you, in advance...may the Lord bless your fight, either way, regardless.  :D

Saturday, April 16, 2016

Christopher Bruce, "Domestic Terrorist"



In an online video titled “The End of America and the World,” Christopher Bruce shouts a warning to the American people to stock up on food, water and cigarettes.
He says President Barack Obama is purposefully engineering a worldwide financial collapse meant to plunge America into despair and bring the rise of a new world order.
Bruce rails against state child protection workers tasked with investigating abuse, comparing them to agents of Nazi Germany.
"CPS, or child protective services, I guarantee you is the new German Gestapo reborn on a worldwide scale," he said in the video uploaded to YouTube in July. "… Mark my words people, these evil social workers are following the commands and answering to only one faction: the New World Order, and they're elitists. Their job is to destroy the family unit and tear us into little bitty bits."
Beginning in February of last year, prosecutors claim the Carroll resident's anger grew more sinister, morphing into illegal threats likely influenced by a growing strain of extreme anti-government ideology, one expert said.

Allegations of harassment

In March 2015, Bruce, 55, pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor harassment charges after he repeatedly phoned Des Moines-based employees of the Iowa Department of Human Services he met through a child custody case. He called the two women "sluts" and other slurs and continued calling after a detective warned him to stop, according to criminal complaints.
Bruce told one of the women in a voice mail, "I really hope you are enjoying your life, because it is about done with," according to another complaint. He was angry at the DHS employee because he believed she spurred a state effort to remove his child
On Monday, Altoona resident Jeanne Munson sometimes cried on the witness stand as she recounted the violent intimidation she said she received from Bruce. The testimony came at the outset of a felony trial against Bruce at the Polk County Courthouse, in which he is charged with threat-explosive or incendiary device and aggravated misdemeanor counts of stalking and harassment.
The two met once in person, brought together at a protest in August by their shared interest in speaking out against the DHS' child removal policies, she testified. But that encounter led to months of discord that boiled over Jan. 13, when prosecutors claim a screaming Bruce phoned Munson 27 times, threatening to burn down her house and shoot her.
"I was afraid more than anything that he would burn my house," Munson said after a string of loud voice mail messages were played for the jury. She said she feared family members or her grandchildren would be inside.
Bruce was angry because he believed Munson and other activists left the protest early, she testified. In one voice mail, he shouted, "The (expletive) police can't (expletive) touch me."
In court documents, Bruce identifies himself as Christopher The Living Man.
blog authored under his name suggests that the United Nations moved tanks onto U.S. soil under the cover of Jade Helm, a military exercise that drew a rash of conspiracy theories.
Bruce labels himself a "sovereign national" — a follower of a loosely organized movement of extremists also known as "sovereign citizens" who believe they are free to disobey U.S. laws, like getting driver's licenses and vehicle registrations. Bruce wrote in one filing that Iowa courts have no jurisdiction over him "unless God's laws are broken."
Polk County Attorney John Sarcone said it's rare for his office to encounter sovereign citizens, particularly in criminal cases.
But the Southern Poverty Law Center, a group that tracks hate and extremists groups, estimates the number of "hard-core" sovereign citizens at approximately 100,000 nationwide, with another 200,000 "dabbling" in the ideology, said senior fellow Mark Potok.





In 2011 the FBI's counter-terrorism analysis section issued a bulletin to law enforcement warning that the Internet and an economic downturn were fueling growth in the movement's numbers.
The FBI considers sovereign citizens a domestic terrorist movement whose members are capable of reacting violently when challenged by law enforcement. Since 2000, lone-acting sovereign citizens have killed six law enforcement officers across the U.S., according to the bureau.
"The vast majority of people who have these beliefs don’t go to prison, don’t commit major crimes," Potok said. "But still, a major portion of them do. … There have been quite a  number of cases of sovereign citizens murdering law enforcement officials."
Potok said Bruce fits into a pattern seen in other sovereign citizens the Southern Poverty Law Center has tracked. People often come to the movement after losing a home or a experience that puts them at odds with the government, such as a property zoning dispute.
"It's fairly common to see someone personalize a difficult confrontation with government agencies into a plot to do in the entire American people," he said. "That really is classic."

Bruce denies wrongdoing

Bruce chose to represent himself on the opening day of his trial Monday. He did not deny making threats toward Munson in his opening statements, but suggested he had no means or intention to actually burn down a home.
Bruce said he had no "vehicle, no weapons, no ammunition, no guns, no bombs, no gas cans or incendiary devices."
But the case hinges on what the Altoona woman feared he was capable of, said Thomas Tolbert, a law student and intern in the county attorney's office who gave the opening statement.
"There's a difference between what someone does, and what Ms. Munson believed the defendant would do," Tolbert said. "Ms. Munson believed that the defendant would burn down her house with her inside."
- Source, The Des Moines Register, Grant Rodgers, Libelous Reporter

Now, boys and girls, my response to this article, written quite recently to Mr. Rodgers:

'Twould seem that you haven't exactly shown or been a prime example of what we little people like to call 'Journalistic Integrity.'

First and foremost, my new and interesting Judeo-Christian friend, it's not 'Sovereign Citizen', it's "Sovereign National"...which, in case you were not aware, is a lot more than 300,000, as you so blithely relate; it would be more like 15,300,000, if anything.  Just about anyone that lived btwn. 1789 and 1864 was a sovereign national.  All of Native America are also sovereign nationals, as are any one of your forefathers who existed during the days of the pre-14th Amendment pretender Constitution, the one entitled Constitution FOR the United States of America.  The Constitution in place at this time is called the Constitution OF the United States of America.  There is, of course, a reason for this.  (Please see http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-whole-ball-o-wax-continued-post.html, There is a letter from Anna Von Reitz, Alaska Supreme Court Justice, filed on November of 2015 there, under 'The United States of America' section).  These people are hardly 'Domestic Terrorists', except to the agents of Government that would rather these people were all dead, i.e., the FBI, etc., the people that purport to be your source on the subject.  Anna Von Reitz filed a 279 trillion dollar lawsuit against the criminals that currently claim to be our 'representatives' in Washington, and they would, of course, like nothing less than to see us all extinct, so that they can continue to fleece the American people in what is, to date, the largest mafia con game to ever hit the planet.

2nd, you are taking, as fact, I imagine because they are allegedly honest, forthcoming elected officials and prosecutors, everything you have heard from just one side of this story, their side.  Had you done any research whatsoever, you would have noticed some disturbing inconsistencies.  I was, in fact, brought up on harassment charges in February of 2015...2-3rd Degree and 1-1st Degree.  I did, as you report, plead guilty to those charges, but only to get my bond reduced so I could get back to proving that these charges were falsely brought, and in order to continue to fight the RICO actions that were in place against me.  The 1st degree charge had to be dropped a month and a half later, just a few days before my trial on the matter (not because I plead to the lesser charges, as they claimed, but because they had no viable proof of this).

This is only a very small part of a very large story that you took almost no time to investigate.  You had ample opportunity to question me in a confidential visit at the Polk County Jail, but you chose, instead, to take the word of the lying County Attorney's office, and an alleged "victim" of my threats and harassment.

Had you looked into the current case further (it is all on record, though I'm sure that they have taken massive steps to hide it, it has to still be there for any possible appeal to the Appellate court), you may have noticed that there were over 210 pieces of evidence filed in it (of which 185 were dismissed due to their relevance, they say), and over 40 witnesses called (28 or so were elected officials and governmental employees, who were all allowed to quash their subpeonaes...not because they would have been subjected to "undue oppression" as they claimed, but because they would have had to testify to matters they wished to not be known, as well as be implicated in collusion and conspiracy against me).  What you do not know is that this is because the crimes these people committed against me and my family over the last year and a half are hidden safely away on the Confidential records of Juvenile Courts; and are quite unjust and heinous.

The video you looked up on Youtube is only one of 4 that rest there.  I imagine that you only chose the first one, because it put me in a light of someone rather mentally unstable and paranoid.  I would strongly suggest that you take things a little further, and peruse the listed links, proffered further down in this letter, so that you can get a better feel for what's really going on here.  That you chose to look at only the blog post entitled 'The End of the (free) United States' from September of last year and none of the other 290 posts there shows your lack of Journalistic ability and research.

That you put extra effort to lump me in with allegedly murderous "Sovereign Citizens" (an oxymoron, by the way...Sovereigns and citizens are two completely opposite groups of people) is not only a move of complete ignorance, it's nothing short of libelous.  Prior to the state stealing my wife's only daughter, 2 years ago, I had absolutely no record of any violent criminal behaviors.  DHS's own director, Charles Palmer (one of the witnesses called to testify at my trial, who also weaseled out of testifying in it) himself, cleared my family of all allegations brought against us to remove our child, and she has yet, after a year, to be returned to our care.  The appeal to our termination of parental rights has been sitting like a dead duck in the Supreme Court for over a year now; so many big-named elected officials and officers of Iowa's courts are involved, they don't dare address it.

The purpose of this letter is two-fold.  First, i would like a retraction of this story, and a publicly written apology to not giving this matter ample research.  Two, it is to show you once and for all that this is not the case of Jeanne Munson, AKA THE STATE OF IOWA against Christopher Bruce, this is the case of Polk County against Christopher, the Living Man.

I present these links to stories given in my blog, so you can better understand the REAL story here, a horrendous and unjust story that has been totally bypassed by those of Iowa's media, to the point of utter ridiculousness, and has caused me to be brought up on charges of harassment by them as well, because they offered to do the story, then backed out; I imagine at the behest of people in power putting the brakes on those stories, when approached.

If you do not choose to indulge yourself in further research, or retract that story, I will opt to A.  contact your superiors, and then B.  Bring charges of libel against the Des Moines Register...no threat intended.

Last but not least, I OPT to not have a driver's license, I don't REFUSE to have one.  If you were to investigate the matter, a driver's license was only previously needed, under the proper constitution and the UCC, to drive commercial vehicles ONLY.  You have an unalienable right to "travel".  You don't need the Government's permission to move from one spot to another.  Also, I am not "Anti-Government"...self Government (please note the definition of "sovereignty) is still Government, as is an Anarchist Government.  I am simply anti-tyranny.  There is a huge difference.  I am not a domestic terrorist...I am a free and sovereign national/State Citizen, a designation we all enjoyed before the civil war.

Christopher Bruce.






And, if you prefer documents filed by the lying bastards in the Juvenile courts and the County Attorneys/Attorney General's offices, I also suggest you refer to these articles, which contain all the confidential documents these criminals would rather no one in Iowa sees; even to go as far as to have me arrested several times (and put me away in jail for what could be as many as four years) in the last year:











and, finally, the "Child Protective Assessment appeal" results and order, clearing us of all allegations, and, upon appeal by the Attorney General's appeal to the director, the director's decision.


*************************************************************************************

Do me a favor will ya, America?  If you get a chance, be sure and call those morons at the Des Moines Register and ask 'em what their problem is?  Here are their email addresses, as well as the phone number for the Register:

David Chivers, CEO
dchivers@dmreg.com
(515) 284-8502

Kevin R. Johnson, Regional Director
krjohnson@dmreg.com
(515) 471-3505

Phil Legler, Vice President, IT
plegler@dmreg.com
(515) 284-8385

Amalie Nash
Editor and VP, Audience Engagement
anash@dmreg.com
(515) 777-7032

Orton Preikschat, Senior Distribution Director
opreiksc@dmreg.com
(515) 284-8384

Mark Wurzer, VP, Advertising
mwurzer@dmreg.com


Des Moines Register's Phone number:  515-284-8141