NOTE 1: This one is a LOOOOOOONG work in progress, and will take me the better parts of today and tomorrow to get it all posted. KEEP CHECKING BACK FOR WHAT'S NEXT!
NOTE 2A: By the way, in case you haven't figured this out yet, I don't ever...EVER expect to win...NOR IS THIS POSSIBLE IN ANY WAY AGAINST ANYONE CLAIMING TO BE GOVERNMENT OVER YOU these days. The purpose of all of this is to 1. Show you exactly what to do and what NOT to do in filing your OWN federal cases, and 2. TO EXPOSE THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF THE JUDICIARIES...NOT ONLY IN YOUR STATE, BUT ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL AS WELL, and to show you that Government, and the agencies thereof, have come up with legal ways to skirt you at all times, using a host of different little tricks, passed by their buddies in the house and senate in order to help them elude justice, commit crimes legally, and get away with it too; including IMMUNITY, claiming to NOT be a municipal corporation (which, of course, they all are) by legal definition, etc.
NOTE 2B: Now, I say this one for the purposes of the Police Departments Briefs. Note that they have found their own excuse to get out of this by claiming that they are not a legally defined "municipal corporation". They say they are a department of the city, not a municipal entity...but doesn't MUNICIPAL MEAN CITY OR LOCAL? Cops work for and are paid for by the city....they allegedly (but do NOT any longer) protect and serve the city. They work as a department of the city. They drive around in the city. They roam the city. They bust people in the city. If you try to sue them, they fall under the city legal department. If you ask them, they'll state that they work for and are paid for by the city. I'd say this makes them slightly MUNICIPAL, and working FOR THE CITY...wouldn't you? But they aren't defined as a municipal corporation, EVIDENTLY, ACCORDING TO THE LAW YOU HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AND DIDN'T PASS IN ANY WAY, and they can't be sued? SOMETHING IS WRONG!!
NOTE 3: FOR ANY OF YOU THAT WOULD CARE TO SEE ALL 800 DOCUMENTS FROM THE JUVENILE CASES THAT STARTED ALL OF THIS, INCLUDING ALL OF MY COMMENTARY AND MOTIONS TO THE CONTRARY; AND ALSO ANY OF THE CRIMINAL CASES INVOLVED HERE, PLEASE FOLLOW THESE LINKS:
the Juvenile Cases:
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-b-august.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-intermission.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-c-september.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-d-october.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-e-november.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-f-december.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-g-january.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/02/and-away-we-go-part-h-february.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/03/and-away-we-go-termination-case-part-1.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/03/and-away-we-go-termination-part-b.html
LET'S ALSO INCLUDE THE CASE THEY WON'T ADDRESS AT ALL, THE CASE BEFORE THE ALJ OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, WHERE THEY FOUND US INNOCENT OF ABUSE, EXPUNGED OUR RECORDS, AND TOOK US OFF THE ABUSE REGISTRY. THE AG THEN APPEALED THIS TO THE DIRECTOR OF DHS, WHO ALSO APPROVED THAT DECISION, IN OUR FAVOR...AND THE COURTS WILL NOT RETURN OUR DAUGHTER???? THIS DECISION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE APPELLATE COURTS 3 TIMES. IT WAS DENIED 3 TIMES AS WELL.
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/06/unfreakinbelievable-part-v-assessment.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/07/a-warning-to-people-good-and-evil-this.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-pre-assessment-assessment-summary.html
Now, the petition of appeal, and the Supreme Court case:
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-petition-of-appeal.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-ol-double-cross-appeal.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-ol-double-cross-appeal-part-ii.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-appeal-to-termination-part-i-this.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/10/unfreakinbelievable-part-vi-supreme.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-termination-appealcross-appeal-part.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-termination-appealcross-appeal-part_28.html
Harassment of 2 social workers, 2015, first criminal case:
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/03/pcj-my-pcj-free-at-last.html
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/03/braving-banjo.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/04/braving-banjo-part-ii-turning-of-screw.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/04/psycho-warfare-part-i.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-turning-o-tables-part-i.html
Darren Tromblay (CityView EIC) Harrassment case, and the felony charges concerning Jeanne Munson, and Mark Worthington, DHS agents (including the events that caused this arrest):
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2016/02/bravingthe-banjo-part-viii-new-and.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2016/04/calling-bluff-part-12-stage-is-set.html
Misdemeanor case, after I was released for probation; and after I asked to be taken OFF probation and do the rest of my time, and they responded setting a date to hear the matter, and then by issuing a warrant for my arrest:
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2017/01/home-again-home-again.html
Next: Post-Conviction relief case, just before this case was filed:
And last but not least, the claim for THIS case:
https://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-fed-funny-farm-part-vii-final-claim.html
And there are a couple more articles about what's already been happening til this point, here:
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-fed-funny-farm-vol-ix-more-state.html
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-fed-funny-farm-part-x-achilles-heel.html
********************************************************************************
Well kids, I can't say as it hasn't been a lot of fun, but this crap is getting seriously outta hand.Not only did we have the claim, pre-answers to motions to dismiss, REAL motions to dismiss, motions to RESIST motions to pre-answers to dismiss, motions to resist motions to dismiss...but now we have replies to motions to resist pre-answer motions to dismiss and replies to resistance motions to dismiss. Confused yet? I know I am. It leaves a person to wonder...when does the actual case get to get going? And once it does, what in God's name is going to happen then? I just can't wait, you can bet that. Annnnnyway, to ensure that, once again, you folks can see the fal-de-ral that occurs when it's you against the world, I once again present the crap that happens when you do. THIS is not only what you're paying these clowns to do with their time, with your TAXES (in other words, do everything they can to protect their own;), but also charge you an additional $400 filing fee....to do the same thing. Then, when you lose (which of course, you will, unless you have a publicized case, where they're forced to act like a REAL court of "LAW"), they then charge you for the court costs, double and triple dipping into your already dipped into pockets; and jail you for when you don't pay them for what they're already being paid to do from your taxes that you shouldn't be paying.
Here then is the most recent rash of motions and more...including my responses, of course. My responses to this utter nonsense will be in type format, rather than legal papers. It's of course a lot more important that you can read mine...since they just repeat themselves, and make ridiculous excuses to get out of receiving any kind of real justice.
Now, I'd like to begin by pointing out to you that almost every brief here mentions that no damages have been claimed, therefore, no relief can be granted. OK, let's see here....reputations of both plaintiffs have been MASSIVELY damaged here. Criminal records have been given just me, when I didn't have one before and I can pretty much no longer work. A child was lost. Homes were lost because of this. Libel. Slander. Property was stolen. Gee, I dunno....does anyone besides me see any damage here?? Cause I do. My wife does. Most of my friends and family do. What the Hell, then? I think I made all these damages quite clear.
First, the State's brief in support of their motion to dismiss the social workers involved and their assistant AG's:
Now my answer....which really isn't an answer, as much as it is a statement. See, by this time I was getting rather annoyed at the stuff they were pulling out of their asses, and decided to go full-tilt on them instead of answer, once again, just what I had in the motion to resist their motion to dismiss.
Christopher (Bruce) the living man, plaintiff, brings his answer to the State’s brief in support of his motion to dismiss those of the Department of Human Service and the AG’s office:
The plaintiffs in this matter would like to begin by stating that the AG’S office, being in charge of the defense of the matter of the Department of Human Services, continues to state facts concerning the removal all the way through our termination, according to the original set of events, which we have taken in front of an ALJ at their department and had all stated facts made by the AG’s office in his brief UTTERLY disproven. The allegations of neglect were false, and never proven, and the ones that allegedly WERE “proven” in Judge Price’s circus court were totally annihilated. We called over 40 witnesses to that hearing, of which almost all were ordered to testify, and the ALJ stated, as fact, that the abuse that was alleged didn’t happen, and that the reasons used to remove our child from our care were NOT VALID, lawfully, and the child should not have been removed, not for the reasons used, and not according to Iowa statute. The AG’s office, not satisfied with the ALJ’s ruling, then appealed it up to the director at the time, Charles Palmer, who AGREED WITH ALL THAT THE ALJ DECIDED.
You would imagine, then, if there were anything that remains that resembled true justice in this land, that since our names were removed from the registry and our records expunged, and the assessment was determined to be fraudulent and without merit (meaning the entire case should not have ever happened, and our termination should have been overturned) that the courts would follow suit and return our daughter to us instantly, with their apologies; and that those who did us wrong would be duly punished for the wrongs they committed. Instead, the appellate court ignored this decision, and in an effort to cover the behinds and the jobs of everyone who was involved, ruled in favor of the District Court to have the mother’s rights terminated, persecuted the man they threw out of the case (claimant Christopher); after they tortured him relentlessly for almost the entirety of both juvenile cases; and allowed a man who had no interest in the mother at all or in the fact that she may have gotten pregnant by him until DHS hunted him down to tell him she had his child (R.S.), and convinced him that he needed to have her instead, even though he had a criminal record, and essentially did not endure the burdens we did while trying to prove our worthiness to parent our child, something that was our right to do anyway, without the big nose of the state being involved.
It had been my intention to answer the State’s absolutely ludicrous brief….but to be honest, I’ve answered so many, exactly the same way no less, that I don’t really see the point in doing so. You’ll dismiss the action, as I and everyone else that have been fighting these injustices have all expected that you would, and we’ll just file it again, and again, and appeal THOSE dismissals, again and again, until we get it right. I have nothing better to do with my life, thanks to these State, County and City criminals…how about you?
So, since the AG insists on rehashing the nightmare we endured using the initial 6 months of wrongly stated facts that were more than disproven to be anything resembling any sort of truth, let it be stated on the record of this court that all he relates can be disproven with abandon, and with ease…again.
Not that this court has any interest in these events for this case, or shouldn’t, considering that this case isn’t about their unlawful decisions in just those cases. This is about our rights being violated, about a criminal organization in operation in and against the citizens of Iowa, and about no one being accountable for making a grave mistake; not only just in the first hours of her removal, but continuously. And when all “State Remedies” concerning the matter were finally exhausted, nearly 3 years, later, many more criminal actions had occurred. I lost a year of my life in the Polk County Jail. I was touted all over Iowa as the most horrendous wanted criminal in Iowa for the crime of annoying social workers. One was still my active caseworker. The other I barely ever said two words to, after she conspired with the courts and they took her word like she was the light of God. I didn’t ever want to talk to either of them. And I still have not to this day. I called them once, on the weekend, when I knew their phones would be off, that’s how much I didn’t want to even speak to them, let alone harass them. That 5 minute phone call to each of them caused me to have my first real criminal charges, and still haunts me to this day. The Des Moines Register, the very paper I read for nearly 42 years of living in Iowa, straight up likened me to a domestic terrorist. My friends and family all laughed it off…they know better. That doesn’t mean I didn’t pay for all of that libel, because I still pay for it. I used to love the Des Moines Register; mainly because it actually reported what we now can’t remember to be “The News”. Now I wouldn’t use it to wipe my ass. We have lost one home; one child and two dogs over all of this, and have been homeless plenty. Plaintiff Christopher hasn’t the ability to even work in most crappy jobs because of his new record, (and thanks to the record of the POLK COUNTY COURT showing I was convicted of felonies; which I was not; but that’s another charge of conspiracy I didn’t state a claim to in order to get relief, isn’t it?) something he never had before this all began, and still, even with all of this damage – to Christopher’s record, to Christopher’s reputation, and to our very souls; we the plaintiffs will fight this until a. I’m fitted for cement shoes, or die of natural causes; b. Our daughter comes to us again to tell us that she understands all that happened, and c. Those who damaged our lives, including our daughter’s, pay for their crimes in whatever way they end up paying…because they will pay. I would prefer it be by this court, but of course, that’s too much to ask. You protect your own, I see that now, and allow those of the city, county and state do anything they like; including stealing children that should never be stolen, to as much as outright MURDER of innocent people in the street with no fear of reprisal, save a suspension with pay here, and a slap on the wrist there.
Should those who allegedly hold the reigns over the States and purporting to be “our Government” continue in this non-chalant attitude concerning criminal actions by soulless officials of the state county and city doing whatever they like to whomever they should choose, and be immune to any and all punishment for it; and utilizing people’s hard earned money in the form of oppressive taxes to do so, we the truly oppressed victims of this judiciary system will continue to expose these non-actions by the courts of the “Federal Government” and get our justice without your help…mainly because, thanks to you, we have nothing left, and nothing better to do; but then it will be from people who care about how many wrongs are done to us without boundaries by those of these lesser State, County and City actors in the name of profit. When people are made aware of the truth of what our Government has allowed to happen to the republic (and believe me, stopping ME will not even put a dent in the current flood of truth that’s been growing exponentially, daily of late) and the atrocities some of us endure, there will someday be enough of an awakening; and only then will there finally be moral outrage, and the people will no longer tolerate your inactions and shoulder shrugging, and just start removing each and every respective criminal official from whatever positions you’re presenting yourselves as lawfully being chosen to be in, unlawfully, and in direct opposition of our rights as sovereign people, over and above our respective states. But then, you’re expecting that, aren’t you, and have prepared for it well.
I wouldn’t count on the 5G prison grid being your salvation however. When the elite are finished using you as their tools to defeat the will and destroy the souls of the masses using the power they’ve lent you, they’ll then drop you like so many used panels of tissue paper, just like they have the rest of us. You have to remember…they only want 500 MILLION people on the earth, and are willing to do whatever it takes to accomplish it, and rule over what remains… including killing off 7 billion of the people that are here now. When you look at it this way, it presents you a little more to fear: the fact that 1 out of every 14 people on this planet will remain alive, and 13 people will die. That’s not really very good betting odds, for your being one of those remaining in this hellhole we now call America.
And what sort of life do you imagine those remaining will have? You will lose whatever position you currently have, and more than likely be slaves of the elite. Your jobs will be done easily by the new race of AI replacements that they’re already replacing others with. You even went as far as to make one of them a citizen of humanity in preparation for that day. You, on the other hand, will only be fit to build their buildings, clean their toilets and dig their ditches..for a while anyway, until AI takes those jobs too… and if you don’t? There are ways they currently have possession of that will ensure that you do exactly what you’re told…whether you want to, or not. And someday, more than likely not long from now, AI will be self-realizing and figure out that man himself is a plague on the earth, and it will be the ruling elite of the world who will then have to fight for their OWN lives against “Skynet.” I myself would rather die standing then serving on MY knees. If you criminals face no other justice but the justice of staying alive to be their servants and live in the world that you helped create for human-kind future, then my wish for justice will be served WELL. In this context, I truly wish you to endure the masses of murders they have in mind, because no Hell will compare to what you have waiting for you, when their dreams are finally met; and world domination is achieved. On the other hand, should you die, like the majority, then that will be even better; for I will watch at God’s hand as he throws you into your own personal apartments in Hell, for what you have done to this once great nation, God’s children, and our children as well.
It will, more than likely, be YOUR children who suffer because of your actions (or, in this case, INACTIONS) as well, think about that. Whatever deal you made, pretty much with the Devil himself, will not reward you – Not the way you think, and most certainly not according to what you deserve. The Law of Contracts that you in the judiciary follow more religiously than any other law will one day do you in, as it’s done us all in. What entity is all about the law of contracts? I figured out what you were all about eons ago. The Devil, and his stench is all over every court in the land. I see and smell it every time I walk into one of your Article I courts. I see it in the sleepless and empty eyes and souls of every attorney and every judge I encounter.
Well, I hate to be the one to break it to you folks. There is no ceremony coming that will ever elevate you to God status. It’s a trick. It’s a ploy. It’s a way for the Devil to claim your soul without worry and without fanfare. Some day, the contract you signed in blood, drunk by you from the innocent children everywhere will burn against you and in your veins and heads, and then, and ONLY then, will you remember my words. I can live with that. I want you to hear these words every time a child cries, every time they kill another 1 million, every time they come for you and YOURS. I’ll have mine returned..everything I had going for me in THIS life is gone, but it doesn’t matter, because what God has in mind when I reach him will pale everything I ever had on Earth, because I chose to follow him. And seeing the Devil in all of you, and the misery it causes you, reinforces my belief in God, for evil cannot exist without an opposite equally great in goodness and love, and you remind me every day that he is real through the evil you perpetrate in these courts of lawlessness. One day, everything will be all right. Be it Kharma, or be it God, doesn’t matter. I’ll take whatever presents, if it means I will finally receive my just deserts. I’d have to say that the best part? Will be when our family is whole again, undamaged, and all who have been removed from our care wrongfully will be reunited with us again, and our rights to be their parents will be restored by God, who gave us the right to parent our offspring and rightful biological property to begin with.
You know there was one thing in the brief is support of the motion to dismiss DHS and all they did to us that I found needing to be addressed and it’s this:
The AG in charge states that, although the Federal Court (per federal code) should assume that all in a complainant’s claim contain events that are true; and then goes on to say that “the court need not accept as true ‘wholly conclusory allegations.’”
I find this interesting from a legal standpoint, considering that the agency that he represents, the Iowa Department of Human Services, engages in this very behavior, hand in hand with Iowa’s Judiciary every….single….day. Day after day, case after case, allegations are made and used against defendants to which no basis of truth or fact resides; not only to remove children from parents initially, but to also never return them, and terminate parental rights. The AG in this case tells their honors that they should not accept non-conclusory allegations as absolute truth or fact, and yet the same agency defends social workers who lie every hour of every day, some as many as 55 times in a single non-conclusory 21-day child protective assessment against their unwitting and unknowing victims, all based on the same hearsay and unproven fact as this assistant AG is referring to; and as ours was, by a social worker that, as I brought out of her during questioning, that this woman who kidnapped my newborn daughter was not married, didn’t have children; who had no experience with newborns at the time, and who had never removed a child before ours. This is the worker that decided we were abusing and/or neglecting our NEWBORN daughter, and who they defended in our assessment appeal. To be frank? She looked a little shaken when I got done asking her over 100 revealing questions about her assessment and her life as a DHS worker. Needless to say, they lost. Not once. Twice. I believe that’s all I have to say about that.
Respectfully,
Let's right on to The motion to dismiss submitted by the Carroll....I mean, I'm sorry, the "City of Carroll Police Department." When you're bringing suit against the criminals in charge, you have to get the name of the business JUST RIGHT, or it could get dismissed easier, yannow.
Here's the motion, followed by their brief. Sometimes, either I would have seriously been repeating myself by answering the brief as well as the motion, or it would have been so full of crap that I just couldn't bear to answer it....either way, sometimes, I simply resisted the motion, and to hell with the brief in support of it, being it was mostly case law (every other word, at times) and other BS. So if you don't see the answer to the brief, it's probably because I just didn't have the time or the inclination to do both.
The answer to that:
Christopher (Bruce) the living man moves to resist the motion to dismiss the Carroll Police Department and Gary Bellinghausen on these grounds:
1. The plaintiffs agree to statement 1.
2. The plaintiffs have stated in several resistance motions that this case does not appeal any past matters or charges, it brings up all new allegations against all defendant; namely, deprivation of rights under color of law the entire time of 4 years, from July 2014 until, essentially October of 2017.
3. As for statement 3, the plaintiffs have more than stated their claims. Should the court require more details, the plaintiffs will be happy to accommodate the court.
4. Per Federal Civil Rule of Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6), the claimants state again that claims have been stated, and resist the motion to dismiss based on this ground. Under this, the claimants answer to:
a. The Carroll Police Department is a business, as are all other police departments and City Departments, in other words, a “Municipal Corporation”, and, as so described, it has the right, as such, to sue, and be sued. Therefore, the claimants have every right to bring claim against said department as a whole.
b. The attorney states that the statute of limitations has run out for this action. Where Officer Gary Bellinghausen is concerned, Breach of Contract has a 10 year statute of limitations. Concerning the matter of the violations of our rights under color of law, and conspiring against our civil rights, there is no stated statute of limitations concerning these actions.
c. Concerning the attorney’s statement about Heck v. Humphrey, the claimants state that there is no bar, because the case referred to does not apply. There is no habeas corpus action involved, and neither plaintiff is incarcerated.
d. Concerning the attorney’s statement about the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine, this does not apply, considering that the claim does not seek to appeal to the Federal District Court concerning any one matter or case, but seeks relief concerning all actions of all the defendants over a period of 4 years. As to the matter of the breach of contract, the claim is against Officer Bellinghausen himself, while he was engaging the Plaintiff Christopher, during his arrest of him on 1/21/2016. This matter was never before charged against Gary Bellinghausen, so concerning that matter, this doctrine ALSO does not apply.
e. Concerning the attorney’s statement about qualified immunity, the claimants once again state for the court that the Carroll Police Department is a business, and, thereby, can be sued in court.
f. Concerning the attorney’s statement concerning the breach of contract between the plaintiffs and Gary Bellinghausen, office of the Carroll Police Department; and the lack of claim concerning it in order to ask for relief, the claimants have stated (in claim #’s 53-56) that officer Bellinghausen, by his actions of entering our property without presenting the required paperwork asked from him by the sign on our door; then by entering the property without our consent or agreement, thereby agreed to contract with the plaintiffs for the agreed upon fee. The Claimants, thereby, state that Officer Bellinghausen did contract with the plaintiffs, and has not, as yet, remitted his requested fee. The Claimants, thereby, ask the court to grant relief to the claimants, based on these occurrences.
Wherefore, the clainants hereby resist the motion to dismiss submitted by attorney Catherine Lucas.
Christopher (Bruce) the living man
Now the brief in "support" of this bullshit:
And the answer to that:
The claimants, herewith, file answer to the brief submitted by Jason C. Palmer, considering the dismissal of the case against the Carroll Police Department and Gary Bellinghausen, Officer therewith.
Concerning the introduction, the defendants have ALL claimed that this matter arises out of events that occurred over the time period between July 21st, 2014 and October of 2017, and the claimants agree. However, almost all of the defendants refer to the case AGCR283733 as a case and appeal for the matter of false arrest. This is not the substance of this claim. The claim is for violation of Constitutional rights, due process rights, conspiracy against our civil rights and more. Concerning the case in question, it has never been alleged the arrest was false, as a matter of fact, neither was the appeal to that matter, though it states it to be so when the appeal to that case was addressed, per Judge Price, and in the PCR hearing, case PCCE080717. The claimant Christopher has never mentioned the matter of false arrest, in any of the criminal matter he has endured; and would like to correct the record of the court as of this answer. As to the breach of contract, that occurred on another date altogether, and the claimants have not brought that action against the Carroll Police Department as a whole, but against Officer Bellinghausen, solely.
The attorney goes on to state that an arrest date is not listed. The arrest date is listed in complaint item #53, but it is the incorrect date. The arrest for this matter occurred on the 21st, not the 23rd. The claimants direct the attorney to claim item #’s 53-56 for the details concerning their claim, for this is the incident the claim concerns. The first arrest, for harassment, by the Secret Service, was the previous year, and did not involve Officer Bellinghausen. The arrest for the matter discussed in the claim was on the date of 1/21/2016. The details of the breach are listed in a more than detailed manner, and if the attorney would care for more details, I can provide her with more details upon her request. In claim item #56, it clearly describes the incident for their attorney. In it, it specifically mentions the fact that Elizabeth purposefully only opened the outside door for the officers, and the officers that were present, including Gary Bellinghausen, opened the outside screen door and entered, without the owner’s consent, making officer Bellinghausen liable for the contract’s stated fee
Also, in claim item #58, it also mentions that the warrant issued to the claimants on the 21st day of January, 2015, was not an arrest warrant, it was a search warrant. This was discovered by someone that was watching the record of the court for me while I was incarcerated, and sent me a copy of the record. That copy was lost in a flood. On later inspection, the warrant was different, and not able to be downloaded by claimant Christopher. The claimant, Christopher, thereby, makes claim that the warrant used to affect the arrest of Christopher on January 21st, 2015, was not the warrant shown on the case SMAC359086, and was substituted for the one used by Officer Bellinghausen.
Concerning this agency the “City of Carroll Police Department,” and its immunity to prosecution, it is not an agency of Government, it is a privately owned and run business; and is listed on Matra.com as a private corporate entity, or, more specifically, a “Municipal Corporation”, allowing that business to sue, and be sued in a court of law. Moreover, any of these State, County and City “Government” agencies (operating as privately owned companies) reside in the jurisdictional care of the United States Corporation, and thereby, when affecting a member of the sovereign NATION; is able to claim no sovereignty, and thereby, no sovereign immunity whatsoever, because it holds no legal construct with which to affect the life of a living breathing sovereign man of the republic. It is therefore qualified to NO immunity whatsoever.
As to the remainder of the brief, the claimants have addressed these issues in their motion to resist the motion to dismiss; and in other motions and answers concerning other defendants as well, plenty. The plaintiffs do hereby resist the motion to dismiss concerning the “The City of Carroll Police Department,” and Officer Gary Bellinghausen.
Respectfully,
Christopher (Bruce) the living man
Christopher (Bruce) the living man
Now, the same bullshit with both the Altoona and Des Moines Police Departments:
First Altoona and their brief:
No need to post an answer, you know what it's going to say, since it says the same things here.
Same with the bullshit excreted by the DMPD: This one, by the way, is a little different. The attorney GRACIOUSLY mentions that I am naming Detective Lancaster ONLY in his official capacity. That means, had I NOT just simply mentioned him that way, I could have sued him. THANK YOU FOR THAT. When this is dismissed, we shall turn that way.
Note too that all of these allege "naked" and "non-conclusory" allegations...allegedly. UMMMMMMM........I think I could make them fully clothed, given the opportunity to take this to trial. Non-conclusory....well, ya, they are NOW...I haven't started yet, dumbasses!
Again, no answer will be given by me to you, because it's the same thing, over and over. C'mon...I don't wanna bore you!
There was an answer for Ashley no longer Andrews of Children and Families of Iowa, but it was pretty sad. I won't bother with that one.
Finally, we got an answer from Anthony Reed, the criminal in charge of making us look like drug addicts, when we don't do drugs. Now this one is interesting! Finally, something a little different! Still full of bullshit, but different smelling bullshit! I actually enjoyed this one:
As yet, the camp for Katherine Walker, of Walker Billingsly and Blair, is still silent. Lucas Taylor got an extension of time to answer, so won't be heard from for a while yet.
Here's what all of this boils down to kids....these people just want to continue to kill people, kidnap kids, break state and federal laws legally, entrap you with laws and speeding tickets, violate your rights...and be left alone. OF COURSE THEY WANT THIS DISMISSED...THE OTHER WAY, ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS, IS JUST NO FUN FOR THEM!
I'd like to also submit the answer to the pre-answer motion to dismiss's motion to dismiss...or whatever I just said. This came in over the weekend, and I was very quick to submit a final statement to this bullshit from the County Attorney's office. NOTE: In the last paragraph, they don't like the fact that I mentioned the County Attorney's head should be in a noose. He says the court shouldn't tolerate that kind of nastiness by me towards the treasonous County Attorney. Note that my statement in regard to this, in the last paragraph, was just as kind, where I tell him, his boss, and his criminal organization that he's welcome to go to Hell, ASAP:
And my statement in response;
And finally, with a bang, I give you something you're all welcome to use, should you come up in cases against these corporate fictions, and their alleged immunities to prosecution:
Christopher the Living Man does provide the court with the following, concerning all resistance, utilizing claims of Immunity:
There has been presented, throughout every motion to dismiss, from every defendant, that the defendants that work for the State, County and City are entitled to absolute, qualified, sovereign and judicial immunities.
There are no such immunities available for these entities, because a. They are listed and run as municipal corporations; in other words, they are places of business, able to sue and be sued; and b. Because the United States itself is a sovereign nation, with 323,000,000 residents, who are also, by default, sovereign.
“The United States of America” is a Municipal Corporation by its definition, and, as subsidiaries, its states are also municipal corporations as well, running under the reigns of the whole of “U.S. Corp”. To best understand what actually happened we follow a “Standard for Review” to first discover the history behind the relationship; and, second, we look to the terms and conditions of the Act, by reviewing the Act itself, to see how it fits in accord with law and our history.
Thus, to understand the parties involved in the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 (hereinafter, “DCOA”), we must first understand who are the parties involved in the relationship as described by the Act. We are not going to delve into the Act here, in its entirety; suffice it to say, looking over the situation, we find the Act is one made by the original jurisdiction government’s Congress, as set by the Constitution for the United States of America. The DCOA describes its venue as: “all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”. The District of Columbia was originally provided for in the Constitution for the United States of America (Sept. 17, 1787) at Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses. Then, on July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, the Territory was formed in the District of Columbia Act, wherein the “ten mile square” territory was permanently created and made the permanent location of the country’s government; that is to say, the “territory” so provided for included both the land and its actual government. Under that Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local government in all matters in said Territory. Then, on February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two counties were formed and their respective officers and district judges were appointed. Further, the established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown and Washington were recognized as constituted and placed under the laws of the District, its judges, etc. The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly called this Act (of, February 27, 1801) the “District of Columbia Organic Act” or the “Charter Act of the District of Columbia” and recognized it as the incorporation of the “municipality” known as the “District of Columbia”. Then, on March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act to that last Act, noted here, added the authority that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges collectively form a County Commission with the authority to appoint all officers as may be needed in similarity to the respective State officials in the states whence the counties Washington and Alexandria came, those being: Maryland and Virginia, respectively.
According to the United States Supreme Court those charter acts (first acts) were the official incorporation of the formal government (with its municipalities) of the District of Columbia as chartered by Congress in accord with the Constitution’s provision. Again, the Supreme Court called that body of government “a corporation”, with the right to sue and be sued. Respectively, since 1801, the District of Columbia has been consistently recognized as a “municipal corporation” with its own government.
That sets the basics for the first rule of our Standard for Review, ‘know the parties’. What we have presented is sufficient to show the basics of who the parties are as they related to resolving the answer to the question above. We admonish everyone to prove the facts for themselves by their own research.
The second rule from the Standard for Review is: “Then you must understand the environmental nature of the relationship.” With that in mind let’s consider the events of the time: the Civil War had recently ended and the country was still under Lincoln’s Conscription Act (Martial Law). Congress had at least three problems they could see no way to directly cure by following the laws of the land (as constituted): they were out of funds, they had promised 40 acres of land to each slave that left the South to fight for the North and they had to reintegrate the south into the Union; which they could not do without controlling the appointment of the Southern States Congressional members. There were other problems; but, these three stand out from the rest. That is enough about the environment for the purposes of this review; however, the more you study the historical events of this time, the more obvious the relationships will become and the more proof you will amass to prove the facts of what actually happened. In the interest of time, space and the topic of this response, we will move on.
The last step of the Standard for Review’s discovery process requires a review of the actual terms of the relationship. Thus, we review the first paragraph of the DCOA; where:
Congress wrote:
|
That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.
|
Given that even the Supreme Court confirms that the government of the District of Columbia was already “created into a government”, so formed into a municipal incorporation in 1801 under the District of Columbia Acts, we wonder, even with Congress’ constitutional authority to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District, how do you create, or incorporate, for the first time, a municipal government that has already been in existence as a municipal corporation for over 70 years? The obvious answer is, “It’s impossible!” There is no way to pass an “Organic Act” when the “Charter Act” is already in place, because the two words (organic and charter) have the same meaning—The First Act.
Though historians can make history appear to change by rewriting it for those unwilling to study the past from the actual records of the past. Even Congress cannot change the actual history. However, the records speak for themselves only if, and when, we study them.
When you consider the historical facts, the only meaning left for the terms given in the opening paragraph of the DCOA (and that which follows) is, the municipal corporation that was created is a private corporation owned by the actual government. Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation has within the operation of its own corporate construct. Thus, we coined the term, “Corp. U.S.”; to distinguish that corporation from the actual “original jurisdiction” government; as it was formed in accord with the Constitution for the United States of America.
We also note Congress reserved the right, granted them in said Constitution, to pass and enforce virtually any law within the District of Columbia; which is almost complete dictatorial authority over their Corp. U.S. construct, without regard for its internal operations or officers. Thus, Congress can lawfully use Corp. U.S. as they see fit, within that portion of the ten mile square defined as the District of Columbia. Respectively (through that authority); the members of Congress now wore two hats; one hat for their original jurisdiction government official seat and a second more effective hat as as a corporate board member titled with the same names: “Congressman”; “Representative” or “Senator”; the President also effectively wore two similar hats.
Thus, our historical records and laws clearly show that Corp. U.S. is not merely an incorporated municipality; rather, it is a private Corporation that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government
To belabor the issue further, because “The United States of America” is a nation of sovereign people, it is a sovereign nation. Though that fact alone should make it clear that the government is, and must remain, the servant of the people not their sovereign, Corp. U.S. promotes the ideology that it cannot be sued because it alleges that it is “Sovereign”. That myth is easily resolved by reviewing the 1871 DCOA (, under which, Corp. U.S. was created. It clearly states that Corp. U.S. can be sued. Respectively, the myth is resolved because sovereign cannot be sued within its own realm without its permission. Nonetheless, we are not willing to rely on that alone to resolve the myth. Instead, let’s review the three elements that define sovereignty in comparison to the government, Corp. U.S. and the people.
1. Sovereignty is a political power that is defined by: dominion, agency and possession:
a. “Dominion” is synonymous with “Land”, which is defined as: “(A)n area of three dimensional space, its position being defined by natural or imaginary points located by reference to the earth’s surface. ‘Land’ is not the fixed contents of that space, although…the owner of that space may well own those fixed contents. Land is immoveable, as distinct from chattels, which are moveable; it is also, in its legal significance, indestructible. The contents of the space may be physically severed, destroyed or consumed, but the space itself, and so the ‘land’, remains immutable.” Peter Butt, Land Law 9 (2nd ed. 1988) Reprinted in Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition;
(1) The government of The United States of America was: formed by the Constitution for the United States of America; and is limited in its authority by said Constitution; which forbids the government from owning land with the exception of that which is necessary to accomplish the following: “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings”. Said Constitution, Article. 1. §. 8. Clause 17.;
(2) Accordingly, when a territory (land) is acquired by The United States of America that land is held for dispossession to the people; who, under a proper claim are granted private Title (land patent) to the land; wherein, most of those patents (outside of the original 13 States & Texas; which came from foreign kings) were granted by the United States of America, under the hand and seal of the President of The United States of America;
(3) Respectively, the land mass of The United States of America is secured by land patents (Titles) that grant the land to private individuals (and to their heirs and assigns);
b. “Agency” is the right, or authority, to act, influence, exert power over and/or control a specific domain.
(1) The purpose the people gave for forming their Constitutional Republic form of government was, and remains: “to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”, said Constitution’s Preamble; respectively, a review of said Constitution shows that: not only did the people never grant said government authority over the people or over their rights to Life, Liberty or Property, they reserved that all such rights, etc. remain with the people (see: amendments 9. and 10.);
(2) The agency so granted to the government of The United States of America is limited to the specific authority the people collectively granted the government to act, for the people, through said Constitution; which only allows government the limited authority to administrate that small portion of the peoples’ collective sovereign authority necessary to accomplish the provisions of said Constitution;
(3) Said governmental agency does not include agency over the private land owned and` occupied by said people; and,
(4) The people retain their private agency over the land they own.
c. “Possession” is the actual control or physical occupancy of a specific domain and the property appurtenant to the same.
(1) The government of The United States of America does not possess the private land owned and occupied by said people; and,
(2) The people possess the private land owned and occupied by them.
By definition, the “governing body” of Iowa is not sovereign; and, by definition, the people that: own, retain the agency over and possess the land (dominion) are sovereign.
Therefore, because even the original jurisdiction government of “The State of Iowa”, the “County of Polk,” and the “City of Des Moines”, “Carroll”, and “Altoona” do not possess any of the three factors, all of which are, necessary to Sovereignty (dominion, agency & possession), they cannot possibly either be sovereign or respectively, rule over the people (as a sovereign could do).
Nevertheless, even though said government is not sovereign, that does not limit the nation from being sovereign; because said people are sovereign and together those people form a “Nation of Sovereigns; which “Nation of Sovereigns” used said Constitution to create a government (“of the people, by the people and for the people”) and to grant said government the collective administrative authority necessary for our government to stand in the world of nations representing the sovereign people of The United States of America; and to, in accord with said Constitution only, control the several States of the Union.
Therefore, because even the original jurisdiction government of “The State of Iowa”, the “County of Polk,” and the “City of Des Moines”, “Carroll”, and “Altoona” are not sovereign; rather, its officers are merely granted the authority to collectively administrate a small portion of the peoples’ sovereignty.
Respectively, when the original jurisdiction government created Corp. U.S. (in accord with the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871), it did not possess authority to grant Corp. U.S. sovereign authority (see: Osborne vs Bank US, 22 US 738), it couldn’t possibly have granted Corp. U.S. sovereign authority. However, as a private corporation, Corp. U.S. was granted the authority to sue and/or be sued. We expect the reason Corp. U.S. consistently claims to be a sovereign is to imply the Sovereign’s advantage of not being able to be sued in their own domain.
The claimants, hereby, state that no one that works for the “State of Iowa,” the County Attorney’s offices of “Polk County”, the “City of Des Moines,” “The City of Carroll”, or the “City of Altoona” is deserving of any such immunities…for itself, as a whole, or as an employee of the same.
Respectfully,
Christopher (Bruce) the living man
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you very much for your comments! Thank you again!! I value your opinions!